Leica M10-P vs Pentax K-S2
The Leica M10-P and the Pentax K-S2 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in August 2018 and February 2015. The M10-P is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera, while the K-S2 is a DSLR. The cameras are based on a full frame (M10-P) and an APS-C (K-S2) sensor. The Leica has a resolution of 23.8 megapixels, whereas the Pentax provides 20 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Leica M10-P and the Pentax K-S2? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Leica M10-P and the Pentax K-S2 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The M10-P can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the K-S2 is available in six color-versions (black, grey, pink, orange, green, white).



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Leica M10-P and the Pentax K-S2 are of equal size. However, the K-S2 is slightly heavier (3 percent) than the M10-P. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.
The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life |
Weather Sealing |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) | Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Leica M10-P | 139 mm | 80 mm | 39 mm | 660 g | 210 | Y | Aug 2018 | 7,995 | ||
2. | Pentax K-S2 | 123 mm | 91 mm | 73 mm | 678 g | 410 | Y | Feb 2015 | 749 | ||
3. | Leica M10-R | 139 mm | 80 mm | 39 mm | 660 g | 210 | Y | Jul 2020 | 8,295 | ||
4. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Jun 2019 | 3,999 | ||
5. | Leica CL | 131 mm | 78 mm | 45 mm | 403 g | 220 | n | Nov 2017 | 2,795 | ||
6. | Leica M10 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 39 mm | 660 g | 210 | Y | Jan 2017 | 6,595 | ||
7. | Leica TL2 | 134 mm | 69 mm | 33 mm | 399 g | 250 | n | Jul 2017 | 1,950 | ||
8. | Leica M Typ 262 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Nov 2015 | 5,195 | ||
9. | Leica Q Typ 116 | 130 mm | 80 mm | 93 mm | 640 g | 300 | n | Jun 2015 | 4,249 | ||
10. | Leica M Typ 240 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | ||
11. | Leica M9 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 37 mm | 585 g | .. | n | Sep 2009 | 7,999 | ||
12. | Leica M8 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 37 mm | 591 g | .. | n | Sep 2006 | 5,499 | ||
13. | Pentax KP | 132 mm | 101 mm | 76 mm | 703 g | 390 | Y | Jan 2017 | 1,099 | ||
14. | Pentax K-70 | 126 mm | 93 mm | 74 mm | 688 g | 410 | Y | Jun 2016 | 649 | ||
15. | Pentax K-3 II | 131 mm | 100 mm | 77 mm | 800 g | 720 | Y | Apr 2015 | 1,099 | ||
16. | Pentax K-S1 | 121 mm | 93 mm | 70 mm | 558 g | 410 | n | Aug 2014 | 749 | ||
17. | Pentax K-3 | 131 mm | 100 mm | 77 mm | 800 g | 560 | Y | Oct 2013 | 1,299 | ||
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. | |||||||||||
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The K-S2 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 91 percent) than the M10-P, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Leica M10-P features a full frame sensor and the Pentax K-S2 an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the K-S2 is 57 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.0 and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 23.8MP, the M10-P offers a higher resolution than the K-S2 (20MP), but the M10-P nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 6.00μm versus 4.28μm for the K-S2) due to its larger sensor. Moreover, the M10-P is a much more recent model (by 3 years and 6 months) than the K-S2, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Leica M10-P implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the M10-P for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 29.8 x 20 inches or 75.6 x 50.7 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 23.8 x 16 inches or 60.5 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 19.8 x 13.3 inches or 50.4 x 33.8 cm. The corresponding values for the Pentax K-S2 are 27.4 x 18.2 inches or 69.5 x 46.3 cm for good quality, 21.9 x 14.6 inches or 55.6 x 37.1 cm for very good quality, and 18.2 x 12.2 inches or 46.3 x 30.9 cm for excellent quality prints.
