Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
The Canon EOS-1D and the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in September 2001 and January 2018. The 1D is a DSLR, while the XP130 is a fixed lens compact. The cameras are based on an APS-H (1D) and a 1/2.3-inch (XP130) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 4.1 megapixels, whereas the Fujifilm provides 15.9 MP. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 1D | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera | |
Canon EF mount lenses | 28-140mm f/3.9-4.9 | |
4.1 MP, APS-H Sensor | 15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor | |
no Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 200-1600 (100-3200) | ISO 100-3200 | |
Optical viewfinder | No viewfinder, LCD framing | |
2.0" LCD, 120k dots | 3.0" LCD, 920k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | |
8 shutter flaps per second | 10 shutter flaps per second | |
Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization | |
Weathersealed body | Waterproof body (20m) | |
500 shots per battery charge | 240 shots per battery charge | |
156 x 158 x 80 mm, 1585 g | 110 x 71 x 28 mm, 207 g |
Body comparison: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 1D and the Fujifilm XP130 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The XP130 can be obtained in five different colors (black, blue, yellow, green, white), while the 1D is only available in black.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm XP130 is considerably smaller (68 percent) than the Canon 1D. More than that, the XP130 is water-proof up to 20m and can, thus, be used for underwater photography.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the XP130 has a lens built in, whereas the 1D is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the 1D and their specifications in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the 1D gets 500 shots out of its NP-E3 battery, while the XP130 can take 240 images on a single charge of its NP-45S power pack. As can be seen in the images above, the 1D has a battery grip built in. This facilitates image-taking in portrait orientation and gives it additional battery power. The power pack in the XP130 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.
The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D» | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 55.9 oz | 500 | Y | Sep 2001 | 6,499 | - | Canon 1D | ||
Fujifilm XP130« | 4.3 in | 2.8 in | 1.1 in | 7.3 oz | 240 | n | Jan 2018 | 229 | - | Fujifilm XP130 | ||
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | 6.2 in | 6.6 in | 3.3 in | 54.0 oz | 1210 | Y | Feb 2016 | 5,999 | Canon 1D X Mark II | |||
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | 5.9 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 31.4 oz | 900 | Y | Aug 2016 | 3,499 | Canon 5D Mark IV | |||
Canon 1D C« » | 6.2 in | 6.5 in | 3.3 in | 54.5 oz | 1120 | Y | Apr 2012 | 14,999 | - | Canon 1D C | ||
Canon 1D X« » | 6.2 in | 6.6 in | 3.3 in | 54.7 oz | 1120 | Y | Oct 2011 | 6,799 | - | Canon 1D X | ||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 43.4 oz | 1500 | Y | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 1D Mark III« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 40.7 oz | 2200 | Y | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | 5.9 in | 6.3 in | 3.1 in | 48.9 oz | 1800 | Y | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 55.2 oz | 1200 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 1D Mark II« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 54.1 oz | 1200 | Y | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 44.6 oz | 600 | Y | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Fujifilm XP140« » | 4.3 in | 2.8 in | 1.1 in | 7.3 oz | 240 | n | Feb 2019 | 229 | Fujifilm XP140 | |||
Nikon W300« » | 4.4 in | 2.6 in | 1.1 in | 8.1 oz | 280 | Y | May 2017 | 389 | Nikon W300 | |||
Olympus TG-5« » | 4.4 in | 2.6 in | 1.3 in | 8.8 oz | 340 | Y | May 2017 | 449 | Olympus TG-5 | |||
Ricoh WG-60« » | 4.8 in | 2.4 in | 1.2 in | 6.8 oz | 300 | Y | Oct 2018 | 279 | Ricoh WG-60 | |||
Sony WX800« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.4 in | 8.2 oz | 370 | n | Oct 2018 | 399 | Sony WX800 | |||
Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The XP130 was launched at a lower price than the 1D, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 1D features an APS-H sensor and the Fujifilm XP130 a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The sensor area in the XP130 is 95 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.3 and 5.6. The sensor in the 1D has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the XP130 offers a 4:3 aspect.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the XP130 offers a higher resolution of 15.9 megapixels, compared with 4.1 MP of the 1D. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.33μm versus 11.56μm for the 1D). However, it should be noted that the XP130 is much more recent (by 16 years and 4 months) than the 1D, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the XP130 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The Canon EOS-1D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 100-3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 are ISO 100 to ISO 3200 (no boost).

