Canon G1 X Mark II vs Sony NEX-6

The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II and the Sony Alpha NEX-6 are two enthusiast cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in February 2014 and September 2012. The G1X Mark II is a fixed lens compact, while the NEX-6 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. The cameras are based on an 1.5-inch (G1X Mark II) and an APS-C (NEX-6) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 13 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 16 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon G1 X Mark II		Sony NEX-6
Fixed lens compact camera		Mirrorless system camera
24-120mm f/2.0-3.9		Sony E mount lenses
13 MP, 1.5" Sensor		16 MP, APS-C Sensor
1080/30p Video		1080/60i Video
ISO 100-12,800		ISO 100-25,600
Viewfinder optional		Electronic viewfinder (2359k dots)
3.0 LCD, 1040k dots		3.0 LCD, 921k dots
Tilting touchscreen		Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive)
5.2 shutter flaps per second		10 shutter flaps per second
240 shots per battery charge		360 shots per battery charge
116 x 74 x 66 mm, 553 g		120 x 67 x 43 mm, 345 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II and the Sony Alpha NEX-6? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon G1 X Mark II and the Sony NEX-6. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony NEX-6 is notably smaller (6 percent) than the Canon G1 X Mark II. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the G1X Mark II nor the NEX-6 are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the G1X Mark II has a lens built in, whereas the NEX-6 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the NEX-6 and their specifications in the Sony E-Mount Lens Catalog.

Concerning battery life, the G1X Mark II gets 240 shots out of its NB-12L battery, while the NEX-6 can take 360 images on a single charge of its NP-FW50 power pack.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon G1 X Mark II	116 mm	74 mm	66 mm	553 g	240	n	Feb 2014	799
2.		Sony NEX-6	120 mm	67 mm	43 mm	345 g	360	n	Sep 2012	999
3.		Canon 760D	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	565 g	440	n	Feb 2015	649
4.		Canon XC10	125 mm	102 mm	122 mm	1040 g	370	n	Apr 2015	2,499
5.		Canon SX60	128 mm	93 mm	114 mm	650 g	340	n	Sep 2014	549
6.		Canon G16	109 mm	76 mm	40 mm	356 g	360	n	Aug 2013	549
7.		Canon S120	100 mm	59 mm	29 mm	217 g	230	n	Aug 2013	449
8.		Canon G1 X	117 mm	81 mm	65 mm	534 g	250	n	Jan 2012	799
9.		Canon 500D	129 mm	98 mm	62 mm	520 g	400	n	Mar 2009	799
10.		Canon 450D	129 mm	98 mm	62 mm	524 g	500	n	Jan 2008	799
11.		Olympus Stylus 1	116 mm	87 mm	57 mm	402 g	410	n	Oct 2013	699
12.		Panasonic LX100	115 mm	66 mm	55 mm	393 g	300	n	Sep 2014	899
13.		Sony A6000	120 mm	67 mm	45 mm	344 g	360	n	Feb 2014	599
14.		Sony A3000	128 mm	91 mm	85 mm	411 g	470	n	Aug 2013	329
15.		Sony NEX-3N	110 mm	62 mm	35 mm	269 g	480	n	Feb 2013	499
16.		Sony NEX-F3	117 mm	67 mm	42 mm	314 g	470	n	May 2012	599
17.		Sony NEX-3	117 mm	62 mm	33 mm	297 g	330	n	May 2010	599
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The G1X Mark II was launched at a lower price than the NEX-6, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon G1 X Mark II features an 1.5-inch sensor and the Sony NEX-6 an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the NEX-6 is 39 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.85 and 1.5. The sensor in the G1X Mark II has a native 4:3 aspect ratio, while the one in the NEX-6 offers a 3:2 aspect.

With 16MP, the NEX-6 offers a higher resolution than the G1X Mark II (13MP), but the NEX-6 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 4.78μm versus 4.49μm for the G1X Mark II) due to its larger sensor. However, the G1X Mark II is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 5 months) than the NEX-6, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units.

The resolution advantage of the Sony NEX-6 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the NEX-6 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 24.6 x 16.3 inches or 62.4 x 41.5 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 19.6 x 13.1 inches or 49.9 x 33.2 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 16.4 x 10.9 inches or 41.6 x 27.6 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon G1 X Mark II are 20.8 x 15.6 inches or 52.8 x 39.6 cm for good quality, 16.6 x 12.5 inches or 42.3 x 31.7 cm for very good quality, and 13.9 x 10.4 inches or 35.2 x 26.4 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Alpha NEX-6 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). Of the two cameras under consideration, the NEX-6 offers substantially better image quality than the G1X Mark II (overall score 20 points higher). The advantage is based on 2.2 bits higher color depth, 2.3 EV in additional dynamic range, and 0.8 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Canon G1 X Mark II	1.5-inch	13.0	4160	3120	1080/30p	21.5	10.8	581	58
2.		Sony NEX-6	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60i	23.7	13.1	1018	78
3.		Canon 760D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.6	12.0	915	70
4.		Canon XC10	1-inch	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
5.		Canon SX60	1/2.3	14.2	4608	3072	1080/60p	19.2	10.8	127	39
6.		Canon G16	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.0	11.7	230	54
7.		Canon S120	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.3	11.9	246	56
8.		Canon G1 X	1.5-inch	14.2	4352	3264	1080/24p	21.7	10.8	644	60
9.		Canon 500D	APS-C	15.1	4752	3168	1080/20p	21.7	11.5	663	63
10.		Canon 450D	APS-C	12.2	4272	2848	none	21.9	10.8	692	61
11.		Olympus Stylus 1	1/1.7	11.8	3968	2976	1080/30p	20.7	11.6	179	51
12.		Panasonic LX100	Four Thirds	12.7	4112	3088	4K/30p	22.3	12.5	553	67
13.		Sony A6000	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.1	13.1	1347	82
14.		Sony A3000	APS-C	19.8	5456	3632	1080/60i	23.7	12.8	1068	78
15.		Sony NEX-3N	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60i	22.8	12.5	1067	74
16.		Sony NEX-F3	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60i	22.7	12.3	1114	73
17.		Sony NEX-3	APS-C	14.0	4592	3056	720/30p	22.1	12.0	830	68

