Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II and the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in February 2014 and February 2016. Both the G1X Mark II and the G7X Mark II are fixed lens compact cameras that are based on an 1.5-inch (G1X Mark II) and an one-inch (G7X Mark II) sensor. The G1X Mark II has a resolution of 13 megapixels, whereas the G7X Mark II provides 20 MP. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon G1 X Mark II | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Fixed lens compact camera | Fixed lens compact camera | |
24-120mm f/2.0-3.9 | 24-100mm f/1.8-2.8 | |
13 MP, 1.5" Sensor | 20 MP, 1" Sensor | |
1080/30p Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 100-12800 | ISO 125-12800 (125-25600) | |
Viewfinder optional | No viewfinder, LCD framing | |
3.0" LCD, 1040k dots | 3.0" LCD, 1040k dots | |
Tilting touchscreen | Tilting touchscreen | |
5.2 shutter flaps per second | 8 shutter flaps per second | |
240 shots per battery charge | 265 shots per battery charge | |
116 x 74 x 66 mm, 553 g | 106 x 61 x 42 mm, 319 g |
Body comparison: Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
The physical size and weight of the Canon G1 X Mark II and the Canon G7 X Mark II are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon G7 X Mark II is notably smaller (25 percent) than the Canon G1 X Mark II. Moreover, the G7X Mark II is substantially lighter (42 percent) than the G1X Mark II. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the G1X Mark II nor the G7X Mark II are weather-sealed.
Concerning battery life, the G1X Mark II gets 240 shots out of its NB-12L battery, while the G7X Mark II can take 265 images on a single charge of its NB-13L power pack. The power pack in the G7X Mark II can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, just click on the right or left arrow next to the camera that you would like to inspect. Alternatively, you can also use the CAM-parator to select your camera combination among a larger number of options.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon G1 X Mark II» | 4.6 in | 2.9 in | 2.6 in | 19.5 oz | 240 | n | Feb 2014 | 799 | Canon G1 X Mark II | |||
Canon G7 X Mark II« | 4.2 in | 2.4 in | 1.7 in | 11.3 oz | 265 | n | Feb 2016 | 699 | Canon G7 X Mark II | |||
Canon G5 X« » | 4.4 in | 3.0 in | 1.7 in | 12.5 oz | 210 | n | Oct 2015 | 799 | Canon G5 X | |||
Canon G9 X« » | 3.9 in | 2.3 in | 1.2 in | 7.4 oz | 220 | n | Oct 2015 | 529 | - | Canon G9 X | ||
Canon M3« » | 4.4 in | 2.7 in | 1.7 in | 12.9 oz | 250 | n | Feb 2015 | 679 | - | Canon M3 | ||
Canon T6i« » | 5.2 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 19.6 oz | 440 | n | Feb 2015 | 749 | - | Canon T6i | ||
Canon T6s« » | 5.2 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 19.9 oz | 440 | n | Feb 2015 | 849 | - | Canon T6s | ||
Canon XC10« » | 4.9 in | 4.0 in | 4.8 in | 36.7 oz | .. | n | Apr 2015 | 2,499 | - | Canon XC10 | ||
Canon G7 X« » | 4.1 in | 2.4 in | 1.6 in | 10.7 oz | 210 | n | Sep 2014 | 699 | - | Canon G7 X | ||
Canon SX60« » | 5.0 in | 3.7 in | 4.5 in | 22.9 oz | 340 | n | Sep 2014 | 549 | - | Canon SX60 | ||
Canon G16« » | 4.3 in | 3.0 in | 1.6 in | 12.6 oz | 360 | n | Aug 2013 | 549 | Canon G16 | |||
Canon G1 X« » | 4.6 in | 3.2 in | 2.6 in | 18.8 oz | 250 | n | Jan 2012 | 799 | - | Canon G1 X | ||
Canon T1i« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 2.4 in | 18.3 oz | 400 | n | Mar 2009 | 799 | - | Canon T1i | ||
Canon XSi« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 2.4 in | 18.5 oz | 500 | n | Jan 2008 | 799 | - | Canon XSi | ||
Panasonic LX100« » | 4.5 in | 2.6 in | 2.2 in | 13.9 oz | 300 | n | Sep 2014 | 899 | Panasonic LX100 | |||
Sony RX100 IV« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.6 in | 10.5 oz | 280 | n | Jun 2015 | 999 | - | Sony RX100 IV | ||
Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The G7X Mark II was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 13 percent) than the G1X Mark II, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison: Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon G1 X Mark II features an 1.5-inch sensor and the Canon G7 X Mark II an one-inch sensor. The sensor area in the G7X Mark II is 56 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.85 and 2.7. The sensor in the G1X Mark II has a native 4:3 aspect ratio, while the one in the G7X Mark II offers a 3:2 aspect.
