Canon 60D vs Fujifilm X-E3

The Canon EOS 60D and the Fujifilm X-E3 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in August 2010 and September 2017. The 60D is a DSLR, while the X-E3 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. Both cameras are equipped with an APS-C sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 17.9 megapixels, whereas the Fujifilm provides 24 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon 60D		Fujifilm X-E3
Digital single lens reflex		Mirrorless system camera
Canon EF mount lenses		Fujifilm X mount lenses
17.9 MP, APS-C Sensor		24 MP, APS-C Sensor
1080/30p Video		4K/30p Video
ISO 100-6,400 (100 - 12,800)		ISO 200-12,800 (100 - 51,200)
Optical viewfinder		Electronic viewfinder (2360k dots)
3.0 LCD, 1040k dots		3.0 LCD, 1040k dots
Swivel screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed touchscreen
5.3 shutter flaps per second		8 shutter flaps per second
Weathersealed body		not weather sealed
1100 shots per battery charge		350 shots per battery charge
145 x 106 x 79 mm, 755 g		121 x 74 x 43 mm, 337 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS 60D and the Fujifilm X-E3? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon 60D and the Fujifilm X-E3. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The X-E3 can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the 60D is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Fujifilm X-E3 is considerably smaller (42 percent) than the Canon 60D. Moreover, the X-E3 is substantially lighter (55 percent) than the 60D. It is worth mentioning in this context that the 60D is splash and dust resistant, while the X-E3 does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Both cameras have similarly sized sensors, but DSLRs have a larger flange-to-focal plane distance than mirrorless cameras, which imposes contraints on the optical engineering process and generally leads to bigger and heavier lenses. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Canon EF Lens Catalog (60D) and the Fujinon X Lens Catalog (X-E3). Mirrorless cameras, such as the X-E3, have moreover the advantage that they can use many lenses from other systems via adapters, as they have a relatively short flange to focal plane distance.

Concerning battery life, the 60D gets 1100 shots out of its LP-E6 battery, while the X-E3 can take 350 images on a single charge of its NP-W126S power pack. The power pack in the X-E3 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon 60D	5.7 in	4.2 in	3.1 in	26.6 oz	1100	Y	Aug 2010	1,399
	Fujifilm X-E3	4.8 in	2.9 in	1.7 in	11.9 oz	350	n	Sep 2017	899
	Canon 80D	5.5 in	4.1 in	3.1 in	25.8 oz	960	Y	Feb 2016	1,199
	Canon 7D II	5.9 in	4.4 in	3.1 in	32.1 oz	670	Y	Sep 2014	1,799
	Canon 70D	5.5 in	4.1 in	3.1 in	26.6 oz	920	Y	Jul 2013	1,199
	Canon T3i	5.2 in	3.9 in	3.1 in	20.1 oz	440	n	Feb 2011	599
	Canon T2i	5.1 in	3.9 in	2.4 in	18.7 oz	440	n	Feb 2010	699
	Canon 7D	5.8 in	4.4 in	2.9 in	30.3 oz	800	Y	Sep 2009	1,699
	Canon T1i	5.1 in	3.9 in	2.4 in	18.3 oz	400	n	Mar 2009	799
	Canon 50D	5.7 in	4.3 in	2.9 in	29.0 oz	800	Y	Aug 2008	1,299
	Canon 40D	5.7 in	4.3 in	2.9 in	29.0 oz	750	n	Aug 2007	1,299
	Fujifilm X-T30	4.6 in	3.3 in	1.9 in	13.5 oz	380	n	Feb 2019	899
	Fujifilm X-T20	4.6 in	3.3 in	1.6 in	13.5 oz	350	n	Jan 2017	899
	Fujifilm X-A3	4.6 in	2.6 in	1.6 in	12.0 oz	410	n	Aug 2016	399
	Fujifilm X-E2S	5.1 in	3.0 in	1.5 in	12.3 oz	350	n	Jan 2016	699
	Fujifilm X-E2	5.1 in	3.0 in	1.5 in	12.3 oz	350	n	Oct 2013	999
	Nikon D7000	5.2 in	4.1 in	3.0 in	27.5 oz	1050	Y	Sep 2010	1,499
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Metric

The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The X-E3 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 36 percent) than the 60D, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. The sensor area in the X-E3 is 11 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have format factors, respectively, of 1.6 (60D) and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 24MP, the X-E3 offers a higher resolution than the 60D (17.9MP), but the X-E3 has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 3.92μm versus 4.31μm for the 60D). Yet, the X-E3 is a much more recent model (by 7 years) than the 60D, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the X-E3 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.

The resolution advantage of the Fujifilm X-E3 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the X-E3 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x 20 inches or 76.2 x 50.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24 x 16 inches or 61 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.3 inches or 50.8 x 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 60D are 25.9 x 17.3 inches or 65.8 x 43.9 cm for good quality, 20.7 x 13.8 inches or 52.7 x 35.1 cm for very good quality, and 17.3 x 11.5 inches or 43.9 x 29.3 cm for excellent quality prints.

The X-E3 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.

The Canon EOS 60D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 6400, which can be extended to ISO 100-12800. The corresponding ISO settings for the Fujifilm X-E3 are ISO 200 to ISO 12800, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-51200.

