Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II

The Fujifilm X-H1 and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II are two enthusiast cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2018 and September 2016. Both the X-H1 and the E-M1 II are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on an APS-C (X-H1) and a Four Thirds (E-M1 II) sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the Olympus provides 20.2 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Fujifilm X-H1		Olympus E-M1 II
Mirrorless system camera		Mirrorless system camera
Fujifilm X mount lenses		Micro Four Thirds lenses
24 MP, APS-C Sensor		20.2 MP, Four Thirds Sensor
4K/30p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 200-12,800 (100 - 51,200)		ISO 200-25,600
Electronic viewfinder (3690k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)
3.0 LCD, 1040k dots		3.0 LCD, 1037k dots
Fully flexible touchscreen		Swivel touchscreen
14 shutter flaps per second		18 shutter flaps per second
In-body stabilization		In-body stabilization
Weathersealed body		Weathersealed body
310 shots per battery charge		440 shots per battery charge
140 x 97 x 86 mm, 673 g		134 x 91 x 67 mm, 574 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X-H1 and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X-H1 and the Olympus E-M1 II is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus E-M1 II is notably smaller (10 percent) than the Fujifilm X-H1. Moreover, the E-M1 II is markedly lighter (15 percent) than the X-H1. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Fujinon X Lens Catalog (X-H1) and the Micro Four Thirds Lens Catalog (E-M1 II). Mirrorless cameras, such as the two under consideration, have the additional advantage of having a short flange to focal plane distance, which makes it possible to mount many lenses from other systems onto the camera via adapters.

Concerning battery life, the X-H1 gets 310 shots out of its NP-W126S battery, while the E-M1 II can take 440 images on a single charge of its BLH-1 power pack. The power pack in the X-H1 can be charged via the USB port, so that it is not always necessary to take the battery charger along when travelling.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life 1	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch 2	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Fujifilm X-H1	5.5 in	3.8 in	3.4 in	23.7 oz	310	Y	Feb 2018	1,899
	Olympus E-M1 II	5.3 in	3.6 in	2.6 in	20.2 oz	440	Y	Sep 2016	1,999
	Fujifilm X-T4	5.3 in	3.7 in	2.5 in	21.4 oz	500	Y	Feb 2020	1,699
	Fujifilm X-Pro3	5.6 in	3.3 in	1.8 in	17.5 oz	440	Y	Oct 2019	1,799
	Fujifilm X-Pro2	5.6 in	3.3 in	1.8 in	17.5 oz	350	Y	Jan 2016	1,699
	Fujifilm X-T2	5.2 in	3.6 in	1.9 in	17.9 oz	340	Y	Jul 2016	1,599
	Nikon Z6	5.3 in	4.0 in	2.6 in	23.8 oz	310	Y	Aug 2018	1,999
	Olympus E-M1 III	5.3 in	3.6 in	2.7 in	20.5 oz	420	Y	Feb 2020	1,799
	Olympus E-M1	5.1 in	3.7 in	2.5 in	17.5 oz	350	Y	Sep 2013	1,399
	Panasonic G9	5.4 in	3.8 in	3.6 in	23.2 oz	400	Y	Nov 2017	1,699
	Panasonic GH5	5.5 in	3.9 in	3.4 in	25.6 oz	410	Y	Jan 2017	1,999
	Panasonic GX8	5.2 in	3.1 in	2.5 in	17.2 oz	330	Y	Jul 2015	1,199
	Pentax KP	5.2 in	4.0 in	3.0 in	24.8 oz	390	Y	Jan 2017	1,099
	Sony A7 III	5.0 in	3.8 in	2.9 in	22.9 oz	610	Y	Feb 2018	1,999
	Sony A77	5.6 in	4.1 in	3.2 in	25.8 oz	470	Y	Aug 2011	1,399
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. (1) Number of images that can be taken on a full battery charge according to the CIPA-standard; (2) Official announcement.