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D» | APS-H | 4.1 | 2496 | 1662 | - | - | - | - | - | Canon 1D | |
Fujifilm XP130« | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | Full Frame | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/60p | 24.1 | 13.5 | 3207 | 88 | Canon 1D X Mark II | |
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | Full Frame | 30.1 | 6720 | 4480 | 4K/30p | 24.8 | 13.6 | 2995 | 91 | Canon 5D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D C« » | Full Frame | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 4K/24p | - | - | - | - | Canon 1D C | |
Canon 1D X« » | Full Frame | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 23.8 | 11.8 | 2786 | 82 | Canon 1D X | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | APS-H | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 12.0 | 1320 | 74 | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | APS-H | 10.1 | 3888 | 2592 | - | 22.7 | 11.7 | 1078 | 71 | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Full Frame | 21.0 | 5616 | 3744 | - | 24.0 | 12.0 | 1663 | 80 | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.2 | 975 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.1 | 1003 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | Full Frame | 11.0 | 4064 | 2704 | - | 21.8 | 11.0 | 954 | 63 | Canon 1Ds | |
Fujifilm XP140« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 4K/15p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm XP140 | |
Nikon W300« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Nikon W300 | |
Olympus TG-5« » | 1/2.3 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Olympus TG-5 | |
Ricoh WG-60« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Ricoh WG-60 | |
Sony WX800« » | 1/2.3 | 18.0 | 4896 | 3672 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Sony WX800 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. The XP130 indeed provides for movie recording, while the 1D does not. The highest resolution format that the XP130 can use is 1080/60p.
Feature comparison: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the 1D has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the XP130 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon 1D and Fujifilm XP130 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D» | optical | Y | 2.0 | 120 | fixed | n | 16000 | 8.0 | n | n | Canon 1D | |
Fujifilm XP130« | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1620 | fixed | Y | 8000 | 16.0 | n | n | Canon 1D X Mark II | |
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1620 | fixed | Y | 8000 | 7.0 | n | n | Canon 5D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D C« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 8000 | 14.0 | n | n | Canon 1D C | |
Canon 1D X« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 8000 | 14.0 | n | n | Canon 1D X | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 8000 | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 8000 | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 8000 | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 8000 | 8.5 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 8000 | 8.3 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 120 | fixed | n | 8000 | 3.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds | |
Fujifilm XP140« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Fujifilm XP140 | |
Nikon W300« » | - | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 4000 | 7.0 | Y | Y | Nikon W300 | |
Olympus TG-5« » | - | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 2000 | 20.0 | Y | Y | Olympus TG-5 | |
Ricoh WG-60« » | - | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 8.0 | Y | n | Ricoh WG-60 | |
Sony WX800« » | - | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony WX800 |
One feature that is present on the 1D, but is missing on the XP130 is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.
The 1D writes its imaging data to Compact Flash cards, while the XP130 uses SDXC cards. The 1D features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the XP130 only has one slot.
Connectivity comparison: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS-1D and Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D» | Y | - | - | - | - | - | FW | - | - | - | Canon 1D | |
Fujifilm XP130« | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D X Mark II | |
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 5D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D C« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D C | |
Canon 1D X« » | Y | mono | - | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D X | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | Y | stereo | - | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | FW | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds | |
Fujifilm XP140« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Fujifilm XP140 | |
Nikon W300« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Nikon W300 | |
Olympus TG-5« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Olympus TG-5 | |
Ricoh WG-60« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - | Ricoh WG-60 | |
Sony WX800« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony WX800 |
It is notable that the 1D has a hotshoe, while the XP130 does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 1D (unlike the XP130) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
Both the 1D and the XP130 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 1D was replaced by the Canon 1D Mark II, while the XP130 was followed by the Fujifilm XP140.
Review summary: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
So how do things add up? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 1D or the Fujifilm XP130 – has the upper hand? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Advantages of the Canon EOS-1D:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Better image quality: Features bigger pixels on a larger sensor for higher quality imaging.
- Richer colors: Larger pixels generate images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Capable of capturing a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can be used in poorly lit environments and still produce good images.
- Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image framing and settings control.
- Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (16000/sec vs 2000/sec) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Can take a variety of interchangeable lenses, including specialty optics.
- More portrait friendly: Features an integrated vertical grip for easier portrait shooting.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (500 versus 240) on a single battery charge.
- Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in September 2001).

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm FinePix XP130:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (15.9 vs 4.1MP), which boosts linear resolution by 92%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 1080/60p video.
