Fujifilm X100V vs Leica SL
The Fujifilm X100V and the Leica SL (Typ 601) are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2020 and October 2015. The X100V is a fixed lens compact, while the SL is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. The cameras are based on an APS-C (X100V) and a full frame (SL) sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 26 megapixels, whereas the Leica provides 24 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X100V and the Leica SL (Typ 601)? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X100V and the Leica SL are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The X100V can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the SL is only available in black.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Leica SL is considerably larger (59 percent) than the Fujifilm X100V. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the X100V has a lens built in, whereas the SL is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup.
The power pack in the X100V can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.
The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life |
Weather Sealing |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) | Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | 128 mm | 75 mm | 53 mm | 478 g | 420 | Y | Feb 2020 | 1,399 | ||
2. | Leica SL | 147 mm | 104 mm | 39 mm | 847 g | 400 | Y | Oct 2015 | 7,450 | ||
3. | Canon G1 X Mark III | 115 mm | 78 mm | 51 mm | 399 g | 200 | Y | Oct 2017 | 1,299 | ||
4. | Canon 1D X Mark II | 158 mm | 168 mm | 83 mm | 1530 g | 1210 | Y | Feb 2016 | 5,999 | ||
5. | Canon 80D | 139 mm | 105 mm | 79 mm | 730 g | 960 | Y | Feb 2016 | 1,199 | ||
6. | Canon 5DS | 152 mm | 116 mm | 76 mm | 930 g | 700 | Y | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | ||
7. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | 141 mm | 83 mm | 46 mm | 497 g | 440 | Y | Oct 2019 | 1,799 | ||
8. | Fujifilm X-T3 | 133 mm | 93 mm | 59 mm | 539 g | 390 | Y | Sep 2018 | 1,499 | ||
9. | Fujifilm X100F | 127 mm | 75 mm | 52 mm | 469 g | 390 | n | Jan 2017 | 1,299 | ||
10. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | 141 mm | 83 mm | 46 mm | 495 g | 350 | Y | Jan 2016 | 1,699 | ||
11. | Fujifilm X-T2 | 133 mm | 92 mm | 49 mm | 507 g | 340 | Y | Jul 2016 | 1,599 | ||
12. | Fujifilm X100T | 127 mm | 74 mm | 52 mm | 440 g | 330 | n | Sep 2014 | 1,299 | ||
13. | Fujifilm X-T1 | 129 mm | 90 mm | 47 mm | 440 g | 350 | Y | Jan 2014 | 1,299 | ||
14. | Leica SL2 | 146 mm | 107 mm | 42 mm | 953 g | 370 | Y | Nov 2019 | 5,999 | ||
15. | Leica M Typ 240 | 139 mm | 80 mm | 42 mm | 680 g | .. | Y | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | ||
16. | Samsung NX1 | 139 mm | 102 mm | 66 mm | 550 g | 500 | Y | Sep 2014 | 1,499 | ||
17. | Sony A6600 | 120 mm | 67 mm | 69 mm | 503 g | 810 | Y | Aug 2019 | 1,399 | ||
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. | |||||||||||
Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The X100V was launched at a lower price than the SL, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm X100V features an APS-C sensor and the Leica SL a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the SL is 135 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.5 and 1.0. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the Fujifilm X100V offers a higher resolution of 26 megapixels, compared with 24 MP of the Leica SL. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 3.76μm versus 6.00μm for the SL). However, it should be noted that the X100V is much more recent (by 4 years and 3 months) than the SL, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.
The X100V has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.
The Fujifilm X100V has a native sensitivity range from ISO 160 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 80-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Leica SL (Typ 601) are ISO 50 to ISO 50000 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports | DXO Overall |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | APS-C | 26.0 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
2. | Leica SL | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | 25.0 | 13.4 | 1821 | 88 | |
3. | Canon G1 X Mark III | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
4. | Canon 1D X Mark II | Full Frame | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 4K/60p | 24.1 | 13.5 | 3207 | 88 | |
5. | Canon 80D | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 23.6 | 13.2 | 1135 | 79 | |
6. | Canon 5DS | Full Frame | 50.3 | 8688 | 5792 | 1080/30p | 24.7 | 12.4 | 2381 | 87 | |
7. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | APS-C | 26.0 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
8. | Fujifilm X-T3 | APS-C | 26.0 | 6240 | 4160 | 4K/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
9. | Fujifilm X100F | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
10. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
11. | Fujifilm X-T2 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
12. | Fujifilm X100T | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
13. | Fujifilm X-T1 | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
14. | Leica SL2 | Full Frame | 46.7 | 8368 | 5584 | 4K/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
15. | Leica M Typ 240 | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | 24.0 | 13.3 | 1860 | 84 | |
16. | Samsung NX1 | APS-C | 28.0 | 6480 | 4320 | 4K/30p | 24.2 | 13.2 | 1363 | 83 | |
17. | Sony A6600 | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | 23.8 | 13.4 | 1497 | 82 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, and both provide the same movie specifications (4K/30p).
