Canon 5D Mark III vs Sony HX400V
The Canon EOS 5D Mark III and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in March 2012 and February 2014. The 5D Mark III is a DSLR, while the HX400V is a fixed lens compact. The cameras are based on a full frame (5D Mark III) and a 1/2.3-inch (HX400V) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 22.1 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 20.2 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 5D Mark III and the Sony HX400V is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony HX400V is considerably smaller (31 percent) than the Canon 5D Mark III. It is worth mentioning in this context that the 5D Mark III is splash and dust resistant, while the HX400V does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete and possibly misleading, as the HX400V has a lens built in, whereas the 5D Mark III is an interchangeable lens camera that requires a separate lens. Attaching the latter will add extra weight and bulk to the setup. You can compare the optics available for the 5D Mark III and their specifications in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the 5D Mark III gets 950 shots out of its LP-E6 battery, while the HX400V can take 300 images on a single charge of its NP-BX1 power pack.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you want to switch the focus of the display and review another camera pair, you can move across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible camera comparisons there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life |
Weather Sealing |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) | Street Price |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 5D Mark III | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 33.5 oz | 950 | Y | Mar 2012 | 3,499 | ||
Sony HX400V | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 4.1 in | 23.3 oz | 300 | n | Feb 2014 | 499 | ||
Canon 5D Mark IV | 5.9 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 31.4 oz | 900 | Y | Aug 2016 | 3,499 | ||
Canon 5DS | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 32.8 oz | 700 | Y | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | ||
Canon 5DS R | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 32.8 oz | 700 | Y | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | ||
Canon SX60 | 5.0 in | 3.7 in | 4.5 in | 22.9 oz | 340 | n | Sep 2014 | 549 | ||
Canon 6D | 5.7 in | 4.4 in | 2.8 in | 27.2 oz | 1090 | Y | Sep 2012 | 2,099 | ||
Canon 5D Mark II | 6.0 in | 4.5 in | 3.0 in | 30.0 oz | 850 | Y | Sep 2008 | 3,499 | ||
Canon 5D | 6.0 in | 4.4 in | 3.0 in | 31.6 oz | 400 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,299 | ||
Nikon D610 | 5.6 in | 4.4 in | 3.2 in | 30.0 oz | 900 | Y | Oct 2013 | 1,999 | ||
Nikon D600 | 5.6 in | 4.4 in | 3.2 in | 30.0 oz | 900 | Y | Sep 2012 | 2,099 | ||
Nikon D800 | 5.7 in | 4.8 in | 3.2 in | 35.3 oz | 900 | Y | Feb 2012 | 2,999 | ||
Nikon D800E | 5.7 in | 4.8 in | 3.2 in | 35.3 oz | 900 | Y | Feb 2012 | 3,299 | ||
Sony HX350 | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 4.1 in | 23.0 oz | 300 | n | Dec 2016 | 449 | ||
Sony HX90V | 4.0 in | 2.3 in | 1.4 in | 8.6 oz | 360 | n | Apr 2015 | 429 | ||
Sony H400 | 5.1 in | 3.7 in | 4.8 in | 22.2 oz | 300 | n | Feb 2014 | 319 | ||
Sony H300 | 5.0 in | 3.5 in | 3.6 in | 20.8 oz | 350 | n | Feb 2014 | 219 | ||
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. | ||||||||||
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The HX400V was launched at a lower price than the 5D Mark III, despite having a lens built in. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 5D Mark III features a full frame sensor and the Sony HX400V a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The sensor area in the HX400V is 97 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.0 and 5.6. The sensor in the 5D Mark III has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the HX400V offers a 4:3 aspect.

