Nikon 1 J4 vs Olympus E-5

The Nikon 1 J4 and the Olympus E-5 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in April 2014 and September 2010. The J4 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, while the E-5 is a DSLR. The cameras are based on an one-inch (J4) and a Four Thirds (E-5) sensor. The Nikon has a resolution of 18.2 megapixels, whereas the Olympus provides 12.2 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Nikon 1 J4		Olympus E-5
Mirrorless system camera		Digital single lens reflex
Nikon 1 mount lenses		Four Thirds lenses
18.2 MP, 1" Sensor		12.2 MP, Four Thirds Sensor
1080/60p Video		720/30p Video
ISO 160-12,800		ISO 100-6,400
No viewfinder, LCD framing		Optical viewfinder
3.0 LCD, 1037k dots		3.0 LCD, 920k dots
no rear screen		Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)
60 shutter flaps per second		5 shutter flaps per second
Lens stabilization only		In-body stabilization
not weather sealed		Weathersealed body
300 shots per battery charge		750 shots per battery charge
100 x 60 x 29 mm, 232 g		142 x 117 x 75 mm, 873 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Nikon 1 J4 and the Olympus E-5? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Nikon 1 J4 and the Olympus E-5 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The J4 can be obtained in four different colors (black, silver, orange, white), while the E-5 is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus E-5 is considerably larger (177 percent) than the Nikon 1 J4. Moreover, the E-5 is substantially heavier (276 percent) than the J4. It is noteworthy in this context that the E-5 is splash and dust-proof, while the J4 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Nikon 1 J4	100 mm	60 mm	29 mm	232 g	300	n	Apr 2014	549
2.		Olympus E-5	142 mm	117 mm	75 mm	873 g	750	Y	Sep 2010	1,699
3.		Canon G9 X	98 mm	58 mm	31 mm	209 g	220	n	Oct 2015	529
4.		Canon 100D	117 mm	91 mm	69 mm	407 g	380	n	Mar 2013	549
5.		Canon 700D	133 mm	100 mm	79 mm	580 g	440	n	Mar 2013	649
6.		Nikon P900	140 mm	103 mm	137 mm	899 g	360	n	Mar 2015	599
7.		Nikon 1 J5	98 mm	60 mm	32 mm	231 g	250	n	Apr 2015	399
8.		Nikon 1 V3	111 mm	65 mm	33 mm	381 g	310	n	Mar 2014	799
9.		Olympus E-450	130 mm	91 mm	53 mm	440 g	500	n	Mar 2009	499
10.		Olympus E-600	130 mm	94 mm	60 mm	535 g	500	n	Aug 2009	449
11.		Olympus E-620	130 mm	94 mm	60 mm	521 g	500	n	Feb 2009	699
12.		Olympus E-3	142 mm	116 mm	75 mm	876 g	750	Y	Oct 2007	1,699
13.		Panasonic GF7	107 mm	65 mm	33 mm	266 g	230	n	Jan 2015	499
14.		Panasonic G6	122 mm	85 mm	71 mm	390 g	340	n	Apr 2013	599
15.		Panasonic GF6	111 mm	65 mm	38 mm	323 g	340	n	Apr 2013	499
16.		Sony NEX-3N	110 mm	62 mm	35 mm	269 g	480	n	Feb 2013	499
17.		Sony A77	143 mm	104 mm	81 mm	732 g	470	Y	Aug 2011	1,399
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The J4 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 68 percent) than the E-5, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Nikon 1 J4 features an one-inch sensor and the Olympus E-5 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the E-5 is 94 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 2.7 and 2.0. The sensor in the J4 has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the E-5 offers a 4:3 aspect.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the Nikon 1 J4 offers a higher resolution of 18.2 megapixels, compared with 12.2 MP of the Olympus E-5. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 2.52μm versus 4.29μm for the E-5). However, it should be noted that the J4 is much more recent (by 3 years and 6 months) than the E-5, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the J4 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Nikon 1 J4 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the J4 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 26.2 x 17.4 inches or 66.4 x 44.3 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 20.9 x 14 inches or 53.2 x 35.4 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 17.4 x 11.6 inches or 44.3 x 29.5 cm. The corresponding values for the Olympus E-5 are 20.2 x 15.1 inches or 51.2 x 38.4 cm for good quality, 16.1 x 12.1 inches or 41 x 30.7 cm for very good quality, and 13.4 x 10.1 inches or 34.1 x 25.6 cm for excellent quality prints.

The J4 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Nikon 1 J4 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 160 to ISO 12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Olympus E-5 are ISO 100 to ISO 6400 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The Overall DXO ratings for the two cameras under consideration are close, suggesting that they provide similar imaging performance. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Nikon 1 J4	1-inch	18.2	5232	3488	1080/60p	20.8	10.7	426	53
2.		Olympus E-5	Four Thirds	12.2	4032	3024	720/30p	21.6	10.5	519	56
3.		Canon G9 X	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	21.5	12.3	495	63
4.		Canon 100D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	21.8	11.3	843	63
5.		Canon 700D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	21.7	11.2	681	61
6.		Nikon P900	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
7.		Nikon 1 J5	1-inch	20.7	5568	3712	4K/15p	21.1	12.0	479	65
8.		Nikon 1 V3	1-inch	18.2	5232	3488	1080/60p	20.8	10.7	384	52
9.		Olympus E-450	Four Thirds	10.0	3648	2736	none	21.5	10.5	512	56
10.		Olympus E-600	Four Thirds	12.2	4032	3024	none	21.5	10.3	541	55
11.		Olympus E-620	Four Thirds	12.2	4032	3024	none	21.3	10.3	536	55
12.		Olympus E-3	Four Thirds	10.0	3648	2736	none	21.6	10.5	571	56
13.		Panasonic GF7	Four Thirds	15.8	4592	3448	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
14.		Panasonic G6	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	21.3	11.5	639	61
15.		Panasonic GF6	Four Thirds	15.8	4592	3448	1080/60i	20.7	10.6	622	54
16.		Sony NEX-3N	APS-C	16.0	4912	3264	1080/60i	22.8	12.5	1067	74
17.		Sony A77	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.0	13.2	801	78

