Fujifilm X100V vs Pentax KP
The Fujifilm X100V and the Pentax KP are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2020 and January 2017. The X100V is a fixed lens compact, while the KP is a DSLR. Both cameras are equipped with an APS-C sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 26 megapixels, whereas the Pentax provides 24.1 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X100V and the Pentax KP? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X100V and the Pentax KP are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
Both cameras are available in two different colors (black, silver).



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Pentax KP is notably larger (39 percent) than the Fujifilm X100V. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the X100V has a lens built in, whereas the KP is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup.
Concerning battery life, the X100V gets 420 shots out of its NP-W126S battery, while the KP can take 390 images on a single charge of its D-LI109 power pack. The power pack in the X100V can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.
The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life |
Weather Sealing |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) | Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | 128 mm | 75 mm | 53 mm | 478 g | 420 | Y | Feb 2020 | 1,399 | ||
2. | Pentax KP | 132 mm | 101 mm | 76 mm | 703 g | 390 | Y | Jan 2017 | 1,099 | ||
3. | Canon RP | 133 mm | 85 mm | 70 mm | 485 g | 250 | n | Feb 2019 | 1,299 | ||
4. | Canon G1 X Mark III | 115 mm | 78 mm | 51 mm | 399 g | 200 | Y | Oct 2017 | 1,299 | ||
5. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | 141 mm | 83 mm | 46 mm | 497 g | 440 | Y | Oct 2019 | 1,799 | ||
6. | Fujifilm X-T3 | 133 mm | 93 mm | 59 mm | 539 g | 390 | Y | Sep 2018 | 1,499 | ||
7. | Fujifilm X100F | 127 mm | 75 mm | 52 mm | 469 g | 390 | n | Jan 2017 | 1,299 | ||
8. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | 141 mm | 83 mm | 46 mm | 495 g | 350 | Y | Jan 2016 | 1,699 | ||
9. | Fujifilm X-T2 | 133 mm | 92 mm | 49 mm | 507 g | 340 | Y | Jul 2016 | 1,599 | ||
10. | Fujifilm X100T | 127 mm | 74 mm | 52 mm | 440 g | 330 | n | Sep 2014 | 1,299 | ||
11. | Pentax K-70 | 126 mm | 93 mm | 74 mm | 688 g | 410 | Y | Jun 2016 | 649 | ||
12. | Pentax K-S2 | 123 mm | 91 mm | 73 mm | 678 g | 410 | Y | Feb 2015 | 749 | ||
13. | Pentax K-3 II | 131 mm | 100 mm | 77 mm | 800 g | 720 | Y | Apr 2015 | 1,099 | ||
14. | Pentax K-3 | 131 mm | 100 mm | 77 mm | 800 g | 560 | Y | Oct 2013 | 1,299 | ||
15. | Pentax K-5 | 131 mm | 97 mm | 73 mm | 760 g | 740 | Y | Sep 2010 | 1,099 | ||
16. | Sigma fp | 113 mm | 70 mm | 45 mm | 422 g | 280 | Y | Jul 2019 | 1,899 | ||
17. | Sony A6600 | 120 mm | 67 mm | 69 mm | 503 g | 810 | Y | Aug 2019 | 1,399 | ||
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. | |||||||||||
Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.
Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. They nevertheless have the same format factor of 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 26MP, the X100V offers a slightly higher resolution than the KP (24.1MP), but the X100V has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.76μm versus 3.90μm for the KP). However, the X100V is a much more recent model (by 3 years) than the KP, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.
The X100V has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.
Unlike the X100V, the KP has the capacity to capture high quality composite images by combining multiple shots after shifting its sensor by miniscule distances. This multi-shot, pixel-shift mode is most suitable for photography of stationary objects (landscapes, studio scenes).
