Fujifilm X-E2S vs Sony HX400V
The Fujifilm X-E2S and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in January 2016 and February 2014. The X-E2S is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, while the HX400V is a fixed lens compact. The cameras are based on an APS-C (X-E2S) and a 1/2.3-inch (HX400V) sensor. The Fujifilm has a resolution of 16 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 20.2 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V | |
---|---|---|
Mirrorless system camera | Fixed lens compact camera | |
Fujifilm X mount lenses | 24-1200mm f/2.8-6.3 | |
16 MP, APS-C Sensor | 20.2 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor | |
1080/60p Video | 1080/60p Video | |
ISO 200-6400 (100-51200) | ISO 80-3200 (80-12800) | |
Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots) | Electronic viewfinder (210k dots) | |
3.0" LCD, 1040k dots | 3.0" LCD, 921k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive) | |
7 shutter flaps per second | 10 shutter flaps per second | |
350 shots per battery charge | 300 shots per battery charge | |
129 x 75 x 37 mm, 350 g | 130 x 93 x 103 mm, 660 g |
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm X-E2S and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The physical size and weight of the Fujifilm X-E2S and the Sony HX400V are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The X-E2S can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the HX400V is only available in black.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony HX400V is notably larger (25 percent) than the Fujifilm X-E2S. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the X-E2S nor the HX400V are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the HX400V has a lens built in, whereas the X-E2S is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the X-E2S and their specifications in the Fujinon X Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the X-E2S gets 350 shots out of its NP-W126 battery, while the HX400V can take 300 images on a single charge of its NP-BX1 power pack.
The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, just select a new right or left comparator from among the camera models in the table. Alternatively, you can also move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-E2S» | 5.1 in | 3.0 in | 1.5 in | 12.3 oz | 350 | n | Jan 2016 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | ||
Sony HX400V« | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 4.1 in | 23.3 oz | 300 | n | Feb 2014 | 499 | Sony HX400V | |||
Canon SX60« » | 5.0 in | 3.7 in | 4.5 in | 22.9 oz | 340 | n | Sep 2014 | 549 | - | Canon SX60 | ||
Fujifilm X-E3« » | 4.8 in | 2.9 in | 1.7 in | 11.9 oz | 350 | n | Sep 2017 | 899 | Fujifilm X-E3 | |||
Fujifilm X-T20« » | 4.6 in | 3.3 in | 1.6 in | 13.5 oz | 350 | n | Jan 2017 | 899 | Fujifilm X-T20 | |||
Fujifilm X70« » | 4.4 in | 2.5 in | 1.7 in | 12.0 oz | 330 | n | Jan 2016 | 799 | - | Fujifilm X70 | ||
Fujifilm X-A10« » | 4.6 in | 2.6 in | 1.6 in | 11.7 oz | 410 | n | Dec 2016 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A10 | ||
Fujifilm X-A2« » | 4.6 in | 2.6 in | 1.6 in | 12.3 oz | 410 | n | Jan 2015 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A2 | ||
Fujifilm X-T10« » | 4.6 in | 3.3 in | 1.6 in | 13.4 oz | 350 | n | May 2015 | 799 | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | ||
Fujifilm X-A1« » | 4.6 in | 2.6 in | 1.5 in | 11.6 oz | 350 | n | Sep 2013 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E2« » | 5.1 in | 3.0 in | 1.5 in | 12.3 oz | 350 | n | Oct 2013 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | ||
Fujifilm X-M1« » | 4.6 in | 2.6 in | 1.5 in | 11.6 oz | 350 | n | Jun 2013 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E1« » | 5.1 in | 3.0 in | 1.5 in | 12.3 oz | 350 | n | Sep 2012 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | ||
Sony HX350« » | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 4.1 in | 23.0 oz | 300 | n | Dec 2016 | 449 | Sony HX350 | |||
Sony HX90V« » | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.4 in | 8.6 oz | 360 | n | Apr 2015 | 429 | Sony HX90V | |||
Sony H400« » | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 4.8 in | 22.2 oz | 300 | n | Feb 2014 | 319 | Sony H400 | |||
Sony H300« » | 5.0 in | 3.5 in | 3.6 in | 20.8 oz | 350 | n | Feb 2014 | 219 | Sony H300 | |||
Note: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. |
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The HX400V was launched at a lower price than the X-E2S, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm X-E2S features an APS-C sensor and the Sony HX400V a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The sensor area in the HX400V is 92 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.5 and 5.6. The sensor in the X-E2S has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the HX400V offers a 4:3 aspect.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the HX400V offers a higher resolution of 20.2 megapixels, compared with 16 MP of the X-E2S. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.18μm versus 4.80μm for the X-E2S). Moreover, it should be noted that the X-E2S is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 11 months) than the HX400V, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Sony HX400V implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the HX400V for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 25.9 x 19.4 inch or 65.8 x 49.4 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 20.7 x 15.6 inch or 52.7 x 39.5 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 17.3 x 13 inch or 43.9 x 32.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Fujifilm X-E2S are 24.5 x 16.3 inch or 62.2 x 41.5 cm for good quality, 19.6 x 13.1 inch or 49.7 x 33.2 cm for very good quality, and 16.3 x 10.9 inch or 41.5 x 27.6 cm for excellent quality prints.
