Leica V-LUX 3 versus Panasonic FZ200
The Leica V-LUX 3 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in December 2011 and July 2012. Both the V-LUX 3 and the FZ200 are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with a 1/2.3-inch sensor. Both cameras offer a resolution of 12 megapixel. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their size, their sensors, their features, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison: Leica V-LUX 3 vs Panasonic FZ200
The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Leica V-LUX 3 and the Panasonic FZ200. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter. If you prefer, you can also use the toggle button to switch to a comparison in percentage terms (in this case, the camera on the left – the V-LUX 3 – represents the basis or 100 percent across all the size and weight measures).
If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Panasonic FZ200 is notably larger (8 percent) than the Leica V-LUX 3. Moreover, the FZ200 is markedly heavier (9 percent) than the V-LUX 3. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the V-LUX 3 nor the FZ200 are weather-sealed.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, just select a new right or left comparator from among the camera models in the table. Alternatively, you can also move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
|Camera Body Specifications
|Leica V-LUX 3 (⇒ rgt)||4.9 in||3.2 in||3.7 in||19.0 oz||410||no||2011||949||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ200 (⇒ lft)||4.9 in||3.4 in||4.3 in||20.7 oz||540||no||2012||599||discont.||check|
|Canon SX60 (⇒ lft | rgt)||5.0 in||3.7 in||4.5 in||22.9 oz||340||no||2014||549||latest||check|
|Canon G1 X Mark II (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.6 in||2.9 in||2.6 in||19.5 oz||240||no||2014||799||latest||check|
|Canon G1 X (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.6 in||3.2 in||2.6 in||18.8 oz||250||no||2012||799||discont.||check|
|Canon SX50 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.8 in||3.4 in||4.2 in||21.0 oz||315||no||2012||429||discont.||check|
|Fujifilm X100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||5.0 in||3.0 in||2.1 in||15.7 oz||300||no||2010||1,199||discont.||check|
|Leica D-LUX 6 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.4 in||2.7 in||1.8 in||10.5 oz||330||no||2012||699||discont.||check|
|Leica V-LUX 4 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.9 in||3.4 in||4.3 in||20.7 oz||540||no||2012||949||discont.||check|
|Leica D-LUX 5 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.3 in||2.6 in||1.7 in||9.6 oz||400||no||2010||699||discont.||check|
|Leica V-LUX 2 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.9 in||3.1 in||3.7 in||18.3 oz||410||no||2010||849||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ300 (⇒ lft | rgt)||5.2 in||3.6 in||4.6 in||24.4 oz||380||YES||2015||599||latest||check|
|Panasonic LX7 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.4 in||2.7 in||1.8 in||10.5 oz||330||no||2012||499||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ150 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.9 in||3.2 in||3.6 in||18.6 oz||410||no||2011||499||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||4.9 in||3.2 in||3.6 in||19.0 oz||410||no||2010||499||discont.||check|
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The FZ200 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 37 percent) than the V-LUX 3, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison: Leica V-LUX 3 vs Panasonic FZ200
The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Both cameras under consideration feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 5.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the smaller-sensor digicams that favor affordability and compact design. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.
The two cameras under review do not only share the same sensor size, but also offer an identical resolution of 12 megapixel. This similarity in sensor specs implies that both the V-LUX 3 and the FZ200 have the same pixel density, as well as the same pixel size. It should, however, be noted that the FZ200 is a somewhat more recent model (by 7 months) than the V-LUX 3, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.
Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
|Leica V-LUX 3 (⇒ rgt)||1/2.3||12.0||4000||3000||1080/60p||-||-||-||-|
|Panasonic FZ200 (⇒ lft)||1/2.3||12.0||4000||3000||1080/60p||19.1||10.8||114||37|
|Canon SX60 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||14.2||4608||3072||1080/60p||19.2||10.8||127||39|
|Canon G1 X Mark II (⇒ lft | rgt)||1.5-inch||13.0||4160||3120||1080/30p||21.5||10.8||581||58|
|Canon G1 X (⇒ lft | rgt)||1.5-inch||14.2||4352||3264||1080/24p||21.7||10.8||644||60|
|Canon SX50 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||12.0||4000||3000||1080/24p||20.3||11.2||179||47|
|Fujifilm X100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||APS-C||12.2||4288||2848||720/30p||22.9||12.4||1001||73|
|Leica D-LUX 6 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/1.7||10.0||3648||2736||1080/60p||-||-||-||-|
|Leica V-LUX 4 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||12.0||4000||3000||1080/60p||-||-||-||-|
|Leica D-LUX 5 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/1.7||10.0||3648||2736||720/60p||-||-||-||-|
|Leica V-LUX 2 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||14.0||4320||3240||1080/60i||-||-||-||-|
|Panasonic FZ300 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||12.0||4000||3000||4K/30p||19.3||11.0||97||38|
|Panasonic LX7 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/1.7||10.0||3648||2736||1080/60p||20.7||11.7||147||50|
|Panasonic FZ150 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||12.0||4000||3000||1080/60p||19.4||10.9||132||40|
|Panasonic FZ100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1/2.3||14.0||4320||3240||1080/60i||-||-||-||-|
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, and both provide the same movie specifications (1080/60p).
