Nikon P950 vs Sony H400

The Nikon Coolpix P950 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in January 2020 and February 2014. Both the P950 and the H400 are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The Nikon has a resolution of 15.9 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 19.9 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Nikon P950		Sony H400
Fixed lens compact camera		Fixed lens compact camera
24-2000mm f/2.8-6.5		24.5-1550mm f/3.4-6.5
15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		19.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor
4K/30p Video		720/30p Video
ISO 100-6,400 (100 - 12,800)		ISO 80-3,200
Electronic viewfinder (2359k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (210k dots)
3.2 LCD, 921k dots		3.0 LCD, 460k dots
Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
7 shutter flaps per second		0.7 shutter flaps per second
290 shots per battery charge		300 shots per battery charge
140 x 110 x 150 mm, 1005 g		130 x 95 x 122 mm, 628 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Nikon Coolpix P950 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Nikon P950 and the Sony H400 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony H400 is notably smaller (20 percent) than the Nikon P950. Moreover, the H400 is substantially lighter (38 percent) than the P950. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the P950 nor the H400 are weather-sealed.

The power pack in the P950 can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Nikon P950	140 mm	110 mm	150 mm	1005 g	290	n	Jan 2020	799
2.		Sony H400	130 mm	95 mm	122 mm	628 g	300	n	Feb 2014	319
3.		Canon G5 X Mark II	111 mm	61 mm	46 mm	340 g	230	n	Jul 2019	899
4.		Canon G7 X Mark III	105 mm	61 mm	41 mm	304 g	235	n	Jul 2019	749
5.		Fujifilm X70	113 mm	64 mm	44 mm	340 g	330	n	Jan 2016	799
6.		Leica Q Typ 116	130 mm	80 mm	93 mm	640 g	300	n	Jun 2015	4,249
7.		Nikon B600	122 mm	82 mm	99 mm	500 g	280	n	Jan 2019	349
8.		Nikon A1000	114 mm	72 mm	41 mm	330 g	250	n	Jan 2019	429
9.		Nikon P1000	146 mm	119 mm	181 mm	1415 g	250	n	Jul 2018	999
10.		Nikon B500	114 mm	78 mm	95 mm	541 g	600	n	Jan 2016	299
11.		Nikon P900	140 mm	103 mm	137 mm	899 g	360	n	Mar 2015	599
12.		Panasonic FZ1000 II	136 mm	97 mm	131 mm	810 g	350	n	Feb 2019	899
13.		Sony RX0 II	59 mm	41 mm	35 mm	132 g	240	Y	Mar 2019	699
14.		Sony RX100 IV	102 mm	58 mm	41 mm	298 g	280	n	Jun 2015	999
15.		Sony HX400V	130 mm	93 mm	103 mm	660 g	300	n	Feb 2014	499
16.		Sony H300	128 mm	89 mm	92 mm	590 g	350	n	Feb 2014	219
17.		Sony H200	123 mm	83 mm	87 mm	530 g	240	n	Jan 2013	249
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The H400 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 60 percent) than the P950, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 5.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the smaller-sensor digicams that favor affordability and compact design. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.

While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the H400 offers a higher resolution of 19.9 megapixels, compared with 15.9 MP of the P950. This megapixels advantage translates into a 12 percent gain in linear resolution. On the other hand, these sensor specs imply that the H400 has a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.19μm versus 1.33μm for the P950). Moreover, it should be noted, that the P950 is much more recent (by 5 years and 10 months) than the H400, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of individual pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Sony H400 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the H400 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 25.8 x 19.3 inches or 65.4 x 49.1 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 20.6 x 15.5 inches or 52.3 x 39.3 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 17.2 x 12.9 inches or 43.6 x 32.7 cm. The corresponding values for the Nikon P950 are 23 x 17.3 inches or 58.5 x 43.9 cm for good quality, 18.4 x 13.8 inches or 46.8 x 35.1 cm for very good quality, and 15.4 x 11.5 inches or 39 x 29.3 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Nikon Coolpix P950 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 are ISO 80 to ISO 3200 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Nikon P950	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
2.		Sony H400	1/2.3	19.9	5152	3864	720/30p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon G5 X Mark II	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
4.		Canon G7 X Mark III	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
5.		Fujifilm X70	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
6.		Leica Q Typ 116	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.3	12.7	2221	85
7.		Nikon B600	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
8.		Nikon A1000	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
9.		Nikon P1000	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
10.		Nikon B500	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60i	..	..	..	..
11.		Nikon P900	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
12.		Panasonic FZ1000 II	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
13.		Sony RX0 II	1-inch	15.4	4800	3200	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
14.		Sony RX100 IV	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	22.8	12.6	591	70
15.		Sony HX400V	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
16.		Sony H300	1/2.3	19.9	5152	3864	720/30p	..	..	..	..
17.		Sony H200	1/2.3	15.2	5184	2930	720/30p	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the P950 provides a higher video resolution than the H400. It can shoot video footage at 4K/30p, while the Sony is limited to 720/30p.

