Canon 200D vs M6
The Canon EOS 200D (called Canon SL2 in some regions) and the Canon EOS M6 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in June 2017 and February 2017. The 200D is a DSLR, while the M6 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. Both cameras are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Both cameras offer a resolution of 24 megapixels. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 200D | Canon M6 | |
Digital single lens reflex | Mirrorless system camera | |
Canon EF mount lenses | Canon EF-M mount lenses | |
24 MP, APS-C Sensor | 24 MP, APS-C Sensor | |
1080/60p Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 100-25600 (100-51200) | ISO 100-25600 | |
Optical viewfinder | Viewfinder optional | |
3.0" LCD, 1040k dots | 3.0" LCD, 1040k dots | |
Swivel touchscreen | Tilting touchscreen | |
5 shutter flaps per second | 9 shutter flaps per second | |
650 shots per battery charge | 295 shots per battery charge | |
122 x 93 x 70 mm, 453 g | 112 x 68 x 45 mm, 390 g |
Body comparison: Canon 200D vs M6
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 200D and the Canon M6 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon M6 is considerably smaller (33 percent) than the Canon 200D. Moreover, the M6 is markedly lighter (14 percent) than the 200D. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the 200D nor the M6 are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, just click on the right or left arrow next to the camera that you would like to inspect. Alternatively, you can also use the CAM-parator to select your camera combination among a larger number of options.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 200D» | 122 mm | 93 mm | 70 mm | 453 g | 650 | n | Jun 2017 | 549 | Canon 200D | |||
Canon M6« | 112 mm | 68 mm | 45 mm | 390 g | 295 | n | Feb 2017 | 779 | Canon M6 | |||
Canon 2000D« » | 129 mm | 101 mm | 78 mm | 475 g | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Canon M50« » | 116 mm | 88 mm | 59 mm | 390 g | 235 | n | Feb 2018 | 779 | Canon M50 | |||
Canon 77D« » | 131 mm | 100 mm | 76 mm | 540 g | 600 | n | Feb 2017 | 899 | Canon 77D | |||
Canon 800D« » | 131 mm | 100 mm | 76 mm | 532 g | 600 | n | Feb 2017 | 749 | Canon 800D | |||
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | 98 mm | 58 mm | 31 mm | 206 g | 235 | n | Jan 2017 | 529 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |||
Canon M100« » | 108 mm | 67 mm | 35 mm | 302 g | 295 | n | Aug 2017 | 499 | Canon M100 | |||
Canon M5« » | 116 mm | 89 mm | 61 mm | 427 g | 295 | n | Sep 2016 | 979 | Canon M5 | |||
Canon M3« » | 111 mm | 68 mm | 44 mm | 366 g | 250 | n | Feb 2015 | 679 | - | Canon M3 | ||
Canon 100D« » | 117 mm | 91 mm | 69 mm | 407 g | 380 | n | Mar 2013 | 549 | - | Canon 100D | ||
Nikon D5600« » | 124 mm | 97 mm | 70 mm | 465 g | 970 | n | Nov 2016 | 699 | Nikon D5600 | |||
Nikon D3400« » | 124 mm | 98 mm | 76 mm | 445 g | 1200 | n | Aug 2016 | 499 | - | Nikon D3400 | ||
Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The 200D was launched at a markedly lower price (by 30 percent) than the M6, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison: Canon 200D vs M6
The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 1.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the medium-sized sensor cameras that aim to strike a balance between image quality and portability. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

The two cameras under review do not only share the same sensor size, but also offer an identical resolution of 24 megapixels. This similarity in sensor specs implies that both the 200D and the M6 have the same pixel density, as well as the same pixel size. It should, however, be noted that the 200D is a somewhat more recent model (by 4 months) than the M6, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time.
The Canon EOS 200D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600, which can be extended to ISO 100-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Canon EOS M6 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 200D» | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.4 | 1041 | 79 | Canon 200D | |
Canon M6« | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon M6 | |
Canon 2000D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 11.9 | 1009 | 71 | Canon 2000D | |
Canon M50« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/24p | - | - | - | - | Canon M50 | |
Canon 77D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.3 | 971 | 78 | Canon 77D | |
Canon 800D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.9 | 12.5 | 522 | 65 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.5 | 12.9 | 1272 | 78 | Canon M100 | |
Canon M5« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.4 | 12.4 | 1262 | 77 | Canon M5 | |
Canon M3« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 11.8 | 1169 | 72 | Canon M3 | |
Canon 100D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.8 | 11.3 | 843 | 63 | Canon 100D | |
Nikon D5600« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.1 | 14.0 | 1306 | 84 | Nikon D5600 | |
Nikon D3400« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.8 | 13.9 | 1192 | 86 | Nikon D3400 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, and both provide the same movie specifications (1080/60p).
