Canon G1 X vs Olympus E-400
The Canon PowerShot G1 X and the Olympus E-400 are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in January 2012 and September 2006. The G1X is a fixed lens compact, while the E-400 is a DSLR. The cameras are based on an 1.5-inch (G1X) and a Four Thirds (E-400) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 14.2 megapixels, whereas the Olympus provides 10 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon PowerShot G1 X and the Olympus E-400? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon G1 X and the Olympus E-400. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Olympus E-400 is notably larger (25 percent) than the Canon G1 X. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the G1X nor the E-400 are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the G1X has a lens built in, whereas the E-400 is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the E-400 and their specifications in the Four Thirds Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the G1X gets 250 shots out of its NB-10L battery, while the E-400 can take 500 images on a single charge of its BLS-1 power pack.
The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life |
Weather Sealing |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) | Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G1 X | 117 mm | 81 mm | 65 mm | 534 g | 250 | n | Jan 2012 | 799 | ||
2. | Olympus E-400 | 130 mm | 91 mm | 53 mm | 435 g | 500 | n | Sep 2006 | 699 | ||
3. | Canon G1 X Mark II | 116 mm | 74 mm | 66 mm | 553 g | 240 | n | Feb 2014 | 799 | ||
4. | Canon G16 | 109 mm | 76 mm | 40 mm | 356 g | 360 | n | Aug 2013 | 549 | ||
5. | Canon S120 | 100 mm | 59 mm | 29 mm | 217 g | 230 | n | Aug 2013 | 449 | ||
6. | Canon SX50 | 123 mm | 87 mm | 106 mm | 595 g | 315 | n | Sep 2012 | 429 | ||
7. | Canon T4i | 133 mm | 100 mm | 79 mm | 575 g | 440 | n | Jun 2012 | 849 | ||
8. | Canon T3 | 130 mm | 100 mm | 78 mm | 495 g | 700 | n | Feb 2011 | 449 | ||
9. | Canon T1i | 129 mm | 98 mm | 62 mm | 520 g | 400 | n | Mar 2009 | 799 | ||
10. | Canon XSi | 129 mm | 98 mm | 62 mm | 524 g | 500 | n | Jan 2008 | 799 | ||
11. | Leica V-LUX 4 | 125 mm | 87 mm | 110 mm | 588 g | 540 | n | Sep 2012 | 949 | ||
12. | Leica V-LUX 3 | 124 mm | 81 mm | 95 mm | 540 g | 410 | n | Dec 2011 | 949 | ||
13. | Olympus E-420 | 130 mm | 91 mm | 53 mm | 440 g | 500 | n | Mar 2008 | 599 | ||
14. | Olympus E-410 | 130 mm | 91 mm | 53 mm | 435 g | 500 | n | Mar 2007 | 699 | ||
15. | Olympus E-510 | 136 mm | 92 mm | 68 mm | 538 g | 750 | n | Mar 2007 | 799 | ||
16. | Olympus E-500 | 130 mm | 95 mm | 66 mm | 479 g | 750 | n | Sep 2005 | 599 | ||
17. | Panasonic L10 | 135 mm | 96 mm | 78 mm | 556 g | 450 | n | Aug 2007 | 599 | ||
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. | |||||||||||
Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison
The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range, and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon G1 X features an 1.5-inch sensor and the Olympus E-400 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the E-400 is 14 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.85 and 2.0. Both cameras feature a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 4:3.
In terms of underlying technology, both cameras are build around CMOS sensors.

With 14.2MP, the G1X offers a higher resolution than the E-400 (10MP), but the G1X has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 4.30μm versus 4.74μm for the E-400). However, the G1X is a much more recent model (by 5 years and 3 months) than the E-400, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels.
The resolution advantage of the Canon G1 X implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the G1X for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 21.8 x 16.3 inches or 55.3 x 41.5 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 17.4 x 13.1 inches or 44.2 x 33.2 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 14.5 x 10.9 inches or 36.8 x 27.6 cm. The corresponding values for the Olympus E-400 are 18.2 x 13.7 inches or 46.3 x 34.7 cm for good quality, 14.6 x 10.9 inches or 37.1 x 27.8 cm for very good quality, and 12.2 x 9.1 inches or 30.9 x 23.2 cm for excellent quality prints.