Technology-wise, the G7X Mark II uses a more advanced image processing engine (DIGIC 7) than the G1X Mark II (DIGIC 6), with benefits for noise reduction, color accuracy, and processing speed.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the G7X Mark II offers a higher resolution of 20 megapixels, compared with 13 MP of the G1X Mark II. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 2.41μm versus 4.49μm for the G1X Mark II). However, it should be noted that the G7X Mark II is much more recent (by 2 years) than the G1X Mark II, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently.
The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800 The corresponding ISO settings for the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II are ISO 125 to ISO 12800, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 125-25600..

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon G1 X Mark II» | 1.5-inch | 13.0 | 4160 | 3120 | 1080/30p | 21.5 | 10.8 | 581 | 58 | Canon G1 X Mark II | |
Canon G7 X Mark II« | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Canon G5 X« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Canon G5 X | |
Canon G9 X« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.5 | 12.3 | 495 | 63 | Canon G9 X | |
Canon M3« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 11.8 | 1169 | 72 | Canon M3 | |
Canon T6i« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 22.7 | 12.0 | 919 | 71 | Canon T6i | |
Canon T6s« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 12.0 | 915 | 70 | Canon T6s | |
Canon XC10« » | 1-inch | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Canon XC10 | |
Canon G7 X« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 23.0 | 12.7 | 556 | 71 | Canon G7 X | |
Canon SX60« » | 1/2.3 | 14.2 | 4608 | 3072 | 1080/60p | 19.2 | 10.8 | 127 | 39 | Canon SX60 | |
Canon G16« » | 1/1.7 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/60p | 21.0 | 11.7 | 230 | 54 | Canon G16 | |
Canon G1 X« » | 1.5-inch | 14.2 | 4352 | 3264 | 1080/24p | 21.7 | 10.8 | 644 | 60 | Canon G1 X | |
Canon T1i« » | APS-C | 15.1 | 4752 | 3168 | 1080/20p | 21.7 | 11.5 | 663 | 63 | Canon T1i | |
Canon XSi« » | APS-C | 12.2 | 4272 | 2848 | - | 21.9 | 10.8 | 692 | 61 | Canon XSi | |
Panasonic LX100« » | Four Thirds | 12.7 | 4112 | 3088 | 4K/30p | 22.3 | 12.5 | 553 | 67 | Panasonic LX100 | |
Sony RX100 IV« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.8 | 12.6 | 591 | 70 | Sony RX100 IV |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the G7X Mark II provides a faster frame rate than the G1X Mark II. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the G1X Mark II is limited to 1080/30p.