Feature comparison
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the SL offers a higher resolution than the one in the X100V (4400k vs 3690k dots). The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Fujifilm X100V and Leica SL in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution (000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) | Built-in Flash (yes/no) | Built-in Image Stab |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | 3690 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 11.0 | Y | n | |
2. | Leica SL | 4400 | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 11.0 | n | n | |
3. | Canon G1 X Mark III | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 1/2000s | 9.0 | Y | Y | |
4. | Canon 1D X Mark II | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1620 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 16.0 | n | n | |
5. | Canon 80D | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 1/8000s | 7.0 | Y | n | |
6. | Canon 5DS | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
7. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | 3690 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | tilting | Y | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
8. | Fujifilm X-T3 | 3690 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/8000s | 11.0 | n | n | |
9. | Fujifilm X100F | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | |
10. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1620 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
11. | Fujifilm X-T2 | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | n | 1/8000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
12. | Fujifilm X100T | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | |
13. | Fujifilm X-T1 | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | n | n | |
14. | Leica SL2 | 5760 | Y | 3.2 | 2100 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | Y | |
15. | Leica M Typ 240 | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
16. | Samsung NX1 | 2360 | Y | 3.0 | 1036 | tilting | Y | 1/8000s | 15.0 | Y | n | |
17. | Sony A6600 | 2359 | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 11.0 | n | Y |
One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The X100V has one, while the SL does not. While the built-in flash of the X100V is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.
The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, both cameras under consideration feature an electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
The Fujifilm X100V and the Leica SL both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the X100V and the SL write their files to SDXC cards. The SL features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the X100V only has one slot. The SL supports UHS-II cards (on its first slot), while the X100V can use UHS-I cards.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm X100V and Leica SL (Typ 601) and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Port |
WiFi Support | NFC Support | Bluetooth Support |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
2. | Leica SL | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | full | 3.0 | Y | - | - | |
3. | Canon G1 X Mark III | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | |
4. | Canon 1D X Mark II | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
5. | Canon 80D | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
6. | Canon 5DS | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
7. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | - | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
8. | Fujifilm X-T3 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
9. | Fujifilm X100F | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
10. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
11. | Fujifilm X-T2 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 3.0 | Y | - | - | |
12. | Fujifilm X100T | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
13. | Fujifilm X-T1 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
14. | Leica SL2 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | full | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | |
15. | Leica M Typ 240 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
16. | Samsung NX1 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 3.0 | Y | Y | Y | |
17. | Sony A6600 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | YES | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y |
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Leica SL (unlike the X100V) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
Travel and landscape photographers will find it useful that the SL has an internal geolocalization sensor and can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.
The X100V is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Fujifilm. In contrast, the SL has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the SL was succeeded by the Leica SL2. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Leica websites.
Review summary
So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Fujifilm X100V and the Leica SL? Which camera is better? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Advantages of the Fujifilm X100V:
- Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1620k vs 1040k dots).
- More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
- Ready to shoot: Has a lens built-in, whereas the SL requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (128x75mm vs 147x104mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
- Less heavy: Is lighter even though it comes with a built-in lens (unlike the SL).
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More modern: Reflects 4 years and 3 months of technical progress since the SL launch.

Reasons to prefer the Leica SL (Typ 601):
- Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
- More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (4400k vs 3690k dots).
- More complete view: Has a viewfinder with a larger field of view (100% vs 95%).
- Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.80x vs 0.52x).
- Easier setting verification: Features a control panel on top to check shooting parameters.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Takes interchangeable lenses and can thus be used with specialty optics.
- Easier geotagging: Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
- More solid recording: Has a full-sized HDMI port for a sturdy connection to an external recorder.
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- Faster buffer clearing: Supports a more advanced SD data transfer standard (UHS-II vs UHS-I).
- More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale value.
- More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in October 2015).
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the SL emerges as the winner of the match-up (14 : 11 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X100V and the Leica SL place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Prime Lens Compact Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the X100V and the SL in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.
