Canon SX30 vs SX60

The Canon PowerShot SX30 IS and the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in September 2010 and September 2014. Both the SX30 and the SX60 are fixed lens compact cameras that are equipped with a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The SX30 has a resolution of 14 megapixels, whereas the SX60 provides 14.2 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon SX30		Canon SX60
Fixed lens compact camera		Fixed lens compact camera
24-840mm f/2.7-5.8		21-1365mm f/3.4-6.5
14 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor		14.2 MP, 1/2.3" Sensor
720/30p Video		1080/60p Video
ISO 100-1,600 (100 - 6,400)		ISO 100-3,200 (100 - 6,400)
Electronic viewfinder (202k dots)		Electronic viewfinder (922k dots)
2.7 LCD, 230k dots		3.0 LCD, 922k dots
Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)		Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)
0.6 shutter flaps per second		6.4 shutter flaps per second
370 shots per battery charge		340 shots per battery charge
123 x 92 x 108 mm, 601 g		128 x 93 x 114 mm, 650 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot SX30 IS and the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon SX30 and the Canon SX60 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon SX60 is notably larger (5 percent) than the Canon SX30. Moreover, the SX60 is markedly heavier (8 percent) than the SX30. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the SX30 nor the SX60 are weather-sealed.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon SX30	123 mm	92 mm	108 mm	601 g	370	n	Sep 2010	429
2.		Canon SX60	128 mm	93 mm	114 mm	650 g	340	n	Sep 2014	549
3.		Canon SX70	127 mm	91 mm	117 mm	608 g	325	n	Sep 2018	549
4.		Canon SX530	120 mm	82 mm	92 mm	442 g	210	n	Jan 2015	429
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	116 mm	74 mm	66 mm	553 g	240	n	Feb 2014	799
6.		Canon G16	109 mm	76 mm	40 mm	356 g	360	n	Aug 2013	549
7.		Canon SX50	123 mm	87 mm	106 mm	595 g	315	n	Sep 2012	429
8.		Canon SX40	123 mm	92 mm	108 mm	600 g	380	n	Sep 2011	429
9.		Canon T3	130 mm	100 mm	78 mm	495 g	700	n	Feb 2011	449
10.		Canon SX20	123 mm	88 mm	87 mm	600 g	..	n	Aug 2009	399
11.		Leica V-LUX 3	124 mm	81 mm	95 mm	540 g	410	n	Dec 2011	949
12.		Leica V-LUX 2	124 mm	80 mm	95 mm	520 g	410	n	Sep 2010	849
13.		Panasonic FZ300	132 mm	92 mm	117 mm	691 g	380	Y	Jul 2015	599
14.		Panasonic FZ150	124 mm	82 mm	92 mm	528 g	410	n	Aug 2011	499
15.		Panasonic FZ100	124 mm	82 mm	92 mm	540 g	410	n	Jul 2010	499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The SX30 was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 22 percent) than the SX60, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as "crop factor") of 5.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the smaller-sensor digicams that favor affordability and compact design. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.

Technology-wise, the SX60 uses a more advanced image processing engine (DIGIC 6) than the SX30 (DIGIC 4), with benefits for noise reduction, color accuracy, and processing speed.

While the two cameras under review share the same sensor size, the SX60 offers a slightly higher resolution of 14.2 megapixels, compared with 14 MP of the SX30. This megapixels advantage translates into a 7 percent gain in linear resolution. On the other hand, these sensor specs imply that the SX60 has a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 1.40μm versus 1.41μm for the SX30). However, it should be noted that the SX60 is much more recent (by 4 years) than the SX30, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that compensate for the smaller pixel size. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that neither of the two cameras has an anti-alias filter installed, so they are able to capture all the detail the sensor resolves.

The Canon PowerShot SX30 IS has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 100-6400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS are ISO 100 to ISO 3200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-6400.

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Canon SX30	1/2.3	14.0	4320	3240	720/30p	..	..	..	..
2.		Canon SX60	1/2.3	14.2	4608	3072	1080/60p	19.2	10.8	127	39
3.		Canon SX70	1/2.3	20.2	5184	3888	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
4.		Canon SX530	1/2.3	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	1.5-inch	13.0	4160	3120	1080/30p	21.5	10.8	581	58
6.		Canon G16	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.0	11.7	230	54
7.		Canon SX50	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	20.3	11.2	179	47
8.		Canon SX40	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	..	..	..	..
9.		Canon T3	APS-C	12.2	4272	2848	720/30p	21.9	11.0	755	62
10.		Canon SX20	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	720/30p	..	..	..	..
11.		Leica V-LUX 3	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
12.		Leica V-LUX 2	1/2.3	14.0	4320	3240	1080/60i	..	..	..	..
13.		Panasonic FZ300	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	4K/30p	19.3	11.0	97	38
14.		Panasonic FZ150	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	19.4	10.9	132	40
15.		Panasonic FZ100	1/2.3	14.0	4320	3240	1080/60i	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the SX60 provides a better video resolution than the SX30. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the SX30 is limited to 720/30p.

