Canon SX60 vs Olympus TG-4

The Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and the Olympus Tough TG-4 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in September 2014 and April 2015. Both the SX60 and the TG-4 are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 14.2 megapixels, whereas the Olympus provides 15.9 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon SX60		Olympus TG-4
Fixed lens compact camera		Fixed lens compact camera
21-1365mm f/3.4-6.5		25-100mm f/2.0-4.9
14.2 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor
1080/60p Video		1080/30p Video
ISO 100-3,200 (100 - 6,400)		ISO 100-6,400
Electronic viewfinder (922k dots)		No viewfinder, LCD framing
3.0 LCD, 922k dots		3.0 LCD, 460k dots
Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
6.4 shutter flaps per second		5 shutter flaps per second
Lens-based stabilization		In-body stabilization
not weather sealed		Waterproof body (15m)
340 shots per battery charge		380 shots per battery charge
128 x 93 x 114 mm, 650 g		112 x 66 x 31 mm, 247 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and the Olympus Tough TG-4? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon SX60 and the Olympus TG-4. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The TG-4 can be obtained in two different colors (black, red), while the SX60 is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus TG-4 is considerably smaller (38 percent) than the Canon SX60. Moreover, the TG-4 is substantially lighter (62 percent) than the SX60. It is noteworthy in this context that the TG-4 is splash and dust-proof, while the SX60 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing. More than that, the TG-4 is water-proof up to 15m and can, thus, be used for underwater photography.

Concerning battery life, the SX60 gets 340 shots out of its NB-10L battery, while the TG-4 can take 380 images on a single charge of its LI-92B power pack. The power pack in the TG-4 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon SX60	128 mm	93 mm	114 mm	650 g	340	n	Sep 2014	549
2.		Olympus TG-4	112 mm	66 mm	31 mm	247 g	380	Y	Apr 2015	379
3.		Canon SX70	127 mm	91 mm	117 mm	608 g	325	n	Sep 2018	549
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	116 mm	74 mm	66 mm	553 g	240	n	Feb 2014	799
5.		Canon G16	109 mm	76 mm	40 mm	356 g	360	n	Aug 2013	549
6.		Canon G15	107 mm	76 mm	40 mm	352 g	350	n	Sep 2012	499
7.		Canon SX50	123 mm	87 mm	106 mm	595 g	315	n	Sep 2012	429
8.		Fujifilm XP140	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	Y	Feb 2019	229
9.		Nikon W300	112 mm	66 mm	29 mm	231 g	280	Y	May 2017	389
10.		Nikon P900	140 mm	103 mm	137 mm	899 g	360	n	Mar 2015	599
11.		Olympus TG-6	113 mm	66 mm	32 mm	253 g	340	Y	May 2019	449
12.		Olympus TG-5	113 mm	66 mm	32 mm	250 g	340	Y	May 2017	449
13.		Panasonic FZ300	132 mm	92 mm	117 mm	691 g	380	Y	Jul 2015	599
14.		Panasonic FZ200	125 mm	87 mm	110 mm	588 g	540	n	Jul 2012	599
15.		Panasonic FZ150	124 mm	82 mm	92 mm	528 g	410	n	Aug 2011	499
16.		Sony HX80	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	245 g	390	n	Mar 2016	349
17.		Sony HX400V	130 mm	93 mm	103 mm	660 g	300	n	Feb 2014	499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The TG-4 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 31 percent) than the SX60, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 5.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the smaller-sensor digicams that favor affordability and compact design. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.

Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with BSI-CMOS (Backside Illuminated Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors.

