Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
The Canon EOS 2000D (called Canon T7 in some regions) and the Pentax K-1 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2018 and February 2016. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are based on an APS-C (2000D) and a full frame (K-1) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the Pentax provides 36.2 MP. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 2000D | Pentax K-1 | |
Digital single lens reflex | Digital single lens reflex | |
Canon EF mount lenses | Pentax K mount lenses | |
24 MP, APS-C Sensor | 36.2 MP, Full Frame Sensor | |
1080/30p Video | 1080/60i Video | |
ISO 100-6400 (100-12800) | ISO 100-204800 | |
Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder | |
3.0" LCD, 920k dots | 3.2" LCD, 1037k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Fully flexible screen (no touchscreen) | |
3 shutter flaps per second | 4.4 shutter flaps per second | |
Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization | |
Not weather sealed | Weathersealed body | |
500 shots per battery charge | 760 shots per battery charge | |
129 x 101 x 78 mm, 475 g | 137 x 110 x 86 mm, 1010 g |
Body comparison: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
The physical size and weight of the Canon 2000D and the Pentax K-1 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Pentax K-1 is notably larger (16 percent) than the Canon 2000D. Moreover, the K-1 is substantially heavier (113 percent) than the 2000D. It is noteworthy in this context that the K-1 is splash and dust-proof, while the 2000D does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.
Concerning battery life, the 2000D gets 500 shots out of its LP-E10 battery, while the K-1 can take 760 images on a single charge of its D-LI90 power pack.
The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, just select a new right or left comparator from among the camera models in the table. Alternatively, you can also move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | 129 mm | 101 mm | 78 mm | 475 g | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Pentax K-1« | 137 mm | 110 mm | 86 mm | 1010 g | 760 | Y | Feb 2016 | 1,799 | - | Pentax K-1 | ||
Canon 4000D« » | 129 mm | 102 mm | 77 mm | 436 g | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 399 | Canon 4000D | |||
Canon 77D« » | 131 mm | 100 mm | 76 mm | 540 g | 600 | n | Feb 2017 | 899 | Canon 77D | |||
Canon 200D« » | 122 mm | 93 mm | 70 mm | 453 g | 650 | n | Jun 2017 | 549 | Canon 200D | |||
Canon 800D« » | 131 mm | 100 mm | 76 mm | 532 g | 600 | n | Feb 2017 | 749 | Canon 800D | |||
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | 98 mm | 58 mm | 31 mm | 206 g | 235 | n | Jan 2017 | 529 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |||
Canon M100« » | 108 mm | 67 mm | 35 mm | 302 g | 295 | n | Aug 2017 | 499 | Canon M100 | |||
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | 151 mm | 116 mm | 76 mm | 890 g | 900 | Y | Aug 2016 | 3,499 | Canon 5D Mark IV | |||
Canon 1300D« » | 129 mm | 101 mm | 78 mm | 485 g | 500 | n | Mar 2016 | 449 | - | Canon 1300D | ||
Canon 750D« » | 132 mm | 101 mm | 78 mm | 555 g | 440 | n | Feb 2015 | 749 | - | Canon 750D | ||
Canon 760D« » | 132 mm | 101 mm | 78 mm | 565 g | 440 | n | Feb 2015 | 849 | - | Canon 760D | ||
Canon 1200D« » | 130 mm | 100 mm | 78 mm | 480 g | 500 | n | Feb 2014 | 449 | - | Canon 1200D | ||
Nikon D500« » | 147 mm | 115 mm | 81 mm | 860 g | 1240 | Y | Jan 2016 | 1,999 | Nikon D500 | |||
Olympus E-M1 II« » | 134 mm | 91 mm | 67 mm | 574 g | 440 | Y | Sep 2016 | 1,999 | Olympus E-M1 II | |||
Pentax K-1 II« » | 137 mm | 110 mm | 86 mm | 1010 g | 670 | Y | Feb 2018 | 1,999 | Pentax K-1 II | |||
Sony A99 II« » | 143 mm | 104 mm | 76 mm | 849 g | 490 | Y | Sep 2016 | 3,199 | Sony A99 II | |||
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The 2000D was launched at a markedly lower price (by 75 percent) than the K-1, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 2000D features an APS-C sensor and the Pentax K-1 a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the K-1 is 160 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.6 and 1.0. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.
Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors.

With 36.2MP, the K-1 offers a higher resolution than the 2000D (24MP), but the K-1 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 4.88μm versus 3.72μm for the 2000D) due to its larger sensor. However, the 2000D is a much more recent model (by 2 years) than the K-1, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the K-1 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
Unlike the 2000D, the K-1 has the capacity to capture high quality composite images by combining multiple shots after shifting its sensor by miniscule distances. This multi-shot, pixel-shift mode is most suitable for photography of stationary objects (landscapes, studio scenes).
