Canon 1D Mark II vs 1DX Mark II

The Canon EOS-1D Mark II and the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II are two professional cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in January 2004 and February 2016. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are based on an APS-H (1D Mark II) and a full frame (1DX Mark II) sensor. The 1D Mark II has a resolution of 8.2 megapixels, whereas the 1DX Mark II provides 20 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon 1D Mark II		Canon 1D X Mark II
Digital single lens reflex		Digital single lens reflex
Canon EF mount lenses		Canon EF mount lenses
8.2 MP, APS-H Sensor		20 MP, Full Frame Sensor
no Video		4K/60p Video
ISO 100-1,600 (50 - 3,200)		ISO 100-51,200 (50 - 409,600)
Optical viewfinder		Optical viewfinder
2.0 LCD, 230k dots		3.2 LCD, 1620k dots
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed touchscreen
8.3 shutter flaps per second		16 shutter flaps per second
Weathersealed body		Weathersealed body
1200 shots per battery charge		1210 shots per battery charge
156 x 158 x 80 mm, 1535 g		158 x 168 x 83 mm, 1530 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS-1D Mark II and the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Canon 1D Mark II and the Canon 1D X Mark II are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon 1D X Mark II is notably larger (8 percent) than the Canon 1D Mark II. However, the 1DX Mark II is slightly lighter (0 percent) than the 1D Mark II. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor (as in the 1DX Mark II) will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, while more compact options are available for the smaller-sensor camera (1D Mark II). You can compare the optics available in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.

Concerning battery life, the 1D Mark II gets 1200 shots out of its NP-E3 battery, while the 1DX Mark II can take 1210 images on a single charge of its LP-E19 power pack. As can be seen in the images above, both cameras have a battery grip built in. This facilitates image-taking in portrait orientation and gives it additional battery power.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life 1	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch 2	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon 1D Mark II	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	54.1 oz	1200	Y	Jan 2004	4,499
	Canon 1D X Mark II	6.2 in	6.6 in	3.3 in	54.0 oz	1210	Y	Feb 2016	5,999
	Canon 1D X Mark III	6.2 in	6.6 in	3.3 in	50.8 oz	2850	Y	Jan 2020	6,499
	Canon 6D Mark II	5.7 in	4.4 in	3.0 in	27.0 oz	1200	Y	Jun 2017	1,999
	Canon 5DS	6.0 in	4.6 in	3.0 in	32.8 oz	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 5DS R	6.0 in	4.6 in	3.0 in	32.8 oz	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 1D X	6.2 in	6.6 in	3.3 in	54.7 oz	1120	Y	Oct 2011	6,799
	Canon 1D Mark IV	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	43.4 oz	1500	Y	Oct 2009	4,999
	Canon 1D Mark III	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	40.7 oz	2200	Y	Feb 2007	4,499
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	5.9 in	6.3 in	3.1 in	48.9 oz	1800	Y	Aug 2007	7,999
	Canon 1D Mark II N	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	55.2 oz	1200	Y	Aug 2005	3,999
	Canon 5D	6.0 in	4.4 in	3.0 in	31.6 oz	400	Y	Aug 2005	3,299
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	42.9 oz	1200	Y	Sep 2004	7,999
	Canon 1Ds	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	44.6 oz	600	Y	Sep 2002	8,999
	Canon 1D	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	55.9 oz	500	Y	Sep 2001	6,499
	Nikon D5	6.3 in	6.3 in	3.6 in	49.9 oz	3780	Y	Jan 2016	6,499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. (1) Number of images that can be taken on a full battery charge according to the CIPA-standard; (2) Official announcement.

Camera Model
Canon 1D Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark III
Canon 6D Mark II
Canon 5DS
Canon 5DS R
Canon 1D X
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 1D Mark III
Canon 1Ds Mark III
Canon 1D Mark II N
Canon 5D
Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Canon 1D
Nikon D5

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The 1D Mark II was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 25 percent) than the 1DX Mark II, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 1D Mark II features an APS-H sensor and the Canon 1D X Mark II a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the 1DX Mark II is 58 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.3 and 1.0. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

In terms of underlying technology, both cameras are build around CMOS sensors.

With 20MP, the 1DX Mark II offers a higher resolution than the 1D Mark II (8.2MP), but the 1DX Mark II has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 6.57μm versus 8.17μm for the 1D Mark II). Yet, the 1DX Mark II is a much more recent model (by 12 years) than the 1D Mark II, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units.