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the NEX-6 provides a faster frame rate than the G1X Mark II. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60i, while the Canon is limited to 1080/30p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the NEX-6 has an electronic viewfinder (2359k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the G1X Mark II relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. That said, the G1X Mark II can be equipped with an optional viewfinder – the EVF-DC1. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon G1 X Mark II and Sony NEX-6 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon G1 X Mark II	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.2	Y	Y
2.		Sony NEX-6	2359	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	n
3.		Canon 760D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
4.		Canon XC10	none	n	3.0	1030	tilting	Y	1/2000s	3.8	n	Y
5.		Canon SX60	922	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	6.4	Y	Y
6.		Canon G16	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.2	Y	Y
7.		Canon S120	none	n	3.0	922	fixed	Y	1/2000s	12.1	Y	Y
8.		Canon G1 X	optical	n	3.0	922	Swivel	n	1/4000s	1.9	Y	Y
9.		Canon 500D	optical	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.4	Y	n
10.		Canon 450D	optical	n	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.5	Y	n
11.		Olympus Stylus 1	1440	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/2000s	7.0	Y	Y
12.		Panasonic LX100	2764	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	11.0	n	Y
13.		Sony A6000	1440	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/4000s	11.0	Y	n
14.		Sony A3000	202	n	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.5	Y	n
15.		Sony NEX-3N	optional	n	3.0	460	tilting	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	n
16.		Sony NEX-F3	optional	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	5.5	Y	n
17.		Sony NEX-3	optional	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	7.0	n	n

One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The G1X Mark II has a touchscreen, while the NEX-6 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.

The Canon G1 X Mark II has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

The G1X Mark II writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the NEX-6 uses SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II and Sony Alpha NEX-6 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon G1 X Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
2.		Sony NEX-6	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
3.		Canon 760D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
4.		Canon XC10	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Canon SX60	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
6.		Canon G16	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
7.		Canon S120	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
8.		Canon G1 X	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
9.		Canon 500D	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
10.		Canon 450D	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Olympus Stylus 1	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
12.		Panasonic LX100	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
13.		Sony A6000	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
14.		Sony A3000	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Sony NEX-3N	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
16.		Sony NEX-F3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
17.		Sony NEX-3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

Both the G1X Mark II and the NEX-6 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The NEX-6 was replaced by the Sony A6000, while the G1X Mark II was followed by the Canon G1 X Mark III. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Sony websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Which of the two cameras – the Canon G1 X Mark II or the Sony NEX-6 – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II:

• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1040k vs 921k dots).
• Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• Ready to shoot: Has a lens built-in, whereas the NEX-6 requires a separate lens.
• Sharper images: Has hand-shake reducing image stabilization built-in.
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
• More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
• More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 1 year and 5 months after the NEX-6).

Reasons to prefer the Sony Alpha NEX-6:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (16 vs 13MP), which boosts linear resolution by 13%.
• Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (20 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
• Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (2.2 bits more color depth).
• More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (2.3 EV of extra DR).
• Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (0.8 stops ISO advantage).
• Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60i versus 1080/30p).
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 5.2 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• More flexible: Takes interchangeable lenses and can thus be used with specialty optics.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (360 versus 240) out of a single battery charge.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in September 2012).

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the NEX-6 emerges as the winner of the match-up (11 : 9 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon G1 X Mark II and the Sony NEX-6 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Travel-Zoom Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the G1X Mark II and the NEX-6 in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon G1 X Mark II	3/5	+	77/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	799
2.		Sony NEX-6	5/5	+ +	78/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	999
3.		Canon 760D	5/5	+	77/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	649
4.		Canon XC10	..	..	80/100	..	..	Apr 2015	2,499
5.		Canon SX60	3/5	+ +	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	549
6.		Canon G16	4/5	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	549
7.		Canon S120	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	449
8.		Canon G1 X	5/5	+	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jan 2012	799
9.		Canon 500D	..	+ +	74/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Mar 2009	799
10.		Canon 450D	..	+ +	+ +	4/5	4.5/5	Jan 2008	799
11.		Olympus Stylus 1	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2013	699
12.		Panasonic LX100	5/5	+ +	85/100	5/5	5/5	Sep 2014	899
13.		Sony A6000	5/5	+	80/100	4.5/5	5/5	Feb 2014	599
14.		Sony A3000	3/5	+	..	4/5	4/5	Aug 2013	329
15.		Sony NEX-3N	3/5	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2013	499
16.		Sony NEX-F3	4/5	..	74/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	May 2012	599
17.		Sony NEX-3	..	..	70/100	4.5/5	4/5	May 2010	599
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.

~

Specifications: Canon G1 X Mark II vs Sony NEX-6

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.