Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II and the Leica C-LUX are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in June 2015 and June 2018. Both the RX10 II and the C-LUX are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with an one-inch sensor. Both cameras offer a resolution of 20 megapixels. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Sony RX10 II | Leica C-LUX | |
Fixed lens compact camera | Fixed lens compact camera | |
24-200mm f/2.8 | 24-360mm f/3.3-6.4 | |
20 MP, 1" Sensor | 20 MP, 1" Sensor | |
4K/30p Video | 4K/30p Video | |
ISO 100-12800 (64-25600) | ISO 125-12800 (80-25600) | |
Electronic viewfinder (2359k dots) | Electronic viewfinder (2330k dots) | |
3.0" LCD, 1229k dots | 3.0" LCD, 1240k dots | |
Tilting screen (no touchscreen) | Fixed touchscreen | |
14 shutter flaps per second | 10 shutter flaps per second | |
Weathersealed body | Not weather sealed | |
400 shots per battery charge | 370 shots per battery charge | |
129 x 88 x 102 mm, 813 g | 113 x 67 x 46 mm, 340 g |
Body comparison: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
The physical size and weight of the Sony RX10 II and the Leica C-LUX are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Leica C-LUX is considerably smaller (33 percent) than the Sony RX10 II. Moreover, the C-LUX is substantially lighter (58 percent) than the RX10 II. It is worth mentioning in this context that the RX10 II is splash and dust resistant, while the C-LUX does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.
The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USB, which can be very convenient when travelling.
The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, just click on the right or left arrow next to the camera that you would like to inspect. Alternatively, you can also use the CAM-parator to select your camera combination among a larger number of options.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sony RX10 II» | 5.1 in | 3.5 in | 4.0 in | 28.7 oz | 400 | Y | Jun 2015 | 1,299 | - | Sony RX10 II | ||
Leica C-LUX« | 4.4 in | 2.6 in | 1.8 in | 12.0 oz | 370 | n | Jun 2018 | 1,049 | Leica C-LUX | |||
Canon 80D« » | 5.5 in | 4.1 in | 3.1 in | 25.8 oz | 960 | Y | Feb 2016 | 1,199 | Canon 80D | |||
Canon G3 X« » | 4.8 in | 3.0 in | 4.1 in | 25.9 oz | 300 | Y | Jun 2015 | 999 | Canon G3 X | |||
Leica D-LUX 7« » | 4.5 in | 2.6 in | 2.6 in | 13.8 oz | 300 | n | Nov 2018 | 1,195 | Leica D-LUX 7 | |||
Leica V-LUX Typ 114« » | 5.4 in | 3.9 in | 5.2 in | 29.3 oz | 360 | n | Sep 2014 | 1,349 | Leica V-LUX Typ 114 | |||
Panasonic FZ2500« » | 5.4 in | 4.0 in | 5.3 in | 32.3 oz | 350 | n | Sep 2016 | 1,199 | Panasonic FZ2500 | |||
Panasonic FZ1000« » | 5.4 in | 3.9 in | 5.2 in | 29.3 oz | 360 | n | Jun 2014 | 899 | - | Panasonic FZ1000 | ||
Sony RX100 VI« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.7 in | 10.6 oz | 240 | n | Jun 2018 | 1,199 | Sony RX100 VI | |||
Sony RX10 III« » | 5.2 in | 3.7 in | 5.0 in | 37.1 oz | 420 | Y | Mar 2016 | 1,499 | Sony RX10 III | |||
Sony RX100 V« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.6 in | 10.5 oz | 220 | n | Oct 2016 | 999 | Sony RX100 V | |||
Sony RX100 IV« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.6 in | 10.5 oz | 280 | n | Jun 2015 | 999 | - | Sony RX100 IV | ||
Sony RX100 III« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.6 in | 10.2 oz | 320 | n | May 2014 | 799 | - | Sony RX100 III | ||
Sony RX10« » | 5.1 in | 3.5 in | 4.0 in | 28.7 oz | 420 | Y | Oct 2013 | 1,299 | - | Sony RX10 | ||
Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The C-LUX was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 19 percent) than the RX10 II, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.
Both cameras under consideration feature an one-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 2.7. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the medium-sized sensor cameras that aim to strike a balance between image quality and portability. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

The two cameras under review do not only share the same sensor size, but also offer an identical resolution of 20 megapixels. This similarity in sensor specs implies that both the RX10 II and the C-LUX have the same pixel density, as well as the same pixel size. It should, however, be noted that the C-LUX is much more recent (by 3 years) than the RX10 II, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time.
The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 64-25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Leica C-LUX are ISO 125 to ISO 12800, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 80-25600..

