Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony HX400V

The Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in January 2018 and February 2014. Both the XP130 and the HX400V are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 15.9 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 20.2 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Fujifilm XP130		Sony HX400V
Fixed lens compact camera		Fixed lens compact camera
28-140mm f/3.9-4.9		24-1200mm f/2.8-6.3
15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		20.2 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor
1080/60p Video		1080/60p Video
ISO 100-3,200		ISO 80-3,200 (80 - 12,800)
No viewfinder, LCD framing		Electronic viewfinder (210k dots)
3.0 LCD, 920k dots		3.0 LCD, 921k dots
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)		Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive)
10 shutter flaps per second		10 shutter flaps per second
In-body stabilization		Lens-based stabilization
240 shots per battery charge		300 shots per battery charge
110 x 71 x 28 mm, 207 g		130 x 93 x 103 mm, 660 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm XP130 and the Sony HX400V. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The XP130 can be obtained in five different colors (black, blue, yellow, green, white), while the HX400V is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony HX400V is considerably larger (55 percent) than the Fujifilm XP130. Moreover, the HX400V is substantially heavier (219 percent) than the XP130. More than that, the XP130 is water-proof up to 20m and can, thus, be used for underwater photography.

Concerning battery life, the XP130 gets 240 shots out of its NP-45S battery, while the HX400V can take 300 images on a single charge of its NP-BX1 power pack. The power pack in the XP130 can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm XP130	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	n	Jan 2018	229
2.		Sony HX400V	130 mm	93 mm	103 mm	660 g	300	n	Feb 2014	499
3.		Canon SX600	104 mm	61 mm	26 mm	188 g	290	n	Jan 2014	249
4.		Canon SX60	128 mm	93 mm	114 mm	650 g	340	n	Sep 2014	549
5.		Fujifilm XP140	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	Y	Feb 2019	229
6.		Fujifilm XP120	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	203 g	210	Y	Jan 2017	229
7.		Nikon W300	112 mm	66 mm	29 mm	231 g	280	Y	May 2017	389
8.		Olympus TG-5	113 mm	66 mm	32 mm	250 g	340	Y	May 2017	449
9.		Olympus TG-4	112 mm	66 mm	31 mm	247 g	380	Y	Apr 2015	379
10.		Ricoh WG-60	123 mm	62 mm	30 mm	193 g	300	Y	Oct 2018	279
11.		Sony HX99	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	242 g	370	n	Aug 2018	449
12.		Sony HX95	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	242 g	370	n	Aug 2018	429
13.		Sony WX800	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	233 g	370	n	Oct 2018	399
14.		Sony HX350	130 mm	93 mm	103 mm	652 g	300	n	Dec 2016	449
15.		Sony HX90V	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	245 g	360	n	Apr 2015	429
16.		Sony H400	130 mm	95 mm	122 mm	628 g	300	n	Feb 2014	319
17.		Sony H300	128 mm	89 mm	92 mm	590 g	350	n	Feb 2014	219
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The XP130 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 54 percent) than the HX400V, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 5.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the smaller-sensor digicams that favor affordability and compact design. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.

In terms of underlying technology, both cameras are build around BSI-CMOS sensors.

While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the HX400V offers a higher resolution of 20.2 megapixels, compared with 15.9 MP of the XP130. This megapixels advantage translates into a 13 percent gain in linear resolution. On the other hand, these sensor specs imply that the HX400V has a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.18μm versus 1.33μm for the XP130). Moreover, it should be noted, that the XP130 is much more recent (by 3 years and 11 months) than the HX400V, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of individual pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Sony HX400V implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the HX400V for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 25.9 x 19.4 inches or 65.8 x 49.4 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 20.7 x 15.6 inches or 52.7 x 39.5 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 17.3 x 13 inches or 43.9 x 32.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Fujifilm XP130 are 23 x 17.3 inches or 58.5 x 43.9 cm for good quality, 18.4 x 13.8 inches or 46.8 x 35.1 cm for very good quality, and 15.4 x 11.5 inches or 39 x 29.3 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Fujifilm FinePix XP130 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V are ISO 80 to ISO 3200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 80-12800.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Fujifilm XP130	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
2.		Sony HX400V	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon SX600	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
4.		Canon SX60	1/2.3	14.2	4608	3072	1080/60p	19.2	10.8	127	39
5.		Fujifilm XP140	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/15p	..	..	..	..
6.		Fujifilm XP120	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
7.		Nikon W300	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
8.		Olympus TG-5	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
9.		Olympus TG-4	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
10.		Ricoh WG-60	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
11.		Sony HX99	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
12.		Sony HX95	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
13.		Sony WX800	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
14.		Sony HX350	1/2.3	19.9	5152	3864	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
15.		Sony HX90V	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
16.		Sony H400	1/2.3	19.9	5152	3864	720/30p	..	..	..	..
17.		Sony H300	1/2.3	19.9	5152	3864	720/30p	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, and both provide the same movie specifications (1080/60p).

