Sony A7 vs RX1R II

The Sony Alpha A7 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in October 2013 and October 2015. The A7 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, while the RX1R II is a fixed lens compact. Both cameras are equipped with a full frame sensor. The A7 has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the RX1R II provides 42.2 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Sony A7		Sony RX1R II
Mirrorless system camera		Fixed lens compact camera
Sony E mount lenses		35mm f/2.0
24 MP, Full Frame Sensor		42.2 MP, Full Frame Sensor
1080/60p Video		1080/60p Video
ISO 100-25,600 (50 - 51,200)		ISO 100-25,600 (50 - 102,400)
Electronic viewfinder (2400k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)
3.0 LCD, 1230k dots		3.0 LCD, 1229k dots
Tilting screen (no touchscreen)		Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive)
5 shutter flaps per second		5 shutter flaps per second
Weathersealed body		not weather sealed
340 shots per battery charge		220 shots per battery charge
127 x 94 x 48 mm, 474 g		113 x 65 x 72 mm, 507 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Sony Alpha A7 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Sony A7 and the Sony RX1R II is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony RX1R II is considerably smaller (38 percent) than the Sony A7. It is worth mentioning in this context that the A7 is splash and dust resistant, while the RX1R II does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the RX1R II has a lens built in, whereas the A7 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the A7 and their specifications in the Sony FE Lens Catalog.

Concerning battery life, the A7 gets 340 shots out of its NP-FW50 battery, while the RX1R II can take 220 images on a single charge of its NP-BX1 power pack. The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USB, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)		Street Price
1.		Sony A7	127 mm	94 mm	48 mm	474 g	340	Y	Oct 2013	1,699
2.		Sony RX1R II	113 mm	65 mm	72 mm	507 g	220	n	Oct 2015	3,299
3.		Canon 5DS	152 mm	116 mm	76 mm	930 g	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699
4.		Nikon D610	141 mm	113 mm	82 mm	850 g	900	Y	Oct 2013	1,999
5.		Panasonic GH4	133 mm	93 mm	84 mm	560 g	500	Y	Feb 2014	1,499
6.		Samsung NX1	139 mm	102 mm	66 mm	550 g	500	Y	Sep 2014	1,499
7.		Sony A7C	124 mm	71 mm	60 mm	509 g	740	Y	Sep 2020	1,799
8.		Sony A6300	120 mm	67 mm	49 mm	404 g	400	Y	Feb 2016	999
9.		Sony A6500	120 mm	67 mm	53 mm	453 g	350	Y	Oct 2016	1,399
10.		Sony RX100 IV	102 mm	58 mm	41 mm	298 g	280	n	Jun 2015	999
11.		Sony A7 II	127 mm	96 mm	60 mm	599 g	350	Y	Nov 2014	1,999
12.		Sony A7S	127 mm	94 mm	48 mm	489 g	380	Y	Apr 2014	2,499
13.		Sony H300	128 mm	89 mm	92 mm	590 g	350	n	Feb 2014	219
14.		Sony A7R	127 mm	94 mm	48 mm	465 g	340	Y	Oct 2013	2,299
15.		Sony RX1R	113 mm	65 mm	70 mm	482 g	270	n	Jun 2013	2,799
16.		Sony RX1	113 mm	65 mm	70 mm	482 g	270	n	Sep 2012	2,799
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a full frame sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 1.0. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the large-sensor cameras that aim for top notch image quality. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the RX1R II offers a higher resolution of 42.2 megapixels, compared with 24 MP of the A7. This megapixels advantage translates into a 33 percent gain in linear resolution. On the other hand, these sensor specs imply that the RX1R II has a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 4.50μm versus 5.97μm for the A7). However, it should be noted that the RX1R II is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 11 months) than the A7, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that at least partly compensate for the smaller pixel size. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the RX1R II has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Sony RX1R II implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the RX1R II for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 39.8 x 26.5 inches or 101 x 67.4 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 31.8 x 21.2 inches or 80.8 x 53.9 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 26.5 x 17.7 inches or 67.3 x 44.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Sony A7 are 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm for good quality, 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm for very good quality, and 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

The A7 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Sony Alpha A7 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600, which can be extended to ISO 50-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II are ISO 100 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 50-102400.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. Of the two cameras under consideration, the RX1R II has a markedly higher DXO score than the A7 (overall score 7 points higher), which will translate into better image quality. The advantage is based on 1 bits higher color depth, 0.3 EV of lower dynamic range, and 0.5 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports		DXO Overall
1.		Sony A7	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.8	14.2	2248		90
2.		Sony RX1R II	Full Frame	42.2	7952	5304	1080/60p	25.8	13.9	3204		97
3.		Canon 5DS	Full Frame	50.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.7	12.4	2381		87
4.		Nikon D610	Full Frame	24.2	6016	4016	1080/30p	25.1	14.4	2925		94
5.		Panasonic GH4	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	23.2	12.8	791		74
6.		Samsung NX1	APS-C	28.0	6480	4320	4K/30p	24.2	13.2	1363		83
7.		Sony A7C	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	25.0	14.7	3407		95
8.		Sony A6300	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	24.4	13.7	1437		85
9.		Sony A6500	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	24.5	13.7	1405		85
10.		Sony RX100 IV	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	4K/30p	22.8	12.6	591		70
11.		Sony A7 II	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.9	13.6	2449		90
12.		Sony A7S	Full Frame	12.0	4240	2832	1080/60p	23.9	13.2	3702		87
13.		Sony H300	1/2.3	19.9	5152	3864	720/30p	..	..	..		..
14.		Sony A7R	Full Frame	36.2	7360	4912	1080/60p	25.6	14.1	2746		95
15.		Sony RX1R	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	25.0	13.6	2537		91
16.		Sony RX1	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	25.1	14.3	2534		93

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, and both provide the same movie specifications (1080/60p).