Camera Model
Fujifilm X-H1
Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-T4
Fujifilm X-Pro3
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X-T2
Nikon Z6
Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M1
Panasonic G9
Panasonic GH5
Panasonic GX8
Pentax KP
Sony A7 III
Sony A77

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The X-H1 was somewhat cheaper (by 5 percent) than the E-M1 II at launch, but both cameras fall into the same price category. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm X-H1 features an APS-C sensor and the Olympus E-M1 II a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the E-M1 II is 39 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.5 and 2.0. The sensor in the X-H1 has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the E-M1 II offers a 4:3 aspect.

Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors.

With 24MP, the X-H1 offers a higher resolution than the E-M1 II (20.2MP), but the X-H1 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.92μm versus 3.34μm for the E-M1 II) due to its larger sensor. Moreover, the X-H1 is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 4 months) than the E-M1 II, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Fujifilm X-H1 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the X-H1 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Olympus E-M1 II are 25.9 x 19.4 inches or 65.8 x 49.4 cm for good quality, 20.7 x 15.6 inches or 52.7 x 39.5 cm for very good quality, and 17.3 x 13 inches or 43.9 x 32.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

Unlike the X-H1, the E-M1 II has the capacity to capture high quality composite images (50MP) by combining multiple shots after shifting its sensor by miniscule distances. This multi-shot, pixel-shift mode is most suitable for photography of stationary objects (landscapes, studio scenes).

The Fujifilm X-H1 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 100-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II are ISO 200 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 64-25600.

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Fujifilm X-H1	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-M1 II	Four Thirds	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	23.7	12.8	1312	80
	Fujifilm X-T4	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-Pro3	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-Pro2	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-T2	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Nikon Z6	Full Frame	24.3	6048	4024	4K/30p	25.3	14.3	3299	95
	Olympus E-M1 III	Four Thirds	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Olympus E-M1	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	23.0	12.7	757	73
	Panasonic G9	Four Thirds	20.2	5184	3888	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
	Panasonic GH5	Four Thirds	20.2	5184	3888	4K/60p	23.9	13.0	807	77
	Panasonic GX8	Four Thirds	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	23.5	12.6	806	75
	Pentax KP	APS-C	24.1	6016	4000	1080/60i	..	..	..	..
	Sony A7 III	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	25.0	14.7	3730	96
	Sony A77	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.0	13.2	801	78

Camera Model
Fujifilm X-H1
Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-T4
Fujifilm X-Pro3
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X-T2
Nikon Z6
Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M1
Panasonic G9
Panasonic GH5
Panasonic GX8
Pentax KP
Sony A7 III
Sony A77

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, and both provide the same movie specifications (4K/30p).

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under consideration are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the X-H1 offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the E-M1 II (3690k vs 2360k dots). The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M1 II along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Fujifilm X-H1	3690	Y	3.0	1040	full-flex	Y	1/8000s	14.0	n	Y
	Olympus E-M1 II	2360	n	3.0	1037	swivel	Y	1/8000s	18.0	n	Y
	Fujifilm X-T4	3690	n	3.0	1620	swivel	Y	1/8000s	15.0	n	Y
	Fujifilm X-Pro3	3690	n	3.0	1620	tilting	Y	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
	Fujifilm X-Pro2	2360	n	3.0	1620	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
	Fujifilm X-T2	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	n	1/8000s	8.0	n	n
	Nikon Z6	3690	Y	3.2	2100	tilting	Y	1/8000s	12.0	n	Y
	Olympus E-M1 III	2360	n	3.0	1037	swivel	Y	1/8000s	18.0	n	Y
	Olympus E-M1	2360	n	3.0	1037	tilting	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y
	Panasonic G9	3680	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/8000s	20.0	n	Y
	Panasonic GH5	3680	n	3.2	1620	swivel	Y	1/8000s	12.0	n	Y
	Panasonic GX8	2360	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y
	Pentax KP	optical	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/6000s	7.0	Y	Y
	Sony A7 III	2359	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y
	Sony A77	2359	Y	3.0	921	full-flex	n	1/8000s	12.0	Y	Y

Camera Model
Fujifilm X-H1
Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-T4
Fujifilm X-Pro3
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X-T2
Nikon Z6
Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M1
Panasonic G9
Panasonic GH5
Panasonic GX8
Pentax KP
Sony A7 III
Sony A77

One feature that is present on the X-H1, but is missing on the E-M1 II is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, both cameras under consideration feature an electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