The Fujifilm X100V has a native sensitivity range from ISO 160 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 80-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Pentax KP are ISO 100 to ISO 819200 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports | DXO Overall |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | APS-C | 26.0 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
2. | Pentax KP | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/60i | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
3. | Canon RP | Full Frame | 26.2 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
4. | Canon G1 X Mark III | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
5. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | APS-C | 26.0 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
6. | Fujifilm X-T3 | APS-C | 26.0 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
7. | Fujifilm X100F | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
8. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
9. | Fujifilm X-T2 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
10. | Fujifilm X100T | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
11. | Pentax K-70 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60i | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
12. | Pentax K-S2 | APS-C | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
13. | Pentax K-3 II | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/60i | 23.6 | 13.6 | 1106 | 80 | |
14. | Pentax K-3 | APS-C | 24.1 | 6016 | 4000 | 1080/60i | 23.7 | 13.4 | 1216 | 80 | |
15. | Pentax K-5 | APS-C | 16.1 | 4928 | 3264 | 1080/25p | 23.7 | 14.1 | 1162 | 82 | |
16. | Sigma fp | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
17. | Sony A6600 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | 23.8 | 13.4 | 1497 | 82 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the X100V provides a higher video resolution than the KP. It can shoot video footage at 4K/30p, while the Pentax is limited to 1080/60i.
Feature comparison
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the X100V has an electronic viewfinder (3690k dots), while the KP has an optical one. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to project supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-free viewing and a very clear framing image. The viewfinder in the KP offers a wider field of view (100%) than the one in the X100V (95%), so that a larger proportion of the captured image is visible in the finder. In addition, the viewfinder of the KP has a higher magnification (0.63x vs 0.52x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Fujifilm X100V and Pentax KP along with similar information for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution (000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) | Built-in Flash (yes/no) | Built-in Image Stab |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | 3690 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 11.0 | Y | n | |
2. | Pentax KP | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | tilting | n | 1/6000s | 7.0 | Y | Y | |
3. | Canon RP | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
4. | Canon G1 X Mark III | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 1/2000s | 9.0 | Y | Y | |
5. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | 3690 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | tilting | Y | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
6. | Fujifilm X-T3 | 3690 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/8000s | 11.0 | n | n | |
7. | Fujifilm X100F | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | |
8. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
9. | Fujifilm X-T2 | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | n | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
10. | Fujifilm X100T | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | |
11. | Pentax K-70 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 1/6000s | 6.0 | Y | Y | |
12. | Pentax K-S2 | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | swivel | n | 1/6000s | 5.4 | Y | Y | |
13. | Pentax K-3 II | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | n | Y | |
14. | Pentax K-3 | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | Y | Y | |
15. | Pentax K-5 | optical | Y | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 7.0 | Y | Y | |
16. | Sigma fp | none | n | 3.2 | 2100 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 12.0 | n | n | |
17. | Sony A6600 | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 11.0 | n | Y |
One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The X100V has a touchscreen, while the KP has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.
The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, both cameras under consideration feature an electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
The Fujifilm X100V and the Pentax KP both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the X100V and the KP write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm X100V and Pentax KP and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Port |
WiFi Support | NFC Support | Bluetooth Support |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
2. | Pentax KP | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | - | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
3. | Canon RP | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | |
4. | Canon G1 X Mark III | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | |
5. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | - | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
6. | Fujifilm X-T3 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
7. | Fujifilm X100F | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
8. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
9. | Fujifilm X-T2 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 3.0 | Y | - | - | |
10. | Fujifilm X100T | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
11. | Pentax K-70 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
12. | Pentax K-S2 | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
13. | Pentax K-3 II | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
14. | Pentax K-3 | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
15. | Pentax K-5 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
16. | Sigma fp | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 3.1 | - | - | - | |
17. | Sony A6600 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | YES | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y |
Both the X100V and the KP are recent models that are part of the current product line-up. The X100V replaced the earlier Fujifilm X100F, while the KP does not have a direct predecessor. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Pentax websites.
Review summary
So how do things add up? Which of the two cameras – the Fujifilm X100V or the Pentax KP – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm X100V:
- Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/60i).
- Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
- More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1620k vs 921k dots).
- Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (11 vs 7 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Ready to shoot: Comes with a built-in lens, while the KP requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (128x75mm vs 132x101mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
- Less heavy: Is lighter even though it comes with a built-in lens (unlike the KP).
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.1 vs 2.0).
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- More modern: Reflects 3 years of technical progress since the KP launch.

Advantages of the Pentax KP:
- High quality composites: Can combine several shots after pixel-shifting its sensor.
- Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free composition.
- More complete view: Has a viewfinder with a larger field of view (100% vs 95%).
- Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.63x vs 0.52x).
