Sony A6000 vs RX10 III

The Sony Alpha A6000 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in February 2014 and March 2016. The A6000 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, while the RX10 III is a fixed lens compact. The cameras are based on an APS-C (A6000) and an one-inch (RX10 III) sensor. The A6000 has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the RX10 III provides 20 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Sony A6000		Sony RX10 III
Mirrorless system camera		Fixed lens compact camera
Sony E mount lenses		24-600mm f/2.4-4.0
24 MP, APS-C Sensor		20 MP, 1" Sensor
1080/60p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 100-25,600 (100 - 51,200)		ISO 100-12,800 (64 - 25,600)
Electronic viewfinder (1440k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (2359k dots)
3.0 LCD, 922k dots		3.0 LCD, 1229k dots
Tilting screen (no touchscreen)		Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive)
11 shutter flaps per second		14 shutter flaps per second
not weather sealed		Weathersealed body
360 shots per battery charge		420 shots per battery charge
120 x 67 x 45 mm, 344 g		133 x 94 x 127 mm, 1051 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Sony Alpha A6000 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Sony A6000 and the Sony RX10 III is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The A6000 can be obtained in three different colors (black, silver, white), while the RX10 III is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony RX10 III is considerably larger (55 percent) than the Sony A6000. It is noteworthy in this context that the RX10 III is splash and dust-proof, while the A6000 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the RX10 III has a lens built in, whereas the A6000 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the A6000 and their specifications in the Sony E-Mount Lens Catalog.

The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USB, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, just click on the right or left arrow next to the camera that you would like to inspect. Alternatively, you can also use the CAM-parator to select your camera combination among a larger number of options.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life 1	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch 2	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Sony A6000	120 mm	67 mm	45 mm	344 g	360	n	Feb 2014	599
	Sony RX10 III	133 mm	94 mm	127 mm	1051 g	420	Y	Mar 2016	1,499
	Canon M3	111 mm	68 mm	44 mm	366 g	250	n	Feb 2015	679
	Canon 7D II	149 mm	112 mm	78 mm	910 g	670	Y	Sep 2014	1,799
	Canon G7 X	103 mm	60 mm	40 mm	304 g	210	n	Sep 2014	699
	Sony RX10 IV	133 mm	94 mm	145 mm	1095 g	400	Y	Sep 2017	1,699
	Sony A6300	120 mm	67 mm	49 mm	404 g	400	Y	Feb 2016	999
	Sony RX10 II	129 mm	88 mm	102 mm	813 g	400	Y	Jun 2015	1,299
	Sony RX100 IV	102 mm	58 mm	41 mm	298 g	280	n	Jun 2015	999
	Sony A5000	110 mm	63 mm	36 mm	269 g	420	n	Jan 2014	449
	Sony A5100	110 mm	63 mm	36 mm	283 g	400	n	Aug 2014	549
	Sony A3000	128 mm	91 mm	85 mm	411 g	470	n	Aug 2013	329
	Sony NEX-3N	110 mm	62 mm	35 mm	269 g	480	n	Feb 2013	499
	Sony NEX-5T	111 mm	59 mm	39 mm	276 g	330	n	Aug 2013	699
	Sony RX10	129 mm	88 mm	102 mm	813 g	420	Y	Oct 2013	1,299
	Sony NEX-6	120 mm	67 mm	43 mm	345 g	360	n	Sep 2012	999
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. (1) Number of images that can be taken on a full battery charge according to the CIPA-standard; (2) Official announcement.

Camera Model
Sony A6000
Sony RX10 III
Canon M3
Canon 7D II
Canon G7 X
Sony RX10 IV
Sony A6300
Sony RX10 II
Sony RX100 IV
Sony A5000
Sony A5100
Sony A3000
Sony NEX-3N
Sony NEX-5T
Sony RX10
Sony NEX-6

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Sony A6000 features an APS-C sensor and the Sony RX10 III an one-inch sensor. The sensor area in the RX10 III is 68 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.5 and 2.7. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 24MP, the A6000 offers a higher resolution than the RX10 III (20MP), but the A6000 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.91μm versus 2.41μm for the RX10 III) due to its larger sensor. However, the RX10 III is a much more recent model (by 2 years and 1 month) than the A6000, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels.

