Leitz Ur-Leica versus Olympus E-M1
Roughly a century of technological development separate the Ur-Leica and the Olympus E-M1. The former was finished in March 1914, while the latter was presented to the public in September 2013. The Ur-Leica was the first camera to use 24x36mm film, whereas the E-M1 is build around a 15.9MP Four Thirds digital imaging sensor.
Body comparison: Ur-Leica vs Olympus E-M1
An illustration of the physical dimensions and weight of the Ur-Leica and the Olympus E-M1 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus E-M1 is notably larger (41 percent) than the Ur-Leica. Moreover, the E-M1 is markedly heavier (16 percent) than the Ur-Leica. In addition, while the Ur-Leica has an integrated lens (the retractable Mikro-Summar 42mm f/4.5), the E-M1 requires an additional lens, which will add further to its weight.
Evidently, the E-M1 is the more convenient and powerful imaging tool, providing an image quality that Oskar Barnack, the creator of the Ur-Leica, probably could not have envisioned. However, there are two aspects (apart from size and weight) where the Ur-Leica has an edge over the E-M1. The first one is battery life. The Ur-Leica is a fully mechanical camera, so that there is no risk of running out of juice during a shooting session...
The second advantage of the Ur-Leica is, well, its resale value. The camera is a museum piece, resting safely at Leica’s headquarters in Wetzlar/Germany. Collectors would probably be willing to pay several million US dollars if it were put up for sale. In contrast, the Olympus E-M1, while surely being the better camera, just lacks the scarcity and historical importance that foster "auction madness" and drive vintage camera prices into six or seven-figure territory.
Any interest in exploring another side-by-side comparison? Just enter your cameras of choice in the search box below and you will be taken to a corresponding display. Alternatively, you can also follow any of the links further down for comparisons that others pursued.
- Canon 40D vs Nikon D850
- Canon 7D vs YI M1
- Canon G7 X Mark II vs Panasonic FT7
- Canon M50 vs Fujifilm X-A2
- Canon SX70 vs Panasonic S1
- Nikon D300S vs Olympus E-M1 II
- Nikon D500 vs Fujifilm X70
- Nikon W300 vs Sony HX99
- Olympus E-450 vs Fujifilm X-T100
- Olympus E-M5 II vs Nikon D5300
- Olympus E-PL7 vs Olympus E-M5 II
- Sony A7 II vs Canon G9 X