While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the TG-4 offers a higher resolution of 15.9 megapixels, compared with 14.2 MP of the SX60. This megapixels advantage translates into a 0 percent gain in linear resolution. On the other hand, these sensor specs imply that the TG-4 has a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.33μm versus 1.40μm for the SX60). However, it should be noted that the TG-4 is a somewhat more recent model (by 6 months) than the SX60, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that at least partly compensate for the smaller pixel size. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the SX60 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The Canon PowerShot SX60 HS has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 3200, which can be extended to ISO 100-6400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Olympus Tough TG-4 are ISO 100 to ISO 6400 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Canon SX60	1/2.3	14.2	4608	3072	1080/60p	19.2	10.8	127	39
2.		Olympus TG-4	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon SX70	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	1.5-inch	13.0	4160	3120	1080/30p	21.5	10.8	581	58
5.		Canon G16	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.0	11.7	230	54
6.		Canon G15	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	19.9	11.5	165	46
7.		Canon SX50	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	20.3	11.2	179	47
8.		Fujifilm XP140	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/15p	..	..	..	..
9.		Nikon W300	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
10.		Nikon P900	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
11.		Olympus TG-6	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
12.		Olympus TG-5	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
13.		Panasonic FZ300	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	19.3	11.0	97	38
14.		Panasonic FZ200	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	19.1	10.8	114	37
15.		Panasonic FZ150	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	19.4	10.9	132	40
16.		Sony HX80	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
17.		Sony HX400V	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	1080/60p	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, but the SX60 provides a higher frame rate than the TG-4. It can shoot video footage at 1080/60p, while the Olympus is limited to 1080/30p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the SX60 has an electronic viewfinder (922k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the TG-4 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon SX60, the Olympus TG-4, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon SX60	922	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	6.4	Y	Y
2.		Olympus TG-4	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	5.0	Y	Y
3.		Canon SX70	2360	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.2	Y	Y
5.		Canon G16	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.2	Y	Y
6.		Canon G15	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.1	Y	Y
7.		Canon SX50	202	n	3.0	461	swivel	n	1/2000s	2.2	Y	Y
8.		Fujifilm XP140	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
9.		Nikon W300	none	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
10.		Nikon P900	921	n	3.0	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
11.		Olympus TG-6	none	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/2000s	20.0	Y	Y
12.		Olympus TG-5	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	20.0	Y	Y
13.		Panasonic FZ300	1440	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
14.		Panasonic FZ200	1312	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
15.		Panasonic FZ150	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	12.0	Y	Y
16.		Sony HX80	638	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
17.		Sony HX400V	210	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	Y

The Olympus TG-4 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Both the SX60 and the TG-4 have zoom lenses built in. The SX60 has a 21-1365mm f/3.4-6.5 optic and the TG-4 offers a 25-100mm f/2.0-4.9 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the Canon provides a wider angle of view at the short end, as well as more tele-photo reach at the long end than the Olympus. The TG-4 offers the faster maximum aperture.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the SX60 and the TG-4 write their files to SDXC cards. The TG-4 supports UHS-I cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s), while the SX60 cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and Olympus Tough TG-4 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon SX60	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
2.		Olympus TG-4	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
3.		Canon SX70	-	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Canon G16	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
6.		Canon G15	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
7.		Canon SX50	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
8.		Fujifilm XP140	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
9.		Nikon W300	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
10.		Nikon P900	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
11.		Olympus TG-6	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
12.		Olympus TG-5	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
13.		Panasonic FZ300	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Panasonic FZ200	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Panasonic FZ150	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
16.		Sony HX80	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
17.		Sony HX400V	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-

It is notable that the SX60 has a hotshoe, while the TG-4 does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.

Travel and landscape photographers will find it useful that the TG-4 has an internal geolocalization sensor and can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.

Both the SX60 and the TG-4 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The SX60 was replaced by the Canon SX70, while the TG-4 was followed by the Olympus TG-5. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Olympus websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon SX60 and the Olympus TG-4? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS:

• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (922k vs 460k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (6.4 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Wider view: Has a wider-angle lens that facilitates landscape or interior shots.
• More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in September 2014).

Arguments in favor of the Olympus Tough TG-4:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/2.0 vs f/3.4).
• More compact: Is smaller (112x66mm vs 128x93mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 403g or 62 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (380 versus 340) out of a single battery charge.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
• Water-proof: Is rugged and sealed and can thus be used for underwater photography (up to 15m).
• Easier geotagging: Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
• Faster buffer clearing: Has an SD card interface that supports the UHS-I standard.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (31 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Was introduced somewhat (6 months) more recently.

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the match-up finishes in a tie (13 points each). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon SX60 and the Olympus TG-4 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Superzoom Camera and Best Travel-Zoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the SX60 or the TG-4 perform in practice. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon SX60	3/5	+ +	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	549
2.		Olympus TG-4	..	+	79/100	4/5	4/5	Apr 2015	379
3.		Canon SX70	..	+ +	..	3.5/5	3.5/5	Sep 2018	549
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	3/5	+	77/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	799
5.		Canon G16	4/5	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	549
6.		Canon G15	4/5	+	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	499
7.		Canon SX50	3/5	+ +	72/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	429
8.		Fujifilm XP140	..	+	..	3.5/5	4/5	Feb 2019	229
9.		Nikon W300	..	+	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	389
10.		Nikon P900	..	..	77/100	4/5	4/5	Mar 2015	599
11.		Olympus TG-6	..	+ +	76/100	4/5	4/5	May 2019	449
12.		Olympus TG-5	..	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	449
13.		Panasonic FZ300	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2015	599
14.		Panasonic FZ200	3/5	+ +	80/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2012	599
15.		Panasonic FZ150	3/5	+ +	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2011	499
16.		Sony HX80	..	..	..	..	..	Mar 2016	349
17.		Sony HX400V	4/5	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	Feb 2014	499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Canon SX60 vs Olympus TG-4

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.