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Canon 60D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.2	11.5	813	66
	Fujifilm X-E3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Canon 80D	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	23.6	13.2	1135	79
	Canon 7D II	APS-C	20.0	5472	3648	1080/60p	22.4	11.8	1082	70
	Canon 70D	APS-C	20.0	5472	3648	1080/30p	22.5	11.6	926	68
	Canon T3i	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.1	11.5	793	65
	Canon T2i	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.1	11.5	784	66
	Canon 7D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.0	11.7	854	66
	Canon T1i	APS-C	15.1	4752	3168	1080/20p	21.7	11.5	663	63
	Canon 50D	APS-C	15.1	4752	3168	none	21.8	11.4	696	63
	Canon 40D	APS-C	10.1	3888	2592	none	22.1	11.3	703	64
	Fujifilm X-T30	APS-C	26.0	6240	4160	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-T20	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	4K/30p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-A3	APS-C	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-E2S	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Fujifilm X-E2	APS-C	16.0	4896	3264	1080/60p	..	..	..	..
	Nikon D7000	APS-C	16.1	4928	3264	10800/24p	23.5	13.9	1167	80

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the X-E3 provides a better video resolution than the 60D. It can shoot movie footage at 4K/30p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/30p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the X-E3 has an electronic viewfinder (2360k dots), while the 60D has an optical one. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to project supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-free viewing and a very clear framing image. The viewfinder in the X-E3 offers a wider field of view (100%) than the one in the 60D (96%), so that a larger proportion of the captured image is visible in the finder. On the other hand, the viewfinder of the 60D has a higher magnification (0.59x vs 0.41x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon 60D, the Fujifilm X-E3, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Canon 60D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	n	1/8000s	5.3	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-E3	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	n
	Canon 80D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/8000s	7.0	Y	n
	Canon 7D II	optical	Y	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	10.0	Y	n
	Canon 70D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	Y	1/8000s	7.0	Y	n
	Canon T3i	optical	n	3.0	1040	swivel	n	1/4000s	3.7	Y	n
	Canon T2i	optical	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.7	Y	n
	Canon 7D	optical	Y	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.0	Y	n
	Canon T1i	optical	n	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.4	Y	n
	Canon 50D	optical	Y	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/8000s	6.3	Y	n
	Canon 40D	optical	Y	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	6.5	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-T30	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-T20	2360	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-A3	none	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/4000s	6.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-E2S	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
	Fujifilm X-E2	2360	n	3.0	1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	7.0	Y	n
	Nikon D7000	optical	Y	3.0	921	fixed	n	1/8000s	6.0	Y	n

One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The 60D has one, while the X-E3 does not. While the built-in flash of the 60D is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.

The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the X-E3 is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).

The Fujifilm X-E3 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 60D and the X-E3 write their files to SDXC cards. The X-E3 supports UHS-I cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s), while the 60D cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 60D and Fujifilm X-E3 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Canon 60D	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Fujifilm X-E3	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	Y
	Canon 80D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-
	Canon 7D II	Y	stereo	mono	Y	Y	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon 70D	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
	Canon T3i	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon T2i	Y	stereo	-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 7D	Y	mono	-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon T1i	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 50D	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 40D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Fujifilm X-T30	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	3.1	Y	-	Y
	Fujifilm X-T20	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-A3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-E2S	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Fujifilm X-E2	Y	stereo	mono	Y	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
	Nikon D7000	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the X-E3 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the 60D does not provide wifi capability.

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 60D (unlike the X-E3) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

The X-E3 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Fujifilm. In contrast, the 60D has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the 60D was succeeded by the Canon 70D. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Fujifilm websites.

Review summary

So how do things add up? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 60D or the Fujifilm X-E3 – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS 60D:

• Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
• Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free composition.
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.59x vs 0.41x).
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (1100 versus 350) on a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
• Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in August 2010).

Arguments in favor of the Fujifilm X-E3:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (24 vs 17.9MP), which boosts linear resolution by 16%.
• Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
• Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/30p vs 1080/30p).
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
• More complete view: Has a viewfinder with a larger field of view (100% vs 96%).
• Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (8 vs 5.3 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• More compact: Is smaller (121x74mm vs 145x106mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 418g or 55 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• More legacy lens friendly: Can use many non-native lenses via adapters.
• Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
• Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
• Faster buffer clearing: Has an SD card interface that supports the UHS-I standard.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (36 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 7 years of technical progress since the 60D launch.

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the X-E3 is the clear winner of the contest (19 : 12 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional sports photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a street photog, and a person interested in family portraits has distinct needs from a landscape shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 60D and the Fujifilm X-E3 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the 60D or the X-E3 perform in practice. User reviews, such as those found at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon 60D	+	79/100	4/5	5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2010	1,399
	Fujifilm X-E3	+	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2017	899
	Canon 80D	+ +	84/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2016	1,199
	Canon 7D II	+	84/100	4/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2014	1,799
	Canon 70D	+ +	83/100	4.5/5	4.5/5	5/5	Jul 2013	1,199
	Canon T3i	o	77/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2011	599
	Canon T2i	+ +	77/100	4/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2010	699
	Canon 7D	+ +	84/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2009	1,699
	Canon T1i	+ +	74/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Mar 2009	799
	Canon 50D	+ +	+ +	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2008	1,299
	Canon 40D	+ +	+ +	4.5/5	o	4.5/5	Aug 2007	1,299
	Fujifilm X-T30	+ +	84/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2019	899
	Fujifilm X-T20	+ +	82/100	5/5	..	4.5/5	Jan 2017	899
	Fujifilm X-A3	..	74/100	4.5/5	..	4/5	Aug 2016	399
	Fujifilm X-E2S	..	77/100	4.5/5	..	4.5/5	Jan 2016	699
	Fujifilm X-E2	..	80/100	4.5/5	..	5/5	Oct 2013	999
	Nikon D7000	..	80/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2010	1,499
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, please note that some of the review sites have changed their methodology and reporting over time.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

~

Specifications: Canon 60D vs Fujifilm X-E3

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.