Feature comparison: Leica V-LUX 3 vs Panasonic FZ200
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the FZ200 offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the V-LUX 3 (1312k vs 202k dots). The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Leica V-LUX 3 and Panasonic FZ200 along with similar information for a selection of comparators. If you need more detail on the specs, you can find comprehensive listings, for example, in the dpreview camera hub.
|Leica V-LUX 3 (⇒ rgt)||202||no||3.0||460||swivel||no||2000||12.0||9.5||YES|
|Panasonic FZ200 (⇒ lft)||1312||no||3.0||460||swivel||no||4000||12.0||13.5||YES|
|Canon SX60 (⇒ lft | rgt)||922||no||3.0||922||swivel||no||2000||6.4||5.5||YES|
|Canon G1 X Mark II (⇒ lft | rgt)||no||no||3.0||1040||tilting||YES||4000||5.2||6.8||YES|
|Canon G1 X (⇒ lft | rgt)||optical||no||3.0||922||Swivel||no||4000||1.9||7||YES|
|Canon SX50 (⇒ lft | rgt)||202||no||3.0||461||swivel||no||2000||2.2||5.5||YES|
|Fujifilm X100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1440||no||2.8||460||fixed||no||4000||5.0||9||no|
|Leica D-LUX 6 (⇒ lft | rgt)||no||no||3.0||920||fixed||no||4000||11.0||8.5||YES|
|Leica V-LUX 4 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1312||no||3.0||460||swivel||no||4000||12.0||13.5||YES|
|Leica D-LUX 5 (⇒ lft | rgt)||no||no||3.0||460||fixed||no||4000||2.5||7.2||YES|
|Leica V-LUX 2 (⇒ lft | rgt)||202||no||3.0||460||swivel||no||2000||11.0||9.5||YES|
|Panasonic FZ300 (⇒ lft | rgt)||1440||no||3.0||1040||swivel||YES||4000||12.0||8.8||YES|
|Panasonic LX7 (⇒ lft | rgt)||no||no||3.0||920||fixed||no||4000||11.0||8.5||YES|
|Panasonic FZ150 (⇒ lft | rgt)||202||no||3.0||460||swivel||no||2000||12.0||9.5||YES|
|Panasonic FZ100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||202||no||3.0||460||swivel||no||2000||11.0||9.5||YES|
Both the V-LUX 3 and the FZ200 have zoom lenses build in. The V-LUX 3 has a 25-600mm f/2.8-5.2 optic and the FZ200 offers a 25-600mm f/2.8-2.8 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Both cameras offer the same maximum aperture.
Both the V-LUX 3 and the FZ200 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The V-LUX 3 was replaced by the Leica V-LUX 4, while the FZ200 was followed by the Panasonic FZ300.
Review summary: Leica V-LUX 3 vs Panasonic FZ200
So what conclusions can be drawn? Is the Leica V-LUX 3 better than the Panasonic FZ200 or vice versa? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.
Arguments in favor of the Leica V-LUX 3:
- More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale price.
- More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in December 2011).
Advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200:
- More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (1312k vs 202k dots).
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (4000/sec vs 2000/sec) to freeze action.
- Longer lasting: Gets more shots (540 versus 410) out of a single battery charge.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (37 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Was introduced somewhat (7 months) more recently.
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the FZ200 emerges as the winner of the match-up (5 : 2 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras is instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the handling experience and imaging performance when actually working with the V-LUX 3 or the FZ200. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate. This is why expert reviews are important. The following table reports the overall rankings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). You can find the full text of the reviews by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
|Leica V-LUX 3 (⇒ rgt)||-||-||-||-||-||2011||949||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ200 (⇒ lft)||HiRec||80/100 Gold||4.5/5||4.5/5||4.5/5||2012||599||discont.||check|
|Canon SX60 (⇒ lft | rgt)||HiRec||75/100||4/5||-||4.5/5||2014||549||latest||check|
|Canon G1 X Mark II (⇒ lft | rgt)||Rec||77/100 Silver||4/5||4/5||4.5/5||2014||799||latest||check|
|Canon G1 X (⇒ lft | rgt)||79/100 Rec||76/100 Silver||4/5||4/5||4.5/5||2012||799||discont.||check|
|Canon SX50 (⇒ lft | rgt)||HiRec||72/100||4.5/5||-||4.5/5||2012||429||discont.||check|
|Fujifilm X100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||-||75/100 Silver||4/5||4/5||5/5||2010||1,199||discont.||check|
|Leica D-LUX 6 (⇒ lft | rgt)||-||-||4/5||-||4/5||2012||699||discont.||check|
|Leica V-LUX 4 (⇒ lft | rgt)||-||-||-||-||-||2012||949||discont.||check|
|Leica D-LUX 5 (⇒ lft | rgt)||-||-||4.5/5||-||4/5||2010||699||discont.||check|
|Leica V-LUX 2 (⇒ lft | rgt)||-||-||-||-||-||2010||849||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ300 (⇒ lft | rgt)||HiRec||-||4.5/5||4.5/5||4.5/5||2015||599||latest||check|
|Panasonic LX7 (⇒ lft | rgt)||HiRec||75/100 Silver||4/5||5/5||4.5/5||2012||499||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ150 (⇒ lft | rgt)||HiRec||76/100 Silver||4/5||5/5||4.5/5||2011||499||discont.||check|
|Panasonic FZ100 (⇒ lft | rgt)||84/100 Rec||-||4.5/5||-||4.5/5||2010||499||discont.||check|
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored. If you cannot find the camera you are interested in, please contact me, and I will try to update the database with the necessary infos.
- Canon 1300D vs Fujifilm X10
- Kodak S-1 vs Sony A7 III
- Nikon D1 vs Leica X-U Typ 113
- Nikon D300 vs Fujifilm X-E2S
- Nikon D5500 vs Nikon D3400
- Nikon D850 vs Panasonic FZ300
- Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus E-M10
- Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7 III
- Panasonic GX8 vs Sony A850
- Panasonic GX9 vs Nikon D750
- Sony A850 vs Nikon D610
- Sony RX100 IV vs Panasonic GX1