Canon M5 vs Olympus E-PL9

The Canon EOS M5 and the Olympus PEN E-PL9 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in September 2016 and February 2018. Both the M5 and the E-PL9 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are based on an APS-C (M5) and a Four Thirds (E-PL9) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 24 megapixels, whereas the Olympus provides 15.9 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon M5		Olympus E-PL9
Mirrorless system camera		Mirrorless system camera
Canon EF-M mount lenses		Micro Four Thirds lenses
24 MP, APS-C Sensor		15.9 MP, Four Thirds Sensor
1080/60p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 100-25,600		ISO 200-6,400 (100 - 25,600)
Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)		No viewfinder, LCD framing
3.2 LCD, 1620k dots		3.0 LCD, 1040k dots
Tilting touchscreen		Tilting touchscreen
9 shutter flaps per second		8.6 shutter flaps per second
Lens stabilization only		In-body stabilization
295 shots per battery charge		350 shots per battery charge
116 x 89 x 61 mm, 427 g		117 x 68 x 39 mm, 380 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS M5 and the Olympus PEN E-PL9? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon M5 and the Olympus E-PL9 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The E-PL9 can be obtained in four different colors (black, brown, blue, white), while the M5 is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus E-PL9 is notably smaller (23 percent) than the Canon M5. Moreover, the E-PL9 is markedly lighter (11 percent) than the M5. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the M5 nor the E-PL9 are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.

Concerning battery life, the M5 gets 295 shots out of its LP-E17 battery, while the E-PL9 can take 350 images on a single charge of its BLS-50 power pack.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)		Street Price
1.		Canon M5	116 mm	89 mm	61 mm	427 g	295	n	Sep 2016	979
2.		Olympus E-PL9	117 mm	68 mm	39 mm	380 g	350	n	Feb 2018	599
3.		Canon M50	116 mm	88 mm	59 mm	390 g	235	n	Feb 2018	779
4.		Canon 77D	131 mm	100 mm	76 mm	540 g	600	n	Feb 2017	899
5.		Canon M6	112 mm	68 mm	45 mm	390 g	295	n	Feb 2017	779
6.		Canon M100	108 mm	67 mm	35 mm	302 g	295	n	Aug 2017	499
7.		Canon SL2	122 mm	93 mm	70 mm	453 g	650	n	Jun 2017	549
8.		Canon M3	111 mm	68 mm	44 mm	366 g	250	n	Feb 2015	679
9.		Canon M10	108 mm	67 mm	35 mm	301 g	255	n	Oct 2015	499
10.		Canon T6i	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	555 g	440	n	Feb 2015	749
11.		Canon T6s	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	565 g	440	n	Feb 2015	649
12.		Nikon D5500	124 mm	97 mm	70 mm	420 g	820	n	Jan 2015	899
13.		Olympus E-PL10	117 mm	68 mm	39 mm	380 g	350	n	Oct 2019	599
14.		Olympus E-M10 III	122 mm	84 mm	50 mm	410 g	330	n	Aug 2017	649
15.		Olympus E-PL8	115 mm	67 mm	38 mm	357 g	350	n	Sep 2016	549
16.		Olympus E-M10 II	120 mm	83 mm	47 mm	390 g	320	n	Aug 2015	649
17.		Olympus E-M10	119 mm	82 mm	46 mm	396 g	320	n	Jan 2014	699
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The E-PL9 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 39 percent) than the M5, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon M5 features an APS-C sensor and the Olympus E-PL9 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the E-PL9 is 32 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.6 and 2.0. The sensor in the M5 has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the E-PL9 offers a 4:3 aspect.

In terms of underlying technology, both cameras are build around CMOS sensors.

With 24MP, the M5 offers a higher resolution than the E-PL9 (15.9MP), but the M5 has marginally smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.72μm versus 3.76μm for the E-PL9). Moreover, the E-PL9 is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 4 months) than the M5, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels.

The resolution advantage of the Canon M5 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the M5 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Olympus E-PL9 are 23 x 17.3 inches or 58.5 x 43.9 cm for good quality, 18.4 x 13.8 inches or 46.8 x 35.1 cm for very good quality, and 15.4 x 11.5 inches or 39 x 29.3 cm for excellent quality prints.