The resolution advantage of the Sony A6000 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the A6000 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Sony RX10 III are 27.4 x 18.2 inches or 69.5 x 46.3 cm for good quality, 21.9 x 14.6 inches or 55.6 x 37.1 cm for very good quality, and 18.2 x 12.2 inches or 46.3 x 30.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

The A6000 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Sony Alpha A6000 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600, which can be extended to ISO 100-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III are ISO 100 to ISO 12800, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 64-25600.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). Of the two cameras under review, the A6000 provides substantially higher image quality than the RX10 III, with an overall score that is 12 points higher. This advantage is based on 1 bits higher color depth, 0.5 EV in additional dynamic range, and 1.5 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Sony A6000	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.1	13.1	1347	82
	Sony RX10 III	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	23.1	12.6	472	70
	Canon M3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.8	11.8	1169	72
	Canon 7D II	APS-C	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	22.4	11.8	1082	70
	Canon G7 X	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	23.0	12.7	556	71
	Sony RX10 IV	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Sony A6300	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	24.4	13.7	1437	85
	Sony RX10 II	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	23.0	12.6	531	70
	Sony RX100 IV	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	22.8	12.6	591	70
	Sony A5000	APS-C	19.8	5456	3632	1080/60i	23.8	13.0	1089	79
	Sony A5100	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.8	12.7	1347	80
	Sony A3000	APS-C	19.8	5456	3632	1080/60i	23.7	12.8	1068	78
	Sony NEX-3N	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60i	22.8	12.5	1067	74
	Sony NEX-5T	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60p	23.6	13.0	1015	78
	Sony RX10	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	22.9	12.6	474	69
	Sony NEX-6	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60i	23.7	13.1	1018	78

Camera Model
Sony A6000
Sony RX10 III
Canon M3
Canon 7D II
Canon G7 X
Sony RX10 IV
Sony A6300
Sony RX10 II
Sony RX100 IV
Sony A5000
Sony A5100
Sony A3000
Sony NEX-3N
Sony NEX-5T
Sony RX10
Sony NEX-6

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the RX10 III provides a better video resolution than the A6000. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/30p, while the A6000 is limited to 1080/60p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the RX10 III offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the A6000 (2359k vs 1440k dots). The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Sony A6000, the Sony RX10 III, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Sony A6000	1440	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/4000s	11.0	Y	n
	Sony RX10 III	2359	Y	3.0	1229	tilting	n	1/2000s	14.0	Y	Y
	Canon M3	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	4.2	Y	n
	Canon 7D II	optical	Y	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	10.0	Y	n
	Canon G7 X	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/2000s	6.5	Y	Y
	Sony RX10 IV	2359	Y	3.0	1440	tilting	Y	1/2000s	24.0	Y	Y
	Sony A6300	2359	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/4000s	11.0	Y	n
	Sony RX10 II	2359	Y	3.0	1229	tilting	n	1/3200s	14.0	Y	Y
	Sony RX100 IV	2359	n	3.0	1228	tilting	n	1/2000s	16.0	Y	Y
	Sony A5000	none	n	3.0	461	tilting	n	1/4000s	3.5	Y	n
	Sony A5100	none	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
	Sony A3000	202	n	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.5	Y	n
	Sony NEX-3N	optional	n	3.0	460	tilting	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	n
	Sony NEX-5T	optional	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/4000s	10.0	n	n
	Sony RX10	1440	Y	3.0	1229	tilting	n	1/3200s	10.0	Y	Y
	Sony NEX-6	2359	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	n

