Fujifilm GFX 100S vs X-T200

The Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Fujifilm X-T200 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in January 2021 and January 2020. Both the GFX 100S and the X-T200 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on a medium format (GFX 100S) and an APS-C (X-T200) sensor. The GFX 100S has a resolution of 101.8 megapixels, whereas the X-T200 provides 24 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Fujifilm GFX 100S		Fujifilm X-T200
Mirrorless system camera		Mirrorless system camera
Fujifilm G mount lenses		Fujifilm X mount lenses
101.8 MP, Medium Format Sensor		24 MP, APS-C Sensor
4K/30p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 100-12,800 (50 - 102,400)		ISO 200-12,800 (100 - 51,200)
Electronic viewfinder (3690k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)
3.2 LCD, 2360k dots		3.5 LCD, 2780k dots
Fully flexible touchscreen		Swivel touchscreen
5 shutter flaps per second		8 shutter flaps per second
In-body stabilization		Lens stabilization only
Weathersealed body		not weather sealed
460 shots per battery charge		270 shots per battery charge
150 x 104 x 87 mm, 900 g		121 x 84 x 55 mm, 370 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Fujifilm X-T200? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Fujifilm X-T200. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The X-T200 can be obtained in three different colors (silver, gold, titanium), while the GFX 100S is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm X-T200 is considerably smaller (35 percent) than the Fujifilm GFX 100S. Moreover, the X-T200 is substantially lighter (59 percent) than the GFX 100S. It is worth mentioning in this context that the GFX 100S is splash and dust resistant, while the X-T200 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.

Concerning battery life, the GFX 100S gets 460 shots out of its NP-W235 battery, while the X-T200 can take 270 images on a single charge of its NP-W126S power pack. The battery packs of both cameras can be charged via USB, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm GFX 100S	150 mm	104 mm	87 mm	900 g	460	Y	Jan 2021	5,999
2.		Fujifilm X-T200	121 mm	84 mm	55 mm	370 g	270	n	Jan 2020	699
3.		Canon R5	138 mm	98 mm	88 mm	738 g	320	Y	Jul 2020	3,899
4.		Fujifilm X-E4	121 mm	73 mm	33 mm	364 g	380	n	Jan 2021	849
5.		Fujifilm X-T4	135 mm	93 mm	64 mm	607 g	500	Y	Feb 2020	1,699
6.		Fujifilm X-S10	126 mm	85 mm	65 mm	465 g	325	n	Oct 2020	999
7.		Fujifilm X-T30	118 mm	83 mm	47 mm	383 g	380	n	Feb 2019	899
8.		Fujifilm GFX 100	156 mm	144 mm	75 mm	1320 g	800	Y	May 2019	9,999
9.		Fujifilm X-A7	119 mm	68 mm	41 mm	320 g	440	n	Sep 2019	499
10.		Fujifilm GFX 50R	161 mm	97 mm	66 mm	775 g	400	Y	Sep 2018	4,499
11.		Fujifilm X-T100	121 mm	83 mm	47 mm	448 g	430	n	May 2018	599
12.		Fujifilm XP130	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	n	Jan 2018	229
13.		Fujifilm GFX 50S	148 mm	94 mm	91 mm	740 g	400	Y	Sep 2016	6,499
14.		Fujifilm X-A3	117 mm	67 mm	40 mm	339 g	410	n	Aug 2016	399
15.		Leica SL2-S	146 mm	107 mm	83 mm	931 g	510	Y	Dec 2020	4,895
16.		Leica SL2	146 mm	107 mm	42 mm	953 g	370	Y	Nov 2019	5,999
17.		Sony A1	129 mm	97 mm	81 mm	737 g	530	Y	Jan 2021	6,499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The X-T200 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 88 percent) than the GFX 100S, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Fujifilm GFX 100S features a medium format sensor and the Fujifilm X-T200 an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the X-T200 is 74 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 0.79 and 1.5. The sensor in the GFX 100S has a native 4:3 aspect ratio, while the one in the X-T200 offers a 3:2 aspect.

