Canon M5 vs Samsung NX500

The Canon EOS M5 and the Samsung NX500 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in September 2016 and February 2015. Both the M5 and the NX500 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the Samsung provides 28 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon M5		Samsung NX500
Mirrorless system camera		Mirrorless system camera
Canon EF-M mount lenses		Samsung NX mount lenses
24 MP, APS-C Sensor		28 MP, APS-C Sensor
1080/60p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 100-25,600		ISO 100-25,600 (100 - 51,200)
Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)		No viewfinder, LCD framing
3.2 LCD, 1620k dots		3.0 LCD, 1036k dots
Tilting touchscreen		Tilting touchscreen
9 shutter flaps per second		9 shutter flaps per second
295 shots per battery charge		370 shots per battery charge
116 x 89 x 61 mm, 427 g		120 x 64 x 43 mm, 287 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS M5 and the Samsung NX500? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Canon M5 and the Samsung NX500 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Samsung NX500 is notably smaller (26 percent) than the Canon M5. Moreover, the NX500 is markedly lighter (33 percent) than the M5. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the M5 nor the NX500 are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.

The power pack in the NX500 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)		Street Price
1.		Canon M5	116 mm	89 mm	61 mm	427 g	295	n	Sep 2016	979
2.		Samsung NX500	120 mm	64 mm	43 mm	287 g	370	n	Feb 2015	799
3.		Canon M50	116 mm	88 mm	59 mm	390 g	235	n	Feb 2018	779
4.		Canon 77D	131 mm	100 mm	76 mm	540 g	600	n	Feb 2017	899
5.		Canon M6	112 mm	68 mm	45 mm	390 g	295	n	Feb 2017	779
6.		Canon M100	108 mm	67 mm	35 mm	302 g	295	n	Aug 2017	499
7.		Canon SL2	122 mm	93 mm	70 mm	453 g	650	n	Jun 2017	549
8.		Canon M3	111 mm	68 mm	44 mm	366 g	250	n	Feb 2015	679
9.		Canon M10	108 mm	67 mm	35 mm	301 g	255	n	Oct 2015	499
10.		Canon T6i	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	555 g	440	n	Feb 2015	749
11.		Canon T6s	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	565 g	440	n	Feb 2015	649
12.		Nikon D5600	124 mm	97 mm	70 mm	465 g	970	n	Nov 2016	699
13.		Nikon D5500	124 mm	97 mm	70 mm	420 g	820	n	Jan 2015	899
14.		Ricoh GR II	117 mm	63 mm	35 mm	251 g	320	n	Jun 2015	699
15.		Sony A5100	110 mm	63 mm	36 mm	283 g	400	n	Aug 2014	549
16.		Sony A6000	120 mm	67 mm	45 mm	344 g	360	n	Feb 2014	599
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The NX500 was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 18 percent) than the M5, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. The sensor area in the NX500 is 11 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have format factors, respectively, of 1.6 (M5) and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 28MP, the NX500 offers a higher resolution than the M5 (24MP), but the NX500 has marginally smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.63μm versus 3.72μm for the M5). It is noteworthy in this context that the M5 is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 7 months) than the NX500, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the NX500 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Samsung NX500 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the NX500 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 32.4 x 21.6 inches or 82.3 x 54.9 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 25.9 x 17.3 inches or 65.8 x 43.9 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 21.6 x 14.4 inches or 54.9 x 36.6 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon M5 are 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm for good quality, 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm for very good quality, and 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon EOS M5 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Samsung NX500 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-51200.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. Of the two cameras under consideration, the NX500 has a markedly higher DXO score than the M5 (overall score 10 points higher), which will translate into better image quality. The advantage is based on 1.4 bits higher color depth, 1.5 EV in additional dynamic range, and 0.1 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports		DXO Overall
1.		Canon M5	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.4	12.4	1262		77
2.		Samsung NX500	APS-C	28.0	6480	4320	4K/30p	24.8	13.9	1379		87
3.		Canon M50	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/24p	..	..	..		..
4.		Canon 77D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.6	13.3	971		78
5.		Canon M6	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..		..
6.		Canon M100	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.5	12.9	1272		78
7.		Canon SL2	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.6	13.4	1041		79
8.		Canon M3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.8	11.8	1169		72
9.		Canon M10	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.2	11.4	753		65
10.		Canon T6i	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.7	12.0	919		71
11.		Canon T6s	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.6	12.0	915		70
12.		Nikon D5600	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.1	14.0	1306		84
13.		Nikon D5500	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.1	14.0	1438		84
14.		Ricoh GR II	APS-C	16.1	4928	3264	1080/30p	23.6	13.7	1078		80
15.		Sony A5100	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.8	12.7	1347		80
16.		Sony A6000	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.1	13.1	1347		82

