Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
The Olympus Evolt E-300 and the Nikon D5600 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in September 2004 and November 2016. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are based on a Four Thirds (E-300) and an APS-C (D5600) sensor. The Olympus has a resolution of 8 megapixels, whereas the Nikon provides 24 MP. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Olympus E-300 | Nikon D5600 | |
Digital single lens reflex | Digital single lens reflex | |
Four Thirds lenses | Nikon F mount lenses | |
8 MP, Four Thirds Sensor | 24 MP, APS-C Sensor | |
no Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 100-400 (100-1600) | ISO 100-25600 | |
Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder | |
1.8" LCD, 134k dots | 3.2" LCD, 1037k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Swivel touchscreen | |
2.5 shutter flaps per second | 5 shutter flaps per second | |
750 shots per battery charge | 970 shots per battery charge | |
147 x 85 x 64 mm, 624 g | 124 x 97 x 70 mm, 465 g |
Body comparison: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Olympus E-300 and the Nikon D5600. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Nikon D5600 is somewhat smaller (4 percent) than the Olympus E-300. Moreover, the D5600 is markedly lighter (25 percent) than the E-300. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the E-300 nor the D5600 are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Four Thirds Lens Catalog (E-300) and the Nikon Lens Catalog (D5600).
Concerning battery life, the E-300 gets 750 shots out of its BLM-1 battery, while the D5600 can take 970 images on a single charge of its EN-EL14a power pack.
The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-300» | 5.8 in | 3.3 in | 2.5 in | 22.0 oz | 750 | n | Sep 2004 | 799 | - | Olympus E-300 | ||
Nikon D5600« | 4.9 in | 3.8 in | 2.8 in | 16.4 oz | 970 | n | Nov 2016 | 699 | Nikon D5600 | |||
Canon XT« » | 5.0 in | 3.7 in | 2.5 in | 19.0 oz | 400 | n | Feb 2005 | 899 | - | Canon XT | ||
Leica Digilux 3« » | 5.7 in | 3.4 in | 3.0 in | 21.4 oz | 750 | n | Sep 2006 | 1,499 | - | Leica Digilux 3 | ||
Nikon D3400« » | 4.9 in | 3.9 in | 3.0 in | 15.7 oz | 1200 | n | Aug 2016 | 499 | - | Nikon D3400 | ||
Nikon D5500« » | 4.9 in | 3.8 in | 2.8 in | 14.8 oz | 820 | n | Jan 2015 | 899 | - | Nikon D5500 | ||
Nikon D5300« » | 4.9 in | 3.9 in | 3.0 in | 16.9 oz | 600 | n | Oct 2013 | 799 | - | Nikon D5300 | ||
Nikon D3200« » | 4.9 in | 3.8 in | 3.0 in | 17.8 oz | 540 | n | Apr 2012 | 599 | - | Nikon D3200 | ||
Nikon D5200« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 3.1 in | 19.6 oz | 500 | n | Nov 2012 | 749 | - | Nikon D5200 | ||
Olympus E-620« » | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 2.4 in | 18.4 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2009 | 699 | - | Olympus E-620 | ||
Olympus E-520« » | 5.4 in | 3.6 in | 2.7 in | 18.9 oz | 750 | n | May 2008 | 699 | - | Olympus E-520 | ||
Olympus E-410« » | 5.1 in | 3.6 in | 2.1 in | 15.3 oz | 500 | n | Mar 2007 | 699 | - | Olympus E-410 | ||
Olympus E-510« » | 5.4 in | 3.6 in | 2.7 in | 19.0 oz | 750 | n | Mar 2007 | 799 | - | Olympus E-510 | ||
Olympus E-330« » | 5.5 in | 3.4 in | 2.8 in | 22.5 oz | 750 | n | Jan 2006 | 999 | - | Olympus E-330 | ||
Olympus E-400« » | 5.1 in | 3.6 in | 2.1 in | 15.3 oz | 500 | n | Sep 2006 | 699 | - | Olympus E-400 | ||
Olympus E-500« » | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 2.6 in | 16.9 oz | 750 | n | Sep 2005 | 599 | - | Olympus E-500 | ||
Olympus E-1« » | 5.6 in | 4.1 in | 3.2 in | 26.0 oz | 750 | Y | Jun 2003 | 1,699 | - | Olympus E-1 | ||
Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The D5600 was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 13 percent) than the E-300, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Olympus E-300 features a Four Thirds sensor and the Nikon D5600 an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the D5600 is 63 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 2.0 and 1.5. The sensor in the E-300 has a native 4:3 aspect ratio, while the one in the D5600 offers a 3:2 aspect.
Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors.

With 24MP, the D5600 offers a higher resolution than the E-300 (8MP), but the D5600 has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.91μm versus 5.30μm for the E-300). Yet, the D5600 is a much more recent model (by 12 years and 1 month) than the E-300, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the D5600 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The Olympus Evolt E-300 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 400, which can be extended to ISO 100-1600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Nikon D5600 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-300» | Four Thirds | 8.0 | 3264 | 2448 | - | - | - | - | - | Olympus E-300 | |
Nikon D5600« | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.1 | 14.0 | 1306 | 84 | Nikon D5600 | |
Canon XT« » | APS-C | 8.0 | 3456 | 2304 | - | 21.8 | 10.8 | 637 | 60 | Canon XT | |
Leica Digilux 3« » | Four Thirds | 7.4 | 3136 | 2352 | - | - | - | - | - | Leica Digilux 3 | |
Nikon D3400« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.8 | 13.9 | 1192 | 86 | Nikon D3400 | |
Nikon D5500« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.1 | 14.0 | 1438 | 84 | Nikon D5500 | |
Nikon D5300« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.0 | 13.9 | 1338 | 83 | Nikon D5300 | |
Nikon D3200« » | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 24.1 | 13.2 | 1131 | 81 | Nikon D3200 | |
Nikon D5200« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60i | 24.2 | 13.9 | 1284 | 84 | Nikon D5200 | |
Olympus E-620« » | Four Thirds | 12.2 | 4032 | 3024 | - | 21.3 | 10.3 | 536 | 55 | Olympus E-620 | |
Olympus E-520« » | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | - | 21.4 | 10.4 | 548 | 55 | Olympus E-520 | |
Olympus E-410« » | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | - | 21.1 | 10.0 | 494 | 51 | Olympus E-410 | |
Olympus E-510« » | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | - | 21.2 | 10.0 | 442 | 52 | Olympus E-510 | |
Olympus E-330« » | Four Thirds | 7.4 | 3136 | 2352 | - | - | - | - | - | Olympus E-330 | |
Olympus E-400« » | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | - | - | - | - | - | Olympus E-400 | |
Olympus E-500« » | Four Thirds | 8.0 | 3264 | 2448 | - | - | - | - | - | Olympus E-500 | |
Olympus E-1« » | Four Thirds | 4.9 | 2560 | 1920 | - | - | - | - | - | Olympus E-1 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The D5600 indeed provides for movie recording, while the E-300 does not. The highest resolution format that the D5600 can use is 1080/60p.
