Canon 1Ds vs Fujifilm XP130
The Canon EOS-1Ds and the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in September 2002 and January 2018. The 1Ds is a DSLR, while the XP130 is a fixed lens compact. The cameras are based on a full frame (1Ds) and a 1/2.3-inch (XP130) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 11 megapixels, whereas the Fujifilm provides 15.9 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 | |
---|---|---|
Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera | |
Canon EF mount lenses | 28-140mm f/3.9-4.9 | |
11 MP, Full Frame Sensor | 15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor | |
no Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 100-1250 | ISO 100-3200 | |
Optical viewfinder | No viewfinder, LCD framing | |
2.0" LCD, 120k dots | 3.0" LCD, 920k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | |
3 shutter flaps per second | 10 shutter flaps per second | |
Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization | |
Weathersealed body | Waterproof body (20m) | |
600 shots per battery charge | 240 shots per battery charge | |
156 x 158 x 80 mm, 1265 g | 110 x 71 x 28 mm, 207 g |
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS-1Ds and the Fujifilm FinePix XP130? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 1Ds and the Fujifilm XP130 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The XP130 can be obtained in five different colors (black, blue, yellow, green, white), while the 1Ds is only available in black.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm XP130 is considerably smaller (68 percent) than the Canon 1Ds. More than that, the XP130 is water-proof up to 20m and can, thus, be used for underwater photography.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the XP130 has a lens built in, whereas the 1Ds is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the 1Ds and their specifications in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the 1Ds gets 600 shots out of its NP-E3 battery, while the XP130 can take 240 images on a single charge of its NP-45S power pack. As can be seen in the images above, the 1Ds has a battery grip built in. This facilitates image-taking in portrait orientation and gives it additional battery power. The power pack in the XP130 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.
The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, just select a new right or left comparator from among the camera models in the table. Alternatively, you can also move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1Ds» | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 44.6 oz | 600 | Y | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Fujifilm XP130« | 4.3 in | 2.8 in | 1.1 in | 7.3 oz | 240 | n | Jan 2018 | 229 | - | Fujifilm XP130 | ||
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | 6.2 in | 6.6 in | 3.3 in | 54.0 oz | 1210 | Y | Feb 2016 | 5,999 | Canon 1D X Mark II | |||
Canon 1D C« » | 6.2 in | 6.5 in | 3.3 in | 54.5 oz | 1120 | Y | Apr 2012 | 14,999 | - | Canon 1D C | ||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 43.4 oz | 1500 | Y | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 1D Mark III« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 40.7 oz | 2200 | Y | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | 5.9 in | 6.3 in | 3.1 in | 48.9 oz | 1800 | Y | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 55.2 oz | 1200 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 5D« » | 6.0 in | 4.4 in | 3.0 in | 31.6 oz | 400 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,299 | - | Canon 5D | ||
Canon 1D Mark II« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 54.1 oz | 1200 | Y | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 42.9 oz | 1200 | Y | Sep 2004 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark II | ||
Fujifilm XP140« » | 4.3 in | 2.8 in | 1.1 in | 7.3 oz | 240 | Y | Feb 2019 | 229 | Fujifilm XP140 | |||
Fujifilm XP120« » | 4.3 in | 2.8 in | 1.1 in | 7.2 oz | 210 | Y | Jan 2017 | 229 | - | Fujifilm XP120 | ||
Nikon D2Xs« » | 6.2 in | 5.9 in | 3.4 in | 44.2 oz | 3800 | Y | Jun 2006 | 4,699 | - | Nikon D2Xs | ||
Olympus TG-4« » | 4.4 in | 2.6 in | 1.2 in | 8.7 oz | 380 | Y | Apr 2015 | 379 | - | Olympus TG-4 | ||
Ricoh WG-60« » | 4.8 in | 2.4 in | 1.2 in | 6.8 oz | 300 | Y | Oct 2018 | 279 | Ricoh WG-60 | |||
Sony WX800« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.4 in | 8.2 oz | 370 | n | Oct 2018 | 399 | Sony WX800 | |||
Note: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. |
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The XP130 was launched at a lower price than the 1Ds, despite having a lens built in. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 1Ds features a full frame sensor and the Fujifilm XP130 a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The sensor area in the XP130 is 97 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.0 and 5.6. The sensor in the 1Ds has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the XP130 offers a 4:3 aspect.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the XP130 offers a higher resolution of 15.9 megapixels, compared with 11 MP of the 1Ds. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.33μm versus 8.83μm for the 1Ds). However, it should be noted that the XP130 is much more recent (by 15 years and 4 months) than the 1Ds, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the XP130 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Fujifilm XP130 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the XP130 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 23 x 17.3 inch or 58.5 x 43.9 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 18.4 x 13.8 inch or 46.8 x 35.1 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 15.4 x 11.5 inch or 39 x 29.3 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 1Ds are 20.3 x 13.5 inch or 51.6 x 34.3 cm for good quality, 16.3 x 10.8 inch or 41.3 x 27.5 cm for very good quality, and 13.5 x 9 inch or 34.4 x 22.9 cm for excellent quality prints.
