Canon 650D vs Fujifilm X100S

The Canon EOS 650D (called Canon T4i in some regions) and the Fujifilm X100S are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in June 2012 and January 2013. The 650D is a DSLR, while the X100S is a fixed lens compact. Both cameras are equipped with an APS-C sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 17.9 megapixels, whereas the Fujifilm provides 16 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon 650D		Fujifilm X100S
Digital single lens reflex		Fixed lens compact camera
Canon EF mount lenses		35mm f/2.0
17.9 MP, APS-C Sensor		16 MP, APS-C Sensor
1080/30p Video		1080/60p Video
ISO 100-12,800 (100 - 25,600)		ISO 200-6,400 (100 - 25,600)
Optical viewfinder		Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)
3.0 LCD, 1040k dots		2.8 LCD, 460k dots
Swivel touchscreen		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
5 shutter flaps per second		6 shutter flaps per second
440 shots per battery charge		330 shots per battery charge
133 x 100 x 79 mm, 575 g		127 x 74 x 54 mm, 445 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS 650D and the Fujifilm X100S? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon 650D and the Fujifilm X100S. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The X100S can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the 650D is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm X100S is notably smaller (29 percent) than the Canon 650D. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the 650D nor the X100S are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the X100S has a lens built in, whereas the 650D is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the 650D and their specifications in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.

Concerning battery life, the 650D gets 440 shots out of its LP-E8 battery, while the X100S can take 330 images on a single charge of its NP-95 power pack.

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon 650D	133 mm	100 mm	79 mm	575 g	440	n	Jun 2012	849
2.		Fujifilm X100S	127 mm	74 mm	54 mm	445 g	330	n	Jan 2013	1,299
3.		Canon 750D	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	555 g	440	n	Feb 2015	749
4.		Canon 760D	132 mm	101 mm	78 mm	565 g	440	n	Feb 2015	649
5.		Canon 1200D	130 mm	100 mm	78 mm	480 g	500	n	Feb 2014	449
6.		Canon 100D	117 mm	91 mm	69 mm	407 g	380	n	Mar 2013	549
7.		Canon 700D	133 mm	100 mm	79 mm	580 g	440	n	Mar 2013	649
8.		Canon G1 X	117 mm	81 mm	65 mm	534 g	250	n	Jan 2012	799
9.		Canon 600D	133 mm	100 mm	80 mm	570 g	440	n	Feb 2011	599
10.		Canon 1100D	130 mm	100 mm	78 mm	495 g	700	n	Feb 2011	449
11.		Canon 550D	129 mm	98 mm	62 mm	530 g	440	n	Feb 2010	699
12.		Canon 500D	129 mm	98 mm	62 mm	520 g	400	n	Mar 2009	799
13.		Fujifilm X100F	127 mm	75 mm	52 mm	469 g	390	n	Jan 2017	1,299
14.		Fujifilm X30	119 mm	72 mm	60 mm	423 g	470	n	Aug 2014	599
15.		Fujifilm X100T	127 mm	74 mm	52 mm	440 g	330	n	Sep 2014	1,299
16.		Fujifilm X100	126 mm	75 mm	54 mm	445 g	300	n	Sep 2010	1,199
17.		Leica X Typ 113	133 mm	73 mm	78 mm	486 g	350	n	Sep 2014	2,295
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. The sensor area in the X100S is 11 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have format factors, respectively, of 1.6 (650D) and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the Canon 650D offers a higher resolution of 17.9 megapixels, compared with 16 MP of the Fujifilm X100S. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 4.31μm versus 4.80μm for the X100S). Moreover, it should be noted that the X100S is a somewhat more recent model (by 7 months) than the 650D, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the X100S has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Canon 650D implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the 650D for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 25.9 x 17.3 inches or 65.8 x 43.9 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 20.7 x 13.8 inches or 52.7 x 35.1 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 17.3 x 11.5 inches or 43.9 x 29.3 cm. The corresponding values for the Fujifilm X100S are 24.5 x 16.3 inches or 62.2 x 41.5 cm for good quality, 19.6 x 13.1 inches or 49.7 x 33.2 cm for very good quality, and 16.3 x 10.9 inches or 41.5 x 27.6 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon EOS 650D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 100-25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm X100S are ISO 200 to ISO 6400, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-25600.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Canon 650D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	21.7	11.2	722	62
2.		Fujifilm X100S	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon 750D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.7	12.0	919	71
4.		Canon 760D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/30p	22.6	12.0	915	70
5.		Canon 1200D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	21.9	11.3	724	63
6.		Canon 100D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	21.8	11.3	843	63
7.		Canon 700D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	21.7	11.2	681	61
8.		Canon G1 X	1.5-inch	14.2	4352	3264	1080/24p	21.7	10.8	644	60
9.		Canon 600D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.1	11.5	793	65
10.		Canon 1100D	APS-C	12.2	4272	2848	720/30p	21.9	11.0	755	62
11.		Canon 550D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.1	11.5	784	66
12.		Canon 500D	APS-C	15.1	4752	3168	1080/20p	21.7	11.5	663	63
13.		Fujifilm X100F	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
14.		Fujifilm X30	2/3	12.0	4000	3000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
15.		Fujifilm X100T	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
16.		Fujifilm X100	APS-C	12.2	4288	2848	720/30p	22.9	12.4	1001	73
17.		Leica X Typ 113	APS-C	16.1	4928	3264	1080/30p	..	..	..	..

Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, but the X100S provides a faster frame rate than the 650D. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/30p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. For example, the X100S has an electronic viewfinder (2360k dots), while the 650D has an optical one. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to project supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-free viewing and a very clear framing image. The viewfinder in the X100S offers a wider field of view (100%) than the one in the 650D (95%), so that a larger proportion of the captured image is visible in the finder. On the other hand, the viewfinder of the 650D has a higher magnification (0.53x vs 0.43x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon 650D and Fujifilm X100S along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon 650D	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
2.		Fujifilm X100S	2360	n	2.8	460	fixed	n	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
3.		Canon 750D	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
4.		Canon 760D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
5.		Canon 1200D	optical	n	3.0	460	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
6.		Canon 100D	optical	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/4000s	4.9	Y	n
7.		Canon 700D	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
8.		Canon G1 X	optical	n	3.0	922	Swivel	n	1/4000s	1.9	Y	Y
9.		Canon 600D	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	n	1/4000s	3.7	Y	n
10.		Canon 1100D	optical	n	2.7	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
11.		Canon 550D	optical	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.7	Y	n
12.		Canon 500D	optical	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.4	Y	n
13.		Fujifilm X100F	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
14.		Fujifilm X30	2360	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	12.0	Y	Y
15.		Fujifilm X100T	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
16.		Fujifilm X100	1440	n	2.8	460	fixed	n	1/4000s	5.0	Y	n
17.		Leica X Typ 113	optional	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/2000s	5.0	Y	n

One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The 650D has a touchscreen, while the X100S has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 650D and the X100S write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 650D and Fujifilm X100S and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon 650D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
2.		Fujifilm X100S	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	-	-	-
3.		Canon 750D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
4.		Canon 760D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
5.		Canon 1200D	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
6.		Canon 100D	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
7.		Canon 700D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
8.		Canon G1 X	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
9.		Canon 600D	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
10.		Canon 1100D	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Canon 550D	Y	stereo	-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
12.		Canon 500D	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
13.		Fujifilm X100F	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Fujifilm X30	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
15.		Fujifilm X100T	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
16.		Fujifilm X100	Y	stereo	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
17.		Leica X Typ 113	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the 650D has a microphone port, which is missing on the X100S. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used.

Both the 650D and the X100S have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 650D was replaced by the Canon 700D, while the X100S was followed by the Fujifilm X100T. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Fujifilm websites.

Review summary

So how do things add up? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 650D or the Fujifilm X100S – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS 650D:

• More detail: Offers more megapixels (17.9 vs 16MP) with a 6% higher linear resolution.
• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free composition.
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.53x vs 0.43x).
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 2.8") for image review and settings control.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1040k vs 460k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• Fewer buttons to press: Is equipped with a touch-sensitive rear screen to facilitate handling.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• More flexible: Can take a variety of interchangeable lenses, including specialty optics.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (440 versus 330) on a single battery charge.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in June 2012).

Advantages of the Fujifilm X100S:

• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
• More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
• More complete view: Has a viewfinder with a larger field of view (100% vs 95%).
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (6 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Ready to shoot: Comes with an integrated lens, while the 650D requires a separate lens.
• More compact: Is smaller (127x74mm vs 133x100mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight even though it has a lens built in (unlike the 650D).
• More modern: Was introduced somewhat (7 months) more recently.

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the 650D is the clear winner of the match-up (13 : 9 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 650D and the Fujifilm X100S place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Prime Lens Compact Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the 650D or the X100S. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon 650D	4/5	+ +	77/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2012	849
2.		Fujifilm X100S	5/5	+ +	81/100	4.5/5	5/5	Jan 2013	1,299
3.		Canon 750D	5/5	..	75/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	749
4.		Canon 760D	5/5	+	77/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	649
5.		Canon 1200D	3/5	+	..	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2014	449
6.		Canon 100D	4/5	+	78/100	4/5	4/5	Mar 2013	549
7.		Canon 700D	..	..	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Mar 2013	649
8.		Canon G1 X	5/5	+	76/100	4/5	4.5/5	Jan 2012	799
9.		Canon 600D	3/5	o	77/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2011	599
10.		Canon 1100D	..	80/100	69/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2011	449
11.		Canon 550D	..	+ +	77/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2010	699
12.		Canon 500D	..	+ +	74/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Mar 2009	799
13.		Fujifilm X100F	5/5	+	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Jan 2017	1,299
14.		Fujifilm X30	4/5	..	76/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2014	599
15.		Fujifilm X100T	5/5	+	81/100	4.5/5	5/5	Sep 2014	1,299
16.		Fujifilm X100	3/5	..	75/100	4/5	5/5	Sep 2010	1,199
17.		Leica X Typ 113	3.5/5	..	..	3.5/5	4/5	Sep 2014	2,295
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Canon 650D vs Fujifilm X100S

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.