The M5 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Canon EOS M5 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Olympus PEN E-PL9 are ISO 200 to ISO 6400, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-25600.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports		DXO Overall
1.		Canon M5	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.4	12.4	1262		77
2.		Olympus E-PL9	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..		..
3.		Canon M50	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/24p	..	..	..		..
4.		Canon 77D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.6	13.3	971		78
5.		Canon M6	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..		..
6.		Canon M100	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.5	12.9	1272		78
7.		Canon SL2	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.6	13.4	1041		79
8.		Canon M3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.8	11.8	1169		72
9.		Canon M10	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.2	11.4	753		65
10.		Canon T6i	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.7	12.0	919		71
11.		Canon T6s	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.6	12.0	915		70
12.		Nikon D5500	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.1	14.0	1438		84
13.		Olympus E-PL10	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..		..
14.		Olympus E-M10 III	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	4K/30p	..	..	..		..
15.		Olympus E-PL8	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..		..
16.		Olympus E-M10 II	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/60p	23.1	12.5	842		73
17.		Olympus E-M10	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	22.8	12.3	884		72

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, but the E-PL9 provides a better video resolution than the M5. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/30p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/60p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the M5 has an electronic viewfinder (2360k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the E-PL9 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon M5, the Olympus E-PL9, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon M5	2360	n	3.2	1620	tilting	Y	1/4000s	9.0	Y	n
2.		Olympus E-PL9	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.6	Y	Y
3.		Canon M50	2360	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	10.0	Y	n
4.		Canon 77D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
5.		Canon M6	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	9.0	Y	n
6.		Canon M100	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.1	Y	n
7.		Canon SL2	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
8.		Canon M3	optional	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	4.2	Y	n
9.		Canon M10	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	4.6	Y	n
10.		Canon T6i	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
11.		Canon T6s	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
12.		Nikon D5500	optical	n	3.2	1037	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
13.		Olympus E-PL10	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.6	Y	Y
14.		Olympus E-M10 III	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.6	Y	Y
15.		Olympus E-PL8	optional	n	3.0	1037	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	Y
16.		Olympus E-M10 II	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	Y
17.		Olympus E-M10	1440	n	3.0	1037	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	Y

One feature that differentiates the E-PL9 and the M5 is in-body image stabilization (IBIS). The E-PL9 reduces the risk of handshake-induced blur with all attached lenses, while the M5 offers no blur reduction with lenses that themselves do not provide optical image stabilization.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the E-PL9 is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

The Olympus E-PL9 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the M5 and the E-PL9 write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS M5 and Olympus PEN E-PL9 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon M5	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
2.		Olympus E-PL9	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
3.		Canon M50	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
4.		Canon 77D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
5.		Canon M6	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
6.		Canon M100	-	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	Y	Y
7.		Canon SL2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	Y
8.		Canon M3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
9.		Canon M10	-	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
10.		Canon T6i	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
11.		Canon T6s	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
12.		Nikon D5500	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
13.		Olympus E-PL10	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
14.		Olympus E-M10 III	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
15.		Olympus E-PL8	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
16.		Olympus E-M10 II	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
17.		Olympus E-M10	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-

It is notable that the M5 has a microphone port, which is missing on the E-PL9. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used.

The M5 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the E-PL9 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the E-PL9 was succeeded by the Olympus E-PL10. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Olympus websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is the Canon M5 better than the Olympus E-PL9 or vice versa? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS M5:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (24 vs 15.9MP) with a 25% higher linear resolution.
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1620k vs 1040k dots).
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in September 2016).

Arguments in favor of the Olympus PEN E-PL9:

• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/60p).
• Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• More compact: Is smaller (117x68mm vs 116x89mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 47g or 11 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Longer lasting: Gets more shots (350 versus 295) out of a single battery charge.
• Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (39 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Was introduced somewhat (1 year and 4 months) more recently.

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the E-PL9 comes out slightly ahead of the M5 (9 : 8 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon M5 and the Olympus E-PL9 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the M5 or the E-PL9. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is why expert reviews are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)			Street Price
1.		Canon M5	4/5	+	82/100	4/5	4/5	Sep 2016	979
2.		Olympus E-PL9	..	+	..	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2018	599
3.		Canon M50	..	+	79/100	..	3.5/5	Feb 2018	779
4.		Canon 77D	4.5/5	..	82/100	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2017	899
5.		Canon M6	..	..	80/100	4/5	4/5	Feb 2017	779
6.		Canon M100	3/5	+	..	4/5	3.5/5	Aug 2017	499
7.		Canon SL2	4/5	+ +	78/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2017	549
8.		Canon M3	4/5	o	75/100	4.5/5	4/5	Feb 2015	679
9.		Canon M10	..	..	..	..	4/5	Oct 2015	499
10.		Canon T6i	5/5	..	75/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	749
11.		Canon T6s	5/5	+	77/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	649
12.		Nikon D5500	5/5	+	79/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2015	899
13.		Olympus E-PL10	..	..	77/100	..	4/5	Oct 2019	599
14.		Olympus E-M10 III	..	+	80/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2017	649
15.		Olympus E-PL8	..	..	..	4.5/5	4/5	Sep 2016	549
16.		Olympus E-M10 II	4.5/5	+ +	80/100	5/5	5/5	Aug 2015	649
17.		Olympus E-M10	4/5	..	80/100	5/5	5/5	Jan 2014	699
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Canon M5 vs Olympus E-PL9

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.