The Fujifilm X-H1 and the Olympus E-M1 II both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the X-H1 and the E-M1 II write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras feature dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. However, while the X-H1 supports UHS-II cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 312 MB/s) on both slots, the E-M1 II supports UHS-II only on its first slot and UHS-I (data transfer speed up to 104 MB/s) on the second one.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Fujifilm X-H1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.0	Y	-	-
	Olympus E-M1 II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-T4	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Fujifilm X-Pro3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	-	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Fujifilm X-Pro2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-T2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.0	Y	-	-
	Nikon Z6	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Olympus E-M1 III	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Olympus E-M1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Panasonic G9	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	full	3.0	Y	-	Y
	Panasonic GH5	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	full	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Panasonic GX8	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Pentax KP	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	-	2.0	Y	-	-
	Sony A7 III	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	Y	Y
	Sony A77	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

Camera Model
Fujifilm X-H1
Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-T4
Fujifilm X-Pro3
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X-T2
Nikon Z6
Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M1
Panasonic G9
Panasonic GH5
Panasonic GX8
Pentax KP
Sony A7 III
Sony A77

It is notable that the E-M1 II has a headphone jack, which makes it possible to attach external headphones and monitor the quality of sound during the recording process. The X-H1 lacks such a headphone port.

Both cameras feature a PC Sync terminal to control professional strobe lights, which will be appreciated by studio photographers.

Both the X-H1 and the E-M1 II are recent models that are part of the current product line-up. The E-M1 II replaced the earlier Olympus E-M1, while the X-H1 does not have a direct predecessor. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Olympus websites.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is the Fujifilm X-H1 better than the Olympus E-M1 II or vice versa? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm X-H1:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (24 vs 20.2MP) with a 11% higher linear resolution.
• Better image quality: Features a larger and more technologically advanced imaging sensor.
• Richer colors: The sensor size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
• More dynamic range: Larger sensor captures a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Larger sensor produces good images even in poorly lit environments.
• More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (3690k vs 2360k dots).
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.75x vs 0.74x).
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 1 year and 4 months after the E-M1 II).

Advantages of the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II:

• High quality composites: Can combine several shots after pixel-shifting its sensor.
• Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (18 vs 14 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 99g or 15 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (440 versus 310) out of a single battery charge.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in September 2016).

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the X-H1 emerges as the winner of the contest (9 : 7 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional sports photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a street photog, and a person interested in family portraits has distinct needs from a landscape shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X-H1 and the Olympus E-M1 II place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the X-H1 and the E-M1 II in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is why expert reviews are important. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Fujifilm X-H1	+	86/100	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Feb 2018	1,899
	Olympus E-M1 II	+ +	85/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2016	1,999
	Fujifilm X-T4	+ +	..	5/5	..	5/5	Feb 2020	1,699
	Fujifilm X-Pro3	+	85/100	4/5	..	..	Oct 2019	1,799
	Fujifilm X-Pro2	+	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2016	1,699
	Fujifilm X-T2	+ +	86/100	4.5/5	5/5	5/5	Jul 2016	1,599
	Nikon Z6	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	5/5	Aug 2018	1,999
	Olympus E-M1 III	..	83/100	4.5/5	..	4/5	Feb 2020	1,799
	Olympus E-M1	+ +	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2013	1,399
	Panasonic G9	+ +	85/100	5/5	5/5	5/5	Nov 2017	1,699
	Panasonic GH5	+ +	85/100	4.5/5	5/5	5/5	Jan 2017	1,999
	Panasonic GX8	+	82/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2015	1,199
	Pentax KP	..	82/100	5/5	..	4.5/5	Jan 2017	1,099
	Sony A7 III	+ +	89/100	5/5	5/5	5/5	Feb 2018	1,999
	Sony A77	91/100	81/100	..	4.5/5	5/5	Aug 2011	1,399
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Camera Model
Fujifilm X-H1
Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-T4
Fujifilm X-Pro3
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X-T2
Nikon Z6
Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M1
Panasonic G9
Panasonic GH5
Panasonic GX8
Pentax KP
Sony A7 III
Sony A77

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.

Specifications: Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.