Feature comparison: Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The G1X Mark II and the G7X Mark II are similar in the sense that neither of the two has a viewfinder. The images are, thus, framed using live view on the rear LCD. That said, the G1X Mark II can be equipped with an optional viewfinder – the EVF-DC1. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon G1 X Mark II and Canon G7 X Mark II in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon G1 X Mark II» | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 5.2 | Y | Y | Canon G1 X Mark II | |
Canon G7 X Mark II« | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 8.0 | Y | Y | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Canon G5 X« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 2000 | 5.9 | Y | Y | Canon G5 X | |
Canon G9 X« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 2000 | 6.0 | Y | Y | Canon G9 X | |
Canon M3« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 4000 | 4.2 | Y | n | Canon M3 | |
Canon T6i« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon T6i | |
Canon T6s« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Canon T6s | |
Canon XC10« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1030 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 3.8 | n | Y | Canon XC10 | |
Canon G7 X« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 6.5 | Y | Y | Canon G7 X | |
Canon SX60« » | 922 | n | 3.0 | 922 | swivel | n | 2000 | 6.4 | Y | Y | Canon SX60 | |
Canon G16« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 922 | fixed | n | 4000 | 2.2 | Y | Y | Canon G16 | |
Canon G1 X« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 922 | Swivel | n | 4000 | 1.9 | Y | Y | Canon G1 X | |
Canon T1i« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.4 | Y | n | Canon T1i | |
Canon XSi« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.5 | Y | n | Canon XSi | |
Panasonic LX100« » | 2764 | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 4000 | 11.0 | n | Y | Panasonic LX100 | |
Sony RX100 IV« » | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 1228 | tilting | n | 2000 | 16.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX100 IV |
Both the G1X Mark II and the G7X Mark II have zoom lenses built in. The G1X Mark II has a 24-120mm f/2.0-3.9 optic and the G7X Mark II offers a 24-100mm f/1.8-2.8 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the G1X Mark II and G7X Mark II provide the same view at the wide-angle end, but the G7X Mark II has less tele-photo reach at the long end. The G7X Mark II offers the faster maximum aperture.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the G1X Mark II and the G7X Mark II write their files to SDXC cards.
Connectivity comparison: Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon G1 X Mark II» | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G1 X Mark II | |
Canon G7 X Mark II« | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G7 X Mark II | |
Canon G5 X« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G5 X | |
Canon G9 X« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G9 X | |
Canon M3« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon M3 | |
Canon T6i« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon T6i | |
Canon T6s« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon T6s | |
Canon XC10« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon XC10 | |
Canon G7 X« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G7 X | |
Canon SX60« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon SX60 | |
Canon G16« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Canon G16 | |
Canon G1 X« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon G1 X | |
Canon T1i« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon T1i | |
Canon XSi« » | Y | - | - | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon XSi | |
Panasonic LX100« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Panasonic LX100 | |
Sony RX100 IV« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX100 IV |
It is notable that the G1X Mark II has a hotshoe, while the G7X Mark II does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.
Both the G1X Mark II and the G7X Mark II are recent models that feature in their makers' current product line-up. The G1X Mark II replaced the earlier Canon G1 X, while the G7X Mark II followed on from the Canon G7 X.
Review summary: Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
So what is the bottom line? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon G1 X Mark II and the Canon G7 X Mark II? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.
Advantages of the Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II:
- Better image quality: Features bigger pixels on a larger sensor for higher quality imaging.
- Richer colors: Larger pixels generate images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Capable of capturing a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can be used in poorly lit environments and still produce good images.
- More framing options: Can be equipped with a hotshoe-mounted accessory-viewfinder.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (4000/sec vs 2000/sec) to freeze action.
- More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
- Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in February 2014).
Reasons to prefer the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (20 vs 13MP), which boosts linear resolution by 26%.
- Better jpgs: Has a more modern image processing engine (DIGIC 7 vs DIGIC 6).
- Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (8 vs 5.2 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.0).
- More compact: Is smaller (106x61mm vs 116x74mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 234g or 42 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
- Longer lasting: Gets more shots (265 versus 240) out of a single battery charge.
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- More affordable: Was released into a lower priced segment (13 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Reflects 2 years of technical progress since the G1X Mark II launch.
