Canon G9 X vs Leica M10-P
The Canon PowerShot G9 X and the Leica M10-P are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in October 2015 and August 2018. The G9X is a fixed lens compact, while the M10-P is a rangefinder-style mirrorless. The cameras are based on an one-inch (G9X) and a full frame (M10-P) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 20 megapixels, whereas the Leica provides 23.8 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot G9 X and the Leica M10-P? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon G9 X and the Leica M10-P is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
Both cameras are available in two different colors (black, silver).



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Leica M10-P is considerably larger (96 percent) than the Canon G9 X. It is noteworthy in this context that the M10-P is splash and dust-proof, while the G9X does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the G9X has a lens built in, whereas the M10-P is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the M10-P and their specifications in the Leica M Lens Catalog.
The power pack in the G9X can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.
The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life |
Weather Sealing |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) | Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G9 X | 98 mm | 58 mm | 31 mm | 209 g | 220 | n | Oct 2015 | 529 | ||
2. | Leica M10-P | 139 mm | 80 mm | 39 mm | 660 g | 210 | Y | Aug 2018 | 7,995 | ||
3. | Canon G9 X Mark II | 98 mm | 58 mm | 31 mm | 206 g | 235 | n | Jan 2017 | 529 | ||
4. | Canon G7 X Mark II | 106 mm | 61 mm | 42 mm | 319 g | 265 | n | Feb 2016 | 699 | ||
5. | Canon M10 | 108 mm | 67 mm | 35 mm | 301 g | 255 | n | Oct 2015 | 499 | ||
6. | Canon G7 X | 103 mm | 60 mm | 40 mm | 304 g | 210 | n | Sep 2014 | 699 | ||
7. | Leica M10-R | 139 mm | 80 mm | 39 mm | 660 g | 210 | Y | Jul 2020 | 8,295 | ||
8. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Jun 2019 | 3,999 | ||
9. | Leica M10 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 39 mm | 660 g | 210 | Y | Jan 2017 | 6,595 | ||
10. | Leica M Typ 262 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Nov 2015 | 5,195 | ||
11. | Leica M Typ 240 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | ||
12. | Nikon 1 J4 | 100 mm | 60 mm | 29 mm | 232 g | 300 | n | Apr 2014 | 549 | ||
13. | Panasonic FZ1000 | 137 mm | 99 mm | 131 mm | 831 g | 360 | n | Jun 2014 | 899 | ||
14. | Sony RX100 V | 102 mm | 58 mm | 41 mm | 299 g | 220 | n | Oct 2016 | 999 | ||
15. | Sony RX100 IV | 102 mm | 58 mm | 41 mm | 298 g | 280 | n | Jun 2015 | 999 | ||
16. | Sony RX100 III | 102 mm | 58 mm | 41 mm | 290 g | 320 | n | May 2014 | 799 | ||
17. | Sony RX100 | 102 mm | 58 mm | 36 mm | 240 g | 330 | n | Jun 2012 | 649 | ||
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. | |||||||||||
Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The G9X was launched at a lower price than the M10-P, despite having a lens built in. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon G9 X features an one-inch sensor and the Leica M10-P a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the M10-P is 638 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 2.7 and 1.0. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 23.8MP, the M10-P offers a higher resolution than the G9X (20MP), but the M10-P nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 6.00μm versus 2.41μm for the G9X) due to its larger sensor. Moreover, the M10-P is a much more recent model (by 2 years and 10 months) than the G9X, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the M10-P has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Leica M10-P implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the M10-P for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 29.8 x 20 inches or 75.6 x 50.7 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 23.8 x 16 inches or 60.5 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 19.8 x 13.3 inches or 50.4 x 33.8 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon G9 X are 27.4 x 18.2 inches or 69.5 x 46.3 cm for good quality, 21.9 x 14.6 inches or 55.6 x 37.1 cm for very good quality, and 18.2 x 12.2 inches or 46.3 x 30.9 cm for excellent quality prints.
