Fujifilm X-T2 vs Panasonic G110

The Fujifilm X-T2 and the Panasonic Lumix DC-G110 (labelled Panasonic G100 in some countries) are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in July 2016 and June 2020. Both the X-T2 and the G110 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on an APS-C (X-T2) and a Four Thirds (G110) sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the Panasonic provides 20.2 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Fujifilm X-T2		Panasonic G110
Mirrorless system camera		Mirrorless system camera
Fujifilm X mount lenses		Micro Four Thirds lenses
24 MP, APS-C Sensor		20.2 MP, Four Thirds Sensor
4K/30p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 200-12,800 (100 - 51,200)		ISO 200-25,600
Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (3680k dots)
3.0 LCD, 1040k dots		3.0 LCD, 1840k dots
Tilting screen (no touchscreen)		Swivel touchscreen
8 shutter flaps per second		10 shutter flaps per second
Weathersealed body		not weather sealed
340 shots per battery charge		270 shots per battery charge
133 x 92 x 49 mm, 507 g		116 x 83 x 54 mm, 352 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X-T2 and the Panasonic Lumix DC-G110? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X-T2 and the Panasonic G110 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The X-T2 can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the G110 is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Panasonic G110 is notably smaller (21 percent) than the Fujifilm X-T2. Moreover, the G110 is markedly lighter (31 percent) than the X-T2. It is worth mentioning in this context that the X-T2 is splash and dust resistant, while the G110 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Fujinon X Lens Catalog (X-T2) and the Micro Four Thirds Lens Catalog (G110). Mirrorless cameras, such as the two under consideration, have the additional advantage of having a short flange to focal plane distance, which makes it possible to mount many lenses from other systems onto the camera via adapters.

Concerning battery life, the X-T2 gets 340 shots out of its NP-W126S battery, while the G110 can take 270 images on a single charge of its DMW-BLG10 power pack. The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USB, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm X-T2	133 mm	92 mm	49 mm	507 g	340	Y	Jul 2016	1,599
2.		Panasonic G110	116 mm	83 mm	54 mm	352 g	270	n	Jun 2020	649
3.		Fujifilm X100V	128 mm	75 mm	53 mm	478 g	420	Y	Feb 2020	1,399
4.		Fujifilm X-T4	135 mm	93 mm	64 mm	607 g	500	Y	Feb 2020	1,699
5.		Fujifilm X-Pro3	141 mm	83 mm	46 mm	497 g	440	Y	Oct 2019	1,799
6.		Fujifilm X-T3	133 mm	93 mm	59 mm	539 g	390	Y	Sep 2018	1,499
7.		Fujifilm X-E3	121 mm	74 mm	43 mm	337 g	350	n	Sep 2017	899
8.		Fujifilm X-T20	118 mm	83 mm	41 mm	383 g	350	n	Jan 2017	899
9.		Fujifilm X-A3	117 mm	67 mm	40 mm	339 g	410	n	Aug 2016	399
10.		Fujifilm X-Pro2	141 mm	83 mm	46 mm	495 g	350	Y	Jan 2016	1,699
11.		Fujifilm X-T1	129 mm	90 mm	47 mm	440 g	350	Y	Jan 2014	1,299
12.		Panasonic TZ95	112 mm	69 mm	42 mm	327 g	380	n	Feb 2019	449
13.		Panasonic G7	125 mm	86 mm	77 mm	410 g	350	n	May 2015	649
14.		Panasonic G6	122 mm	85 mm	71 mm	390 g	340	n	Apr 2013	599
15.		Panasonic G5	120 mm	83 mm	71 mm	396 g	320	n	Jul 2012	599
16.		Panasonic G3	115 mm	84 mm	47 mm	336 g	270	n	May 2011	599
17.		Sony A6500	120 mm	67 mm	53 mm	453 g	350	Y	Oct 2016	1,399
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The G110 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 59 percent) than the X-T2, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm X-T2 features an APS-C sensor and the Panasonic G110 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the G110 is 39 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.5 and 2.0. The sensor in the X-T2 has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the G110 offers a 4:3 aspect.

With 24MP, the X-T2 offers a higher resolution than the G110 (20.2MP), but the X-T2 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.92μm versus 3.34μm for the G110) due to its larger sensor. However, the G110 is a much more recent model (by 3 years and 11 months) than the X-T2, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Fujifilm X-T2 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the X-T2 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Panasonic G110 are 25.9 x 19.4 inches or 65.8 x 49.4 cm for good quality, 20.7 x 15.6 inches or 52.7 x 39.5 cm for very good quality, and 17.3 x 13 inches or 43.9 x 32.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

The X-T2 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Fujifilm X-T2 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 100-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Panasonic Lumix DC-G110 are ISO 200 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-25600.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Fujifilm X-T2	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
2.		Panasonic G110	Four Thirds	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
3.		Fujifilm X100V	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
4.		Fujifilm X-T4	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
5.		Fujifilm X-Pro3	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
6.		Fujifilm X-T3	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
7.		Fujifilm X-E3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
8.		Fujifilm X-T20	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
9.		Fujifilm X-A3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
10.		Fujifilm X-Pro2	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
11.		Fujifilm X-T1	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
12.		Panasonic TZ95	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
13.		Panasonic G7	Four Thirds	15.8	4592	3448	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
14.		Panasonic G6	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	21.3	11.5	639	61
15.		Panasonic G5	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
16.		Panasonic G3	Four Thirds	15.8	4592	3448	1080/60i	21.0	10.6	667	56
17.		Sony A6500	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	24.5	13.7	1405	85

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, and both provide the same movie specifications (4K/30p).

