Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GX80
The Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80 (labelled Panasonic GX85 in some countries) are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in January 2012 and April 2016. Both the X-Pro1 and the GX80 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on an APS-C (X-Pro1) and a Four Thirds (GX80) sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 16 megapixels, whereas the Panasonic provides 15.8 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 | |
---|---|---|
Mirrorless system camera | Mirrorless system camera | |
Fujifilm X mount lenses | Micro Four Thirds lenses | |
16 MP, APS-C Sensor | 15.8 MP, Four Thirds Sensor | |
1080/24p Video | 4K/30p Video | |
ISO 200-6400 (100-25600) | ISO 200-25600 | |
Electronic viewfinder (1440k dots) | Electronic viewfinder (2765k dots) | |
3.0" LCD, 1230k dots | 3.0" LCD, 1040k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Tilting touchscreen | |
6 shutter flaps per second | 8 shutter flaps per second | |
Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization | |
300 shots per battery charge | 290 shots per battery charge | |
140 x 82 x 43 mm, 450 g | 122 x 71 x 44 mm, 426 g |
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the Panasonic GX80 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The GX80 can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the X-Pro1 is only available in black.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Panasonic GX80 is notably smaller (25 percent) than the Fujifilm X-Pro1. Moreover, the GX80 is markedly lighter (5 percent) than the X-Pro1. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the X-Pro1 nor the GX80 are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Fujinon X Lens Catalog (X-Pro1) and the Micro Four Thirds Lens Catalog (GX80). Mirrorless cameras, such as the two under consideration, have the additional advantage of having a short flange to focal plane distance, which makes it possible to mount many lenses from other systems onto the camera via adapters.
Concerning battery life, the X-Pro1 gets 300 shots out of its NP-W126 battery, while the GX80 can take 290 images on a single charge of its DMW-BLG10 power pack.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, just select a new right or left comparator from among the camera models in the table. Alternatively, you can also move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-Pro1» | 140 mm | 82 mm | 43 mm | 450 g | 300 | n | Jan 2012 | 1,699 | - | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | ||
Panasonic GX80« | 122 mm | 71 mm | 44 mm | 426 g | 290 | n | Apr 2016 | 799 | Panasonic GX80 | |||
Fujifilm X-E2S« » | 129 mm | 75 mm | 37 mm | 350 g | 350 | n | Jan 2016 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | ||
Fujifilm X-Pro2« » | 141 mm | 83 mm | 46 mm | 495 g | 350 | Y | Jan 2016 | 1,699 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | |||
Fujifilm X-T10« » | 118 mm | 83 mm | 41 mm | 381 g | 350 | n | May 2015 | 799 | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | ||
Fujifilm X100T« » | 127 mm | 74 mm | 52 mm | 440 g | 330 | n | Sep 2014 | 1,299 | - | Fujifilm X100T | ||
Fujifilm X-T1« » | 129 mm | 90 mm | 47 mm | 440 g | 350 | Y | Jan 2014 | 1,299 | - | Fujifilm X-T1 | ||
Fujifilm X100S« » | 127 mm | 74 mm | 54 mm | 445 g | 330 | n | Jan 2013 | 1,299 | - | Fujifilm X100S | ||
Fujifilm X-A1« » | 117 mm | 67 mm | 39 mm | 330 g | 350 | n | Sep 2013 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E2« » | 129 mm | 75 mm | 37 mm | 350 g | 350 | n | Oct 2013 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | ||
Fujifilm X-M1« » | 117 mm | 67 mm | 39 mm | 330 g | 350 | n | Jun 2013 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E1« » | 129 mm | 75 mm | 38 mm | 350 g | 350 | n | Sep 2012 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | ||
Olympus E-M10 II« » | 120 mm | 83 mm | 47 mm | 390 g | 320 | n | Aug 2015 | 649 | - | Olympus E-M10 II | ||
Olympus E-M10« » | 119 mm | 82 mm | 46 mm | 396 g | 320 | n | Jan 2014 | 699 | - | Olympus E-M10 | ||
Panasonic GX9« » | 124 mm | 72 mm | 47 mm | 407 g | 260 | n | Feb 2018 | 849 | Panasonic GX9 | |||
Panasonic G80« » | 128 mm | 89 mm | 74 mm | 505 g | 330 | Y | Sep 2016 | 899 | - | Panasonic G80 | ||
Panasonic GX7« » | 123 mm | 71 mm | 55 mm | 402 g | 350 | n | Aug 2013 | 999 | - | Panasonic GX7 | ||
Note: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. |
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The GX80 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 53 percent) than the X-Pro1, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm X-Pro1 features an APS-C sensor and the Panasonic GX80 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the GX80 is 39 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.5 and 2.0. The sensor in the X-Pro1 has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the GX80 offers a 4:3 aspect.