The Canon EOS-1Ds has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1250, which can be extended to ISO 50-1250. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 are ISO 100 to ISO 3200 (no boost).

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1Ds» | Full Frame | 11.0 | 4064 | 2704 | - | 21.8 | 11.0 | 954 | 63 | Canon 1Ds | |
Fujifilm XP130« | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | Full Frame | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/60p | 24.1 | 13.5 | 3207 | 88 | Canon 1D X Mark II | |
Canon 1D C« » | Full Frame | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 4K/24p | - | - | - | - | Canon 1D C | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | APS-H | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 12.0 | 1320 | 74 | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | APS-H | 10.1 | 3888 | 2592 | - | 22.7 | 11.7 | 1078 | 71 | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Full Frame | 21.0 | 5616 | 3744 | - | 24.0 | 12.0 | 1663 | 80 | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.2 | 975 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 5D« » | Full Frame | 12.7 | 4368 | 2912 | - | 22.9 | 11.1 | 1368 | 71 | Canon 5D | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.1 | 1003 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | Full Frame | 16.6 | 4992 | 3328 | - | 23.3 | 11.3 | 1480 | 74 | Canon 1Ds Mark II | |
Fujifilm XP140« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 4K/15p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm XP140 | |
Fujifilm XP120« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm XP120 | |
Nikon D2Xs« » | APS-C | 12.2 | 4288 | 2848 | - | 22.2 | 10.9 | 489 | 59 | Nikon D2Xs | |
Olympus TG-4« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Olympus TG-4 | |
Ricoh WG-60« » | 1/2.3 | 15.9 | 4608 | 3456 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Ricoh WG-60 | |
Sony WX800« » | 1/2.3 | 18.0 | 4896 | 3672 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Sony WX800 |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The XP130 indeed provides for movie recording, while the 1Ds does not. The highest resolution format that the XP130 can use is 1080/60p.
Feature comparison
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the 1Ds has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the XP130 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon 1Ds and Fujifilm XP130 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1Ds» | optical | Y | 2.0 | 120 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds | |
Fujifilm XP130« | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1620 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 16.0 | n | n | Canon 1D X Mark II | |
Canon 1D C« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 14.0 | n | n | Canon 1D C | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.5 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 5D« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.0 | n | n | Canon 5D | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 4.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds Mark II | |
Fujifilm XP140« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Fujifilm XP140 | |
Fujifilm XP120« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Fujifilm XP120 | |
Nikon D2Xs« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Nikon D2Xs | |
Olympus TG-4« » | - | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 5.0 | Y | Y | Olympus TG-4 | |
Ricoh WG-60« » | - | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | Ricoh WG-60 | |
Sony WX800« » | - | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | Y | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony WX800 |
One feature that is present on the 1Ds, but is missing on the XP130 is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.
The Fujifilm XP130 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
The 1Ds writes its imaging data to Compact Flash cards, while the XP130 uses SDXC cards.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS-1Ds and Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1Ds» | Y | - | - | - | - | - | FW | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds | |
Fujifilm XP130« | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Fujifilm XP130 | |
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D X Mark II | |
Canon 1D C« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D C | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | Y | stereo | - | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 5D« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5D | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds Mark II | |
Fujifilm XP140« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Fujifilm XP140 | |
Fujifilm XP120« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm XP120 | |
Nikon D2Xs« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D2Xs | |
Olympus TG-4« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Olympus TG-4 | |
Ricoh WG-60« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - | Ricoh WG-60 | |
Sony WX800« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony WX800 |
It is notable that the 1Ds has a hotshoe, while the XP130 does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 1Ds (unlike the XP130) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
Both the 1Ds and the XP130 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 1Ds was replaced by the Canon 1Ds Mark II, while the XP130 was followed by the Fujifilm XP140. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Fujifilm websites.
Review summary
So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon 1Ds and the Fujifilm XP130? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Advantages of the Canon EOS-1Ds:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Better image quality: Features bigger pixels on a larger sensor for higher quality imaging.
- Richer colors: The pixel size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Larger pixels capture a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Larger pixels means good image quality even under poor lighting.
- Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
- Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Can take a variety of interchangeable lenses, including specialty optics.
- More portrait friendly: Features an integrated vertical grip for easier portrait shooting.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (600 versus 240) on a single battery charge.
- Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in September 2002).