The X-E2S has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.
The Fujifilm X-E2S has a native sensitivity range from ISO 200 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-51200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V are ISO 80 to ISO 3200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 80-12800.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-E2S» | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | |
Sony HX400V« | 1/2.3 | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Sony HX400V | |
Canon SX60« » | 1/2.3 | 14.2 | 4608 | 3072 | 1080/60p | 19.2 | 10.8 | 127 | 39 | Canon SX60 | |
Fujifilm X-E3« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E3 | |
Fujifilm X-T20« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-T20 | |
Fujifilm X70« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X70 | |
Fujifilm X-A10« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-A10 | |
Fujifilm X-A2« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-A2 | |
Fujifilm X-T10« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | |
Fujifilm X-A1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | |
Fujifilm X-E2« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | |
Fujifilm X-M1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
Fujifilm X-E1« » | APS-C | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/24p | - | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | |
Sony HX350« » | 1/2.3 | 19.9 | 5152 | 3864 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Sony HX350 | |
Sony HX90V« » | 1/2.3 | 18.0 | 4896 | 3672 | 1080/60p | - | - | - | - | Sony HX90V | |
Sony H400« » | 1/2.3 | 19.9 | 5152 | 3864 | 720/30p | - | - | - | - | Sony H400 | |
Sony H300« » | 1/2.3 | 19.9 | 5152 | 3864 | 720/30p | - | - | - | - | Sony H300 |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, and both provide the same movie specifications (1080/60p).
Feature comparison
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under consideration are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the X-E2S offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the HX400V (2360k vs 210k dots). The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Fujifilm X-E2S, the Sony HX400V, and comparable cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-E2S» | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 7.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-E2S | |
Sony HX400V« | 210 | n | 3.0 | 921 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony HX400V | |
Canon SX60« » | 922 | n | 3.0 | 922 | swivel | n | 1/2000s | 6.4 | Y | Y | Canon SX60 | |
Fujifilm X-E3« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 8.0 | n | n | Fujifilm X-E3 | |
Fujifilm X-T20« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-T20 | |
Fujifilm X70« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X70 | |
Fujifilm X-A10« » | - | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-A10 | |
Fujifilm X-A2« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 5.6 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-A2 | |
Fujifilm X-T10« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 8.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-T10 | |
Fujifilm X-A1« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 5.6 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-A1 | |
Fujifilm X-E2« » | 2360 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 7.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-E2 | |
Fujifilm X-M1« » | - | n | 3.0 | 920 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 5.6 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
Fujifilm X-E1« » | 2360 | n | 2.8 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | Fujifilm X-E1 | |
Sony HX350« » | 202 | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony HX350 | |
Sony HX90V« » | 638 | n | 3.0 | 921 | tilting | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | Sony HX90V | |
Sony H400« » | 210 | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 0.7 | Y | Y | Sony H400 | |
Sony H300« » | - | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/1500s | 0.8 | Y | Y | Sony H300 |
The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the X-E2S is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
The Fujifilm X-E2S has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
The X-E2S writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the HX400V uses SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. The X-E2S supports UHS-I cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s), while the HX400V cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm X-E2S and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-E2S» | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | |
Sony HX400V« | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony HX400V | |
Canon SX60« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon SX60 | |
Fujifilm X-E3« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | Y | Fujifilm X-E3 | |
Fujifilm X-T20« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-T20 | |
Fujifilm X70« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X70 | |
Fujifilm X-A10« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-A10 | |
Fujifilm X-A2« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-A2 | |
Fujifilm X-T10« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | |
Fujifilm X-A1« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | |
Fujifilm X-E2« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | |
Fujifilm X-M1« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
Fujifilm X-E1« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | |
Sony HX350« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - | Sony HX350 | |
Sony HX90V« » | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Sony HX90V | |
Sony H400« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Sony H400 | |
Sony H300« » | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | Sony H300 |
It is notable that the X-E2S has a microphone port, which is missing on the HX400V. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used.
Travel and landscape photographers will find it useful that the HX400V has an internal geolocalization sensor and can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.
The HX400V is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Sony. In contrast, the X-E2S has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the X-E2S was succeeded by the Fujifilm X-E3. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm and Sony websites.
Review summary
So what is the bottom line? Is the Fujifilm X-E2S better than the Sony HX400V or vice versa? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm X-E2S:
- Better image quality: Features a larger and more technologically advanced imaging sensor.
- Richer colors: The sensor size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Larger sensor captures a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Larger sensor produces good images even in poorly lit environments.
- Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
- Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
- More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (2360k vs 210k dots).
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1040k vs 921k dots).
- Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
- Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
- More flexible: Accepts interchangeable lenses, so that lens characteristics can be altered.
