Canon S120 vs Sony A900

The Canon PowerShot S120 and the Sony Alpha A900 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in August 2013 and September 2008. The S120 is a fixed lens compact, while the A900 is a DSLR. The cameras are based on a 1/1.7-inch (S120) and a full frame (A900) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 12 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 24.4 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon S120		Sony A900
Fixed lens compact camera		Digital single lens reflex
24-120mm f/1.8-5.7		Sony A mount lenses
12 MP, 1/1.7" Sensor		24.4 MP, Full Frame Sensor
1080/60p Video		no Video
ISO 80-12,800		ISO 200-3,200 (100 - 6,400)
No viewfinder, LCD framing		Optical viewfinder
3.0 LCD, 922k dots		3.0 LCD, 922k dots
Fixed touchscreen		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
12.1 shutter flaps per second		5 shutter flaps per second
Lens-based stabilization		In-body stabilization
not weather sealed		Weathersealed body
230 shots per battery charge		880 shots per battery charge
100 x 59 x 29 mm, 217 g		156 x 117 x 82 mm, 895 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot S120 and the Sony Alpha A900? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon S120 and the Sony A900. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony A900 is considerably larger (209 percent) than the Canon S120. It is noteworthy in this context that the A900 is splash and dust-proof, while the S120 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the S120 has a lens built in, whereas the A900 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup.

Concerning battery life, the S120 gets 230 shots out of its NB-6LH battery, while the A900 can take 880 images on a single charge of its NP-FM500H power pack.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)		Street Price
1.		Canon S120	100 mm	59 mm	29 mm	217 g	230	n	Aug 2013	449
2.		Sony A900	156 mm	117 mm	82 mm	895 g	880	Y	Sep 2008	2,999
3.		Canon G9 X Mark II	98 mm	58 mm	31 mm	206 g	235	n	Jan 2017	529
4.		Canon G9 X	98 mm	58 mm	31 mm	209 g	220	n	Oct 2015	529
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	116 mm	74 mm	66 mm	553 g	240	n	Feb 2014	799
6.		Canon G16	109 mm	76 mm	40 mm	356 g	360	n	Aug 2013	549
7.		Canon G1 X	117 mm	81 mm	65 mm	534 g	250	n	Jan 2012	799
8.		Canon G15	107 mm	76 mm	40 mm	352 g	350	n	Sep 2012	499
9.		Canon SX50	123 mm	87 mm	106 mm	595 g	315	n	Sep 2012	429
10.		Nikon P7800	119 mm	78 mm	50 mm	399 g	350	n	Sep 2013	549
11.		Panasonic LF1	103 mm	62 mm	28 mm	192 g	250	n	Apr 2013	499
12.		Panasonic LX7	111 mm	68 mm	46 mm	298 g	330	n	Jul 2012	499
13.		Sony A9	127 mm	96 mm	63 mm	673 g	650	Y	Apr 2017	4,499
14.		Sony A99 II	143 mm	104 mm	76 mm	849 g	490	Y	Sep 2016	3,199
15.		Sony A7S II	127 mm	96 mm	60 mm	627 g	370	Y	Sep 2015	2,999
16.		Sony A99	147 mm	111 mm	78 mm	812 g	500	Y	Sep 2012	2,799
17.		Sony A850	156 mm	117 mm	82 mm	895 g	880	Y	Aug 2009	1,999
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The S120 was launched at a lower price than the A900, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon S120 features a 1/1.7-inch sensor and the Sony A900 a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the A900 is 1905 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 4.5 and 1.0. The sensor in the S120 has a native 4:3 aspect ratio, while the one in the A900 offers a 3:2 aspect.

With 24.4MP, the A900 offers a higher resolution than the S120 (12MP), but the A900 nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 5.94μm versus 1.89μm for the S120) due to its larger sensor. However, the S120 is a much more recent model (by 4 years and 11 months) than the A900, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units.

The resolution advantage of the Sony A900 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the A900 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30.2 x 20.2 inches or 76.8 x 51.2 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24.2 x 16.1 inches or 61.4 x 41 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20.2 x 13.4 inches or 51.2 x 34.1 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon S120 are 20 x 15 inches or 50.8 x 38.1 cm for good quality, 16 x 12 inches or 40.6 x 30.5 cm for very good quality, and 13.3 x 10 inches or 33.9 x 25.4 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon PowerShot S120 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 80 to ISO 12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Alpha A900 are ISO 200 to ISO 3200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-6400.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. Of the two cameras under consideration, the A900 offers substantially better image quality than the S120 (overall score 23 points higher). The advantage is based on 2.4 bits higher color depth, 0.4 EV in additional dynamic range, and 2.5 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports		DXO Overall
1.		Canon S120	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.3	11.9	246		56
2.		Sony A900	Full Frame	24.4	6048	4032	none	23.7	12.3	1431		79
3.		Canon G9 X Mark II	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	21.9	12.5	522		65
4.		Canon G9 X	1-inch	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	21.5	12.3	495		63
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	1.5-inch	13.0	4160	3120	1080/30p	21.5	10.8	581		58
6.		Canon G16	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	21.0	11.7	230		54
7.		Canon G1 X	1.5-inch	14.2	4352	3264	1080/24p	21.7	10.8	644		60
8.		Canon G15	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	19.9	11.5	165		46
9.		Canon SX50	1/2.3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/24p	20.3	11.2	179		47
10.		Nikon P7800	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/30p	21.2	11.7	200		54
11.		Panasonic LF1	1/1.7	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60i	20.8	11.6	211		52
12.		Panasonic LX7	1/1.7	10.0	3648	2736	1080/60p	20.7	11.7	147		50
13.		Sony A9	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	24.9	13.3	3517		92
14.		Sony A99 II	Full Frame	42.2	7952	5304	4K/30p	25.4	13.4	2317		92
15.		Sony A7S II	Full Frame	12.0	4240	2832	4K/30p	23.6	13.3	2993		85
16.		Sony A99	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	25.0	14.0	1555		89
17.		Sony A850	Full Frame	24.4	6048	4032	none	23.8	12.2	1415		79