With 101.8MP, the GFX 100S offers a higher resolution than the X-T200 (24MP), but the GFX 100S has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.76μm versus 3.92μm for the X-T200). However, the GFX 100S is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year) than the X-T200, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the GFX 100S has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Fujifilm GFX 100S implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the GFX 100S for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 58.2 x 43.7 inches or 147.9 x 110.9 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 46.6 x 34.9 inches or 118.3 x 88.8 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 38.8 x 29.1 inches or 98.6 x 74 cm. The corresponding values for the Fujifilm X-T200 are 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm for good quality, 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm for very good quality, and 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Fujifilm GFX 100S has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 50-102400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm X-T200 are ISO 200 to ISO 12800, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-51200.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Fujifilm GFX 100S	Medium Format	101.8	11648	8736	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
2.		Fujifilm X-T200	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon R5	Full Frame	44.8	8192	5464	8k/30p	25.3	14.6	3042	95
4.		Fujifilm X-E4	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
5.		Fujifilm X-T4	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
6.		Fujifilm X-S10	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
7.		Fujifilm X-T30	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
8.		Fujifilm GFX 100	Medium Format	101.8	11648	8736	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
9.		Fujifilm X-A7	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
10.		Fujifilm GFX 50R	Medium Format	51.1	8256	6192	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
11.		Fujifilm X-T100	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/15p	..	..	..	..
12.		Fujifilm XP130	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
13.		Fujifilm GFX 50S	Medium Format	51.1	8256	6192	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
14.		Fujifilm X-A3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
15.		Leica SL2-S	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
16.		Leica SL2	Full Frame	46.7	8368	5584	4K/60p	..	..	..	..
17.		Sony A1	Full Frame	49.8	8640	5760	8k/30p	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, and both provide the same movie specifications (4K/30p).

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. The two cameras under consideration are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the GFX 100S offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the X-T200 (3690k vs 2360k dots). The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Fujifilm GFX 100S and Fujifilm X-T200 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Fujifilm GFX 100S	3690	Y	3.2	2360	full-flex	Y	1/4000s	5.0	n	Y
2.		Fujifilm X-T200	2360	n	3.5	2780	swivel	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
3.		Canon R5	5760	Y	3.2	2100	swivel	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y
4.		Fujifilm X-E4	2360	n	3.0	1620	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	n
5.		Fujifilm X-T4	3690	n	3.0	1620	swivel	Y	1/8000s	15.0	n	Y
6.		Fujifilm X-S10	2360	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	Y
7.		Fujifilm X-T30	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
8.		Fujifilm GFX 100	optional	Y	3.2	2360	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.0	n	Y
9.		Fujifilm X-A7	none	n	3.5	2760	swivel	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
10.		Fujifilm GFX 50R	3690	n	3.2	2360	tilting	Y	1/4000s	3.0	n	n
11.		Fujifilm X-T100	2360	n	3.0	1040	full-flex	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
12.		Fujifilm XP130	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
13.		Fujifilm GFX 50S	optional	Y	3.2	2360	full-flex	Y	1/4000s	3.0	n	n
14.		Fujifilm X-A3	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
15.		Leica SL2-S	5760	Y	3.2	2100	fixed	Y	1/8000s	20.0	n	Y
16.		Leica SL2	5760	Y	3.2	2100	fixed	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y
17.		Sony A1	9437	n	3.0	1440	tilting	Y	1/8000s	10.0	n	Y

One feature that is present on the GFX 100S, but is missing on the X-T200 is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, both cameras under consideration feature an electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

The Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Fujifilm X-T200 both have an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the GFX 100S and the X-T200 write their files to SDXC cards. The GFX 100S features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the X-T200 only has one slot. The GFX 100S supports UHS-II cards (on both slots), while the X-T200 can use UHS-I cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Fujifilm GFX 100S and Fujifilm X-T200 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Fujifilm GFX 100S	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.2	Y	-	Y
2.		Fujifilm X-T200	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
3.		Canon R5	Y	mono	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.2	Y	-	Y
4.		Fujifilm X-E4	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.2	Y	-	Y
5.		Fujifilm X-T4	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
6.		Fujifilm X-S10	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.2	Y	-	Y
7.		Fujifilm X-T30	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
8.		Fujifilm GFX 100	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
9.		Fujifilm X-A7	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	Y
10.		Fujifilm GFX 50R	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.0	Y	-	Y
11.		Fujifilm X-T100	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
12.		Fujifilm XP130	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
13.		Fujifilm GFX 50S	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	3.0	Y	-	-
14.		Fujifilm X-A3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
15.		Leica SL2-S	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	full	3.2	Y	-	Y
16.		Leica SL2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	full	3.1	Y	-	Y
17.		Sony A1	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.2	Y	-	Y

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Fujifilm GFX 100S (unlike the X-T200) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

Both the GFX 100S and the X-T200 are recent models that are part of the current product line-up. The X-T200 replaced the earlier Fujifilm X-T100, while the GFX 100S followed on from the Fujifilm GFX 100. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Fujifilm website.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Fujifilm X-T200? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Advantages of the Fujifilm GFX 100S:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (101.8 vs 24MP) with a 102% higher linear resolution.
• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better image quality: Features a larger and more technologically advanced imaging sensor.
• Richer colors: The sensor size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
• More dynamic range: Larger sensor captures a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
• Better low-light sensitivity: Larger sensor produces good images even in poorly lit environments.
• More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (3690k vs 2360k dots).
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.77x vs 0.62x).
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (460 versus 270) on a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
• Sharper images: Has hand-shake reducing image stabilization built-in.
• Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.2 vs 3.1).
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
• Faster buffer clearing: Supports a more advanced SD data transfer standard (UHS-II vs UHS-I).
• More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 1 year after the X-T200).

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm X-T200:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.5" vs 3.2") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (2780k vs 2360k dots).
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (8 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• More compact: Is smaller (121x84mm vs 150x104mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 530g or 59 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (88 percent cheaper at launch).
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in January 2020).

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the GFX 100S is the clear winner of the match-up (17 : 10 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Fujifilm GFX 100S and the Fujifilm X-T200 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the GFX 100S or the X-T200. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Fujifilm GFX 100S	..	..	..	..	..	Jan 2021	5,999
2.		Fujifilm X-T200	3.5/5	..	82/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jan 2020	699
3.		Canon R5	4.5/5	..	91/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2020	3,899
4.		Fujifilm X-E4	..	..	..	..	..	Jan 2021	849
5.		Fujifilm X-T4	5/5	+ +	..	5/5	5/5	Feb 2020	1,699
6.		Fujifilm X-S10	5/5	..	86/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2020	999
7.		Fujifilm X-T30	5/5	+ +	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2019	899
8.		Fujifilm GFX 100	4.5/5	+ +	90/100	5/5	4.5/5	May 2019	9,999
9.		Fujifilm X-A7	3/5	..	81/100	4/5	3.5/5	Sep 2019	499
10.		Fujifilm GFX 50R	5/5	..	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2018	4,499
11.		Fujifilm X-T100	4/5	+	79/100	4/5	4.5/5	May 2018	599
12.		Fujifilm XP130	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2018	229
13.		Fujifilm GFX 50S	..	..	85/100	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2016	6,499
14.		Fujifilm X-A3	..	..	74/100	4.5/5	4/5	Aug 2016	399
15.		Leica SL2-S	4/5	..	..	..	4.5/5	Dec 2020	4,895
16.		Leica SL2	4/5	..	..	4.5/5	4/5	Nov 2019	5,999
17.		Sony A1	..	..	..	..	..	Jan 2021	6,499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Fujifilm GFX 100S vs Fujifilm X-T200

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.