- More compact: Is smaller (129x75mm vs 130x93mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (350 versus 300) on a single battery charge.
- Faster buffer clearing: Has an SD card interface that supports the UHS-I standard.
- More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 1 year and 11 months after the HX400V).

Reasons to prefer the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (20.2 vs 16MP), which boosts linear resolution by 10%.
- More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 7 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Ready to shoot: Has an integrated lens, whereas the X-E2S necessitates an extra lens.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Easier geotagging: Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in February 2014).
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the X-E2S is the clear winner of the match-up (15 : 9 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm X-E2S and the Sony HX400V place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera and Best Superzoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the X-E2S and the HX400V in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
Expert reviews
This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fujifilm X-E2S» | - | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jan 2016 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-E2S | ||
Sony HX400V« | + + | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Feb 2014 | 499 | Sony HX400V | |||
Canon SX60« » | + + | 75/100 | 4/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Sep 2014 | 549 | - | Canon SX60 | ||
Fujifilm X-E3« » | + | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2017 | 899 | Fujifilm X-E3 | |||
Fujifilm X-T20« » | + + | 82/100 | 5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 899 | Fujifilm X-T20 | |||
Fujifilm X70« » | - | 76/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2016 | 799 | - | Fujifilm X70 | ||
Fujifilm X-A10« » | - | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Dec 2016 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A10 | ||
Fujifilm X-A2« » | - | - | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2015 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A2 | ||
Fujifilm X-T10« » | + + | 80/100 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | May 2015 | 799 | - | Fujifilm X-T10 | ||
Fujifilm X-A1« » | - | - | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Sep 2013 | 399 | - | Fujifilm X-A1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E2« » | - | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 5/5 | Oct 2013 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E2 | ||
Fujifilm X-M1« » | + | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jun 2013 | 699 | - | Fujifilm X-M1 | ||
Fujifilm X-E1« » | + + | 79/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2012 | 999 | - | Fujifilm X-E1 | ||
Sony HX350« » | - | - | - | - | 4/5 | Dec 2016 | 449 | Sony HX350 | |||
Sony HX90V« » | + + | - | 4/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Apr 2015 | 429 | Sony HX90V | |||
Sony H400« » | o | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 319 | Sony H400 | |||
Sony H300« » | + | - | 4.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Feb 2014 | 219 | Sony H300 | |||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (-) not available. |
The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Ebay offers Sony HX400V:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 1D X vs Sony HX400V
- Canon T5 vs Fujifilm X-E2S
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Fujifilm X-T10
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Fujifilm X70
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Nikon D3300
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Nikon D3500
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Panasonic GH5s
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Pentax K-1 II
- Fujifilm X-E2S vs Sony RX100 III
- Hasselblad X1D II vs Sony HX400V
- Panasonic TZ95 vs Sony HX400V
- Sony A77 II vs Sony HX400V
Specifications: Fujifilm X-E2S vs Sony HX400V
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Mirrorless system camera | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | Fujifilm X mount lenses | 24-1200mm f/2.8-6.3 |
Launch Date | January 2016 | February 2014 |
Launch Price | USD 699 | USD 499 |
Sensor Specs | Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | 1/2.3" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Sensor Area | 368.16 mm2 | 28.0735 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 28.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.5x | 5.6x |
Sensor Resolution | 16 Megapixels | 20.2 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 4896 x 3264 pixels | 5184 x 3888 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 4.80 μm | 1.18 μm |
Pixel Density | 4.34 MP/cm2 | 71.80 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | no AA filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/60p Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 200-6400 ISO | 80-3200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-51200 ISO | 80-12800 ISO |
Image Processor | EXR Processor II | BIONZ X |
Screen Specs | Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V |
Viewfinder Type | Electronic viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.41x | ..x |
Viewfinder Resolution | 2360k dots | 210k dots |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 1040k dots | 921k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Tilting screen |
Shooting Specs | Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V |
Autofocus System | On-Sensor Phase-detect | Contrast-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | Focus Peaking | No Peaking Feature |
Continuous Shooting | 7 shutter flaps/s | 10 shutter flaps/s |
Electronic Shutter | up to 1/32000s | no E-Shutter |
Time-Lapse Photography | Intervalometer built-in | no Intervalometer |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | MS or SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
UHS card support | UHS-I | no |
Connectivity Specs | Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | micro HDMI | micro HDMI |
Microphone Port | External MIC port | no MIC socket |
Wifi Support | Wifi built-in | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | no NFC | NFC built-in |
Geotagging | no internal GPS | GPS built-in |
Body Specs | Fujifilm X-E2S | Sony HX400V |
Battery Type | NP-W126 | NP-BX1 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 350 shots per charge | 300 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
129 x 75 x 37 mm (5.1 x 3.0 x 1.5 in) |
130 x 93 x 103 mm (5.1 x 3.7 x 4.1 in) |
Camera Weight | 350 g (12.3 oz) | 660 g (23.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.