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The two cameras under review are similar with respect to both having an electronic viewfinder. However, the one in the SX60 offers a substantially higher resolution than the one in the SX30 (922k vs 202k dots). The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon SX30, the Canon SX60, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon SX30	202	n	2.7	230	swivel	n	1/3200s	0.6	Y	Y
2.		Canon SX60	922	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	6.4	Y	Y
3.		Canon SX70	2360	n	3.0	922	swivel	n	1/2000s	10.0	Y	Y
4.		Canon SX530	none	n	3.0	461	fixed	n	1/2000s	1.6	Y	Y
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.2	Y	Y
6.		Canon G16	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.2	Y	Y
7.		Canon SX50	202	n	3.0	461	swivel	n	1/2000s	2.2	Y	Y
8.		Canon SX40	202	n	2.7	230	swivel	n	1/3200s	10.3	Y	Y
9.		Canon T3	optical	n	2.7	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
10.		Canon SX20	202	n	2.5	230	swivel	n	1/3200s	0.7	Y	Y
11.		Leica V-LUX 3	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	12.0	Y	Y
12.		Leica V-LUX 2	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	11.0	Y	Y
13.		Panasonic FZ300	1440	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
14.		Panasonic FZ150	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	12.0	Y	Y
15.		Panasonic FZ100	202	n	3.0	460	swivel	n	1/2000s	11.0	Y	Y

Both the SX30 and the SX60 have zoom lenses built in. The SX30 has a 24-840mm f/2.7-5.8 optic and the SX60 offers a 21-1365mm f/3.4-6.5 (focal lengths in full frame equivalent terms). Hence, the SX60 provides a wider angle of view at the short end, as well as more tele-photo reach at the long end than the SX30. The SX30 offers the faster maximum aperture.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the SX30 and the SX60 write their files to SDXC cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot SX30 IS and Canon PowerShot SX60 HS and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon SX30	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	YES	2.0	-	-	-
2.		Canon SX60	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
3.		Canon SX70	-	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
4.		Canon SX530	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
6.		Canon G16	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
7.		Canon SX50	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
8.		Canon SX40	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	YES	2.0	-	-	-
9.		Canon T3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
10.		Canon SX20	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	YES	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Leica V-LUX 3	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
12.		Leica V-LUX 2	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
13.		Panasonic FZ300	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Panasonic FZ150	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Panasonic FZ100	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the SX60 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the SX30 does not provide wifi capability.

Both the SX30 and the SX60 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The SX30 was replaced by the Canon SX40, while the SX60 was followed by the Canon SX70. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon website.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is the Canon SX30 better than the Canon SX60 or vice versa? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Canon PowerShot SX30 IS:

• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/3200s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• Better light gathering: Has a lens with a wider maximum aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.4).
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced segment (22 percent cheaper at launch).
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in September 2010).

Arguments in favor of the Canon PowerShot SX60 HS:

• Better jpgs: Has a more modern image processing engine (DIGIC 6 vs DIGIC 4).
• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (1080/60p vs 720/30p).
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• More detailed viewfinder: Has higher resolution electronic viewfinder (922k vs 202k dots).
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 2.7") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (922k vs 230k dots).
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (6.4 vs 0.6 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Wider view: Has a wider-angle lens that facilitates landscape or interior shots.
• More tele-reach: Has a longer tele-lens for perspective compression and subject magnification.
• Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
• More modern: Reflects 4 years of technical progress since the SX30 launch.

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the SX60 is the clear winner of the contest (13 : 4 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon SX30 and the Canon SX60 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Superzoom Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the SX30 and the SX60 in practical situations. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is why expert reviews are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon SX30	3/5	+ +	..	3.5/5	4/5	Sep 2010	429
2.		Canon SX60	3/5	+ +	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	549
3.		Canon SX70	..	+ +	..	3.5/5	3.5/5	Sep 2018	549
4.		Canon SX530	..	+ +	..	4/5	4/5	Jan 2015	429
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	3/5	+	77/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	799
6.		Canon G16	4/5	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	549
7.		Canon SX50	3/5	+ +	72/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	429
8.		Canon SX40	..	+	..	4.5/5	4/5	Sep 2011	429
9.		Canon T3	..	80/100	69/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2011	449
10.		Canon SX20	..	+ +	73/100	..	4/5	Aug 2009	399
11.		Leica V-LUX 3	..	..	..	..	..	Dec 2011	949
12.		Leica V-LUX 2	..	..	..	..	..	Sep 2010	849
13.		Panasonic FZ300	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2015	599
14.		Panasonic FZ150	3/5	+ +	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2011	499
15.		Panasonic FZ100	..	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2010	499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

~

Specifications: Canon SX30 vs Canon SX60

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.