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 2.0") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (920k vs 120k dots).
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 8 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Ready to shoot: Comes with an integrated lens, while the 1D requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (110x71mm vs 156x158mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight even though it has a lens built in (unlike the 1D).
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Water-proof: Can be used in the rain and for underwater photography (up to 20m).
- Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More modern: Reflects 16 years and 4 months of technical progress since the 1D launch.
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the XP130 comes out slightly ahead of the 1D (16 : 15 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera.
In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the 1D or the XP130 perform in practice. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.
Expert reviews: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
This is why expert reviews are important. The adjacent table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). The full reviews are available by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D» | - | HiRec | - | - | - | Sep 2001 | 6,499 | - | Canon 1D | ||
Fujifilm XP130« | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Jan 2018 | 229 | - | Fujifilm XP130 | ||
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | - | 89/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 5,999 | Canon 1D X Mark II | |||
Canon 5D Mark IV« » | HiRec | 87/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2016 | 3,499 | Canon 5D Mark IV | |||
Canon 1D C« » | - | - | - | - | - | Apr 2012 | 14,999 | - | Canon 1D C | ||
Canon 1D X« » | - | - | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2011 | 6,799 | - | Canon 1D X | ||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | - | 89/100 | - | 5/5 | - | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 1D Mark III« » | - | - | - | rev | - | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | - | HiRec | 4.5/5 | - | - | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | - | - | - | - | - | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 1D Mark II« » | - | HiRec | - | rev | - | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds« » | - | HiRec | - | - | - | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Fujifilm XP140« » | - | - | - | - | - | Feb 2019 | 229 | Fujifilm XP140 | |||
Nikon W300« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | May 2017 | 389 | Nikon W300 | |||
Olympus TG-5« » | HiRec | - | 4/5 | rev | 4/5 | May 2017 | 449 | Olympus TG-5 | |||
Ricoh WG-60« » | - | - | - | - | - | Oct 2018 | 279 | Ricoh WG-60 | |||
Sony WX800« » | - | - | - | - | - | Oct 2018 | 399 | Sony WX800 |
The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.
Check Ebay offers Fujifilm XP130:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. An an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
- Canon 50D vs Leica SL
- Canon G16 vs Panasonic LX10
- Canon M100 vs Nikon D3100
- Canon SL2 vs Nikon D1
- Fujifilm X30 vs Leica X-U Typ 113
- Leica X2 vs Leica TL2
- Nikon D7100 vs Panasonic GH5s
- Olympus E-M10 II vs Nikon D750
- Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A7S II
- Panasonic S1R vs Olympus E-M1X
- Sony A5100 vs Canon Rebel
- Sony NEX-5R vs Sony RX100
Specifications: Canon 1D vs Fujifilm XP130
Camera Model | Canon 1D | Fujifilm XP130 |
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | 28-140mm f/3.9-4.9 |
Launch Date | September 2001 | January 2018 |
Launch Price | USD 6499 | USD 229 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-H Sensor | 1/2.3" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 28.7 x 19.1 mm | 6.17 x 19.1 mm |
Sensor Area | 548.17 mm2 | 28.0735 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 34.5 mm | 7.7 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.3x | 5.6x |
Sensor Resolution | 4.1 Megapixels | 15.9 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 2496 x 1662 pixels | 4608 x 3456 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 11.56 μm | 1.33 μm |
Pixel Density | 0.76 MP/cm2 | 56.73 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 200-1600 ISO | 100-3200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-3200 ISO | no Enhancement |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | No viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | n/a |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.55x | n/a |
Top-Level Screen | Control Panel | no Top Display |
LCD Framing | n/a | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 2.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 120k dots | 920k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fixed screen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/16000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous Shooting | 8 shutter flaps/s | 10 shutter flaps/s |
Image Stabilization | Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | CF cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Dual card slots | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | no Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | PC Sync socket | no PC Sync |
USB Connector | Firewire | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | micro HDMI |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Bluetooth Support | no Bluetooth | Bluetooth built-in |
Body Specs | ||
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Waterproof body (20m) |
Battery Type | NP-E3 power pack | NP-45S power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 500 shots per charge | 240 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | no USB charging | USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
156 x 158 x 80 mm (6.1 x 6.2 x 3.1 in) |
110 x 71 x 28 mm (4.3 x 2.8 x 1.1 in) |
Camera Weight | 1585 g (55.9 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.