Fujifilm XP130 vs Leica TL2

The Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and the Leica TL2 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in January 2018 and July 2017. The XP130 is a fixed lens compact, while the TL2 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. The cameras are based on a 1/2.3-inch (XP130) and an APS-C (TL2) sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 15.9 megapixels, whereas the Leica provides 24.1 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Fujifilm XP130		Leica TL2
Fixed lens compact camera		Mirrorless system camera
28-140mm f/3.9-4.9		Leica T mount lenses
15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		24.1 MP, APS-C Sensor
1080/60p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 100-3,200		ISO 100-50,000
No viewfinder, LCD framing		Viewfinder optional
3.0 LCD, 920k dots		3.7 LCD, 1230k dots
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed touchscreen
10 shutter flaps per second		7 shutter flaps per second
In-body stabilization		Lens stabilization only
240 shots per battery charge		250 shots per battery charge
110 x 71 x 28 mm, 207 g		134 x 69 x 33 mm, 399 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and the Leica TL2? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm XP130 and the Leica TL2 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The XP130 can be obtained in five different colors (black, blue, yellow, green, white), while the TL2 is available in two color-versions (black, silver).

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Leica TL2 is notably larger (18 percent) than the Fujifilm XP130. More than that, the XP130 is water-proof up to 20m and can, thus, be used for underwater photography.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the XP130 has a lens built in, whereas the TL2 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup.

The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USB, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm XP130	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	n	Jan 2018	229
2.		Leica TL2	134 mm	69 mm	33 mm	399 g	250	n	Jul 2017	1,950
3.		Canon SX600	104 mm	61 mm	26 mm	188 g	290	n	Jan 2014	249
4.		Fujifilm XP140	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	Y	Feb 2019	229
5.		Fujifilm X-T20	118 mm	83 mm	41 mm	383 g	350	n	Jan 2017	899
6.		Fujifilm XP120	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	203 g	210	Y	Jan 2017	229
7.		Fujifilm X-A3	117 mm	67 mm	40 mm	339 g	410	n	Aug 2016	399
8.		Leica CL	131 mm	78 mm	45 mm	403 g	220	n	Nov 2017	2,795
9.		Leica TL	134 mm	69 mm	33 mm	384 g	400	n	Nov 2016	1,695
10.		Nikon W300	112 mm	66 mm	29 mm	231 g	280	Y	May 2017	389
11.		Nikon D3400	124 mm	98 mm	76 mm	445 g	1200	n	Aug 2016	499
12.		Olympus TG-5	113 mm	66 mm	32 mm	250 g	340	Y	May 2017	449
13.		Olympus TG-4	112 mm	66 mm	31 mm	247 g	380	Y	Apr 2015	379
14.		Ricoh WG-60	123 mm	62 mm	30 mm	193 g	300	Y	Oct 2018	279
15.		Sony HX99	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	242 g	370	n	Aug 2018	449
16.		Sony HX95	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	242 g	370	n	Aug 2018	429
17.		Sony WX800	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	233 g	370	n	Oct 2018	399
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The XP130 was launched at a lower price than the TL2, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm XP130 features a 1/2.3-inch sensor and the Leica TL2 an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the TL2 is 1225 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 5.6 and 1.5. The sensor in the XP130 has a native 4:3 aspect ratio, while the one in the TL2 offers a 3:2 aspect.

With 24.1MP, the TL2 offers a higher resolution than the XP130 (15.9MP), but the TL2 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.92μm versus 1.33μm for the XP130) due to its larger sensor. However, the XP130 is a somewhat more recent model (by 6 months) than the TL2, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Leica TL2 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the TL2 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30.1 x 20.1 inches or 76.4 x 51 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24.1 x 16.1 inches or 61.1 x 40.8 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.4 inches or 50.9 x 34 cm. The corresponding values for the Fujifilm XP130 are 23 x 17.3 inches or 58.5 x 43.9 cm for good quality, 18.4 x 13.8 inches or 46.8 x 35.1 cm for very good quality, and 15.4 x 11.5 inches or 39 x 29.3 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Fujifilm FinePix XP130 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Leica TL2 are ISO 100 to ISO 50000 (no boost).