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The S120 indeed provides movie recording capabilities, while the A900 does not. The highest resolution format that the S120 can use is 1080/60p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the A900 has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the S120 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon S120 and Sony A900 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon S120	none	n	3.0	922	fixed	Y	1/2000s	12.1	Y	Y
2.		Sony A900	optical	Y	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	Y
3.		Canon G9 X Mark II	none	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/2000s	8.2	Y	Y
4.		Canon G9 X	none	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/2000s	6.0	Y	Y
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	5.2	Y	Y
6.		Canon G16	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.2	Y	Y
7.		Canon G1 X	optical	n	3.0	922	Swivel	n	1/4000s	1.9	Y	Y
8.		Canon G15	optical	n	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.1	Y	Y
9.		Canon SX50	202	n	3.0	461	swivel	n	1/2000s	2.2	Y	Y
10.		Nikon P7800	921	n	3.0	921	swivel	n	1/4000s	8.0	Y	Y
11.		Panasonic LF1	200	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/4000s	10.0	Y	Y
12.		Panasonic LX7	optional	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/4000s	11.0	Y	Y
13.		Sony A9	3686	n	3.0	1440	tilting	Y	1/8000s	20.0	n	Y
14.		Sony A99 II	2400	Y	3.0	1229	full-flex	n	1/8000s	12.0	n	Y
15.		Sony A7S II	2400	n	3.0	1229	tilting	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	Y
16.		Sony A99	2359	Y	3.0	1229	full-flex	n	1/8000s	6.0	n	Y
17.		Sony A850	optical	Y	3.0	922	fixed	n	1/8000s	3.0	n	Y

One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The S120 has one, while the A900 does not. While the built-in flash of the S120 is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.

The Canon S120 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

The S120 writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the A900 uses Compact Flash or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. The A900 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the S120 only has one slot.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot S120 and Sony Alpha A900 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon S120	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
2.		Sony A900	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
3.		Canon G9 X Mark II	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
4.		Canon G9 X	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
6.		Canon G16	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
7.		Canon G1 X	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
8.		Canon G15	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
9.		Canon SX50	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
10.		Nikon P7800	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Panasonic LF1	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
12.		Panasonic LX7	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
13.		Sony A9	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
14.		Sony A99 II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
15.		Sony A7S II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
16.		Sony A99	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	-	-	-
17.		Sony A850	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the S120 offers wifi support, while the A900 does not. Wifi can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location.

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Sony A900 (unlike the S120) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

Both the S120 and the A900 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The A900 was replaced by the Sony A99, while the S120 does not have a direct successor. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Sony websites.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is the Canon S120 better than the Sony A900 or vice versa? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot S120:

• Broader imaging potential: Can record not only still images but also 1080/60p movies.
• Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (12.1 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• Ready to shoot: Comes with a built-in lens, while the A900 requires a separate lens.
• More compact: Is smaller (100x59mm vs 156x117mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• Less heavy: Is lighter even though it comes with a built-in lens (unlike the A900).
• Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
• Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
• More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
• More modern: Reflects 4 years and 11 months of technical progress since the A900 launch.

Reasons to prefer the Sony Alpha A900:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (24.4 vs 12MP), which boosts linear resolution by 45%.
• Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (23 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
• Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (2.4 bits more color depth).
• Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (2.5 stops ISO advantage).
• Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Easier setting verification: Features a control panel on top to check shooting parameters.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/2000s) to freeze action.
• More flexible: Makes it possible to change lenses and thus to use specialty optics.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (880 versus 230) out of a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is splash and dust sealed for shooting in inclement weather conditions.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
• More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in September 2008).

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the A900 emerges as the winner of the match-up (14 : 11 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon S120 and the Sony A900 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Travel-Zoom Camera and Best DSLR Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the S120 or the A900 perform in practice. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)			Street Price
1.		Canon S120	..	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	449
2.		Sony A900	..	+ +	+ +	4.5/5	5/5	Sep 2008	2,999
3.		Canon G9 X Mark II	4/5	..	75/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2017	529
4.		Canon G9 X	3.5/5	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Oct 2015	529
5.		Canon G1 X Mark II	3/5	+	77/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	799
6.		Canon G16	4/5	+	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2013	549
7.		Canon G1 X	5/5	+	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jan 2012	799
8.		Canon G15	4/5	+	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	499
9.		Canon SX50	3/5	+ +	72/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	429
10.		Nikon P7800	3/5	..	..	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2013	549
11.		Panasonic LF1	3/5	+	..	4/5	4.5/5	Apr 2013	499
12.		Panasonic LX7	3/5	+ +	75/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jul 2012	499
13.		Sony A9	5/5	+ +	89/100	5/5	5/5	Apr 2017	4,499
14.		Sony A99 II	..	..	85/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2016	3,199
15.		Sony A7S II	5/5	+	..	4.5/5	5/5	Sep 2015	2,999
16.		Sony A99	5/5	..	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	2,799
17.		Sony A850	3/5	..	75/100	..	4.5/5	Aug 2009	1,999
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

~

Specifications: Canon S120 vs Sony A900

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.