Expert reviews
This is where reviews by experts come in. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
AP score |
CL score |
DPR score |
EPZ score |
PB score |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Fujifilm X100V | 5/5 | + + | 86/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2020 | 1,399 | ||
2. | Leica SL | 4/5 | .. | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Oct 2015 | 7,450 | ||
3. | Canon G1 X Mark III | 5/5 | + | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2017 | 1,299 | ||
4. | Canon 1D X Mark II | .. | .. | 89/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 5,999 | ||
5. | Canon 80D | 4/5 | + + | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2016 | 1,199 | ||
6. | Canon 5DS | .. | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | ||
7. | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | 4/5 | + | 85/100 | 4/5 | .. | Oct 2019 | 1,799 | ||
8. | Fujifilm X-T3 | 5/5 | + + | 88/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2018 | 1,499 | ||
9. | Fujifilm X100F | 5/5 | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 1,299 | ||
10. | Fujifilm X-Pro2 | .. | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2016 | 1,699 | ||
11. | Fujifilm X-T2 | 5/5 | + + | 86/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Jul 2016 | 1,599 | ||
12. | Fujifilm X100T | 5/5 | + | 81/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2014 | 1,299 | ||
13. | Fujifilm X-T1 | 5/5 | + + | 84/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Jan 2014 | 1,299 | ||
14. | Leica SL2 | 4/5 | .. | .. | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Nov 2019 | 5,999 | ||
15. | Leica M Typ 240 | 4/5 | .. | .. | 4/5 | .. | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | ||
16. | Samsung NX1 | 5/5 | .. | 87/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2014 | 1,499 | ||
17. | Sony A6600 | 4/5 | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | Aug 2019 | 1,399 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available. |
The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.
Check Amazon price Leica SL:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just make your choice using the following search menu. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.
Specifications: Fujifilm X100V vs Leica SL
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Fujifilm X100V | Leica SL |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Fixed lens compact camera | Mirrorless system camera |
Camera Lens | 35mm f/2.0 | Leica L mount lenses |
Launch Date | February 2020 | October 2015 |
Launch Price | USD 1,399 | USD 7,450 |
Sensor Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Leica SL |
Sensor Technology | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | Full Frame Sensor |
Sensor Size | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 36.0 x 24.0 mm |
Sensor Area | 368.16 mm2 | 864 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 28.3 mm | 43.3 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.5x | 1.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 26 Megapixels | 24 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 6240 x 4160 pixels | 6000 x 4000 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 3.76 μm | 6.00 μm |
Pixel Density | 7.05 MP/cm2 | 2.78 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | no AA filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 4K/30p Video | 4K/30p Video |
ISO Setting | 160 - 12,800 ISO | 50 - 50,000 ISO |
ISO Boost | 80 - 51,200 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | X-Processor 4 | Maestro II |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | .. | 88 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | .. | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | .. | 13.4 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | .. | 1821 |
Screen Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Leica SL |
Viewfinder Type | Electronic viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.52x | 0.80x |
Viewfinder Resolution | 3690k dots | 4400k dots |
Top-Level Screen | no Top Display | Control Panel |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0inch | 3.0inch |
LCD Resolution | 1620k dots | 1040k dots |
LCD Attachment | Tilting screen | Fixed screen |
Touch Input | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Leica SL |
Focus System | On-Sensor Phase-detect | Contrast-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | Focus Peaking | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous Shooting | 11 shutter flaps/s | 11 shutter flaps/s |
Electronic Shutter | up to 1/32000s | up to 1/16000s |
Time-Lapse Photography | Intervalometer built-in | Intervalometer built-in |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | no On-Board Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Dual card slots |
UHS card support | UHS-I | Single UHS-II |
Connectivity Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Leica SL |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | no PC Sync | PC Sync socket |
USB Connector | USB 3.1 | USB 3.0 |
HDMI Port | micro HDMI | full HDMI |
Microphone Port | External MIC port | External MIC port |
Headphone Socket | no Headphone port | Headphone port |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Bluetooth Support | Bluetooth built-in | no Bluetooth |
Geotagging | no internal GPS | GPS built-in |
Body Specs | Fujifilm X100V | Leica SL |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | NP-W126S | BP-SCL4 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 420 shots per charge | 400 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | USB charging | no USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
128 x 75 x 53 mm (5.0 x 3.0 x 2.1 in) |
147 x 104 x 39 mm (5.8 x 4.1 x 1.5 in) |
Camera Weight | 478 g (16.9 oz) | 847 g (29.9 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.