With 16MP, the X-Pro1 offers a slightly higher resolution than the GX80 (15.8MP), but the X-Pro1 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 4.80μm versus 3.77μm for the GX80) due to its larger sensor. However, the GX80 is a much more recent model (by 4 years and 2 months) than the X-Pro1, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.
The Fujifilm X-Pro1 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80 are ISO 200 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-25600.

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-Pro1» | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/24p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | |
Panasonic GX80« | Four Thirds | 15.8 | 4592 | 3448 | 4K/30p | 22.9 | 12.6 | 662 | 71 | Panasonic GX80 | |
Fujifilm X-E2S« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | |
Fujifilm X-Pro2« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | |
Fujifilm X-T10« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | |
Fujifilm X100T« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X100T | |
Fujifilm X-T1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-T1 | |
Fujifilm X100S« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X100S | |
Fujifilm X-A1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | |
Fujifilm X-E2« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | |
Fujifilm X-M1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
Fujifilm X-E1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/24p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | |
Olympus E-M10 II« » | Four Thirds | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/60p | 23.1 | 12.5 | 842 | 73 | Olympus E-M10 II | |
Olympus E-M10« » | Four Thirds | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 12.3 | 884 | 72 | Olympus E-M10 | |
Panasonic GX9« » | Four Thirds | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Panasonic GX9 | |
Panasonic G80« » | Four Thirds | 15.8 | 4592 | 3448 | 4K/30p | 22.8 | 12.5 | 656 | 71 | Panasonic G80 | |
Panasonic GX7« » | Four Thirds | 15.8 | 4592 | 3448 | 1080/60p | 22.6 | 12.2 | 718 | 70 | Panasonic GX7 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the GX80 provides a better video resolution than the X-Pro1. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/30p, while the Fujifilm is limited to 1080/24p.
Feature comparison
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the GX80 offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the X-Pro1 (2765k vs 1440k dots). The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Panasonic GX80 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-Pro1» | 1440 | n | 3.0 | 1230 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | n | n | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | |
Panasonic GX80« | 2765 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic GX80 | |
Fujifilm X-E2S« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 7.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-E2S | |
Fujifilm X-Pro2« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | |
Fujifilm X-T10« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-T10 | |
Fujifilm X100T« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X100T | |
Fujifilm X-T1« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | n | n | Fujifilm X-T1 | |
Fujifilm X100S« » | 2360 | n | 2.8 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X100S | |
Fujifilm X-A1« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 5.6 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-A1 | |
Fujifilm X-E2« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 7.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-E2 | |
Fujifilm X-M1« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 5.6 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
Fujifilm X-E1« » | 2360 | n | 2.8 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-E1 | |
Olympus E-M10 II« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | Y | Olympus E-M10 II | |
Olympus E-M10« » | 1440 | n | 3.0 | 1037 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | Y | Olympus E-M10 | |
Panasonic GX9« » | 2760 | n | 3.0 | 1240 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 9.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic GX9 | |
Panasonic G80« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 1/4000s | 9.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic G80 | |
Panasonic GX7« » | 2760 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/8000s | 5.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic GX7 |
One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The GX80 has a touchscreen, while the X-Pro1 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.
The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the GX80 is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
The Panasonic GX80 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the X-Pro1 and the GX80 write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-Pro1» | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | |
Panasonic GX80« | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Panasonic GX80 | |
Fujifilm X-E2S« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | |
Fujifilm X-Pro2« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | |
Fujifilm X-T10« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | |
Fujifilm X100T« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X100T | |
Fujifilm X-T1« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-T1 | |
Fujifilm X100S« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - | Fujifilm X100S | |
Fujifilm X-A1« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | |
Fujifilm X-E2« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | |
Fujifilm X-M1« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
Fujifilm X-E1« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | |
Olympus E-M10 II« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Olympus E-M10 II | |
Olympus E-M10« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Olympus E-M10 | |
Panasonic GX9« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Panasonic GX9 | |
Panasonic G80« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Panasonic G80 | |
Panasonic GX7« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Panasonic GX7 |
It is notable that the GX80 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the X-Pro1 does not offer wifi capability.
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Fujifilm X-Pro1 (unlike the GX80) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
The GX80 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Panasonic. In contrast, the X-Pro1 has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the X-Pro1 was succeeded by the Fujifilm X-Pro2. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Panasonic websites.
Review summary
So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the Panasonic GX80? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm X-Pro1:
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1230k vs 1040k dots).
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in January 2012).

Advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80:
- Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/24p).
- More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (2765k vs 1440k dots).
- More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
- Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (8 vs 6 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
- Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
- More compact: Is smaller (122x71mm vs 140x82mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (53 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Reflects 4 years and 2 months of technical progress since the X-Pro1 launch.
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the GX80 is the clear winner of the contest (13 : 3 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the Panasonic GX80 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the X-Pro1 and the GX80 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews
This is where reviews by experts come in. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-Pro1» | + + | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2012 | 1,699 | - | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | ||
Panasonic GX80« | + + | 82/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Apr 2016 | 799 | Panasonic GX80 | |||
Fujifilm X-E2S« » | - | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jan 2016 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | ||
Fujifilm X-Pro2« » | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2016 | 1,699 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | |||
Fujifilm X-T10« » | + + | 80/100 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | May 2015 | 799 | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | ||
Fujifilm X100T« » | + | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2014 | 1,299 | - | Fujifilm X100T | ||
Fujifilm X-T1« » | + + | 84/100 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | Jan 2014 | 1,299 | - | Fujifilm X-T1 | ||
Fujifilm X100S« » | + + | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | Jan 2013 | 1,299 | - | Fujifilm X100S | ||
Fujifilm X-A1« » | - | - | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Sep 2013 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E2« » | - | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 5/5 | Oct 2013 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | ||
Fujifilm X-M1« » | + | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jun 2013 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E1« » | + + | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2012 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | ||
Olympus E-M10 II« » | + + | 80/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Aug 2015 | 649 | - | Olympus E-M10 II | ||
Olympus E-M10« » | - | 80/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Jan 2014 | 699 | - | Olympus E-M10 | ||
Panasonic GX9« » | + | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 849 | Panasonic GX9 | |||
Panasonic G80« » | + + | 84/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2016 | 899 | - | Panasonic G80 | ||
Panasonic GX7« » | + | 79/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Aug 2013 | 999 | - | Panasonic GX7 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (-) not available. |
The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Check Ebay offers Panasonic GX80:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
- Canon 1300D vs Panasonic GX80
- Canon G1 X Mark II vs Panasonic GX80
- Canon T6s vs Fujifilm X-Pro1
- Fujifilm X-A3 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1
- Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Nikon D3400
- Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Olympus E-M10
- Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GF5
- Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Sony A6100
- Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Sony WX800
- Panasonic GX80 vs Sony A6600
- Panasonic GX80 vs Sony NEX-5
- Panasonic GX80 vs Sony RX100 II
Specifications: Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GX80
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Mirrorless system camera | Mirrorless system camera |
Camera Lens | Fujifilm X mount lenses | Micro Four Thirds lenses |
Launch Date | January 2012 | April 2016 |
Launch Price | USD 1699 | USD 799 |
Sensor Specs | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | Four Thirds Sensor |
Sensor Size | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 17.3 x 13.0 mm |
Sensor Area | 368.16 mm2 | 224.9 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 28.3 mm | 21.6 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.5x | 2.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 16 Megapixels | 15.8 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 4896 x 3264 pixels | 4592 x 3448 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 4.80 μm | 3.77 μm |
Pixel Density | 4.34 MP/cm2 | 7.04 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | no AA filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/24p Video | 4K/30p Video |
ISO Setting | 200-6400 ISO | 200-25600 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-25600 ISO | 100-25600 ISO |
Image Processor | EXR Processor | Venus |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | .. | 71 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | .. | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | .. | 12.6 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | .. | 662 |
Screen Specs | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 |
Viewfinder Type | Electronic viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | ..x | 0.70x |
Viewfinder Resolution | 1440k dots | 2765k dots |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 1230k dots | 1040k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Tilting screen |
Touch Input | no Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 |
Autofocus System | Contrast-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | Focus Peaking | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/4000/s | 1/4000/s |
Continuous Shooting | 6 shutter flaps/s | 8 shutter flaps/s |
Electronic Shutter | no E-Shutter | up to 1/16000s |
Time-Lapse Photography | no Intervalometer | Intervalometer built-in |
Image Stabilization | Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
UHS card support | UHS-I | UHS-I |
Connectivity Specs | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | PC Sync socket | no PC Sync |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | micro HDMI |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Body Specs | Fujifilm X-Pro1 | Panasonic GX80 |
Battery Type | NP-W126 | DMW-BLG10 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 300 shots per charge | 290 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
140 x 82 x 43 mm (5.5 x 3.2 x 1.7 in) |
122 x 71 x 44 mm (4.8 x 2.8 x 1.7 in) |
Camera Weight | 450 g (15.9 oz) | 426 g (15.0 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.