With 22.1MP, the 5D Mark III offers a slightly higher resolution than the HX400V (20.2MP), but the 5D Mark III nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 6.25μm versus 1.18μm for the HX400V) due to its larger sensor. However, the HX400V is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 11 months) than the 5D Mark III, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixels. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the HX400V has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Canon 5D Mark III implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the 5D Mark III for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 28.8 x 19.2 inches or 73.2 x 48.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 23 x 15.4 inches or 58.5 x 39 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 19.2 x 12.8 inches or 48.8 x 32.5 cm. The corresponding values for the Sony HX400V are 25.9 x 19.4 inches or 65.8 x 49.4 cm for good quality, 20.7 x 15.6 inches or 52.7 x 39.5 cm for very good quality, and 17.3 x 13 inches or 43.9 x 32.9 cm for excellent quality prints.
The Canon EOS 5D Mark III has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600, which can be extended to ISO 50-102400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V are ISO 80 to ISO 3200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 80-12800.

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and color depth ("DXO Portrait"). The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports | DXO Overall |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 5D Mark III | Full Frame | 22.1 | 5760 | 3840 | 1080/30p | 24.0 | 11.7 | 2293 | 81 | |
Sony HX400V | 1/2.3 | 20.2 | 5184 | 3888 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
Canon 5D Mark IV | Full Frame | 30.1 | 6720 | 4480 | 4K/30p | 24.8 | 13.6 | 2995 | 91 | |
Canon 5DS | Full Frame | 50.3 | 8688 | 5792 | 1080/30p | 24.7 | 12.4 | 2381 | 87 | |
Canon 5DS R | Full Frame | 50.3 | 8688 | 5792 | 1080/30p | 24.6 | 12.4 | 2308 | 86 | |
Canon SX60 | 1/2.3 | 14.2 | 4608 | 3072 | 1080/60p | 19.2 | 10.8 | 127 | 39 | |
Canon 6D | Full Frame | 20.0 | 5472 | 3648 | 1080/30p | 23.8 | 12.1 | 2340 | 82 | |
Canon 5D Mark II | Full Frame | 21.0 | 5616 | 3744 | 1080/30p | 23.7 | 11.9 | 1815 | 79 | |
Canon 5D | Full Frame | 12.7 | 4368 | 2912 | none | 22.9 | 11.1 | 1368 | 71 | |
Nikon D610 | Full Frame | 24.2 | 6016 | 4016 | 1080/30p | 25.1 | 14.4 | 2925 | 94 | |
Nikon D600 | Full Frame | 24.2 | 6016 | 4016 | 1080/30p | 25.1 | 14.2 | 2980 | 94 | |
Nikon D800 | Full Frame | 36.2 | 7360 | 4912 | 1080/30p | 25.3 | 14.4 | 2853 | 95 | |
Nikon D800E | Full Frame | 36.2 | 7360 | 4912 | 1080/30p | 25.6 | 14.3 | 2979 | 96 | |
Sony HX350 | 1/2.3 | 19.9 | 5152 | 3864 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
Sony HX90V | 1/2.3 | 18.0 | 4896 | 3672 | 1080/60p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
Sony H400 | 1/2.3 | 19.9 | 5152 | 3864 | 720/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
Sony H300 | 1/2.3 | 19.9 | 5152 | 3864 | 720/30p | .. | .. | .. | .. |
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the HX400V provides a faster frame rate than the 5D Mark III. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/30p.
Feature comparison
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the HX400V has an electronic viewfinder (210k dots), while the 5D Mark III has an optical one. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to project supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-free viewing and a very clear framing image. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon 5D Mark III, the Sony HX400V, and comparable cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution (000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) | Built-in Flash (yes/no) | Built-in Image Stab |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 5D Mark III | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 6.0 | n | n | |
Sony HX400V | 210 | n | 3.0 | 921 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | |
Canon 5D Mark IV | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1620 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 7.0 | n | n | |
Canon 5DS | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
Canon 5DS R | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | |
Canon SX60 | 922 | n | 3.0 | 922 | swivel | n | 1/2000s | 6.4 | Y | Y | |
Canon 6D | optical | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 4.5 | n | n | |
Canon 5D Mark II | optical | Y | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.9 | n | n | |
Canon 5D | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.0 | n | n | |
Nikon D610 | optical | Y | 3.2 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 6.0 | Y | n | |
Nikon D600 | optical | Y | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 5.5 | Y | n | |
Nikon D800 | optical | Y | 3.2 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 4.0 | Y | n | |
Nikon D800E | optical | Y | 3.2 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 4.0 | Y | n | |
Sony HX350 | 202 | n | 3.0 | 922 | tilting | n | 1/4000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | |
Sony HX90V | 638 | n | 3.0 | 921 | tilting | n | 1/2000s | 10.0 | Y | Y | |
Sony H400 | 210 | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/2000s | 0.7 | Y | Y | |
Sony H300 | none | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 1/1500s | 0.8 | Y | Y |
One feature that is present on the 5D Mark III, but is missing on the HX400V is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.