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/6000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Makes it possible to change lenses and thus to use specialty optics.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in January 2017).
If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the X100V is the clear winner of the match-up (13 : 8 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X100V and the Pentax KP place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Prime Lens Compact Camera and Best DSLR Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the X100V or the KP. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.
Expert reviews
This is why expert reviews are important. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
AP score |
CL score |
DPR score |
EPZ score |
PB score |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | 5/5 | + + | 86/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2020 | 1,399 | ||
2. | Pentax KP | 4/5 | .. | 82/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 1,099 | ||
3. | Canon RP | 4/5 | + | .. | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Feb 2019 | 1,299 | ||
4. | Canon G1 X Mark III | 5/5 | + | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2017 | 1,299 | ||
5. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | 4/5 | + | 85/100 | 4/5 | .. | Oct 2019 | 1,799 | ||
6. | Fujifilm X-T3 | 5/5 | + + | 88/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2018 | 1,499 | ||
7. | Fujifilm X100F | 5/5 | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 1,299 | ||
8. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | .. | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2016 | 1,699 | ||
9. | Fujifilm X-T2 | 5/5 | + + | 86/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Jul 2016 | 1,599 | ||
10. | Fujifilm X100T | 5/5 | + | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2014 | 1,299 | ||
11. | Pentax K-70 | 4.5/5 | .. | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2016 | 649 | ||
12. | Pentax K-S2 | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 749 | ||
13. | Pentax K-3 II | 4.5/5 | .. | .. | 5/5 | 5/5 | Apr 2015 | 1,099 | ||
14. | Pentax K-3 | 4/5 | .. | 83/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Oct 2013 | 1,299 | ||
15. | Pentax K-5 | 4/5 | .. | 83/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2010 | 1,099 | ||
16. | Sigma fp | 4/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jul 2019 | 1,899 | ||
17. | Sony A6600 | 4/5 | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Aug 2019 | 1,399 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available. |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Check Amazon price Pentax KP:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
Specifications: Fujifilm X100V vs Pentax KP
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Fujifilm X100V | Pentax KP |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Fixed lens compact camera | Digital single lens reflex |
Camera Lens | 35mm f/2.0 | Pentax K mount lenses |
Launch Date | February 2020 | January 2017 |
Launch Price | USD 1,399 | USD 1,099 |
Sensor Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Pentax KP |
Sensor Technology | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | APS-C Sensor |
Sensor Size | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
Sensor Area | 368.16 mm2 | 366.6 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 28.3 mm | 28.2 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.5x | 1.5x |
Sensor Resolution | 26 Megapixels | 24.1 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 6240 x 4160 pixels | 6016 x 4000 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 3.76 μm | 3.90 μm |
Pixel Density | 7.05 MP/cm2 | 6.56 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | no AA filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 4K/30p Video | 1080/60i Video |
ISO Setting | 160 - 12,800 ISO | 100 - 819,200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 80 - 51,200 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | X-Processor 4 | PRIME IV |
Screen Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Pentax KP |
Viewfinder Type | Electronic viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.52x | 0.63x |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3690k dots | |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0inch | 3.0inch |
LCD Resolution | 1620k dots | 921k dots |
LCD Attachment | Tilting screen | Tilting screen |
Touch Input | Touchscreen | no Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Pentax KP |
Focus System | On-Sensor Phase-detect | Phase-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | Focus Peaking | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous Shooting | 11 shutter flaps/s | 7 shutter flaps/s |
Electronic Shutter | up to 1/32000s | up to 1/24000s |
Time-Lapse Photography | Intervalometer built-in | Intervalometer built-in |
Image Stabilization | no shake reduction | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
UHS card support | UHS-I | UHS-I |
Connectivity Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Pentax KP |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 3.1 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | micro HDMI | no HDMI |
Microphone Port | External MIC port | External MIC port |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Bluetooth Support | Bluetooth built-in | no Bluetooth |
Body Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Pentax KP |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | NP-W126S | D-LI109 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 420 shots per charge | 390 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | USB charging | no USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
128 x 75 x 53 mm (5.0 x 3.0 x 2.1 in) |
132 x 101 x 76 mm (5.2 x 4.0 x 3.0 in) |
Camera Weight | 478 g (16.9 oz) | 703 g (24.8 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.