Feature comparison: Canon 200D vs M6
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the 200D has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the M6 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. That said, the M6 can be equipped with an optional viewfinder – the EVF-DC2. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon 200D and Canon M6 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 200D» | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 200D | |
Canon M6« | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 9.0 | Y | n | Canon M6 | |
Canon 2000D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 2000D | |
Canon M50« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 10.0 | Y | n | Canon M50 | |
Canon 77D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 6.0 | Y | n | Canon 77D | |
Canon 800D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 6.0 | Y | n | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 2000 | 8.2 | Y | Y | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 6.1 | Y | n | Canon M100 | |
Canon M5« » | 2360 | n | 3.2 | 1620 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 9.0 | Y | n | Canon M5 | |
Canon M3« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 4.2 | Y | n | Canon M3 | |
Canon 100D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 4000 | 4.9 | Y | n | Canon 100D | |
Nikon D5600« » | optical | n | 3.2 | 1037 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D5600 | |
Nikon D3400« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D3400 |
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 200D and the M6 write their files to SDXC cards.
Connectivity comparison: Canon 200D vs M6
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 200D and Canon EOS M6 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 200D» | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 200D | |
Canon M6« | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon M6 | |
Canon 2000D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 2000D | |
Canon M50« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon M50 | |
Canon 77D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 77D | |
Canon 800D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon M100 | |
Canon M5« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon M5 | |
Canon M3« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon M3 | |
Canon 100D« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 100D | |
Nikon D5600« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Nikon D5600 | |
Nikon D3400« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Nikon D3400 |
Both the 200D and the M6 are recent models that feature in their makers' current product line-up. The M6 replaced the earlier Canon M5, while the 200D followed on from the Canon 100D.
Review summary: Canon 200D vs M6
So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon 200D and the Canon M6? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.
Advantages of the Canon EOS 200D:
- Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image framing and settings control.
- More flexible LCD: Has swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (650 versus 295) on a single battery charge.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (30 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 4 months after the M6).
Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS M6:
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (9 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- More compact: Is smaller (112x68mm vs 122x93mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 63g or 14 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
- More legacy lens friendly: Can use many non-native lenses via adapters.
- More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in February 2017).
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the match-up finishes in a tie (5 points each). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera.
In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says nothing about, for example, the handling, responsiveness, and overall imaging quality of the 200D and the M6 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews: Canon 200D vs M6
This is where reviews by experts come in. The following table reports the overall rankings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). The detailed reviews can be accessed by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 200D» | HiRec | 78/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2017 | 549 | Canon 200D | |||
Canon M6« | - | 80/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 779 | Canon M6 | |||
Canon 2000D« » | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Canon M50« » | Rec | 79/100 | - | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 779 | Canon M50 | |||
Canon 77D« » | - | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 899 | Canon 77D | |||
Canon 800D« » | - | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 749 | Canon 800D | |||
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 529 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |||
Canon M100« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Aug 2017 | 499 | Canon M100 | |||
Canon M5« » | Rec | 82/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Sep 2016 | 979 | Canon M5 | |||
Canon M3« » | rev | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2015 | 679 | - | Canon M3 | ||
Canon 100D« » | Rec | 78/100 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | Mar 2013 | 549 | - | Canon 100D | ||
Nikon D5600« » | - | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Nov 2016 | 699 | Nikon D5600 | |||
Nikon D3400« » | Rec | 76/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2016 | 499 | - | Nikon D3400 |
The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Amazon price Canon M6:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just make your choice using the following search menu. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.
- Canon 80D vs Sony RX1R II
- Canon G3 X vs Canon 1300D
- Canon M100 vs Canon 4000D
- Canon T2i vs Canon SL1
- Fujifilm X-E3 vs Canon T7i
- Nikon D5600 vs Sony RX100
- Nikon Z6 vs Canon M6
- Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus E-M10
- Panasonic GX850 vs Sony A6000
- Sony A7 III vs Sony RX100 V
- Sony RX1 vs Panasonic G9
- Sony RX100 IV vs Olympus E-PL9
Specifications: Canon 200D vs Canon M6
Camera Model | Canon 200D | Canon M6 |
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Mirrorless system camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | Canon EF-M mount lenses |
Launch Date | June 2017 | February 2017 |
Launch Price | USD 549 | USD 779 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | APS-C Sensor |
Sensor Size | 22.3 x 14.9 mm | 22.3 x 14.9 mm |
Sensor Area | 332.27 mm2 | 332.27 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 26.8 mm | 26.8 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.6x | 1.6x |
Sensor Resolution | 24 Megapixels | 24 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 pixels | 6000 x 4000 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 3.72 μm | 3.72 μm |
Pixel Density | 7.22 MP/cm2 | 7.22 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | Anti-Alias filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/60p Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-25600 ISO | 100-25600 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-51200 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | DIGIC 7 | DIGIC 7 |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 79 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 23.6 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 13.4 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 1041 | .. |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Viewfinder optional |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | n/a |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.54x | n/a |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 1040k dots | 1040k dots |
LCD Attachment | Swivel screen | Tilting screen |
Touch Input | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | On-Sensor Phase-detect |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous Shooting | 5 shutter flaps/s | 9 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | mini HDMI |
Microphone Port | External MIC port | External MIC port |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | NFC built-in | NFC built-in |
Bluetooth Support | Bluetooth built-in | Bluetooth built-in |
Body Specs | ||
Battery Type | LP-E17 power pack | LP-E17 power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 650 shots per charge | 295 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
122 x 93 x 70 mm (4.8 x 3.7 x 2.8 in) |
112 x 68 x 45 mm (4.4 x 2.7 x 1.8 in) |
Camera Weight | 453 g (16.0 oz) | 390 g (13.8 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.