Canon 2000D vs SX730
The Canon EOS 2000D (called Canon T7 in some regions) and the Canon PowerShot SX730 HS are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2018 and April 2017. The 2000D is a DSLR, while the SX730 is a fixed lens compact. The cameras are based on an APS-C (2000D) and a 1/2.3-inch (SX730) sensor. The 2000D has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the SX730 provides 20.2 MP. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 2000D | Canon SX730 | |
Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera | |
Canon EF mount lenses | 24-960mm f/3.3-6.9 | |
24 MP, APS-C Sensor | 20.2 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor | |
1080/30p Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 100-6400 (100-12800) | ISO 80-3200 | |
Optical viewfinder | No viewfinder, LCD framing | |
3.0" LCD, 920k dots | 3.0" LCD, 922k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive) | |
3 shutter flaps per second | 5.9 shutter flaps per second | |
500 shots per battery charge | 250 shots per battery charge | |
129 x 101 x 78 mm, 475 g | 110 x 64 x 40 mm, 300 g |
Body comparison: Canon 2000D vs SX730
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 2000D and the Canon SX730 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon SX730 is considerably smaller (46 percent) than the Canon 2000D. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the 2000D nor the SX730 are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the SX730 has a lens built in, whereas the 2000D is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the 2000D and their specifications in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the 2000D gets 500 shots out of its LP-E10 battery, while the SX730 can take 250 images on a single charge of its NB-13L power pack.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, just click on the right or left arrow next to the camera that you would like to inspect. Alternatively, you can also use the CAM-parator to select your camera combination among a larger number of options.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | 5.1 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 16.8 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Canon SX730« | 4.3 in | 2.5 in | 1.6 in | 10.6 oz | 250 | n | Apr 2017 | 399 | - | Canon SX730 | ||
Canon 4000D« » | 5.1 in | 4.0 in | 3.0 in | 15.4 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 399 | Canon 4000D | |||
Canon SX740« » | 4.3 in | 2.5 in | 1.6 in | 10.5 oz | 265 | n | Jul 2018 | 399 | Canon SX740 | |||
Canon 77D« » | 5.2 in | 3.9 in | 3.0 in | 19.0 oz | 600 | n | Feb 2017 | 899 | Canon 77D | |||
Canon 200D« » | 4.8 in | 3.7 in | 2.8 in | 16.0 oz | 650 | n | Jun 2017 | 549 | Canon 200D | |||
Canon 800D« » | 5.2 in | 3.9 in | 3.0 in | 18.8 oz | 600 | n | Feb 2017 | 749 | Canon 800D | |||
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | 3.9 in | 2.3 in | 1.2 in | 7.3 oz | 235 | n | Jan 2017 | 529 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |||
Canon M100« » | 4.3 in | 2.6 in | 1.4 in | 10.7 oz | 295 | n | Aug 2017 | 499 | Canon M100 | |||
Canon 1300D« » | 5.1 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 17.1 oz | 500 | n | Mar 2016 | 449 | - | Canon 1300D | ||
Canon G7 X Mark II« » | 4.2 in | 2.4 in | 1.7 in | 11.3 oz | 265 | n | Feb 2016 | 699 | Canon G7 X Mark II | |||
Canon 750D« » | 5.2 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 19.6 oz | 440 | n | Feb 2015 | 749 | - | Canon 750D | ||
Canon 760D« » | 5.2 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 19.9 oz | 440 | n | Feb 2015 | 849 | - | Canon 760D | ||
Canon 1200D« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 3.1 in | 16.9 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2014 | 449 | - | Canon 1200D | ||
Panasonic TS7« » | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 1.5 in | 11.3 oz | 300 | Y | May 2018 | 449 | Panasonic TS7 | |||
Panasonic ZS70« » | 4.4 in | 2.6 in | 1.6 in | 11.4 oz | 380 | n | Apr 2017 | 449 | Panasonic ZS70 | |||
Sony HX99« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.4 in | 8.5 oz | 370 | n | Aug 2018 | 449 | Sony HX99 | |||
Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The SX730 was launched at a lower price than the 2000D, despite having a lens built in. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison: Canon 2000D vs SX730
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 2000D features an APS-C sensor and the Canon SX730 a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The sensor area in the SX730 is 92 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.6 and 5.6. The sensor in the 2000D has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the SX730 offers a 4:3 aspect.
