Canon SX60 vs Fujifilm XP140

The Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and the Fujifilm FinePix XP140 are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in September 2014 and February 2019. Both the SX60 and the XP140 are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 14.2 megapixels, whereas the Fujifilm provides 15.9 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon SX60		Fujifilm XP140
Fixed lens compact camera		Fixed lens compact camera
21-1365mm f/3.4-6.5		28-140mm f/3.9-4.9
14.2 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		15.9 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor
1080/60p Video		4K/15p Video
ISO 100-3,200 (100 - 6,400)		ISO 100-12,800
Electronic viewfinder (922k dots)		No viewfinder, LCD framing
3.0 LCD, 922k dots		3.0 LCD, 920k dots
Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
6.4 shutter flaps per second		10 shutter flaps per second
Lens-based stabilization		In-body stabilization
not weather sealed		Waterproof body (25m)
340 shots per battery charge		240 shots per battery charge
128 x 93 x 114 mm, 650 g		110 x 71 x 28 mm, 207 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and the Fujifilm FinePix XP140? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Canon SX60 and the Fujifilm XP140 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The XP140 can be obtained in five different colors (black, blue, yellow, green, white), while the SX60 is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm XP140 is considerably smaller (34 percent) than the Canon SX60. Moreover, the XP140 is substantially lighter (68 percent) than the SX60. It is noteworthy in this context that the XP140 is splash and dust-proof, while the SX60 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing. More than that, the XP140 is water-proof up to 25m and can, thus, be used for underwater photography.

Concerning battery life, the SX60 gets 340 shots out of its NB-10L battery, while the XP140 can take 240 images on a single charge of its NP-45S power pack. The power pack in the XP140 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)		Street Price
1.		Canon SX60	128 mm	93 mm	114 mm	650 g	340	n	Sep 2014	549
2.		Fujifilm XP140	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	Y	Feb 2019	229
3.		Canon SX70	127 mm	91 mm	117 mm	608 g	325	n	Sep 2018	549
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	116 mm	74 mm	66 mm	553 g	240	n	Feb 2014	799
5.		Canon G16	109 mm	76 mm	40 mm	356 g	360	n	Aug 2013	549
6.		Canon G15	107 mm	76 mm	40 mm	352 g	350	n	Sep 2012	499
7.		Canon SX50	123 mm	87 mm	106 mm	595 g	315	n	Sep 2012	429
8.		Fujifilm XP130	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	207 g	240	n	Jan 2018	229
9.		Fujifilm XP120	110 mm	71 mm	28 mm	203 g	210	Y	Jan 2017	229
10.		Nikon W300	112 mm	66 mm	29 mm	231 g	280	Y	May 2017	389
11.		Nikon P900	140 mm	103 mm	137 mm	899 g	360	n	Mar 2015	599
12.		Panasonic FZ300	132 mm	92 mm	117 mm	691 g	380	Y	Jul 2015	599
13.		Panasonic FZ200	125 mm	87 mm	110 mm	588 g	540	n	Jul 2012	599
14.		Panasonic FZ150	124 mm	82 mm	92 mm	528 g	410	n	Aug 2011	499
15.		Ricoh WG-60	123 mm	62 mm	30 mm	193 g	300	Y	Oct 2018	279
16.		Sony HX99	102 mm	58 mm	36 mm	242 g	370	n	Aug 2018	449
17.		Sony HX400V	130 mm	93 mm	103 mm	660 g	300	n	Feb 2014	499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The XP140 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 58 percent) than the SX60, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 5.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the smaller-sensor digicams that favor affordability and compact design. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.

Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with BSI-CMOS (Backside Illuminated Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors.

While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the XP140 offers a higher resolution of 15.9 megapixels, compared with 14.2 MP of the SX60. This megapixels advantage translates into a 0 percent gain in linear resolution. On the other hand, these sensor specs imply that the XP140 has a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.33μm versus 1.40μm for the SX60). However, it should be noted that the XP140 is much more recent (by 4 years and 5 months) than the SX60, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that compensate for the smaller pixel size. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The Canon PowerShot SX60 HS has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 3200, which can be extended to ISO 100-6400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm FinePix XP140 are ISO 100 to ISO 12800 (no boost).

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports		DXO Overall
1.		Canon SX60	1/2.3	14.2	4608	3072	1080/60p	19.2	10.8	127		39
2.		Fujifilm XP140	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/15p	..	..	..		..
3.		Canon SX70	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	..	..	..		..
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	1.5-inch	13.0	4160	3120	1080/30p	21.5	10.8	581		58
5.		Canon G16	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.0	11.7	230		54
6.		Canon G15	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	19.9	11.5	165		46
7.		Canon SX50	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	20.3	11.2	179		47
8.		Fujifilm XP130	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..		..
9.		Fujifilm XP120	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..		..
10.		Nikon W300	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..		..
11.		Nikon P900	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..		..
12.		Panasonic FZ300	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	19.3	11.0	97		38
13.		Panasonic FZ200	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	19.1	10.8	114		37
14.		Panasonic FZ150	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	19.4	10.9	132		40
15.		Ricoh WG-60	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	..	..	..		..
16.		Sony HX99	1/2.3	18.0	4896	3672	4K/30p	..	..	..		..
17.		Sony HX400V	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	1080/60p	..	..	..		..