The Canon PowerShot G9 X has a native sensitivity range from ISO 125 to ISO 12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Leica M10-P are ISO 100 to ISO 50000 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports | DXO Overall |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G9 X | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.5 | 12.3 | 495 | 63 | |
2. | Leica M10-P | Full Frame | 23.8 | 5952 | 3992 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
3. | Canon G9 X Mark II | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.9 | 12.5 | 522 | 65 | |
4. | Canon G7 X Mark II | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
5. | Canon M10 | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 22.2 | 11.4 | 753 | 65 | |
6. | Canon G7 X | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 23.0 | 12.7 | 556 | 71 | |
7. | Leica M10-R | Full Frame | 40.9 | 7864 | 5200 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
8. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
9. | Leica M10 | Full Frame | 23.8 | 5952 | 3992 | none | 24.4 | 13.2 | 2133 | 86 | |
10. | Leica M Typ 262 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
11. | Leica M Typ 240 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | 24.0 | 13.3 | 1860 | 84 | |
12. | Nikon 1 J4 | 1-inch | 18.2 | 5232 | 3488 | 1080/60p | 20.8 | 10.7 | 426 | 53 | |
13. | Panasonic FZ1000 | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.1 | 11.7 | 517 | 64 | |
14. | Sony RX100 V | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.8 | 12.4 | 586 | 70 | |
15. | Sony RX100 IV | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.8 | 12.6 | 591 | 70 | |
16. | Sony RX100 III | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 22.4 | 12.3 | 495 | 67 | |
17. | Sony RX100 | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 22.6 | 12.4 | 390 | 66 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The G9X indeed provides movie recording capabilities, while the M10-P does not. The highest resolution format that the G9X can use is 1080/60p.
Feature comparison
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the M10-P has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the G9X relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon G9 X and Leica M10-P along with similar information for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution (000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) | Built-in Flash (yes/no) | Built-in Image Stab |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G9 X | none | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/2000s | 6.0 | Y | Y | |
2. | Leica M10-P | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
3. | Canon G9 X Mark II | none | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/2000s | 8.2 | Y | Y | |
4. | Canon G7 X Mark II | none | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/2000s | 8.0 | Y | Y | |
5. | Canon M10 | none | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 4.6 | Y | n | |
6. | Canon G7 X | none | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/2000s | 6.5 | Y | Y | |
7. | Leica M10-R | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 4.5 | n | n | |
8. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
9. | Leica M10 | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
10. | Leica M Typ 262 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
11. | Leica M Typ 240 | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
12. | Nikon 1 J4 | none | n | 3.0 | 1037 | Fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 60.0 | Y | n | |
13. | Panasonic FZ1000 | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 1/4000s | 12.0 | Y | Y | |
14. | Sony RX100 V | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 1/2000s | 24.0 | Y | Y | |
15. | Sony RX100 IV | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 1228 | tilting | n | 1/2000s | 16.0 | Y | Y | |
16. | Sony RX100 III | 1440 | n | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | |
17. | Sony RX100 | none | n | 3.0 | 1229 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y |
One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The G9X has one, while the M10-P does not. While the built-in flash of the G9X is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.
The Canon G9 X and the Leica M10-P both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the G9X and the M10-P write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot G9 X and Leica M10-P and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Port |
WiFi Support | NFC Support | Bluetooth Support |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G9 X | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
2. | Leica M10-P | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
3. | Canon G9 X Mark II | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | |
4. | Canon G7 X Mark II | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
5. | Canon M10 | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
6. | Canon G7 X | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
7. | Leica M10-R | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
8. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | Y | mono | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
9. | Leica M10 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | |
10. | Leica M Typ 262 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
11. | Leica M Typ 240 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
12. | Nikon 1 J4 | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
13. | Panasonic FZ1000 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
14. | Sony RX100 V | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
15. | Sony RX100 IV | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
16. | Sony RX100 III | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
17. | Sony RX100 | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - |
It is notable that the M10-P has a hotshoe, which makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun. The G9X does not feature such an accessory-socket.
The M10-P is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Leica. In contrast, the G9X has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the G9X was succeeded by the Canon G9 X Mark II. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Leica websites.
Review summary
So what is the bottom line? Which of the two cameras – the Canon G9 X or the Leica M10-P – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot G9 X:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Broader imaging potential: Can record not only still images but also 1080/60p movies.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (6 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Ready to shoot: Has a lens built-in, whereas the M10-P requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (98x58mm vs 139x80mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
- Less heavy: Is lighter even though it comes with a built-in lens (unlike the M10-P).
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- Sharper images: Has hand-shake reducing image stabilization built-in.
- Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in October 2015).

Arguments in favor of the Leica M10-P:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (23.8 vs 20MP), which boosts linear resolution by 9%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Better image quality: Is equipped with a larger and more technologically advanced sensor.
- Richer colors: The sensor size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Larger sensor captures a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Larger sensor produces good images even in poorly lit environments.
- Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/4000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Takes interchangeable lenses and can thus be used with different optics.
- Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
- Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
- More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale value.
- More modern: Reflects 2 years and 10 months of technical progress since the G9X launch.
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the M10-P comes out slightly ahead of the G9X (13 : 12 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional sports photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a street photog, and a person interested in family portraits has distinct needs from a landscape shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the G9X or the M10-P. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.
Expert reviews
This is where reviews by experts come in. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
AP score |
CL score |
DPR score |
EPZ score |
PB score |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G9 X | 3.5/5 | + + | .. | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2015 | 529 | ||
2. | Leica M10-P | .. | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Aug 2018 | 7,995 | ||
3. | Canon G9 X Mark II | 4/5 | .. | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 529 | ||
4. | Canon G7 X Mark II | 4.5/5 | + + | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 699 | ||
5. | Canon M10 | .. | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Oct 2015 | 499 | ||
6. | Canon G7 X | 4/5 | + + | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2014 | 699 | ||
7. | Leica M10-R | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Jul 2020 | 8,295 | ||
8. | Leica M-E Typ 240 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | Jun 2019 | 3,999 | ||
9. | Leica M10 | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 6,595 | ||
10. | Leica M Typ 262 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | Nov 2015 | 5,195 | ||
11. | Leica M Typ 240 | 4/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | .. | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | ||
12. | Nikon 1 J4 | 3/5 | .. | .. | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Apr 2014 | 549 | ||
13. | Panasonic FZ1000 | 4/5 | + + | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2014 | 899 | ||
14. | Sony RX100 V | 4.5/5 | + + | 83/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2016 | 999 | ||
15. | Sony RX100 IV | 4.5/5 | + + | 85/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2015 | 999 | ||
16. | Sony RX100 III | 5/5 | + + | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | May 2014 | 799 | ||
17. | Sony RX100 | 5/5 | + + | 78/100 | 4/5 | 5/5 | Jun 2012 | 649 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available. |
The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Ebay offers Leica M10-P:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.
Specifications: Canon G9 X vs Leica M10-P
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Canon G9 X | Leica M10-P |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Fixed lens compact camera | Rangefinder camera |
Camera Lens | 28-84mm f/2.0-4.9 | Leica M mount lenses |
Launch Date | October 2015 | August 2018 |
Launch Price | USD 529 | USD 7,995 |
Sensor Specs | Canon G9 X | Leica M10-P |
Sensor Technology | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | 1" Sensor | Full Frame Sensor |
Sensor Size | 13.2 x 8.8 mm | 35.8 x 23.9 mm |
Sensor Area | 116.16 mm2 | 855.62 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 15.9 mm | 43 mm |
Crop Factor | 2.7x | 1.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 20 Megapixels | 23.8 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 5472 x 3648 pixels | 5952 x 3992 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 2.41 μm | 6.00 μm |
Pixel Density | 17.18 MP/cm2 | 2.78 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/60p Video | no Video |
ISO Setting | 125 - 12,800 ISO | 100 - 50,000 ISO |
Image Processor | DIGIC 6 | Maestro II |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 63 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 21.5 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 12.3 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 495 | .. |
Screen Specs | Canon G9 X | Leica M10-P |
Viewfinder Type | no viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.73x | |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0inch | 3.0inch |
LCD Resolution | 1040k dots | 1037k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fixed screen |
Touch Input | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | Canon G9 X | Leica M10-P |
Focus System | Contrast-detect AF | Manual Focus |
Manual Focusing Aid | Focus Peaking | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous Shooting | 6 shutter flaps/s | 5 shutter flaps/s |
Time-Lapse Photography | Intervalometer built-in | Intervalometer built-in |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | no On-Board Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
UHS card support | UHS-I | UHS-I |
Connectivity Specs | Canon G9 X | Leica M10-P |
External Flash | no Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | no USB |
HDMI Port | micro HDMI | no HDMI |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | NFC built-in | no NFC |
Body Specs | Canon G9 X | Leica M10-P |
Environmental Sealing | not weather sealed | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | NB-13L | BP-SCL5 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 220 shots per charge | 210 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | USB charging | no USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
98 x 58 x 31 mm (3.9 x 2.3 x 1.2 in) |
139 x 80 x 39 mm (5.5 x 3.1 x 1.5 in) |
Camera Weight | 209 g (7.4 oz) | 660 g (23.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.