The Canon PowerShot G1 X has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Olympus E-400 are ISO 100 to ISO 1600 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports | DXO Overall |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G1 X | 1.5-inch | 14.2 | 4352 | 3264 | 1080/24p | 21.7 | 10.8 | 644 | 60 | |
2. | Olympus E-400 | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
3. | Canon G1 X Mark II | 1.5-inch | 13.0 | 4160 | 3120 | 1080/30p | 21.5 | 10.8 | 581 | 58 | |
4. | Canon G16 | 1/1.7 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/60p | 21.0 | 11.7 | 230 | 54 | |
5. | Canon S120 | 1/1.7 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/60p | 21.3 | 11.9 | 246 | 56 | |
6. | Canon SX50 | 1/2.3 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/24p | 20.3 | 11.2 | 179 | 47 | |
7. | Canon T4i | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.7 | 11.2 | 722 | 62 | |
8. | Canon T3 | APS-C | 12.2 | 4272 | 2848 | 720/30p | 21.9 | 11.0 | 755 | 62 | |
9. | Canon T1i | APS-C | 15.1 | 4752 | 3168 | 1080/20p | 21.7 | 11.5 | 663 | 63 | |
10. | Canon XSi | APS-C | 12.2 | 4272 | 2848 | none | 21.9 | 10.8 | 692 | 61 | |
11. | Leica V-LUX 4 | 1/2.3 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
12. | Leica V-LUX 3 | 1/2.3 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
13. | Olympus E-420 | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | none | 21.5 | 10.4 | 527 | 56 | |
14. | Olympus E-410 | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | none | 21.1 | 10.0 | 494 | 51 | |
15. | Olympus E-510 | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | none | 21.2 | 10.0 | 442 | 52 | |
16. | Olympus E-500 | Four Thirds | 8.0 | 3264 | 2448 | none | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
17. | Panasonic L10 | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | none | 21.3 | 10.8 | 429 | 55 |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The G1X indeed provides movie recording capabilities, while the E-400 does not. The highest resolution format that the G1X can use is 1080/24p.
Feature comparison
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. The G1X and the E-400 are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon G1 X and Olympus E-400 in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution (000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) | Built-in Flash (yes/no) | Built-in Image Stab |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G1 X | optical | n | 3.0 | 922 | Swivel | n | 1/4000s | 1.9 | Y | Y | |
2. | Olympus E-400 | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | Y | n | |
3. | Canon G1 X Mark II | optional | n | 3.0 | 1040 | tilting | Y | 1/4000s | 5.2 | Y | Y | |
4. | Canon G16 | optical | n | 3.0 | 922 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 2.2 | Y | Y | |
5. | Canon S120 | none | n | 3.0 | 922 | fixed | Y | 1/2000s | 12.1 | Y | Y | |
6. | Canon SX50 | 202 | n | 3.0 | 461 | swivel | n | 1/2000s | 2.2 | Y | Y | |
7. | Canon T4i | optical | n | 3.0 | 1040 | swivel | Y | 1/4000s | 5.0 | Y | n | |
8. | Canon T3 | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | Y | n | |
9. | Canon T1i | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.4 | Y | n | |
10. | Canon XSi | optical | n | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.5 | Y | n | |
11. | Leica V-LUX 4 | 1312 | n | 3.0 | 460 | swivel | n | 1/4000s | 12.0 | Y | Y | |
12. | Leica V-LUX 3 | 202 | n | 3.0 | 460 | swivel | n | 1/2000s | 12.0 | Y | Y | |
13. | Olympus E-420 | optical | n | 2.7 | 215 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.5 | Y | n | |
14. | Olympus E-410 | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | Y | n | |
15. | Olympus E-510 | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | Y | Y | |
16. | Olympus E-500 | optical | n | 2.5 | 215 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 2.5 | Y | n | |
17. | Panasonic L10 | optical | n | 2.5 | 207 | swivel | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | Y | n |
The G1X writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the E-400 uses Compact Flash or xD Picture cards. The E-400 features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the G1X only has one slot.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon PowerShot G1 X and Olympus E-400 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Port |
WiFi Support | NFC Support | Bluetooth Support |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G1 X | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
2. | Olympus E-400 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
3. | Canon G1 X Mark II | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
4. | Canon G16 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
5. | Canon S120 | - | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
6. | Canon SX50 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
7. | Canon T4i | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
8. | Canon T3 | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
9. | Canon T1i | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
10. | Canon XSi | Y | - | - | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
11. | Leica V-LUX 4 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
12. | Leica V-LUX 3 | Y | stereo | - | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
13. | Olympus E-420 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
14. | Olympus E-410 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
15. | Olympus E-510 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
16. | Olympus E-500 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
17. | Panasonic L10 | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - |
Both the G1X and the E-400 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The E-400 was replaced by the Olympus E-410, while the G1X was followed by the Canon G1X Mark II. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Olympus websites.
Review summary
So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon G1 X and the Olympus E-400? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Reasons to prefer the Canon PowerShot G1 X:
- More detail: Offers more megapixels (14.2 vs 10MP) with a 19% higher linear resolution.