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the XP140 provides a better video resolution than the SX60. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/15p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/60p.

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the SX60 has an electronic viewfinder (922k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the XP140 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon SX60 and Fujifilm XP140 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon SX60	922	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	6.4	Y	Y
2.		Fujifilm XP140	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
3.		Canon SX70	2360	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.2	Y	Y
5.		Canon G16	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.2	Y	Y
6.		Canon G15	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.1	Y	Y
7.		Canon SX50	202	n	3.0	461	swivel	n	1/2000s	2.2	Y	Y
8.		Fujifilm XP130	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
9.		Fujifilm XP120	none	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
10.		Nikon W300	none	n	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
11.		Nikon P900	921	n	3.0	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	Y
12.		Panasonic FZ300	1440	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
13.		Panasonic FZ200	1312	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
14.		Panasonic FZ150	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	12.0	Y	Y
15.		Ricoh WG-60	none	n	2.7	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
16.		Sony HX99	638	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
17.		Sony HX400V	210	n	3.0	921	tilting	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	Y

The Fujifilm XP140 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Both the SX60 and the XP140 have zoom lenses built in. The SX60 has a 21-1365mm f/3.4-6.5 optic and the XP140 offers a 28-140mm f/3.9-4.9 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the Canon provides a wider angle of view at the short end, as well as more tele-photo reach at the long end than the Fujifilm. The SX60 offers the faster maximum aperture.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the SX60 and the XP140 write their files to SDXC cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and Fujifilm FinePix XP140 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon SX60	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
2.		Fujifilm XP140	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
3.		Canon SX70	-	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Canon G16	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
6.		Canon G15	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
7.		Canon SX50	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
8.		Fujifilm XP130	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
9.		Fujifilm XP120	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
10.		Nikon W300	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
11.		Nikon P900	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
12.		Panasonic FZ300	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
13.		Panasonic FZ200	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
14.		Panasonic FZ150	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Ricoh WG-60	-	mono	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
16.		Sony HX99	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
17.		Sony HX400V	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-

It is notable that the SX60 has a hotshoe, while the XP140 does not. This socket makes it possible to easily attach optional accessories, such as an external flash gun.

The XP140 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Fujifilm. In contrast, the SX60 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the SX60 was succeeded by the Canon SX70. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Fujifilm websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is the Canon SX60 better than the Fujifilm XP140 or vice versa? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS:

• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/3.4 vs f/3.9).
• Wider view: Has a wider-angle lens that facilitates landscape or interior shots.
• More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (340 versus 240) on a single battery charge.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in September 2014).

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm FinePix XP140:

• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/15p vs 1080/60p).
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 6.4 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• More compact: Is smaller (110x71mm vs 128x93mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 443g or 68 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
• Water-proof: Is rugged and sealed and can thus be used for underwater photography (up to 25m).
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (58 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 4 years and 5 months of technical progress since the SX60 launch.

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the match-up finishes in a tie (11 points each). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon SX60 and the Fujifilm XP140 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Superzoom Camera and Best Travel-Zoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the SX60 and the XP140 in practical situations. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)			Street Price
1.		Canon SX60	3/5	+ +	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	549
2.		Fujifilm XP140	..	+	..	3.5/5	4/5	Feb 2019	229
3.		Canon SX70	..	+ +	..	3.5/5	3.5/5	Sep 2018	549
4.		Canon G1 X Mark II	3/5	+	77/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	799
5.		Canon G16	4/5	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	549
6.		Canon G15	4/5	+	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	499
7.		Canon SX50	3/5	+ +	72/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	429
8.		Fujifilm XP130	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2018	229
9.		Fujifilm XP120	..	o	..	3.5/5	4/5	Jan 2017	229
10.		Nikon W300	..	+	..	4/5	4/5	May 2017	389
11.		Nikon P900	..	..	77/100	4/5	4/5	Mar 2015	599
12.		Panasonic FZ300	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2015	599
13.		Panasonic FZ200	3/5	+ +	80/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2012	599
14.		Panasonic FZ150	3/5	+ +	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2011	499
15.		Ricoh WG-60	..	..	..	..	..	Oct 2018	279
16.		Sony HX99	..	..	..	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2018	449
17.		Sony HX400V	4/5	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	Feb 2014	499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Canon SX60 vs Fujifilm XP140

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.