Feature comparison: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The E-300 and the D5600 are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Olympus E-300 and Nikon D5600 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-300» | optical | n | 1.8 | 134 | fixed | n | 4000 | 2.5 | Y | n | Olympus E-300 | |
Nikon D5600« | optical | n | 3.2 | 1037 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D5600 | |
Canon XT« » | optical | n | 1.8 | 115 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon XT | |
Leica Digilux 3« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 207 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Leica Digilux 3 | |
Nikon D3400« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D3400 | |
Nikon D5500« » | optical | n | 3.2 | 1037 | swivel | Y | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D5500 | |
Nikon D5300« » | optical | n | 3.2 | 1037 | swivel | n | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D5300 | |
Nikon D3200« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 4000 | 4.0 | Y | n | Nikon D3200 | |
Nikon D5200« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 4000 | 5.0 | Y | n | Nikon D5200 | |
Olympus E-620« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | swivel | n | 4000 | 4.0 | Y | Y | Olympus E-620 | |
Olympus E-520« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 215 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.5 | Y | Y | Olympus E-520 | |
Olympus E-410« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Olympus E-410 | |
Olympus E-510« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | Y | Olympus E-510 | |
Olympus E-330« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | tilting | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Olympus E-330 | |
Olympus E-400« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Olympus E-400 | |
Olympus E-500« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 4000 | 2.5 | Y | n | Olympus E-500 | |
Olympus E-1« » | optical | Y | 1.8 | 134 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | n | n | Olympus E-1 |
One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The D5600 has a touchscreen, while the E-300 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.
The D5600 has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing. This characteristic will be appreciated by vloggers and photographers who are interested in taking selfies. In contrast, the E-300 does not have a selfie-screen.The E-300 writes its imaging data to Compact Flash or xD Picture cards, while the D5600 uses SDXC cards. The E-300 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the D5600 only has one slot.
Connectivity comparison: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Olympus Evolt E-300 and Nikon D5600 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-300» | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-300 | |
Nikon D5600« | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Nikon D5600 | |
Canon XT« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon XT | |
Leica Digilux 3« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Leica Digilux 3 | |
Nikon D3400« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Nikon D3400 | |
Nikon D5500« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Nikon D5500 | |
Nikon D5300« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Nikon D5300 | |
Nikon D3200« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D3200 | |
Nikon D5200« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D5200 | |
Olympus E-620« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-620 | |
Olympus E-520« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-520 | |
Olympus E-410« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-410 | |
Olympus E-510« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-510 | |
Olympus E-330« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-330 | |
Olympus E-400« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-400 | |
Olympus E-500« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-500 | |
Olympus E-1« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-1 |
It is notable that the D5600 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the E-300 does not offer wifi capability.
The D5600 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Nikon. In contrast, the E-300 has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the E-300 was succeeded by the Olympus E-330.
Review summary: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
So what conclusions can be drawn? Which of the two cameras – the Olympus E-300 or the Nikon D5600 – has the upper hand? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Advantages of the Olympus Evolt E-300:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in September 2004).

Reasons to prefer the Nikon D5600:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (24 vs 8MP), which boosts linear resolution by 77%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Better image quality: Is equipped with a larger and more technologically advanced sensor.
- Richer colors: Larger sensor generates images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Capable of capturing a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can be used in poorly lit environments and still produce good images.
- Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 1080/60p video.
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 1.8") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1037k vs 134k dots).
- More flexible LCD: Has swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
- Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
- More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (5 vs 2.5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 159g or 25 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
- Longer lasting: Gets more shots (970 versus 750) out of a single battery charge.
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- More affordable: Was released into a lower priced segment (13 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Reflects 12 years and 1 month of technical progress since the E-300 launch.
If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the D5600 is the clear winner of the contest (20 : 3 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says nothing about, for example, the handling, responsiveness, and overall imaging quality of the E-300 and the D5600 in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.