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm FinePix XP130:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (15.9 vs 11MP), which boosts linear resolution by 18%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 1080/60p video.
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 2.0") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (920k vs 120k dots).
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 3 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
- Ready to shoot: Comes with an integrated lens, while the 1Ds requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (110x71mm vs 156x158mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight even though it has a lens built in (unlike the 1Ds).
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Water-proof: Is rugged and sealed and can thus be used for underwater photography (up to 20m).
- Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More modern: Reflects 15 years and 4 months of technical progress since the 1Ds launch.
If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the XP130 emerges as the winner of the match-up (17 : 14 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 1Ds and the Fujifilm XP130 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Travel-Zoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the 1Ds and the XP130 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews
This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1Ds» | - | + + | - | - | - | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Fujifilm XP130« | o | - | 3.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Jan 2018 | 229 | - | Fujifilm XP130 | ||
Canon 1D X Mark II« » | - | 89/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 5,999 | Canon 1D X Mark II | |||
Canon 1D C« » | - | - | - | - | - | Apr 2012 | 14,999 | - | Canon 1D C | ||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | - | 89/100 | - | 5/5 | - | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 1D Mark III« » | - | - | - | o | - | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | - | + + | 4.5/5 | - | - | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | - | - | - | - | - | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 5D« » | 88/100 | + + | o | o | - | Aug 2005 | 3,299 | - | Canon 5D | ||
Canon 1D Mark II« » | - | + + | - | o | - | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | - | + + | - | - | - | Sep 2004 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark II | ||
Fujifilm XP140« » | + | - | 3.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Feb 2019 | 229 | Fujifilm XP140 | |||
Fujifilm XP120« » | o | - | 3.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Jan 2017 | 229 | - | Fujifilm XP120 | ||
Nikon D2Xs« » | - | - | - | o | - | Jun 2006 | 4,699 | - | Nikon D2Xs | ||
Olympus TG-4« » | + | 79/100 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | Apr 2015 | 379 | - | Olympus TG-4 | ||
Ricoh WG-60« » | - | - | - | - | - | Oct 2018 | 279 | Ricoh WG-60 | |||
Sony WX800« » | - | - | - | - | - | Oct 2018 | 399 | Sony WX800 | |||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (-) not available. |
The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Ebay offers Fujifilm XP130:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Canon 1Ds Mark II
- Canon 1Ds Mark III vs Canon 5DS
- Canon 1Ds Mark III vs Nikon D3
- Canon 1Ds Mark III vs Sony NEX-3
- Canon 1Ds vs Canon SX410
- Canon 1Ds vs Canon T3i
- Canon 1Ds vs Canon T5
- Canon 1Ds vs Panasonic S1H
- Canon 400D vs Fujifilm XP130
- Fujifilm XP130 vs Nikon D1H
- Fujifilm XP130 vs Panasonic G95
- Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony A7S
Specifications: Canon 1Ds vs Fujifilm XP130
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | 28-140mm f/3.9-4.9 |
Launch Date | September 2002 | January 2018 |
Launch Price | USD 8999 | USD 229 |
Sensor Specs | Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Format | Full Frame Sensor | 1/2.3" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 36.0 x 23.8 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Sensor Area | 856.8 mm2 | 28.0735 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 43.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.0x | 5.6x |
Sensor Resolution | 11 Megapixels | 15.9 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 4064 x 2704 pixels | 4608 x 3456 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 8.83 μm | 1.33 μm |
Pixel Density | 1.28 MP/cm2 | 56.73 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-1250 ISO | 100-3200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 50-1250 ISO | no Enhancement |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 63 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 21.8 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 11.0 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 954 | .. |
Screen Specs | Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 |
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | No viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.70x | |
Top-Level Screen | Control Panel | no Top Display |
LCD Framing | Live View | |
Rear LCD Size | 2.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 120k dots | 920k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fixed screen |
Shooting Specs | Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 |
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Continuous Shooting | 3 shutter flaps/s | 10 shutter flaps/s |
Time-Lapse Photography | no Intervalometer | Intervalometer built-in |
Image Stabilization | Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | CF cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 |
External Flash | Hotshoe | no Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | PC Sync socket | no PC Sync |
USB Connector | Firewire | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | micro HDMI |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Bluetooth Support | no Bluetooth | Bluetooth built-in |
Body Specs | Canon 1Ds | Fujifilm XP130 |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Waterproof body (20m) |
Battery Type | NP-E3 | NP-45S |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 600 shots per charge | 240 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | no USB charging | USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
156 x 158 x 80 mm (6.1 x 6.2 x 3.1 in) |
110 x 71 x 28 mm (4.3 x 2.8 x 1.1 in) |
Camera Weight | 1265 g (44.6 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.