- Broader imaging potential: Can record not only still images but also 1080/24p movies.
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 2.5") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (922k vs 215k dots).
- More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
- Ready to shoot: Comes with a built-in lens, while the E-400 requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (117x81mm vs 130x91mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
- Sharper images: Has hand-shake reducing image stabilization built-in.
- More modern: Reflects 5 years and 3 months of technical progress since the E-400 launch.

Advantages of the Olympus E-400:
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (3 vs 1.9 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- More flexible: Makes it possible to change lenses and thus to use specialty optics.
- Longer lasting: Gets more shots (500 versus 250) out of a single battery charge.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in September 2006).
If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the G1X is the clear winner of the match-up (9 : 5 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon G1 X and the Olympus E-400 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Travel-Zoom Camera and Best DSLR Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the G1X or the E-400 perform in practice. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.
Expert reviews
This is where reviews by experts come in. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
AP score |
CL score |
DPR score |
EPZ score |
PB score |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Canon G1 X | 5/5 | + | 76/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2012 | 799 | ||
2. | Olympus E-400 | .. | 85/100 | .. | 4/5 | 4/5 | Sep 2006 | 699 | ||
3. | Canon G1 X Mark II | 3/5 | + | 77/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 799 | ||
4. | Canon G16 | 4/5 | + | .. | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2013 | 549 | ||
5. | Canon S120 | .. | + + | .. | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2013 | 449 | ||
6. | Canon SX50 | 3/5 | + + | 72/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2012 | 429 | ||
7. | Canon T4i | 4/5 | + + | 77/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2012 | 849 | ||
8. | Canon T3 | .. | 80/100 | 69/100 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2011 | 449 | ||
9. | Canon T1i | .. | + + | 74/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2009 | 799 | ||
10. | Canon XSi | .. | + + | + + | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2008 | 799 | ||
11. | Leica V-LUX 4 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | Sep 2012 | 949 | ||
12. | Leica V-LUX 3 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | Dec 2011 | 949 | ||
13. | Olympus E-420 | .. | 85/100 | + + | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2008 | 599 | ||
14. | Olympus E-410 | .. | 86/100 | + + | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2007 | 699 | ||
15. | Olympus E-510 | .. | 89/100 | + + | 3.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2007 | 799 | ||
16. | Olympus E-500 | .. | 76/100 | + + | .. | .. | Sep 2005 | 599 | ||
17. | Panasonic L10 | .. | 85/100 | + | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Aug 2007 | 599 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available. |
The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Ebay offers Olympus E-400:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
Specifications: Canon G1 X vs Olympus E-400
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Canon G1 X | Olympus E-400 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Fixed lens compact camera | Digital single lens reflex |
Camera Lens | 28-112mm f/2.8-5.8 | Four Thirds lenses |
Launch Date | January 2012 | September 2006 |
Launch Price | USD 799 | USD 699 |
Sensor Specs | Canon G1 X | Olympus E-400 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | 1.5" Sensor | Four Thirds Sensor |
Sensor Size | 18.7 x 14.0 mm | 17.3 x 13.0 mm |
Sensor Area | 261.8 mm2 | 224.9 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 23.4 mm | 21.6 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.85x | 2.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 14.2 Megapixels | 10 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 4352 x 3264 pixels | 3648 x 2736 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 4.30 μm | 4.74 μm |
Pixel Density | 5.43 MP/cm2 | 4.44 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | Anti-Alias filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/24p Video | no Video |
ISO Setting | 100 - 12,800 ISO | 100 - 1,600 ISO |
Image Processor | DIGIC 5 | TruePic |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 60 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 21.7 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 10.8 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 644 | .. |
Screen Specs | Canon G1 X | Olympus E-400 |
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 74% | 95% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.46x | |
LCD Framing | Live View | |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0inch | 2.5inch |
LCD Resolution | 922k dots | 215k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | |
Shooting Specs | Canon G1 X | Olympus E-400 |
Focus System | Contrast-detect AF | Phase-detect AF |
Continuous Shooting | 1.9 shutter flaps/s | 3 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDXC cards | CF or XD cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Dual card slots |
Connectivity Specs | Canon G1 X | Olympus E-400 |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | no HDMI |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | no Wifi |
Body Specs | Canon G1 X | Olympus E-400 |
Battery Type | NB-10L | BLS-1 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 250 shots per charge | 500 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
117 x 81 x 65 mm (4.6 x 3.2 x 2.6 in) |
130 x 91 x 53 mm (5.1 x 3.6 x 2.1 in) |
Camera Weight | 534 g (18.8 oz) | 435 g (15.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.