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the J4 provides a higher video resolution than the E-5. It can shoot video footage at 1080/60p, while the Olympus is limited to 720/30p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. For example, the E-5 has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the J4 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Nikon 1 J4 and Olympus E-5 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Nikon 1 J4	none	n	3.0	1037	Fixed	Y	1/4000s	60.0	Y	n
2.		Olympus E-5	optical	Y	3.0	920	swivel	n	1/8000s	5.0	Y	Y
3.		Canon G9 X	none	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/2000s	6.0	Y	Y
4.		Canon 100D	optical	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/4000s	4.9	Y	n
5.		Canon 700D	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
6.		Nikon P900	921	n	3.0	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
7.		Nikon 1 J5	none	n	3.0	1037	tilting	Y	1/4000s	60.0	Y	n
8.		Nikon 1 V3	optional	n	3.0	1037	tilting	Y	1/4000s	60.0	Y	n
9.		Olympus E-450	optical	n	2.7	215	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.5	Y	n
10.		Olympus E-600	optical	n	2.7	230	swivel	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	Y
11.		Olympus E-620	optical	n	2.7	230	swivel	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	Y
12.		Olympus E-3	optical	Y	2.5	230	swivel	n	1/8000s	5.0	Y	Y
13.		Panasonic GF7	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/500s	5.8	Y	n
14.		Panasonic G6	1440	n	3.0	1036	swivel	Y	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
15.		Panasonic GF6	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	4.2	Y	n
16.		Sony NEX-3N	optional	n	3.0	460	tilting	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	n
17.		Sony A77	2359	Y	3.0	921	full-flex	n	1/8000s	12.0	Y	Y

One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The J4 has a touchscreen, while the E-5 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the J4 is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

The J4 writes its imaging data to micro SDXC cards, while the E-5 uses Compact Flash or xD Picture cards. The E-5 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the J4 only has one slot.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Nikon 1 J4 and Olympus E-5 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Nikon 1 J4	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
2.		Olympus E-5	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
3.		Canon G9 X	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
4.		Canon 100D	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
5.		Canon 700D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
6.		Nikon P900	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
7.		Nikon 1 J5	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
8.		Nikon 1 V3	-	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
9.		Olympus E-450	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
10.		Olympus E-600	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Olympus E-620	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
12.		Olympus E-3	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
13.		Panasonic GF7	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
14.		Panasonic G6	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
15.		Panasonic GF6	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
16.		Sony NEX-3N	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
17.		Sony A77	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the J4 offers wifi support, while the E-5 does not. Wifi can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location.

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Olympus E-5 (unlike the J4) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

Both the J4 and the E-5 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The J4 was replaced by the Nikon 1 J5, while the E-5 does not have a direct successor. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Nikon and Olympus websites.

Review summary

So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Nikon 1 J4 and the Olympus E-5? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Arguments in favor of the Nikon 1 J4:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (18.2 vs 12.2MP) with a 25% higher linear resolution.
• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (1080/60p vs 720/30p).
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1037k vs 920k dots).
• Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (60 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
• More compact: Is smaller (100x60mm vs 142x117mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• Less heavy: Is lighter (by 641g or 73 percent) and hence easier to carry around.
• More legacy lens friendly: Can take a broad range of non-native lenses via adapters.
• Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (68 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 3 years and 6 months of technical progress since the E-5 launch.

Advantages of the Olympus E-5:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Easier setting verification: Features a control panel on top to check shooting parameters.
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (750 versus 300) out of a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
• Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
• More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in September 2010).

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the J4 comes out slightly ahead of the E-5 (14 : 13 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Nikon 1 J4 and the Olympus E-5 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera and Best DSLR Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the J4 or the E-5 perform in practice. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Nikon 1 J4	3/5	..	..	4.5/5	4/5	Apr 2014	549
2.		Olympus E-5	4/5	..	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2010	1,699
3.		Canon G9 X	3.5/5	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2015	529
4.		Canon 100D	4/5	+	78/100	4/5	4/5	Mar 2013	549
5.		Canon 700D	..	..	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Mar 2013	649
6.		Nikon P900	..	..	77/100	4/5	4/5	Mar 2015	599
7.		Nikon 1 J5	..	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Apr 2015	399
8.		Nikon 1 V3	3/5	..	76/100	4.5/5	4/5	Mar 2014	799
9.		Olympus E-450	..	..	..	4/5	4/5	Mar 2009	499
10.		Olympus E-600	..	..	..	..	4.5/5	Aug 2009	449
11.		Olympus E-620	3/5	88/100	72/100	4.5/5	5/5	Feb 2009	699
12.		Olympus E-3	..	88/100	+ +	o	4/5	Oct 2007	1,699
13.		Panasonic GF7	4/5	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2015	499
14.		Panasonic G6	4/5	+ +	..	5/5	4.5/5	Apr 2013	599
15.		Panasonic GF6	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Apr 2013	499
16.		Sony NEX-3N	3/5	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2013	499
17.		Sony A77	5/5	91/100	81/100	..	5/5	Aug 2011	1,399
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

~

Specifications: Nikon 1 J4 vs Olympus E-5

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.