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under consideration are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the A7 offers a slightly higher resolution than the one in the RX1R II (2400k vs 2360k dots). The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Sony A7 and Sony RX1R II in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Sony A7	2400	n	3.0	1230	tilting	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
2.		Sony RX1R II	2360	n	3.0	1229	tilting	n	1/4000s	5.0	n	n
3.		Canon 5DS	optical	Y	3.2	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
4.		Nikon D610	optical	Y	3.2	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
5.		Panasonic GH4	2359	n	3.0	1036	swivel	Y	1/8000s	12.0	Y	n
6.		Samsung NX1	2360	Y	3.0	1036	tilting	Y	1/8000s	15.0	Y	n
7.		Sony A7C	2360	n	3.0	922	swivel	Y	1/4000s	10.0	n	Y
8.		Sony A6300	2359	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/4000s	11.0	Y	n
9.		Sony A6500	2359	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/4000s	11.0	Y	Y
10.		Sony RX100 IV	2359	n	3.0	1228	tilting	n	1/2000s	16.0	Y	Y
11.		Sony A7 II	2400	n	3.0	1230	tilting	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	Y
12.		Sony A7S	2400	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
13.		Sony H300	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/1500s	0.8	Y	Y
14.		Sony A7R	2400	n	3.0	1230	tilting	n	1/8000s	4.0	n	n
15.		Sony RX1R	optional	n	3.0	1229	fixed	n	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
16.		Sony RX1	optional	n	3.0	1229	fixed	n	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the A7 and the RX1R II write their files to SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Sony Alpha A7 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Sony A7	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
2.		Sony RX1R II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
3.		Canon 5DS	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
4.		Nikon D610	Y	mono	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	-	-	-
5.		Panasonic GH4	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
6.		Samsung NX1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.0	Y	Y	Y
7.		Sony A7C	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.2	Y	Y	Y
8.		Sony A6300	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
9.		Sony A6500	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
10.		Sony RX100 IV	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
11.		Sony A7 II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
12.		Sony A7S	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
13.		Sony H300	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Sony A7R	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
15.		Sony RX1R	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
16.		Sony RX1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

The RX1R II is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Sony. In contrast, the A7 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the A7 was succeeded by the Sony A7 II. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Sony website.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Which of the two cameras – the Sony A7 or the Sony RX1R II – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Reasons to prefer the Sony Alpha A7:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• More flexible: Accepts interchangeable lenses, so that lens characteristics can be altered.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (340 versus 220) on a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in October 2013).

Advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (42.2 vs 24MP), which boosts linear resolution by 33%.
• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better image quality: Scores markedly higher (7 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (0.5 stops ISO advantage).
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.74x vs 0.71x).
• Ready to shoot: Has an integrated lens, whereas the A7 necessitates an extra lens.
• More compact: Is smaller (113x65mm vs 127x94mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• More modern: Was introduced somewhat (1 year and 11 months) more recently.

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the match-up finishes in a tie (8 points each). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Sony A7 and the Sony RX1R II place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera and Best Prime Lens Compact Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the A7 and the RX1R II in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Expert reviews

This is why expert reviews are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)			Street Price
1.		Sony A7	5/5	+ +	80/100	5/5	5/5	Oct 2013	1,699
2.		Sony RX1R II	5/5	..	82/100	..	4.5/5	Oct 2015	3,299
3.		Canon 5DS	..	+	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	3,699
4.		Nikon D610	4/5	+ +	87/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2013	1,999
5.		Panasonic GH4	5/5	+ +	85/100	5/5	5/5	Feb 2014	1,499
6.		Samsung NX1	5/5	..	87/100	5/5	5/5	Sep 2014	1,499
7.		Sony A7C	3.5/5	..	86/100	4/5	4/5	Sep 2020	1,799
8.		Sony A6300	4.5/5	+	85/100	5/5	5/5	Feb 2016	999
9.		Sony A6500	5/5	+ +	85/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2016	1,399
10.		Sony RX100 IV	4.5/5	+ +	85/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jun 2015	999
11.		Sony A7 II	5/5	+	82/100	4.5/5	5/5	Nov 2014	1,999
12.		Sony A7S	4/5	..	86/100	4.5/5	5/5	Apr 2014	2,499
13.		Sony H300	..	+	..	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2014	219
14.		Sony A7R	5/5	+ +	82/100	4.5/5	5/5	Oct 2013	2,299
15.		Sony RX1R	5/5	..	..	4/5	4.5/5	Jun 2013	2,799
16.		Sony RX1	5/5	..	79/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	2,799
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Sony A7 vs Sony RX1R II

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.