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under consideration are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the P950 offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the H400 (2359k vs 210k dots). The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Nikon P950 and Sony H400 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Nikon P950	2359	n	3.2	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
2.		Sony H400	210	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	0.7	Y	Y
3.		Canon G5 X Mark II	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/2000s	30	Y	Y
4.		Canon G7 X Mark III	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/2000s	30	Y	Y
5.		Fujifilm X70	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
6.		Leica Q Typ 116	3680	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/2000s	10.0	n	Y
7.		Nikon B600	none	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.4	Y	Y
8.		Nikon A1000	1166	n	3.0	1036	tilting	Y	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
9.		Nikon P1000	2359	n	3.2	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
10.		Nikon B500	none	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	7.4	Y	Y
11.		Nikon P900	921	n	3.0	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
12.		Panasonic FZ1000 II	2360	n	3.0	1240	swivel	Y	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
13.		Sony RX0 II	none	n	1.5	230	tilting	n	..	5.5	n	n
14.		Sony RX100 IV	2359	n	3.0	1228	tilting	n	1/2000s	16.0	Y	Y
15.		Sony HX400V	210	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	Y
16.		Sony H300	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/1500s	0.8	Y	Y
17.		Sony H200	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/1500s	0.8	Y	Y

The Nikon P950 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Both the P950 and the H400 have zoom lenses built in. The P950 has a 24-2000mm f/2.8-6.5 optic and the H400 offers a 24.5-1550mm f/3.4-6.5 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the Nikon provides a wider angle of view at the short end, as well as more tele-photo reach at the long end than the Sony. The P950 offers the faster maximum aperture.

The P950 writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the H400 uses SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Nikon Coolpix P950 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Nikon P950	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
2.		Sony H400	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
3.		Canon G5 X Mark II	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
4.		Canon G7 X Mark III	-	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
5.		Fujifilm X70	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
6.		Leica Q Typ 116	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
7.		Nikon B600	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
8.		Nikon A1000	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
9.		Nikon P1000	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
10.		Nikon B500	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
11.		Nikon P900	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
12.		Panasonic FZ1000 II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
13.		Sony RX0 II	-	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
14.		Sony RX100 IV	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
15.		Sony HX400V	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
16.		Sony H300	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
17.		Sony H200	-	mono	mono	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the P950 has a hotshoe, while the H400 does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.

Both the P950 and the H400 are recent models that are part of the current product line-up. The H400 replaced the earlier Sony H200, while the P950 followed on from the Nikon P900. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Nikon and Sony websites.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Nikon P950 and the Sony H400? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Arguments in favor of the Nikon Coolpix P950:

• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 720/30p).
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (2359k vs 210k dots).
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (921k vs 460k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/4000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (7 vs 0.7 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.4).
• Wider view: Has a wider-angle lens that facilitates landscape or interior shots.
• More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• More modern: Reflects 5 years and 10 months of technical progress since the H400 launch.

Advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (19.9 vs 15.9MP), which boosts linear resolution by 12%.
• More compact: Is smaller (130x95mm vs 140x110mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 377g or 38 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (60 percent cheaper at launch).
• More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in February 2014).

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the P950 is the clear winner of the match-up (17 : 5 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Nikon P950 and the Sony H400 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Superzoom Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the P950 and the H400 in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Nikon P950	..	..	..	4/5	4/5	Jan 2020	799
2.		Sony H400	..	o	..	3.5/5	3.5/5	Feb 2014	319
3.		Canon G5 X Mark II	4/5	+	82/100	..	4/5	Jul 2019	899
4.		Canon G7 X Mark III	..	+ +	81/100	4/5	..	Jul 2019	749
5.		Fujifilm X70	4.5/5	..	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2016	799
6.		Leica Q Typ 116	5/5	..	80/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2015	4,249
7.		Nikon B600	..	+	..	3.5/5	3/5	Jan 2019	349
8.		Nikon A1000	..	+ +	..	3.5/5	3/5	Jan 2019	429
9.		Nikon P1000	..	+	73/100	3.5/5	3.5/5	Jul 2018	999
10.		Nikon B500	..	+	..	4/5	3.5/5	Jan 2016	299
11.		Nikon P900	..	..	77/100	4/5	4/5	Mar 2015	599
12.		Panasonic FZ1000 II	..	..	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2019	899
13.		Sony RX0 II	..	..	..	3.5/5	4/5	Mar 2019	699
14.		Sony RX100 IV	4.5/5	+ +	85/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jun 2015	999
15.		Sony HX400V	4/5	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	Feb 2014	499
16.		Sony H300	..	+	..	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2014	219
17.		Sony H200	..	..	..	3.5/5	3.5/5	Jan 2013	249
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Nikon P950 vs Sony H400

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.