Canon R vs Fujifilm X-M1

The Canon EOS R and the Fujifilm X-M1 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in September 2018 and June 2013. Both the Canon R and the X-M1 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on a full frame (Canon R) and an APS-C (X-M1) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 30.1 megapixels, whereas the Fujifilm provides 16 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon R		Fujifilm X-M1
Mirrorless system camera		Mirrorless system camera
Canon RF mount lenses		Fujifilm X mount lenses
30.1 MP, Full Frame Sensor		16 MP, APS-C Sensor
4K/30p Video		1080/30p Video
ISO 100-40,000 (50 - 102,400)		ISO 200-6,400 (100 - 25,600)
Electronic viewfinder (3690k dots)		No viewfinder, LCD framing
3.2 LCD, 2100k dots		3.0 LCD, 920k dots
Swivel touchscreen		Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive)
8 shutter flaps per second		5.6 shutter flaps per second
Weathersealed body		not weather sealed
370 shots per battery charge		350 shots per battery charge
139 x 98 x 84 mm, 660 g		117 x 67 x 39 mm, 330 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS R and the Fujifilm X-M1? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon R and the Fujifilm X-M1 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The X-M1 can be obtained in three different colors (black, silver, brown), while the Canon R is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm X-M1 is considerably smaller (42 percent) than the Canon R. Moreover, the X-M1 is substantially lighter (50 percent) than the Canon R. It is worth mentioning in this context that the Canon R is splash and dust resistant, while the X-M1 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.

Concerning battery life, the Canon R gets 370 shots out of its LP-E6N battery, while the X-M1 can take 350 images on a single charge of its NP-W126 power pack. The power pack in the Canon R can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon R	139 mm	98 mm	84 mm	660 g	370	Y	Sep 2018	2,299
	Fujifilm X-M1	117 mm	67 mm	39 mm	330 g	350	n	Jun 2013	699
	Canon 90D	141 mm	105 mm	77 mm	701 g	1300	Y	Aug 2019	1,199
	Canon 6D Mark II	144 mm	111 mm	75 mm	765 g	1200	Y	Jun 2017	1,999
	Canon 80D	139 mm	105 mm	79 mm	730 g	960	Y	Feb 2016	1,199
	Canon 6D	145 mm	111 mm	71 mm	770 g	1090	Y	Sep 2012	2,099
	Fujifilm X-E2S	129 mm	75 mm	37 mm	350 g	350	n	Jan 2016	699
	Fujifilm X-T10	118 mm	83 mm	41 mm	381 g	350	n	May 2015	799
	Fujifilm X-A1	117 mm	67 mm	39 mm	330 g	350	n	Sep 2013	399
	Fujifilm X-E2	129 mm	75 mm	37 mm	350 g	350	n	Oct 2013	999
	Fujifilm X-E1	129 mm	75 mm	38 mm	350 g	350	n	Sep 2012	999
	Nikon Z6	134 mm	101 mm	67 mm	675 g	310	Y	Aug 2018	1,999
	Nikon D750	141 mm	113 mm	78 mm	750 g	1230	Y	Sep 2014	2,299
	Nikon Df	144 mm	110 mm	67 mm	760 g	1400	Y	Nov 2013	2,749
	Panasonic GH5s	139 mm	98 mm	87 mm	660 g	440	Y	Jan 2018	2,499
	Samsung NX1	139 mm	102 mm	66 mm	550 g	500	Y	Sep 2014	1,499
	Sony A7 III	127 mm	96 mm	74 mm	650 g	610	Y	Feb 2018	1,999
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The X-M1 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 70 percent) than the Canon R, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon R features a full frame sensor and the Fujifilm X-M1 an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the X-M1 is 57 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.0 and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 30.1MP, the Canon R offers a higher resolution than the X-M1 (16MP), but the Canon R nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 5.36μm versus 4.80μm for the X-M1) due to its larger sensor. Moreover, the Canon R is a much more recent model (by 5 years and 2 months) than the X-M1, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the X-M1 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Canon R implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the Canon R for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 33.6 x 22.4 inches or 85.3 x 56.9 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 26.9 x 17.9 inches or 68.3 x 45.5 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 22.4 x 14.9 inches or 56.9 x 37.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Fujifilm X-M1 are 24.5 x 16.3 inches or 62.2 x 41.5 cm for good quality, 19.6 x 13.1 inches or 49.7 x 33.2 cm for very good quality, and 16.3 x 10.9 inches or 41.5 x 27.6 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon R has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Canon EOS R has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 40000, which can be extended to ISO 50-102400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm X-M1 are ISO 200 to ISO 6400, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-25600.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Canon R	Full Frame	30.1	6720	4480	4K/30p	24.5	13.5	2742	89
	Fujifilm X-M1	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
	Canon 90D	APS-C	32.3	6960	4640	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Canon 6D Mark II	Full Frame	26.0	6240	4160	1080/60p	24.4	11.9	2862	85
	Canon 80D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.6	13.2	1135	79
	Canon 6D	Full Frame	20.0	5472	3648	1080/30p	23.8	12.1	2340	82
	Fujifilm X-E2S	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-T10	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-A1	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-E2	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-E1	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/24p	..	..	..	..
	Nikon Z6	Full Frame	24.3	6048	4024	4K/30p	25.3	14.3	3299	95
	Nikon D750	Full Frame	24.2	6016	4016	1080/60p	24.8	14.5	2956	93
	Nikon Df	Full Frame	16.2	4928	3280	none	24.6	13.1	3279	89
	Panasonic GH5s	Four Thirds	9.9	3680	2700	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
	Samsung NX1	APS-C	28.0	6480	4320	4K/30p	24.2	13.2	1363	83
	Sony A7 III	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	25.0	14.7	3730	96

