Leica V-LUX 2 vs Olympus E-300

The Leica V-LUX 2 and the Olympus Evolt E-300 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in September 2010 and September 2004. The V-LUX 2 is a fixed lens compact, while the E-300 is a DSLR. The cameras are based on a 1/2.3-inch (V-LUX 2) and a Four Thirds (E-300) sensor. The Leica has a resolution of 14 megapixels, whereas the Olympus provides 8 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Leica V-LUX 2		Olympus E-300
Fixed lens compact camera		Digital single lens reflex
25-600mm f/2.8-5.2		Four Thirds lenses
14 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		8 MP, Four Thirds Sensor
1080/60i Video		no Video
ISO 100-1,600 (100 - 6,400)		ISO 100-400 (100 - 1,600)
Electronic viewfinder (202k dots)		Optical viewfinder
3.0 LCD, 460k dots		1.8 LCD, 134k dots
Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
11 shutter flaps per second		2.5 shutter flaps per second
410 shots per battery charge		750 shots per battery charge
124 x 80 x 95 mm, 520 g		147 x 85 x 64 mm, 624 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Leica V-LUX 2 and the Olympus Evolt E-300? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Leica V-LUX 2 and the Olympus E-300 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus E-300 is notably larger (26 percent) than the Leica V-LUX 2. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the V-LUX 2 nor the E-300 are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the V-LUX 2 has a lens built in, whereas the E-300 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the E-300 and their specifications in the Four Thirds Lens Catalog.

Concerning battery life, the V-LUX 2 gets 410 shots out of its BP-DC9 battery, while the E-300 can take 750 images on a single charge of its BLM-1 power pack.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Leica V-LUX 2	4.9 in	3.1 in	3.7 in	18.3 oz	410	n	Sep 2010	849
	Olympus E-300	5.8 in	3.3 in	2.5 in	22.0 oz	750	n	Sep 2004	799
	Canon G1 X Mark II	4.6 in	2.9 in	2.6 in	19.5 oz	240	n	Feb 2014	799
	Canon SX40	4.8 in	3.6 in	4.3 in	21.2 oz	380	n	Sep 2011	429
	Canon SX30	4.8 in	3.6 in	4.3 in	21.2 oz	370	n	Sep 2010	429
	Canon SX20	4.8 in	3.5 in	3.4 in	21.2 oz	..	n	Aug 2009	399
	Leica X Typ 113	5.2 in	2.9 in	3.1 in	17.1 oz	350	n	Sep 2014	2,295
	Leica V-LUX 4	4.9 in	3.4 in	4.3 in	20.7 oz	540	n	Sep 2012	949
	Leica V-LUX 3	4.9 in	3.2 in	3.7 in	19.0 oz	410	n	Dec 2011	949
	Leica Digilux 3	5.7 in	3.4 in	3.0 in	21.4 oz	750	n	Sep 2006	1,499
	Leica V-LUX 1	5.6 in	3.4 in	5.6 in	25.9 oz	360	n	Sep 2006	849
	Olympus E-330	5.5 in	3.4 in	2.8 in	22.5 oz	750	n	Jan 2006	999
	Olympus E-400	5.1 in	3.6 in	2.1 in	15.3 oz	500	n	Sep 2006	699
	Olympus E-500	5.1 in	3.7 in	2.6 in	16.9 oz	750	n	Sep 2005	599
	Olympus E-1	5.6 in	4.1 in	3.2 in	26.0 oz	750	Y	Jun 2003	1,699
	Panasonic FZ150	4.9 in	3.2 in	3.6 in	18.6 oz	410	n	Aug 2011	499
	Panasonic FZ100	4.9 in	3.2 in	3.6 in	19.0 oz	410	n	Jul 2010	499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Metric

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Leica V-LUX 2 features a 1/2.3-inch sensor and the Olympus E-300 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the E-300 is 704 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 5.6 and 2.0. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the Leica V-LUX 2 offers a higher resolution of 14 megapixels, compared with 8 MP of the Olympus E-300. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.41μm versus 5.30μm for the E-300). However, it should be noted that the V-LUX 2 is much more recent (by 5 years and 11 months) than the E-300, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the V-LUX 2 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Leica V-LUX 2 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the V-LUX 2 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 21.6 x 16.2 inches or 54.9 x 41.1 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 17.3 x 13 inches or 43.9 x 32.9 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 14.4 x 10.8 inches or 36.6 x 27.4 cm. The corresponding values for the Olympus E-300 are 16.3 x 12.2 inches or 41.5 x 31.1 cm for good quality, 13.1 x 9.8 inches or 33.2 x 24.9 cm for very good quality, and 10.9 x 8.2 inches or 27.6 x 20.7 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Leica V-LUX 2 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 100-6400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Olympus Evolt E-300 are ISO 100 to ISO 400, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-1600.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Leica V-LUX 2	1/2.3	14.0	4320	3240	1080/60i	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-300	Four Thirds	8.0	3264	2448	none	..	..	..	..
	Canon G1 X Mark II	1.5-inch	13.0	4160	3120	1080/30p	21.5	10.8	581	58
	Canon SX40	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	..	..	..	..
	Canon SX30	1/2.3	14.0	4320	3240	720/30p	..	..	..	..
	Canon SX20	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	720/30p	..	..	..	..
	Leica X Typ 113	APS-C	16.1	4928	3264	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
	Leica V-LUX 4	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Leica V-LUX 3	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Leica Digilux 3	Four Thirds	7.4	3136	2352	none	..	..	..	..
	Leica V-LUX 1	1/1.8	10.0	3648	2736	480/30p	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-330	Four Thirds	7.4	3136	2352	none	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-400	Four Thirds	10.0	3648	2736	none	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-500	Four Thirds	8.0	3264	2448	none	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-1	Four Thirds	4.9	2560	1920	none	..	..	..	..
	Panasonic FZ150	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	19.4	10.9	132	40
	Panasonic FZ100	1/2.3	14.0	4320	3240	1080/60i	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. The V-LUX 2 indeed provides movie recording capabilities, while the E-300 does not. The highest resolution format that the V-LUX 2 can use is 1080/60i.