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the NX500 provides a better video resolution than the M5. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/30p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/60p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. For example, the M5 has an electronic viewfinder (2360k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the NX500 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon M5, the Samsung NX500, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon M5	2360	n	3.2	1620	tilting	Y	1/4000s	9.0	Y	n
2.		Samsung NX500	none	n	3.0	1036	tilting	Y	1/6000s	9.0	Y	n
3.		Canon M50	2360	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	10.0	Y	n
4.		Canon 77D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
5.		Canon M6	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	9.0	Y	n
6.		Canon M100	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.1	Y	n
7.		Canon SL2	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
8.		Canon M3	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	4.2	Y	n
9.		Canon M10	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	4.6	Y	n
10.		Canon T6i	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
11.		Canon T6s	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
12.		Nikon D5600	optical	n	3.2	1037	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
13.		Nikon D5500	optical	n	3.2	1037	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
14.		Ricoh GR II	optional	n	3.0	1230	fixed	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	n
15.		Sony A5100	none	n	3.0	922	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
16.		Sony A6000	1440	n	3.0	922	tilting	n	1/4000s	11.0	Y	n

The Samsung NX500 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the M5 and the NX500 write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS M5 and Samsung NX500 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon M5	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
2.		Samsung NX500	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
3.		Canon M50	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
4.		Canon 77D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
5.		Canon M6	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
6.		Canon M100	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
7.		Canon SL2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
8.		Canon M3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
9.		Canon M10	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
10.		Canon T6i	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
11.		Canon T6s	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
12.		Nikon D5600	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
13.		Nikon D5500	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Ricoh GR II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
15.		Sony A5100	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
16.		Sony A6000	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-

It is notable that the M5 has a microphone port, which is missing on the NX500. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used.

The M5 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the NX500 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). There has not been a direct replacement model for the NX500 from Samsung. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Samsung websites.

Review summary

So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon M5 and the Samsung NX500? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS M5:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1620k vs 1036k dots).
• More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 1 year and 7 months after the NX500).

Reasons to prefer the Samsung NX500:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (28 vs 24MP), which boosts linear resolution by 8%.
• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better image quality: Scores markedly higher (10 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
• Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (1.4 bits more color depth).
• More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (1.5 EV of extra DR).
• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/60p).
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/6000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• More compact: Is smaller (120x64mm vs 116x89mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 140g or 33 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (370 versus 295) out of a single battery charge.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• More affordable: Was released into a lower priced segment (18 percent cheaper at launch).
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in February 2015).

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the NX500 is the clear winner of the contest (14 : 6 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional sports photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a street photog, and a person interested in family portraits has distinct needs from a landscape shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon M5 and the Samsung NX500 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the M5 or the NX500. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)			Street Price
1.		Canon M5	4/5	+	82/100	4/5	4/5	Sep 2016	979
2.		Samsung NX500	4.5/5	..	81/100	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	799
3.		Canon M50	..	+	79/100	..	3.5/5	Feb 2018	779
4.		Canon 77D	4.5/5	..	82/100	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2017	899
5.		Canon M6	..	..	80/100	4/5	4/5	Feb 2017	779
6.		Canon M100	3/5	+	..	4/5	3.5/5	Aug 2017	499
7.		Canon SL2	4/5	+ +	78/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2017	549
8.		Canon M3	4/5	o	75/100	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2015	679
9.		Canon M10	..	..	..	..	4/5	Oct 2015	499
10.		Canon T6i	5/5	..	75/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	749
11.		Canon T6s	5/5	+	77/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	649
12.		Nikon D5600	4/5	..	79/100	4.5/5	4/5	Nov 2016	699
13.		Nikon D5500	5/5	+	79/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2015	899
14.		Ricoh GR II	..	..	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2015	699
15.		Sony A5100	4.5/5	+	..	4.5/5	5/5	Aug 2014	549
16.		Sony A6000	5/5	+	80/100	4.5/5	5/5	Feb 2014	599
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.

~

Specifications: Canon M5 vs Samsung NX500

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.