The Canon EOS 2000D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Pentax K-1 are ISO 100 to ISO 204800 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). Of the two cameras under consideration, the K-1 offers substantially better image quality than the 2000D (overall score 25 points higher). The advantage is based on 2.8 bits higher color depth, 2.7 EV in additional dynamic range, and 1.7 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 11.9 | 1009 | 71 | Canon 2000D | |
Pentax K-1« | Full Frame | 36.2 | 7360 | 4912 | 1080/60i | 25.4 | 14.6 | 3280 | 96 | Pentax K-1 | |
Canon 4000D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.9 | 11.4 | 695 | 63 | Canon 4000D | |
Canon 77D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.3 | 971 | 78 | Canon 77D | |
Canon 200D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.4 | 1041 | 79 | Canon 200D | |
Canon 800D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.9 | 12.5 | 522 | 65 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.5 | 12.9 | 1272 | 78 | Canon M100 | |
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | Full Frame | 30.1 | 6720 | 4480 | 4K/30p | 24.8 | 13.6 | 2995 | 91 | Canon 5D Mark IV | |
Canon 1300D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Canon 1300D | |
Canon 750D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 22.7 | 12.0 | 919 | 71 | Canon 750D | |
Canon 760D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 12.0 | 915 | 70 | Canon 760D | |
Canon 1200D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.9 | 11.3 | 724 | 63 | Canon 1200D | |
Nikon D500« » | APS-C | 20.7 | 5568 | 3712 | 4K/30p | 24.0 | 14.0 | 1324 | 83 | Nikon D500 | |
Olympus E-M1 II« » | Four Thirds | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 4K/30p | 23.7 | 12.8 | 1312 | 80 | Olympus E-M1 II | |
Pentax K-1 II« » | Full Frame | 36.2 | 7360 | 4912 | 1080/60i | - | - | - | - | Pentax K-1 II | |
Sony A99 II« » | Full Frame | 42.2 | 7952 | 5304 | 4K/30p | 25.4 | 13.4 | 2317 | 92 | Sony A99 II |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the K-1 provides a faster frame rate than the 2000D. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60i, while the Canon is limited to 1080/30p.
Feature comparison: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The 2000D and the K-1 are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon 2000D, the Pentax K-1, and comparable cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 2000D | |
Pentax K-1« | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1037 | full-flex | n | 8000 | 4.4 | n | Y | Pentax K-1 | |
Canon 4000D« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 4000D | |
Canon 77D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 6.0 | Y | n | Canon 77D | |
Canon 200D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 200D | |
Canon 800D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 6.0 | Y | n | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 2000 | 8.2 | Y | Y | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 6.1 | Y | n | Canon M100 | |
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1620 | fixed | Y | 8000 | 7.0 | n | n | Canon 5D Mark IV | |
Canon 1300D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1300D | |
Canon 750D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 750D | |
Canon 760D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 760D | |
Canon 1200D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1200D | |
Nikon D500« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 2359 | tilting | Y | 8000 | 10.0 | n | n | Nikon D500 | |
Olympus E-M1 II« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1037 | swivel | Y | 8000 | 18.0 | n | Y | Olympus E-M1 II | |
Pentax K-1 II« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1037 | full-flex | n | 8000 | 4.4 | n | Y | Pentax K-1 II | |
Sony A99 II« » | 2400 | Y | 3.0 | 1229 | full-flex | n | 8000 | 12.0 | n | Y | Sony A99 II |
One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The 2000D has one, while the K-1 does not. While the built-in flash of the 2000D is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 2000D and the K-1 write their files to SDXC cards. The K-1 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the 2000D only has one slot.
Connectivity comparison: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 2000D and Pentax K-1 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 2000D | |
Pentax K-1« | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Pentax K-1 | |
Canon 4000D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 4000D | |
Canon 77D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 77D | |
Canon 200D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 200D | |
Canon 800D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon M100 | |
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 5D Mark IV | |
Canon 1300D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 1300D | |
Canon 750D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 750D | |
Canon 760D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 760D | |
Canon 1200D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1200D | |
Nikon D500« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | Y | Y | Y | Nikon D500 | |
Olympus E-M1 II« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 3.0 | Y | - | - | Olympus E-M1 II | |
Pentax K-1 II« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Pentax K-1 II | |
Sony A99 II« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Sony A99 II |
It is notable that the K-1 has a headphone jack, which makes it possible to attach external headphones and monitor the quality of sound during the recording process. The 2000D lacks such a headphone port.
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Pentax K-1 (unlike the 2000D) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
The 2000D is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the K-1 has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the K-1 was succeeded by the Pentax K-1 II.
Review summary: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
So what is the bottom line? Is the Canon 2000D better than the Pentax K-1 or vice versa? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS 2000D:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- More compact: Is smaller (129x101mm vs 137x110mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
- Less heavy: Is lighter (by 535g or 53 percent) and hence easier to carry around.
- Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (75 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Reflects 2 years of technical progress since the K-1 launch.

Reasons to prefer the Pentax K-1:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (36.2 vs 24MP), which boosts linear resolution by 23%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- High quality composites: Can combine several shots after pixel-shifting its sensor.
- Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (25 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
- Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (2.8 bits more color depth).
- More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (2.7 EV of extra DR).
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (1.7 stops ISO advantage).
- Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60i versus 1080/30p).
- Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
- Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
- Easier setting verification: Features a control panel on top to check shooting parameters.
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1037k vs 920k dots).
- More flexible LCD: Has full-flex screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (8000/sec vs 4000/sec) to freeze action.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (4.4 vs 3 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Longer lasting: Gets more shots (760 versus 500) out of a single battery charge.
- Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in February 2016).
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the K-1 is the clear winner of the contest (22 : 7 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says nothing about, for example, the handling, responsiveness, and overall imaging quality of the 2000D and the K-1 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The following table reports the overall rankings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). You can find the full text of the reviews by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Pentax K-1« | - | 84/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Feb 2016 | 1,799 | - | Pentax K-1 | ||
Canon 4000D« » | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 399 | Canon 4000D | |||
Canon 77D« » | - | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 899 | Canon 77D | |||
Canon 200D« » | HiRec | 78/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2017 | 549 | Canon 200D | |||
Canon 800D« » | - | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 749 | Canon 800D | |||
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 529 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |||
Canon M100« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Aug 2017 | 499 | Canon M100 | |||
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | HiRec | 87/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2016 | 3,499 | Canon 5D Mark IV | |||
Canon 1300D« » | rev | 73/100 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Mar 2016 | 449 | - | Canon 1300D | ||
Canon 750D« » | - | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 749 | - | Canon 750D | ||
Canon 760D« » | Rec | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 849 | - | Canon 760D | ||
Canon 1200D« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 449 | - | Canon 1200D | ||
Nikon D500« » | HiRec | 91/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Jan 2016 | 1,999 | Nikon D500 | |||
Olympus E-M1 II« » | HiRec | 85/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2016 | 1,999 | Olympus E-M1 II | |||
Pentax K-1 II« » | - | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 1,999 | Pentax K-1 II | |||
Sony A99 II« » | - | 85/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2016 | 3,199 | Sony A99 II |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Amazon price Pentax K-1:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 2000D vs Canon 6D Mark II
- Canon 40D vs Canon M10
- Canon 7D vs Canon 77D
- Canon 800D vs Canon M5
- Canon G7 X Mark II vs Panasonic FT7
- Canon SX730 vs Canon M50
- Fujifilm X100F vs Panasonic GH5
- Kodak AZ901 vs Panasonic TS7
- Nikon D3500 vs YI M1
- Panasonic GX9 vs Panasonic GX1
- Sony A5100 vs Sony HX400V
- Sony A6000 vs Canon 1D X Mark II
Specifications: Canon 2000D vs Pentax K-1
Camera Model | Canon 2000D | Pentax K-1 |
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Digital single lens reflex |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | Pentax K mount lenses |
Launch Date | February 2018 | February 2016 |
Launch Price | USD 449 | USD 1799 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | Full Frame Sensor |
Sensor Size | 22.3 x 14.9 mm | 35.9 x 14.9 mm |
Sensor Area | 332.27 mm2 | 861.6 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 26.8 mm | 43.2 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.6x | 1.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 24 Megapixels | 36.2 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 pixels | 7360 x 4912 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 3.72 μm | 4.88 μm |
Pixel Density | 7.22 MP/cm2 | 4.20 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/30p Video | 1080/60i Video |
ISO Setting | 100-6400 ISO | 100-204800 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-12800 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | DIGIC 4+ | PRIME IV |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 71 | 96 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 22.6 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 11.9 | 14.6 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 1009 | 3280 |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.50x | 0.70x |
Top-Level Screen | no Top Display | Control Panel |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.2 inch |
LCD Resolution | 920k dots | 1037k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fully flexible screen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Phase-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous Shooting | 3 shutter flaps/s | 4.4 shutter flaps/s |
Image Stabilization | Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | no On-Board Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Dual card slots |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | no PC Sync | PC Sync socket |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | micro HDMI |
Microphone Port | no MIC socket | External MIC port |
Headphone Socket | no Headphone port | Headphone port |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | NFC built-in | no NFC |
Body Specs | ||
Environmental Sealing | Not weather sealed | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | LP-E10 power pack | D-LI90 power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 500 shots per charge | 760 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
129 x 101 x 78 mm (5.1 x 4.0 x 3.1 in) |
137 x 110 x 86 mm (5.4 x 4.3 x 3.4 in) |
Camera Weight | 475 g (16.8 oz) | 1010 g (35.6 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.