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the V-LUX 2 has an electronic viewfinder (202k dots), while the E-300 has an optical one. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to project supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-free viewing and a very clear framing image. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Leica V-LUX 2 and Olympus E-300 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Leica V-LUX 2	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	11.0	Y	Y
	Olympus E-300	optical	n	1.8	134	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.5	Y	n
	Canon G1 X Mark II	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.2	Y	Y
	Canon SX40	202	n	2.7	230	swivel	n	1/3200s	10.3	Y	Y
	Canon SX30	202	n	2.7	230	swivel	n	1/3200s	0.6	Y	Y
	Canon SX20	202	n	2.5	230	swivel	n	1/3200s	0.7	Y	Y
	Leica X Typ 113	optional	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	5.0	Y	n
	Leica V-LUX 4	1312	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
	Leica V-LUX 3	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	12.0	Y	Y
	Leica Digilux 3	optical	n	2.5	207	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
	Leica V-LUX 1	235	n	2.0	207	swivel	n	1/2000s	2.0	Y	Y
	Olympus E-330	optical	n	2.5	215	tilting	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
	Olympus E-400	optical	n	2.5	215	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
	Olympus E-500	optical	n	2.5	215	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.5	Y	n
	Olympus E-1	optical	Y	1.8	134	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	n	n
	Panasonic FZ150	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	12.0	Y	Y
	Panasonic FZ100	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	11.0	Y	Y

The V-LUX 2 writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the E-300 uses Compact Flash or xD Picture cards. The E-300 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the V-LUX 2 only has one slot.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Leica V-LUX 2 and Olympus Evolt E-300 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Leica V-LUX 2	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Olympus E-300	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon G1 X Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Canon SX40	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	YES	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon SX30	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	YES	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon SX20	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	YES	2.0	-	-	-
	Leica X Typ 113	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Leica V-LUX 4	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Leica V-LUX 3	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Leica Digilux 3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Leica V-LUX 1	Y	mono	mono	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Olympus E-330	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Olympus E-400	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Olympus E-500	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Olympus E-1	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Panasonic FZ150	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Panasonic FZ100	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

Both the V-LUX 2 and the E-300 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The E-300 was replaced by the Olympus E-330, while the V-LUX 2 was followed by the Leica V-LUX 3. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Leica and Olympus websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is the Leica V-LUX 2 better than the Olympus E-300 or vice versa? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Advantages of the Leica V-LUX 2:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (14 vs 8MP) with a 32% higher linear resolution.
• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Broader imaging potential: Can record not only still images but also 1080/60i movies.
• More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 1.8") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (460k vs 134k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (11 vs 2.5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Ready to shoot: Comes with a built-in lens, while the E-300 requires a separate lens.
• More compact: Is smaller (124x80mm vs 147x85mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• Less heavy: Is lighter even though it comes with a built-in lens (unlike the E-300).
• Sharper images: Has hand-shake reducing image stabilization built-in.
• More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale price.
• More modern: Reflects 5 years and 11 months of technical progress since the E-300 launch.

Arguments in favor of the Olympus Evolt E-300:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Better image quality: Features bigger pixels on a larger sensor for higher quality imaging.
• Richer colors: The pixel size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
• More dynamic range: Larger pixels capture a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Larger pixels means good image quality even under poor lighting.
• Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free composition.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/4000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• More flexible: Makes it possible to change lenses and thus to use specialty optics.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (750 versus 410) out of a single battery charge.
• Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
• More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in September 2004).

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the V-LUX 2 is the clear winner of the match-up (15 : 11 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Leica V-LUX 2 and the Olympus E-300 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Superzoom Camera and Best DSLR Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the V-LUX 2 and the E-300 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Leica V-LUX 2	..	..	..	..	..	Sep 2010	849
	Olympus E-300	..	+	o	o	4.5/5	Sep 2004	799
	Canon G1 X Mark II	+	77/100	4/5	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	799
	Canon SX40	+	..	4.5/5	5/5	4/5	Sep 2011	429
	Canon SX30	+ +	..	3.5/5	4.5/5	4/5	Sep 2010	429
	Canon SX20	+ +	73/100	..	4/5	4/5	Aug 2009	399
	Leica X Typ 113	..	..	3.5/5	..	4/5	Sep 2014	2,295
	Leica V-LUX 4	..	..	..	..	..	Sep 2012	949
	Leica V-LUX 3	..	..	..	..	..	Dec 2011	949
	Leica Digilux 3	..	..	..	..	..	Sep 2006	1,499
	Leica V-LUX 1	..	..	..	..	..	Sep 2006	849
	Olympus E-330	..	+	o	3.5/5	..	Jan 2006	999
	Olympus E-400	85/100	..	4/5	..	4/5	Sep 2006	699
	Olympus E-500	76/100	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2005	599
	Olympus E-1	..	+	o	o	..	Jun 2003	1,699
	Panasonic FZ150	+ +	76/100	4/5	5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2011	499
	Panasonic FZ100	+	..	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Jul 2010	499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Leica V-LUX 2 vs Olympus E-300

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.