Expert reviews: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
This is why expert reviews are important. The adjacent table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). You can find the full text of the reviews by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-300» | - | Rec | rev | rev | 4.5/5 | Sep 2004 | 799 | - | Olympus E-300 | ||
Nikon D5600« | - | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Nov 2016 | 699 | Nikon D5600 | |||
Canon XT« » | 80/100 | HiRec | rev | rev | - | Feb 2005 | 899 | - | Canon XT | ||
Leica Digilux 3« » | - | - | - | - | - | Sep 2006 | 1,499 | - | Leica Digilux 3 | ||
Nikon D3400« » | Rec | 76/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2016 | 499 | - | Nikon D3400 | ||
Nikon D5500« » | Rec | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2015 | 899 | - | Nikon D5500 | ||
Nikon D5300« » | HiRec | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2013 | 799 | - | Nikon D5300 | ||
Nikon D3200« » | HiRec | 73/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Apr 2012 | 599 | - | Nikon D3200 | ||
Nikon D5200« » | HiRec | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Nov 2012 | 749 | - | Nikon D5200 | ||
Olympus E-620« » | 88/100 | 72/100 | 4.5/5 | rev | 5/5 | Feb 2009 | 699 | - | Olympus E-620 | ||
Olympus E-520« » | 87/100 | HiRec | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | May 2008 | 699 | - | Olympus E-520 | ||
Olympus E-410« » | 86/100 | HiRec | 4/5 | rev | 4.5/5 | Mar 2007 | 699 | - | Olympus E-410 | ||
Olympus E-510« » | 89/100 | HiRec | 3.5/5 | rev | 4.5/5 | Mar 2007 | 799 | - | Olympus E-510 | ||
Olympus E-330« » | - | Rec | rev | 3.5/5 | - | Jan 2006 | 999 | - | Olympus E-330 | ||
Olympus E-400« » | 85/100 | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Sep 2006 | 699 | - | Olympus E-400 | ||
Olympus E-500« » | 76/100 | HiRec | - | - | - | Sep 2005 | 599 | - | Olympus E-500 | ||
Olympus E-1« » | - | Rec | rev | rev | - | Jun 2003 | 1,699 | - | Olympus E-1 |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.
Check Ebay offers Nikon D5600:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Nikon D610
- Canon 2000D vs Nikon D40
- Canon 5D Mark IV vs Panasonic FZ330
- Canon 5DS vs Panasonic GX8
- Canon 5DS vs Panasonic S1
- Fujifilm X-T10 vs Leica D-LUX 7
- Fujifilm X-T3 vs Canon M50
- Leica M9 vs Nikon D5500
- Olympus E-M10 vs Canon SX60
- Panasonic GF7 vs Panasonic GF3
- Panasonic GX800 vs Fujifilm X-E2
- Sony A7R II vs Leica M Typ 262
Specifications: Olympus E-300 vs Nikon D5600
Camera Model | Olympus E-300 | Nikon D5600 |
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Digital single lens reflex |
Camera Lens | Four Thirds lenses | Nikon F mount lenses |
Launch Date | September 2004 | November 2016 |
Launch Price | USD 799 | USD 699 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | Four Thirds Sensor | APS-C Sensor |
Sensor Size | 17.3 x 13.0 mm | 23.5 x 13.0 mm |
Sensor Area | 224.9 mm2 | 366.6 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 21.6 mm | 28.2 mm |
Crop Factor | 2.0x | 1.5x |
Sensor Resolution | 8 Megapixels | 24 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 3264 x 2448 pixels | 6000 x 4000 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 5.30 μm | 3.91 μm |
Pixel Density | 3.55 MP/cm2 | 6.55 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-400 ISO | 100-25600 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-1600 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | TruePic | EXPEED 4 |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | .. | 84 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | .. | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | .. | 14.0 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | .. | 1306 |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | 95% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.5x | 0.57x |
LCD Framing | n/a | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 1.8 inch | 3.2 inch |
LCD Resolution | 134k dots | 1037k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Swivel screen |
Touch Input | no Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Phase-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous Shooting | 2.5 shutter flaps/s | 5 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | CF or XD cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Dual card slots | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | mini HDMI |
Microphone Port | no MIC socket | External MIC port |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | no NFC | NFC built-in |
Bluetooth Support | no Bluetooth | Bluetooth built-in |
Body Specs | ||
Battery Type | BLM-1 power pack | EN-EL14a power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 750 shots per charge | 970 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
147 x 85 x 64 mm (5.8 x 3.3 x 2.5 in) |
124 x 97 x 70 mm (4.9 x 3.8 x 2.8 in) |
Camera Weight | 624 g (22.0 oz) | 465 g (16.4 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.