The resolution advantage of the Canon 1D X Mark II implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the 1DX Mark II for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 27.4 x 18.2 inches or 69.5 x 46.3 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 21.9 x 14.6 inches or 55.6 x 37.1 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 18.2 x 12.2 inches or 46.3 x 30.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 1D Mark II are 17.5 x 11.7 inches or 44.5 x 29.7 cm for good quality, 14 x 9.3 inches or 35.6 x 23.7 cm for very good quality, and 11.7 x 7.8 inches or 29.7 x 19.8 cm for excellent quality prints.

The 1DX Mark II has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Canon EOS-1D Mark II has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 50-3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II are ISO 100 to ISO 51200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 50-409600.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). Of the two cameras under consideration, the 1DX Mark II offers substantially better image quality than the 1D Mark II (overall score 22 points higher). The advantage is based on 1.8 bits higher color depth, 2.4 EV in additional dynamic range, and 1.7 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Canon 1D Mark II	APS-H	8.2	3504	2336	none	22.3	11.1	1003	66
	Canon 1D X Mark II	Full Frame	20.0	5472	3648	4K/60p	24.1	13.5	3207	88
	Canon 1D X Mark III	Full Frame	20.0	5472	3648	4K/60p	24.2	14.5	3248	91
	Canon 6D Mark II	Full Frame	26.0	6240	4160	1080/60p	24.4	11.9	2862	85
	Canon 5DS	Full Frame	50.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.7	12.4	2381	87
	Canon 5DS R	Full Frame	50.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.6	12.4	2308	86
	Canon 1D X	Full Frame	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	23.8	11.8	2786	82
	Canon 1D Mark IV	APS-H	16.0	4896	3264	1080/30p	22.8	12.0	1320	74
	Canon 1D Mark III	APS-H	10.1	3888	2592	none	22.7	11.7	1078	71
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	Full Frame	21.0	5616	3744	none	24.0	12.0	1663	80
	Canon 1D Mark II N	APS-H	8.2	3504	2336	none	22.3	11.2	975	66
	Canon 5D	Full Frame	12.7	4368	2912	none	22.9	11.1	1368	71
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	Full Frame	16.6	4992	3328	none	23.3	11.3	1480	74
	Canon 1Ds	Full Frame	11.0	4064	2704	none	21.8	11.0	954	63
	Canon 1D	APS-H	4.1	2496	1662	none	..	..	..	..
	Nikon D5	Full Frame	20.7	5588	3712	4K/30p	25.1	12.3	2343	88

Camera Model
Canon 1D Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark III
Canon 6D Mark II
Canon 5DS
Canon 5DS R
Canon 1D X
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 1D Mark III
Canon 1Ds Mark III
Canon 1D Mark II N
Canon 5D
Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Canon 1D
Nikon D5

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The 1DX Mark II indeed provides for movie recording, while the 1D Mark II does not. The highest resolution format that the 1DX Mark II can use is 4K/60p.

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The 1D Mark II and the 1DX Mark II are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same field of view (100%), but the viewfinder of the 1DX Mark II has a higher magnification than the one of the 1D Mark II (0.76x vs 0.55x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon 1D Mark II and Canon 1D X Mark II in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Canon 1D Mark II	optical	Y	2.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.3	n	n
	Canon 1D X Mark II	optical	Y	3.2	1620	fixed	Y	1/8000s	16.0	n	n
	Canon 1D X Mark III	optical	Y	3.2	2100	fixed	Y	1/8000s	20.0	n	n
	Canon 6D Mark II	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	6.5	n	n
	Canon 5DS	optical	Y	3.2	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
	Canon 5DS R	optical	Y	3.2	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
	Canon 1D X	optical	Y	3.2	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	14.0	n	n
	Canon 1D Mark IV	optical	Y	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/8000s	10.0	n	n
	Canon 1D Mark III	optical	Y	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	10.0	n	n
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	optical	Y	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
	Canon 1D Mark II N	optical	Y	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.5	n	n
	Canon 5D	optical	Y	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	3.0	n	n
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	optical	Y	2.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	4.0	n	n
	Canon 1Ds	optical	Y	2.0	120	fixed	n	1/8000s	3.0	n	n
	Canon 1D	optical	Y	2.0	120	fixed	n	1/16000s	8.0	n	n
	Nikon D5	optical	Y	3.2	2359	fixed	Y	1/8000s	14.0	n	n

Camera Model
Canon 1D Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark III
Canon 6D Mark II
Canon 5DS
Canon 5DS R
Canon 1D X
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 1D Mark III
Canon 1Ds Mark III
Canon 1D Mark II N
Canon 5D
Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Canon 1D
Nikon D5

One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The 1DX Mark II has a touchscreen, while the 1D Mark II has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.