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sony RX10 II» | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 23.0 | 12.6 | 531 | 70 | Sony RX10 II | |
Leica C-LUX« | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Leica C-LUX | |
Canon 80D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.2 | 1135 | 79 | Canon 80D | |
Canon G3 X« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 21.4 | 12.3 | 521 | 63 | Canon G3 X | |
Leica D-LUX 7« » | Four Thirds | 16.8 | 4736 | 3552 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Leica D-LUX 7 | |
Leica V-LUX Typ 114« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Leica V-LUX Typ 114 | |
Panasonic FZ2500« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Panasonic FZ2500 | |
Panasonic FZ1000« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.1 | 11.7 | 517 | 64 | Panasonic FZ1000 | |
Sony RX100 VI« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Sony RX100 VI | |
Sony RX10 III« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 23.1 | 12.6 | 472 | 70 | Sony RX10 III | |
Sony RX100 V« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.8 | 12.4 | 586 | 70 | Sony RX100 V | |
Sony RX100 IV« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/30p | 22.8 | 12.6 | 591 | 70 | Sony RX100 IV | |
Sony RX100 III« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 22.4 | 12.3 | 495 | 67 | Sony RX100 III | |
Sony RX10« » | 1-inch | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/60p | 22.9 | 12.6 | 474 | 69 | Sony RX10 |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, and both provide the same movie specifications (4K/30p).
Feature comparison: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under consideration are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the RX10 II offers a slightly higher resolution than the one in the C-LUX (2359k vs 2330k dots). The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Sony RX10 II and Leica C-LUX in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sony RX10 II» | 2359 | Y | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 3200 | 14.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX10 II | |
Leica C-LUX« | 2330 | n | 3.0 | 1240 | fixed | Y | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Leica C-LUX | |
Canon 80D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 8000 | 7.0 | Y | n | Canon 80D | |
Canon G3 X« » | - | n | 3.2 | 1620 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 5.9 | Y | Y | Canon G3 X | |
Leica D-LUX 7« » | 2764 | n | 3.0 | 1240 | fixed | Y | 4000 | 11.0 | n | Y | Leica D-LUX 7 | |
Leica V-LUX Typ 114« » | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 4000 | 12.0 | Y | Y | Leica V-LUX Typ 114 | |
Panasonic FZ2500« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 12.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic FZ2500 | |
Panasonic FZ1000« » | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 4000 | 12.0 | Y | Y | Panasonic FZ1000 | |
Sony RX100 VI« » | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | Y | 2000 | 24.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX100 VI | |
Sony RX10 III« » | 2359 | Y | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 2000 | 14.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX10 III | |
Sony RX100 V« » | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 2000 | 24.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX100 V | |
Sony RX100 IV« » | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 1228 | tilting | n | 2000 | 16.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX100 IV | |
Sony RX100 III« » | 1440 | n | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 2000 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX100 III | |
Sony RX10« » | 1440 | Y | 3.0 | 1229 | tilting | n | 3200 | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony RX10 |
One feature that is present on the RX10 II, but is missing on the C-LUX is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.
The reported shutter speed and shutter burst refer to the use of the mechanical shutter. In addition, both cameras feature an electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
Both the RX10 II and the C-LUX have zoom lenses built in. The RX10 II has a 24-200mm f/2.8-2.8 optic and the C-LUX offers a 24-360mm f/3.3-6.4 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the Sony and Leica provide the same view at the wide-angle end, but the Leica has more tele-photo reach at the long end. The RX10 II offers the faster maximum aperture.
The RX10 II writes its imaging data to SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards, while the C-LUX uses SDXC cards.
Connectivity comparison: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II and Leica C-LUX and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sony RX10 II» | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX10 II | |
Leica C-LUX« | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Leica C-LUX | |
Canon 80D« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 80D | |
Canon G3 X« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon G3 X | |
Leica D-LUX 7« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Leica D-LUX 7 | |
Leica V-LUX Typ 114« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Leica V-LUX Typ 114 | |
Panasonic FZ2500« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Panasonic FZ2500 | |
Panasonic FZ1000« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Panasonic FZ1000 | |
Sony RX100 VI« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Sony RX100 VI | |
Sony RX10 III« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX10 III | |
Sony RX100 V« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX100 V | |
Sony RX100 IV« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX100 IV | |
Sony RX100 III« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX100 III | |
Sony RX10« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony RX10 |
It is notable that the RX10 II has a hotshoe, while the C-LUX does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.
The C-LUX is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Leica. In contrast, the RX10 II has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the RX10 II was succeeded by the Sony RX10 III.
Review summary: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
So how do things add up? Is the Sony RX10 II better than the Leica C-LUX or vice versa? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II:
- Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
- Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
- Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
- More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (3200/sec vs 2000/sec) to freeze action.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (14 vs 10 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3).
- Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
- Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in June 2015).