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the G110 offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the X-T2 (3680k vs 2360k dots). The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Fujifilm X-T2, the Panasonic G110, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Fujifilm X-T2	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	n	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
2.		Panasonic G110	3680	n	3.0	1840	swivel	Y	1/500s	10.0	Y	n
3.		Fujifilm X100V	3690	n	3.0	1620	tilting	Y	1/4000s	11.0	Y	n
4.		Fujifilm X-T4	3690	n	3.0	1620	swivel	Y	1/8000s	15.0	n	Y
5.		Fujifilm X-Pro3	3690	n	3.0	1620	tilting	Y	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
6.		Fujifilm X-T3	3690	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/8000s	11.0	n	n
7.		Fujifilm X-E3	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	n
8.		Fujifilm X-T20	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
9.		Fujifilm X-A3	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
10.		Fujifilm X-Pro2	2360	n	3.0	1620	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
11.		Fujifilm X-T1	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	n	1/4000s	8.0	n	n
12.		Panasonic TZ95	2330	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
13.		Panasonic G7	2360	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
14.		Panasonic G6	1440	n	3.0	1036	swivel	Y	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
15.		Panasonic G5	1440	n	3.0	920	swivel	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
16.		Panasonic G3	1440	n	3.0	460	swivel	Y	1/4000s	4.0	Y	n
17.		Sony A6500	2359	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/4000s	11.0	Y	Y

One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The G110 has a touchscreen, while the X-T2 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, both cameras under consideration feature an electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

The Fujifilm X-T2 and the Panasonic G110 both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the X-T2 and the G110 write their files to SDXC cards. The X-T2 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the G110 only has one slot. The X-T2 supports UHS-II cards (on both slots), while the G110 can use UHS-I cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm X-T2 and Panasonic Lumix DC-G110 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Fujifilm X-T2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.0	Y	-	-
2.		Panasonic G110	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
3.		Fujifilm X100V	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
4.		Fujifilm X-T4	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
5.		Fujifilm X-Pro3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	-	3.1	Y	-	Y
6.		Fujifilm X-T3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
7.		Fujifilm X-E3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
8.		Fujifilm X-T20	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
9.		Fujifilm X-A3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
10.		Fujifilm X-Pro2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
11.		Fujifilm X-T1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
12.		Panasonic TZ95	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
13.		Panasonic G7	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Panasonic G6	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
15.		Panasonic G5	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
16.		Panasonic G3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
17.		Sony A6500	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-

It is notable that the G110 has a headphone jack, which makes it possible to attach external headphones and monitor the quality of sound during the recording process. The X-T2 lacks such a headphone port.

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Fujifilm X-T2 (unlike the G110) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

The G110 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Panasonic. In contrast, the X-T2 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the X-T2 was succeeded by the Fujifilm X-T3 . Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Panasonic websites.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Which of the two cameras – the Fujifilm X-T2 or the Panasonic G110 – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Reasons to prefer the Fujifilm X-T2:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (24 vs 20.2MP) with a 11% higher linear resolution.
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.77x vs 0.73x).
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/500s) to freeze action.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (340 versus 270) on a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
• Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.0 vs 2.0).
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
• Faster buffer clearing: Supports a more advanced SD data transfer standard (UHS-II vs UHS-I).
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in July 2016).

Arguments in favor of the Panasonic Lumix DC-G110:

• Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
• More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (3680k vs 2360k dots).
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1840k vs 1040k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 8 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• More compact: Is smaller (116x83mm vs 133x92mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 155g or 31 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (59 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 3 years and 11 months of technical progress since the X-T2 launch.

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the G110 emerges as the winner of the match-up (13 : 11 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X-T2 and the Panasonic G110 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the X-T2 and the G110 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm X-T2	5/5	+ +	86/100	4.5/5	5/5	Jul 2016	1,599
2.		Panasonic G110	..	..	..	4/5	4/5	Jun 2020	649
3.		Fujifilm X100V	5/5	+ +	86/100	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2020	1,399
4.		Fujifilm X-T4	5/5	+ +	..	5/5	5/5	Feb 2020	1,699
5.		Fujifilm X-Pro3	4/5	+	85/100	4/5	..	Oct 2019	1,799
6.		Fujifilm X-T3	5/5	+ +	88/100	5/5	5/5	Sep 2018	1,499
7.		Fujifilm X-E3	4.5/5	+	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2017	899
8.		Fujifilm X-T20	5/5	+ +	82/100	5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2017	899
9.		Fujifilm X-A3	..	..	74/100	4.5/5	4/5	Aug 2016	399
10.		Fujifilm X-Pro2	..	+	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2016	1,699
11.		Fujifilm X-T1	5/5	+ +	84/100	5/5	5/5	Jan 2014	1,299
12.		Panasonic TZ95	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	..	Feb 2019	449
13.		Panasonic G7	4/5	+ +	80/100	5/5	4.5/5	May 2015	649
14.		Panasonic G6	4/5	+ +	..	5/5	4.5/5	Apr 2013	599
15.		Panasonic G5	3/5	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2012	599
16.		Panasonic G3	3/5	+ +	75/100	4.5/5	5/5	May 2011	599
17.		Sony A6500	5/5	+ +	85/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2016	1,399
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Fujifilm X-T2 vs Panasonic G110

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.