The Leica M10-P has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 50000. The corresponding ISO settings for the Pentax K-S2 are ISO 100 to ISO 51200 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports | DXO Overall |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Leica M10-P | Full Frame | 23.8 | 5952 | 3992 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
2. | Pentax K-S2 | APS-C | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
3. | Leica M10-R | Full Frame | 40.9 | 7864 | 5200 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
4. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
5. | Leica CL | APS-C | 24.1 | 6014 | 4014 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
6. | Leica M10 | Full Frame | 23.8 | 5952 | 3992 | none | 24.4 | 13.2 | 2133 | 86 | |
7. | Leica TL2 | APS-C | 24.1 | 6014 | 4014 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
8. | Leica M Typ 262 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
9. | Leica Q Typ 116 | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.3 | 12.7 | 2221 | 85 | |
10. | Leica M Typ 240 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | 24.0 | 13.3 | 1860 | 84 | |
11. | Leica M9 | Full Frame | 18.1 | 5212 | 3472 | none | 22.5 | 11.7 | 884 | 69 | |
12. | Leica M8 | APS-H | 10.4 | 3936 | 2630 | none | 21.1 | 11.3 | 663 | 59 | |
13. | Pentax KP | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/60i | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
14. | Pentax K-70 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60i | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
15. | Pentax K-3 II | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/60i | 23.6 | 13.6 | 1106 | 80 | |
16. | Pentax K-S1 | APS-C | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/30p | 23.5 | 13.0 | 1061 | 78 | |
17. | Pentax K-3 | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/60i | 23.7 | 13.4 | 1216 | 80 |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The K-S2 indeed provides for movie recording, while the M10-P does not. The highest resolution format that the K-S2 can use is 1080/30p.
Feature comparison
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The M10-P and the K-S2 are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same field of view (100%), but the viewfinder of the M10-P has a higher magnification than the one of the K-S2 (0.73x vs 0.63x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Leica M10-P, the Pentax K-S2, and comparable cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution (000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) | Built-in Flash (yes/no) | Built-in Image Stab |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Leica M10-P | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
2. | Pentax K-S2 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 1/6000s | 5.4 | Y | Y | |
3. | Leica M10-R | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 4.5 | n | n | |
4. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
5. | Leica CL | 2360 | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | |
6. | Leica M10 | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
7. | Leica TL2 | optional | n | 3.7 | 1230 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 7.0 | n | n | |
8. | Leica M Typ 262 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
9. | Leica Q Typ 116 | 3680 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/2000s | 10.0 | n | Y | |
10. | Leica M Typ 240 | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
11. | Leica M9 | optical | n | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 2.0 | n | n | |
12. | Leica M8 | optical | n | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 2.0 | n | n | |
13. | Pentax KP | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | tilting | n | 1/6000s | 7.0 | Y | Y | |
14. | Pentax K-70 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 1/6000s | 6.0 | Y | Y | |
15. | Pentax K-3 II | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | n | Y | |
16. | Pentax K-S1 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/6000s | 5.4 | Y | Y | |
17. | Pentax K-3 | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | Y | Y |
One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The M10-P has a touchscreen, while the K-S2 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.
The K-S2 has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing. This characteristic will be appreciated by vloggers and photographers who are interested in taking selfies. In contrast, the M10-P does not have a selfie-screen.The Leica M10-P and the Pentax K-S2 both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the M10-P and the K-S2 write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Leica M10-P and Pentax K-S2 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Port |
WiFi Support | NFC Support | Bluetooth Support |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Leica M10-P | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
2. | Pentax K-S2 | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
3. | Leica M10-R | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
4. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | Y | mono | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
5. | Leica CL | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
6. | Leica M10 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
7. | Leica TL2 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 3.0 | Y | - | - | |
8. | Leica M Typ 262 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
9. | Leica Q Typ 116 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
10. | Leica M Typ 240 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
11. | Leica M9 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
12. | Leica M8 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
13. | Pentax KP | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | - | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
14. | Pentax K-70 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
15. | Pentax K-3 II | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
16. | Pentax K-S1 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
17. | Pentax K-3 | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - |
Both the M10-P and the K-S2 are recent models that are part of the current product line-up. The K-S2 replaced the earlier Pentax K-S1, while the M10-P followed on from the Leica M9-P. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Leica and Pentax websites.
Review summary
So what is the bottom line? Is there a clear favorite between the Leica M10-P and the Pentax K-S2? Which camera is better? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Reasons to prefer the Leica M10-P:
- More detail: Offers more megapixels (23.8 vs 20MP) with a 9% higher linear resolution.
- Better image quality: Features a larger and more technologically advanced imaging sensor.
- Richer colors: The sensor size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Larger sensor captures a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Larger sensor produces good images even in poorly lit environments.
- Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.73x vs 0.63x).