Advantages of the Leica C-LUX:
- Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
- More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
- More compact: Is smaller (113x67mm vs 129x88mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 473g or 58 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
- More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale value.
- More affordable: Was released into a lower priced segment (19 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Reflects 3 years of technical progress since the RX10 II launch.
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the RX10 II is the clear winner of the match-up (11 : 7 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision.
In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the RX10 II or the C-LUX handle or perform in practice. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
This is why expert reviews are important. The table below summarizes the assessments of some of the best known camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). You can find the full text of the reviews by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sony RX10 II» | HiRec | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Jun 2015 | 1,299 | - | Sony RX10 II | ||
Leica C-LUX« | - | - | 4.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Jun 2018 | 1,049 | Leica C-LUX | |||
Canon 80D« » | HiRec | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 1,199 | Canon 80D | |||
Canon G3 X« » | Rec | - | 4.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Jun 2015 | 999 | Canon G3 X | |||
Leica D-LUX 7« » | - | - | - | - | 4.5/5 | Nov 2018 | 1,195 | Leica D-LUX 7 | |||
Leica V-LUX Typ 114« » | - | - | - | - | 5/5 | Sep 2014 | 1,349 | Leica V-LUX Typ 114 | |||
Panasonic FZ2500« » | Rec | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2016 | 1,199 | Panasonic FZ2500 | |||
Panasonic FZ1000« » | HiRec | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2014 | 899 | - | Panasonic FZ1000 | ||
Sony RX100 VI« » | HiRec | 83/100 | 4/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jun 2018 | 1,199 | Sony RX100 VI | |||
Sony RX10 III« » | Rec | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2016 | 1,499 | Sony RX10 III | |||
Sony RX100 V« » | HiRec | 83/100 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2016 | 999 | Sony RX100 V | |||
Sony RX100 IV« » | HiRec | 85/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2015 | 999 | - | Sony RX100 IV | ||
Sony RX100 III« » | HiRec | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | May 2014 | 799 | - | Sony RX100 III | ||
Sony RX10« » | Rec | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2013 | 1,299 | - | Sony RX10 |
The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Check Ebay offers Leica C-LUX:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 4000D vs Olympus E-PL8
- Canon 5DS vs Canon 2000D
- Canon D30 vs Fujifilm XP130
- Canon G1 X vs Nikon D40
- Canon G9 X Mark II vs Canon T5
- Canon M100 vs Olympus E-PL9
- Canon T7i vs Sony RX1R II
- Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Nikon D4
- Leica M10-P vs Fujifilm X-T1
- Nikon P900 vs Panasonic TZ200
- Panasonic LX100 vs Nikon D5100
- Pentax Q vs Canon G1 X Mark III
Specifications: Sony RX10 II vs Leica C-LUX
Camera Model | Sony RX10 II | Leica C-LUX |
Camera Type | Fixed lens compact camera | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | 24-200mm f/2.8 | 24-360mm f/3.3-6.4 |
Launch Date | June 2015 | June 2018 |
Launch Price | USD 1299 | USD 1049 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | 1" Sensor | 1" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 13.2 x 8.8 mm | 13.2 x 8.8 mm |
Sensor Area | 116.16 mm2 | 116.16 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 15.9 mm | 15.9 mm |
Crop Factor | 2.7x | 2.7x |
Sensor Resolution | 20 Megapixels | 20 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 5472 x 3648 pixels | 5472 x 3648 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 2.41 μm | 2.41 μm |
Pixel Density | 17.18 MP/cm2 | 17.18 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | Anti-Alias filter |
Movie Capability | 4K/30p Video | 4K/30p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-12800 ISO | 125-12800 ISO |
ISO Boost | 64-25600 ISO | 80-25600 ISO |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 70 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 23.0 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 12.6 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 531 | .. |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Electronic viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.70x | 0.53x |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2359k dots | 2330k dots |
Top-Level Screen | Control Panel | no Top Display |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 1229k dots | 1240k dots |
LCD Attachment | Tilting screen | Fixed screen |
Touch Input | no Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Contrast-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous Shooting | 14 shutter flaps/s | 10 shutter flaps/s |
Silent Shooting | Electronic Shutter | Electronic Shutter |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | MS or SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | no Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | micro HDMI | micro HDMI |
Microphone Port | External MIC port | no MIC socket |
Headphone Socket | Headphone port | no Headphone port |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | NFC built-in | no NFC |
Body Specs | ||
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Not weather sealed |
Battery Type | NP-FW50 power pack | BP-DC15 power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 400 shots per charge | 370 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | USB charging | USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
129 x 88 x 102 mm (5.1 x 3.5 x 4.0 in) |
113 x 67 x 46 mm (4.4 x 2.6 x 1.8 in) |
Camera Weight | 813 g (28.7 oz) | 340 g (12.0 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.