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, but the Canon R provides a higher video resolution than the X-M1. It can shoot video footage at 4K/30p, while the Fujifilm is limited to 1080/30p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the Canon R has an electronic viewfinder (3690k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the X-M1 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon R, the Fujifilm X-M1, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Canon R	3690	Y	3.2	2100	swivel	Y	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
	Fujifilm X-M1	none	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	5.6	Y	n
	Canon 90D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/8000s	11.0	Y	n
	Canon 6D Mark II	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	6.5	n	n
	Canon 80D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/8000s	7.0	Y	n
	Canon 6D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	4.5	n	n
	Fujifilm X-E2S	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-T10	2360	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-A1	none	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	5.6	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-E2	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-E1	2360	n	2.8	460	fixed	n	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
	Nikon Z6	3690	Y	3.2	2100	tilting	Y	1/8000s	12.0	n	Y
	Nikon D750	optical	Y	3.2	1229	tilting	n	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
	Nikon Df	optical	Y	3.2	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	5.5	n	n
	Panasonic GH5s	3680	n	3.2	1620	swivel	Y	1/8000s	12.0	n	n
	Samsung NX1	2360	Y	3.0	1036	tilting	Y	1/8000s	15.0	Y	n
	Sony A7 III	2359	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y

One feature that is present on the Canon R, but is missing on the X-M1 is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the Canon R is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the Canon R and the X-M1 write their files to SDXC cards. The Canon R supports UHS-II cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 312 MB/s), while the X-M1 can use UHS-I cards (up to 104 MB/s).

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS R and Fujifilm X-M1 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Canon R	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Fujifilm X-M1	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
	Canon 90D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	Y	-	Y
	Canon 6D Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
	Canon 80D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Canon 6D	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-E2S	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-T10	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-A1	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-E2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-E1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Nikon Z6	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Nikon D750	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
	Nikon Df	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Panasonic GH5s	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	full	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Samsung NX1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.0	Y	Y	Y
	Sony A7 III	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	Y	Y

It is notable that the Canon R has a microphone port, which is missing on the X-M1. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used.

The Canon R is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the X-M1 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). There has not been a direct replacement model for the X-M1 from Fujifilm. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Fujifilm websites.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon R and the Fujifilm X-M1? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS R:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (30.1 vs 16MP) with a 37% higher linear resolution.
• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Better image quality: Features a larger and more technologically advanced imaging sensor.
• Richer colors: The sensor size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
• More dynamic range: Larger sensor captures a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Larger sensor produces good images even in poorly lit environments.
• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/30p).
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (2100k vs 920k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (8 vs 5.6 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
• Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.1 vs 2.0).
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• Faster buffer clearing: Supports a more advanced SD data transfer standard (UHS-II vs UHS-I).
• More modern: Reflects 5 years and 2 months of technical progress since the X-M1 launch.

Reasons to prefer the Fujifilm X-M1:

• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• More compact: Is smaller (117x67mm vs 139x98mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 330g or 50 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (70 percent cheaper at launch).
• More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in June 2013).

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the Canon R is the clear winner of the match-up (26 : 6 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon R and the Fujifilm X-M1 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the Canon R and the X-M1 in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon R	o	79/100	4.5/5	4/5	4/5	Sep 2018	2,299
	Fujifilm X-M1	+	77/100	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Jun 2013	699
	Canon 90D	+	85/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2019	1,199
	Canon 6D Mark II	+	80/100	4.5/5	4/5	4/5	Jun 2017	1,999
	Canon 80D	+ +	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2016	1,199
	Canon 6D	+ +	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	2,099
	Fujifilm X-E2S	..	77/100	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Jan 2016	699
	Fujifilm X-T10	+ +	80/100	5/5	4/5	5/5	May 2015	799
	Fujifilm X-A1	..	..	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Sep 2013	399
	Fujifilm X-E2	..	80/100	4.5/5	..	5/5	Oct 2013	999
	Fujifilm X-E1	+ +	79/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	999
	Nikon Z6	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	5/5	Aug 2018	1,999
	Nikon D750	+ +	90/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	2,299
	Nikon Df	..	81/100	4/5	4/5	4/5	Nov 2013	2,749
	Panasonic GH5s	..	84/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2018	2,499
	Samsung NX1	..	87/100	5/5	4.5/5	5/5	Sep 2014	1,499
	Sony A7 III	+ +	89/100	5/5	5/5	5/5	Feb 2018	1,999
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Canon R vs Fujifilm X-M1

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.