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1037k vs 921k dots).
- Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
- More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale price.
- More modern: Reflects 3 years and 6 months of technical progress since the K-S2 launch.

Arguments in favor of the Pentax K-S2:
- Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 1080/30p video.
- More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
- More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/6000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
- Longer lasting: Gets more shots (410 versus 210) out of a single battery charge.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (91 percent cheaper at launch).
- More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in February 2015).
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the match-up finishes in a tie (10 points each). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the M10-P and the K-S2 in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.
Expert reviews
This is where reviews by experts come in. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
AP score |
CL score |
DPR score |
EPZ score |
PB score |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Leica M10-P | .. | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Aug 2018 | 7,995 | ||
2. | Pentax K-S2 | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 749 | ||
3. | Leica M10-R | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Jul 2020 | 8,295 | ||
4. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | Jun 2019 | 3,999 | ||
5. | Leica CL | .. | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Nov 2017 | 2,795 | ||
6. | Leica M10 | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 6,595 | ||
7. | Leica TL2 | 3.5/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | 4/5 | Jul 2017 | 1,950 | ||
8. | Leica M Typ 262 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | Nov 2015 | 5,195 | ||
9. | Leica Q Typ 116 | 5/5 | .. | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2015 | 4,249 | ||
10. | Leica M Typ 240 | 4/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | .. | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | ||
11. | Leica M9 | .. | .. | .. | 4.5/5 | .. | Sep 2009 | 7,999 | ||
12. | Leica M8 | .. | .. | + + | .. | .. | Sep 2006 | 5,499 | ||
13. | Pentax KP | 4/5 | .. | 82/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 1,099 | ||
14. | Pentax K-70 | 4.5/5 | .. | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2016 | 649 | ||
15. | Pentax K-3 II | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | 5/5 | 5/5 | Apr 2015 | 1,099 | ||
16. | Pentax K-S1 | 4/5 | .. | .. | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Aug 2014 | 749 | ||
17. | Pentax K-3 | 4/5 | .. | 83/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Oct 2013 | 1,299 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available. |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Check Amazon price Pentax K-S2:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just make your choice using the following search menu. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
Specifications: Leica M10-P vs Pentax K-S2
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Leica M10-P | Pentax K-S2 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Rangefinder camera | Digital single lens reflex |
Camera Lens | Leica M mount lenses | Pentax K mount lenses |
Launch Date | August 2018 | February 2015 |
Launch Price | USD 7,995 | USD 749 |
Sensor Specs | Leica M10-P | Pentax K-S2 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | Full Frame Sensor | APS-C Sensor |
Sensor Size | 35.8 x 23.9 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
Sensor Area | 855.62 mm2 | 366.6 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 43 mm | 28.2 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.0x | 1.5x |
Sensor Resolution | 23.8 Megapixels | 20 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 5952 x 3992 pixels | 5472 x 3648 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 6.00 μm | 4.28 μm |
Pixel Density | 2.78 MP/cm2 | 5.45 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | no AA filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | 1080/30p Video |
ISO Setting | 100 - 50,000 ISO | 100 - 51,200 ISO |
Image Processor | Maestro II | PRIME MII |
Screen Specs | Leica M10-P | Pentax K-S2 |
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.73x | 0.63x |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0inch | 3.0inch |
LCD Resolution | 1037k dots | 921k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Swivel screen |
Touch Input | Touchscreen | no Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | Leica M10-P | Pentax K-S2 |
Focus System | Manual Focus | Phase-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | Focus Peaking | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous Shooting | 5 shutter flaps/s | 5.4 shutter flaps/s |
Time-Lapse Photography | Intervalometer built-in | Intervalometer built-in |
Image Stabilization | no shake reduction | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
UHS card support | UHS-I | UHS-I |
Connectivity Specs | Leica M10-P | Pentax K-S2 |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | no USB | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | micro HDMI |
Microphone Port | no MIC socket | External MIC port |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | no NFC | NFC built-in |
Body Specs | Leica M10-P | Pentax K-S2 |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | BP-SCL5 | D-LI109 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 210 shots per charge | 410 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
139 x 80 x 39 mm (5.5 x 3.1 x 1.5 in) |
123 x 91 x 73 mm (4.8 x 3.6 x 2.9 in) |
Camera Weight | 660 g (23.3 oz) | 678 g (23.9 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.