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the HX400V has an electronic viewfinder (210k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the XP130 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Fujifilm XP130 and Sony HX400V in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Fujifilm XP130	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
2.		Sony HX400V	210	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	Y
3.		Canon SX600	none	n	3.0	461	fixed	n	1/2000s	3.9	Y	Y
4.		Canon SX60	922	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	6.4	Y	Y
5.		Fujifilm XP140	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
6.		Fujifilm XP120	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
7.		Nikon W300	none	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
8.		Olympus TG-5	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	20.0	Y	Y
9.		Olympus TG-4	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	5.0	Y	Y
10.		Ricoh WG-60	none	n	2.7	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
11.		Sony HX99	638	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
12.		Sony HX95	638	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
13.		Sony WX800	none	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
14.		Sony HX350	202	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	Y
15.		Sony HX90V	638	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
16.		Sony H400	210	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	0.7	Y	Y
17.		Sony H300	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/1500s	0.8	Y	Y

The Fujifilm XP130 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Both the XP130 and the HX400V have zoom lenses built in. The XP130 has a 28-140mm f/3.9-4.9 optic and the HX400V offers a 24-1200mm f/2.8-6.3 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the Sony provides a wider angle of view at the short end, as well as more tele-photo reach at the long end than the Fujifilm. The HX400V offers the faster maximum aperture.

The XP130 writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the HX400V uses SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Fujifilm XP130	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
2.		Sony HX400V	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
3.		Canon SX600	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
4.		Canon SX60	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Fujifilm XP140	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
6.		Fujifilm XP120	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
7.		Nikon W300	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
8.		Olympus TG-5	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
9.		Olympus TG-4	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
10.		Ricoh WG-60	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Sony HX99	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
12.		Sony HX95	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
13.		Sony WX800	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
14.		Sony HX350	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Sony HX90V	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
16.		Sony H400	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
17.		Sony H300	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-

It is notable that the HX400V has a hotshoe, which makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun. The XP130 does not feature such an accessory-socket.

Travel and landscape photographers will find it useful that the HX400V has an internal geolocalization sensor and can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.

The HX400V is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Sony. In contrast, the XP130 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the XP130 was succeeded by the Fujifilm XP140. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Sony websites.

Review summary

So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Fujifilm XP130 and the Sony HX400V? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Fujifilm FinePix XP130:

• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• More compact: Is smaller (110x71mm vs 130x93mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• Less heavy: Is lighter (by 453g or 69 percent) and hence easier to carry around.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• Water-proof: Is rugged and sealed and can thus be used for underwater photography (up to 20m).
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (54 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 3 years and 11 months of technical progress since the HX400V launch.

Advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (20.2 vs 15.9MP), which boosts linear resolution by 13%.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/4000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.9).
• Wider view: Has a wider-angle lens that facilitates landscape or interior shots.
• More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (300 versus 240) out of a single battery charge.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Easier geotagging: Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
• More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in February 2014).

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the HX400V is the clear winner of the contest (12 : 8 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm XP130 and the Sony HX400V place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Travel-Zoom Camera and Best Superzoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the XP130 or the HX400V. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm XP130	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2018	229
2.		Sony HX400V	4/5	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	Feb 2014	499
3.		Canon SX600	..	+	..	4/5	4/5	Jan 2014	249
4.		Canon SX60	3/5	+ +	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	549
5.		Fujifilm XP140	..	+	..	3.5/5	4/5	Feb 2019	229
6.		Fujifilm XP120	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2017	229
7.		Nikon W300	..	+	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	389
8.		Olympus TG-5	..	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	449
9.		Olympus TG-4	..	+	79/100	4/5	4/5	Apr 2015	379
10.		Ricoh WG-60	..	..	..	..	..	Oct 2018	279
11.		Sony HX99	..	..	..	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2018	449
12.		Sony HX95	..	..	..	..	..	Aug 2018	429
13.		Sony WX800	..	..	..	..	..	Oct 2018	399
14.		Sony HX350	..	..	..	..	4/5	Dec 2016	449
15.		Sony HX90V	4/5	+ +	..	4/5	4.5/5	Apr 2015	429
16.		Sony H400	..	o	..	3.5/5	3.5/5	Feb 2014	319
17.		Sony H300	..	+	..	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2014	219
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

~

Specifications: Fujifilm XP130 vs Sony HX400V

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.