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the G7X Mark II comes out slightly ahead of the G1X Mark II (10 : 9 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras is instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the G1X Mark II or the G7X Mark II handle or perform in practice. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews: Canon G1 X Mark II vs G7X Mark II
This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The table below summarizes the assessments of some of the best known camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). You can find the full text of the reviews by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon G1 X Mark II» | Rec | 77/100 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 799 | Canon G1 X Mark II | |||
Canon G7 X Mark II« | HiRec | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 699 | Canon G7 X Mark II | |||
Canon G5 X« » | HiRec | 78/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2015 | 799 | Canon G5 X | |||
Canon G9 X« » | HiRec | - | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2015 | 529 | - | Canon G9 X | ||
Canon M3« » | rev | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2015 | 679 | - | Canon M3 | ||
Canon T6i« » | - | 75/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 749 | - | Canon T6i | ||
Canon T6s« » | Rec | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 849 | - | Canon T6s | ||
Canon XC10« » | - | 80/100 | - | - | - | Apr 2015 | 2,499 | - | Canon XC10 | ||
Canon G7 X« » | HiRec | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2014 | 699 | - | Canon G7 X | ||
Canon SX60« » | HiRec | 75/100 | 4/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Sep 2014 | 549 | - | Canon SX60 | ||
Canon G16« » | Rec | - | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2013 | 549 | Canon G16 | |||
Canon G1 X« » | Rec | 76/100 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2012 | 799 | - | Canon G1 X | ||
Canon T1i« » | HiRec | 74/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2009 | 799 | - | Canon T1i | ||
Canon XSi« » | HiRec | HiRec | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2008 | 799 | - | Canon XSi | ||
Panasonic LX100« » | HiRec | 85/100 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2014 | 899 | Panasonic LX100 | |||
Sony RX100 IV« » | HiRec | 85/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2015 | 999 | - | Sony RX100 IV |
The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Amazon price Canon G7 X Mark II:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. An an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
- Canon 200D vs Sony A7 III
- Canon 5D Mark IV vs Olympus E-P1
- Canon 5D vs Fujifilm X-E2S
- Canon 77D vs Nikon D60
- Canon M50 vs Pentax K-3
- Fujifilm X-E2 vs Panasonic GH3
- Nikon D3400 vs Samsung NX1
- Nikon D610 vs Canon 750D
- Nikon W300 vs Panasonic TZ100
- Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-410
- Sony A900 vs Nikon D750
- Sony HX99 vs Sony NEX-7
Specifications: Canon G1 X Mark II vs Canon G7 X Mark II
Camera Model | Canon G1 X Mark II | Canon G7 X Mark II |
Camera Type | Fixed lens compact camera | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | 24-120mm f/2.0-3.9 | 24-100mm f/1.8-2.8 |
Launch Date | February 2014 | February 2016 |
Launch Price | USD 799 | USD 699 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Format | 1.5" Sensor | 1" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 18.7 x 14.0 mm | 13.2 x 14.0 mm |
Sensor Area | 261.8 mm2 | 116.16 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 23.4 mm | 15.9 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.85x | 2.7x |
Sensor Resolution | 13 Megapixels | 20 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 4160 x 3120 pixels | 5472 x 3648 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 4.49 μm | 2.41 μm |
Pixel Density | 4.96 MP/cm2 | 17.18 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | Anti-Alias filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/30p Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-12800 ISO | 125-12800 ISO |
ISO Boost | no Enhancement | 125-25600 ISO |
Image Processor | DIGIC 6 | DIGIC 7 |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 58 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 21.5 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 10.8 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 581 | .. |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Viewfinder optional | No viewfinder |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 1040k dots | 1040k dots |
LCD Attachment | Tilting screen | Tilting screen |
Touch Input | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Contrast-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous Shooting | 5.2 shutter flaps/s | 8 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | no Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | micro HDMI |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | NFC built-in | NFC built-in |
Body Specs | ||
Battery Type | NB-12L power pack | NB-13L power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 240 shots per charge | 265 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | no USB charging | USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
116 x 74 x 66 mm (4.6 x 2.9 x 2.6 in) |
106 x 61 x 42 mm (4.2 x 2.4 x 1.7 in) |
Camera Weight | 553 g (19.5 oz) | 319 g (11.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.