Camera Model
Sony A6000
Sony RX10 III
Canon M3
Canon 7D II
Canon G7 X
Sony RX10 IV
Sony A6300
Sony RX10 II
Sony RX100 IV
Sony A5000
Sony A5100
Sony A3000
Sony NEX-3N
Sony NEX-5T
Sony RX10
Sony NEX-6

One feature that is present on the RX10 III, but is missing on the A6000 is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the RX10 III is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the A6000 and the RX10 III write their files to SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Sony Alpha A6000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Sony A6000	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony RX10 III	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Canon M3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Canon 7D II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon G7 X	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony RX10 IV	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony A6300	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony RX10 II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony RX100 IV	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony A5000	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony A5100	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony A3000	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Sony NEX-3N	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
	Sony NEX-5T	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony RX10	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Sony NEX-6	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-

Camera Model
Sony A6000
Sony RX10 III
Canon M3
Canon 7D II
Canon G7 X
Sony RX10 IV
Sony A6300
Sony RX10 II
Sony RX100 IV
Sony A5000
Sony A5100
Sony A3000
Sony NEX-3N
Sony NEX-5T
Sony RX10
Sony NEX-6

It is notable that the RX10 III has a microphone port, which can help to improve the quality of audio recordings by attaching an external microphone. The A6000 does not feature such a mic input.

The RX10 III is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Sony. In contrast, the A6000 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the A6000 was succeeded by the Sony A6300. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Sony website.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Sony A6000 and the Sony RX10 III? Which camera is better? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Reasons to prefer the Sony Alpha A6000:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (24 vs 20MP) with a 10% higher linear resolution.
• Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (12 points) in the DXO overall assessment.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Requires less light for good images (1.5 stops ISO advantage).
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/4000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• More flexible: Accepts interchangeable lenses, so that lens characteristics can be altered.
• More compact: Is smaller (120x67mm vs 133x94mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in February 2014).

Arguments in favor of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III:

• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/60p).
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
• More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (2359k vs 1440k dots).
• Easier setting verification: Features a control panel on top to check shooting parameters.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1229k vs 922k dots).
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (14 vs 11 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
• Ready to shoot: Has an integrated lens, whereas the A6000 necessitates an extra lens.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (420 versus 360) out of a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
• Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
• More modern: Reflects 2 years and 1 month of technical progress since the A6000 launch.

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the RX10 III is the clear winner of the contest (13 : 8 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Sony A6000 and the Sony RX10 III place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera and Best Superzoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the A6000 or the RX10 III. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Sony A6000	+	80/100	4.5/5	5/5	5/5	Feb 2014	599
	Sony RX10 III	+	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Mar 2016	1,499
	Canon M3	o	75/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2015	679
	Canon 7D II	+	84/100	4/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	1,799
	Canon G7 X	+ +	77/100	4.5/5	3.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	699
	Sony RX10 IV	+	84/100	4.5/5	..	5/5	Sep 2017	1,699
	Sony A6300	+	85/100	5/5	5/5	5/5	Feb 2016	999
	Sony RX10 II	+ +	82/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4/5	Jun 2015	1,299
	Sony RX100 IV	+ +	85/100	4/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2015	999
	Sony A5000	+	..	4.5/5	o	4.5/5	Jan 2014	449
	Sony A5100	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	5/5	Aug 2014	549
	Sony A3000	+	..	4/5	4.5/5	4/5	Aug 2013	329
	Sony NEX-3N	..	..	4.5/5	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2013	499
	Sony NEX-5T	..	..	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Aug 2013	699
	Sony RX10	+	80/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2013	1,299
	Sony NEX-6	+ +	78/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	999
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Camera Model
Sony A6000
Sony RX10 III
Canon M3
Canon 7D II
Canon G7 X
Sony RX10 IV
Sony A6300
Sony RX10 II
Sony RX100 IV
Sony A5000
Sony A5100
Sony A3000
Sony NEX-3N
Sony NEX-5T
Sony RX10
Sony NEX-6

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just make your choice using the following search menu. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

Specifications: Sony A6000 vs Sony RX10 III

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.