The 1D Mark II writes its imaging data to Compact Flash or SD cards, while the 1DX Mark II uses Compact Flash or CFast cards. Both cameras feature dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS-1D Mark II and Canon EOS-1D X Mark II and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Canon 1D Mark II	Y	-	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	-	-
	Canon 1D X Mark II	Y	mono	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D X Mark III	Y	mono	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Canon 6D Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
	Canon 5DS	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon 5DS R	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D X	Y	mono	-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D Mark IV	Y	stereo	-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D Mark III	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D Mark II N	Y	-	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	-	-
	Canon 5D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1Ds	Y	-	-	-	-	-	FW	-	-	-
	Canon 1D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	FW	-	-	-
	Nikon D5	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.0	-	-	-

Camera Model
Canon 1D Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark III
Canon 6D Mark II
Canon 5DS
Canon 5DS R
Canon 1D X
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 1D Mark III
Canon 1Ds Mark III
Canon 1D Mark II N
Canon 5D
Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Canon 1D
Nikon D5

Both cameras feature a PC Sync terminal to control professional strobe lights, which will be appreciated by studio photographers.

Travel and landscape photographers will find it useful that the 1DX Mark II has an internal geolocalization sensor and can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.

Both the 1D Mark II and the 1DX Mark II have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 1D Mark II was replaced by the Canon 1D Mark II N, while the 1DX Mark II was followed by the Canon 1DX Mark III. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon website.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon 1D Mark II and the Canon 1D X Mark II? Which camera is better? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Advantages of the Canon EOS-1D Mark II:

• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced segment (25 percent cheaper at launch).
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in January 2004).

Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (20 vs 8.2MP), which boosts linear resolution by 56%.
• Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (22 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
• Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (1.8 bits more color depth).
• More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (2.4 EV of extra DR).
• Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (1.7 stops ISO advantage).
• Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 4K/60p video.
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.76x vs 0.55x).
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 2.0") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1620k vs 230k dots).
• Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (16 vs 8.3 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Easier geotagging: Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
• Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.0 vs 1.1).
• More modern: Reflects 12 years of technical progress since the 1D Mark II launch.

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the 1DX Mark II is the clear winner of the contest (15 : 2 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional sports photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a street photog, and a person interested in family portraits has distinct needs from a landscape shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 1D Mark II and the Canon 1D X Mark II place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the 1D Mark II or the 1DX Mark II. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon 1D Mark II	..	+ +	..	o	..	Jan 2004	4,499
	Canon 1D X Mark II	..	89/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2016	5,999
	Canon 1D X Mark III	+ +	..	4.5/5	..	4/5	Jan 2020	6,499
	Canon 6D Mark II	+	80/100	4.5/5	4/5	4/5	Jun 2017	1,999
	Canon 5DS	+	83/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 5DS R	+	83/100	5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 1D X	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2011	6,799
	Canon 1D Mark IV	..	89/100	..	5/5	..	Oct 2009	4,999
	Canon 1D Mark III	..	..	..	o	..	Feb 2007	4,499
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	..	+ +	4.5/5	..	..	Aug 2007	7,999
	Canon 1D Mark II N	..	..	..	..	..	Aug 2005	3,999
	Canon 5D	88/100	+ +	o	o	..	Aug 2005	3,299
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	..	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2004	7,999
	Canon 1Ds	..	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2002	8,999
	Canon 1D	..	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2001	6,499
	Nikon D5	..	89/100	4.5/5	5/5	5/5	Jan 2016	6,499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Camera Model
Canon 1D Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark II
Canon 1D X Mark III
Canon 6D Mark II
Canon 5DS
Canon 5DS R
Canon 1D X
Canon 1D Mark IV
Canon 1D Mark III
Canon 1Ds Mark III
Canon 1D Mark II N
Canon 5D
Canon 1Ds Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Canon 1D
Nikon D5

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

Specifications: Canon 1D Mark II vs Canon 1D X Mark II

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.