Technology-wise, the SX730 uses a more advanced image processing engine (DIGIC 6) than the 2000D (DIGIC 4+), with benefits for noise reduction, color accuracy, and processing speed.

With 24MP, the 2000D offers a higher resolution than the SX730 (20.2MP), but the 2000D nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.72μm versus 1.18μm for the SX730) due to its larger sensor. Moreover, the 2000D is a somewhat more recent model (by 10 months) than the SX730, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the SX730 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The Canon EOS 2000D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Canon PowerShot SX730 HS are ISO 80 to ISO 3200 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 11.9 | 1009 | 71 | Canon 2000D | |
Canon SX730« | 1/2.3 | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon SX730 | |
Canon 4000D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.9 | 11.4 | 695 | 63 | Canon 4000D | |
Canon SX740« » | 1/2.3 | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Canon SX740 | |
Canon 77D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.3 | 971 | 78 | Canon 77D | |
Canon 200D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.4 | 1041 | 79 | Canon 200D | |
Canon 800D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.9 | 12.5 | 522 | 65 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.5 | 12.9 | 1272 | 78 | Canon M100 | |
Canon 1300D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Canon 1300D | |
Canon G7 X Mark II« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Canon 750D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 22.7 | 12.0 | 919 | 71 | Canon 750D | |
Canon 760D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 12.0 | 915 | 70 | Canon 760D | |
Canon 1200D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.9 | 11.3 | 724 | 63 | Canon 1200D | |
Panasonic TS7« » | 1/2.3 | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Panasonic TS7 | |
Panasonic ZS70« » | 1/2.3 | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 4K/30p | 19.1 | 10.6 | 106 | 36 | Panasonic ZS70 | |
Sony HX99« » | 1/2.3 | 18.0 | 4896 | 3672 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Sony HX99 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, but the SX730 provides a faster frame rate than the 2000D. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the 2000D is limited to 1080/30p.
Feature comparison: Canon 2000D vs SX730
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the 2000D has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the SX730 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon 2000D and Canon SX730 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 2000D | |
Canon SX730« | - | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | n | 3200 | 5.9 | Y | Y | Canon SX730 | |
Canon 4000D« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 4000D | |
Canon SX740« » | - | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | n | 3200 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Canon SX740 | |
Canon 77D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 6.0 | Y | n | Canon 77D | |
Canon 200D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 200D | |
Canon 800D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 6.0 | Y | n | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 2000 | 8.2 | Y | Y | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 6.1 | Y | n | Canon M100 | |
Canon 1300D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1300D | |
Canon G7 X Mark II« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 8.0 | Y | Y | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Canon 750D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 750D | |
Canon 760D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon 760D | |
Canon 1200D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1200D | |
Panasonic TS7« » | 1170 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1300 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic TS7 | |
Panasonic ZS70« » | 1166 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic ZS70 | |
Sony HX99« » | 638 | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony HX99 |
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 2000D and the SX730 write their files to SDXC cards.
Connectivity comparison: Canon 2000D vs SX730
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 2000D and Canon PowerShot SX730 HS and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 2000D | |
Canon SX730« | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon SX730 | |
Canon 4000D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 4000D | |
Canon SX740« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon SX740 | |
Canon 77D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 77D | |
Canon 200D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 200D | |
Canon 800D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon 800D | |
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon G9 X Mark II | |
Canon M100« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Canon M100 | |
Canon 1300D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 1300D | |
Canon G7 X Mark II« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Canon 750D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 750D | |
Canon 760D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 760D | |
Canon 1200D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1200D | |
Panasonic TS7« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Panasonic TS7 | |
Panasonic ZS70« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Panasonic ZS70 | |
Sony HX99« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony HX99 |
It is notable that the 2000D has a hotshoe, while the SX730 does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.
The 2000D is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the SX730 has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the SX730 was succeeded by the Canon SX730 HS.
Review summary: Canon 2000D vs SX730
So what conclusions can be drawn? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 2000D or the Canon SX730 – has the upper hand? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.
Advantages of the Canon EOS 2000D:
- More detail: Offers more megapixels (24 vs 20.2MP) with a 11% higher linear resolution.
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Better image quality: Features a larger and more technologically advanced imaging sensor.
- Richer colors: Larger sensor generates images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Capable of capturing a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can be used in poorly lit environments and still produce good images.
- Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image framing and settings control.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (4000/sec vs 3200/sec) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Can take a variety of interchangeable lenses, including specialty optics.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (500 versus 250) on a single battery charge.
- Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
- More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 10 months after the SX730).
Reasons to prefer the Canon PowerShot SX730 HS:
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Better jpgs: Has a more modern image processing engine (DIGIC 6 vs DIGIC 4+).
- Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
- More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
- More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (5.9 vs 3 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Ready to shoot: Comes with an integrated lens, while the 2000D requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (110x64mm vs 129x101mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight even though it has a lens built in (unlike the 2000D).
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in April 2017).
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the SX730 comes out slightly ahead of the 2000D (13 : 12 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras is instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says nothing about, for example, the handling, responsiveness, and overall imaging quality of the 2000D and the SX730 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews: Canon 2000D vs SX730
This is where reviews by experts come in. The table below summarizes the assessments of some of the best known camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). The full reviews are available by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 2000D» | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Canon SX730« | Rec | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Apr 2017 | 399 | - | Canon SX730 | ||
Canon 4000D« » | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 399 | Canon 4000D | |||
Canon SX740« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Jul 2018 | 399 | Canon SX740 | |||
Canon 77D« » | - | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 899 | Canon 77D | |||
Canon 200D« » | HiRec | 78/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2017 | 549 | Canon 200D | |||
Canon 800D« » | - | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2017 | 749 | Canon 800D | |||
Canon G9 X Mark II« » | - | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 529 | Canon G9 X Mark II | |||
Canon M100« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Aug 2017 | 499 | Canon M100 | |||
Canon 1300D« » | rev | 73/100 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Mar 2016 | 449 | - | Canon 1300D | ||
Canon G7 X Mark II« » | HiRec | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 699 | Canon G7 X Mark II | |||
Canon 750D« » | - | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 749 | - | Canon 750D | ||
Canon 760D« » | Rec | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 849 | - | Canon 760D | ||
Canon 1200D« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 449 | - | Canon 1200D | ||
Panasonic TS7« » | Rec | - | - | - | 3.5/5 | May 2018 | 449 | Panasonic TS7 | |||
Panasonic ZS70« » | HiRec | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Apr 2017 | 449 | Panasonic ZS70 | |||
Sony HX99« » | - | - | 4/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Aug 2018 | 449 | Sony HX99 |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Check Amazon price Canon SX730:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. An an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
- Canon 1300D vs Canon 600D
- Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon 50D
- Canon 5D Mark IV vs Canon SX50
- Canon M10 vs Panasonic G80
- Fujifilm X-H1 vs Canon 1000D
- Leica M8 vs Nikon D40X
- Nikon D5600 vs Nikon D40X
- Nikon D70 vs Sony A7 III
- Olympus E-P1 vs Fujifilm X-A3
- Panasonic LX100 II vs Panasonic GH5s
- Sony A7R III vs Leica TL2
- Sony A7R vs Canon 77D
Specifications: Canon 2000D vs Canon SX730
Camera Model | Canon 2000D | Canon SX730 |
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | 24-960mm f/3.3-6.9 |
Launch Date | February 2018 | April 2017 |
Launch Price | USD 449 | USD 399 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | 1/2.3" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 22.3 x 14.9 mm | 6.17 x 14.9 mm |
Sensor Area | 332.27 mm2 | 28.0735 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 26.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.6x | 5.6x |
Sensor Resolution | 24 Megapixels | 20.2 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 pixels | 5184 x 3888 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 3.72 μm | 1.18 μm |
Pixel Density | 7.22 MP/cm2 | 71.80 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/30p Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-6400 ISO | 80-3200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-12800 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | DIGIC 4+ | DIGIC 6 |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 71 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 22.6 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 11.9 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 1009 | .. |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | No viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | n/a |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.50x | n/a |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Tilting screen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous Shooting | 3 shutter flaps/s | 5.9 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | no Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | micro HDMI |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | NFC built-in | NFC built-in |
Bluetooth Support | no Bluetooth | Bluetooth built-in |
Body Specs | ||
Battery Type | LP-E10 power pack | NB-13L power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 500 shots per charge | 250 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
129 x 101 x 78 mm (5.1 x 4.0 x 3.1 in) |
110 x 64 x 40 mm (4.3 x 2.5 x 1.6 in) |
Camera Weight | 475 g (16.8 oz) | 300 g (10.6 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.