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Fujifilm XP130	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
2.		Leica TL2	APS-C	24.1	6014	4014	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon SX600	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
4.		Fujifilm XP140	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/15p	..	..	..	..
5.		Fujifilm X-T20	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
6.		Fujifilm XP120	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
7.		Fujifilm X-A3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
8.		Leica CL	APS-C	24.1	6014	4014	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
9.		Leica TL	APS-C	16.1	4928	3264	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
10.		Nikon W300	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
11.		Nikon D3400	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.8	13.9	1192	86
12.		Olympus TG-5	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
13.		Olympus TG-4	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
14.		Ricoh WG-60	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
15.		Sony HX99	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
16.		Sony HX95	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
17.		Sony WX800	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the TL2 provides a better video resolution than the XP130. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/30p, while the Fujifilm is limited to 1080/60p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The XP130 and the TL2 are similar in the sense that neither of the two has a viewfinder. The images are, thus, framed using live view on the rear LCD. That said, the TL2 can be equipped with an optional viewfinder – the Visoflex (Typ 020). The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Fujifilm XP130 and Leica TL2 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Fujifilm XP130	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
2.		Leica TL2	optional	n	3.7	1230	fixed	Y	1/4000s	7.0	n	n
3.		Canon SX600	none	n	3.0	461	fixed	n	1/2000s	3.9	Y	Y
4.		Fujifilm XP140	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
5.		Fujifilm X-T20	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
6.		Fujifilm XP120	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
7.		Fujifilm X-A3	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
8.		Leica CL	2360	Y	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	n
9.		Leica TL	optional	n	3.7	1230	fixed	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
10.		Nikon W300	none	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
11.		Nikon D3400	optical	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
12.		Olympus TG-5	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	20.0	Y	Y
13.		Olympus TG-4	none	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/2000s	5.0	Y	Y
14.		Ricoh WG-60	none	n	2.7	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
15.		Sony HX99	638	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
16.		Sony HX95	638	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
17.		Sony WX800	none	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y

One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The XP130 has one, while the TL2 does not. While the built-in flash of the XP130 is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.

The Fujifilm XP130 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the XP130 and the TL2 write their files to SDXC cards. The TL2 supports UHS-II cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 312 MB/s), while the XP130 cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm FinePix XP130 and Leica TL2 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Fujifilm XP130	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
2.		Leica TL2	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	3.0	Y	-	-
3.		Canon SX600	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
4.		Fujifilm XP140	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
5.		Fujifilm X-T20	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
6.		Fujifilm XP120	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
7.		Fujifilm X-A3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
8.		Leica CL	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	-	-	Y	-	-
9.		Leica TL	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
10.		Nikon W300	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
11.		Nikon D3400	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	Y
12.		Olympus TG-5	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
13.		Olympus TG-4	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Ricoh WG-60	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Sony HX99	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
16.		Sony HX95	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
17.		Sony WX800	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-

It is notable that the TL2 has a hotshoe, which makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun. The XP130 does not feature such an accessory-socket.

The TL2 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Leica. In contrast, the XP130 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the XP130 was succeeded by the Fujifilm XP140. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Leica websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Which of the two cameras – the Fujifilm XP130 or the Leica TL2 – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Fujifilm FinePix XP130:

• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 7 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• Ready to shoot: Has a lens built-in, whereas the TL2 requires a separate lens.
• More compact: Is smaller (110x71mm vs 134x69mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• Less heavy: Is lighter even though it comes with a built-in lens (unlike the TL2).
• Sharper images: Has hand-shake reducing image stabilization built-in.
• Water-proof: Is rugged and sealed and can thus be used for underwater photography (up to 20m).
• Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
• More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 6 months after the TL2).

Advantages of the Leica TL2:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (24.1 vs 15.9MP), which boosts linear resolution by 26%.
• Better image quality: Features bigger pixels on a larger sensor for higher quality imaging.
• Richer colors: The pixel size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
• More dynamic range: Larger pixels capture a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Larger pixels means good image quality even under poor lighting.
• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/60p).
• More framing options: Can be equipped with a hotshoe-mounted accessory-viewfinder.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.7" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1230k vs 920k dots).
• Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/4000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• More flexible: Takes interchangeable lenses and can thus be used with specialty optics.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.0 vs 2.0).
• Faster buffer clearing: Has an SD card interface that supports the UHS-II standard.
• More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale value.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in July 2017).

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the TL2 is the clear winner of the contest (17 : 11 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm XP130 and the Leica TL2 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Travel-Zoom Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the XP130 and the TL2 in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is why expert reviews are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm XP130	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2018	229
2.		Leica TL2	3.5/5	..	..	4/5	4/5	Jul 2017	1,950
3.		Canon SX600	..	+	..	4/5	4/5	Jan 2014	249
4.		Fujifilm XP140	..	+	..	3.5/5	4/5	Feb 2019	229
5.		Fujifilm X-T20	5/5	+ +	82/100	5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2017	899
6.		Fujifilm XP120	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2017	229
7.		Fujifilm X-A3	..	..	74/100	4.5/5	4/5	Aug 2016	399
8.		Leica CL	..	..	..	..	4/5	Nov 2017	2,795
9.		Leica TL	..	..	..	..	4/5	Nov 2016	1,695
10.		Nikon W300	..	+	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	389
11.		Nikon D3400	4/5	+	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2016	499
12.		Olympus TG-5	..	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	449
13.		Olympus TG-4	..	+	79/100	4/5	4/5	Apr 2015	379
14.		Ricoh WG-60	..	..	..	..	..	Oct 2018	279
15.		Sony HX99	..	..	..	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2018	449
16.		Sony HX95	..	..	..	..	..	Aug 2018	429
17.		Sony WX800	..	..	..	..	..	Oct 2018	399
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Fujifilm XP130 vs Leica TL2

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.