The 5D Mark III writes its imaging data to Compact Flash or SDXC cards, while the HX400V uses SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. The 5D Mark III features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the HX400V only has one slot.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Port |
WiFi Support | NFC Support | Bluetooth Support |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 5D Mark III | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
Sony HX400V | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
Canon 5D Mark IV | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | Y | Y | - | |
Canon 5DS | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
Canon 5DS R | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
Canon SX60 | Y | stereo | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
Canon 6D | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
Canon 5D Mark II | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
Canon 5D | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
Nikon D610 | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
Nikon D600 | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
Nikon D800 | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
Nikon D800E | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | |
Sony HX350 | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | - | - | - | |
Sony HX90V | - | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | |
Sony H400 | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - | |
Sony H300 | - | mono | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | - | - |
It is notable that the 5D Mark III has a microphone port, which is missing on the HX400V. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used.
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 5D Mark III (unlike the HX400V) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
Travel and landscape photographers will find it useful that the HX400V has an internal geolocalization sensor and can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.
The HX400V is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Sony. In contrast, the 5D Mark III has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the 5D Mark III was succeeded by the Canon 5D Mark IV. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Sony websites.
Review summary
So what conclusions can be drawn? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 5D Mark III or the Sony HX400V – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS 5D Mark III:
- More detail: Offers more megapixels (22.1 vs 20.2MP) with a 7% higher linear resolution.
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Better image quality: Features bigger pixels on a larger sensor for higher quality imaging.
- Richer colors: The pixel size advantage translates into images with better, more accurate colors.
- More dynamic range: Larger pixels capture a wider spectrum of light and dark details.
- Better low-light sensitivity: Larger pixels means good image quality even under poor lighting.
- Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
- Better sound control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
- Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free composition.
- Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 3.0") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1040k vs 921k dots).
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
- More flexible: Can take a variety of interchangeable lenses, including specialty optics.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (950 versus 300) on a single battery charge.
- Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in March 2012).

Reasons to prefer the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V:
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
- More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
- More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 6 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- Ready to shoot: Comes with an integrated lens, while the 5D Mark III requires a separate lens.
- More compact: Is smaller (130x93mm vs 152x116mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight even though it has a lens built in (unlike the 5D Mark III).
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
- Easier geotagging: Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances.
- More affordable: Was introduced at a lower price, despite coming with a built-in lens.
- More modern: Was introduced somewhat (1 year and 11 months) more recently.
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the 5D Mark III is the clear winner of the match-up (19 : 15 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 5D Mark III and the Sony HX400V place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Superzoom Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the 5D Mark III or the HX400V perform in practice. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.
Expert reviews
This is why expert reviews are important. The following table reports the overall ratings of the cameras as published by some of the major camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
camera labs |
dp review |
ephoto zine |
imaging resource |
photography blog |
Camera Launch |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 5D Mark III | + + | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2012 | 3,499 | ||
Sony HX400V | + + | .. | 4/5 | .. | 4/5 | Feb 2014 | 499 | ||
Canon 5D Mark IV | + + | 87/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2016 | 3,499 | ||
Canon 5DS | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | ||
Canon 5DS R | + | 83/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | ||
Canon SX60 | + + | 75/100 | 4/5 | .. | 4.5/5 | Sep 2014 | 549 | ||
Canon 6D | + + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2012 | 2,099 | ||
Canon 5D Mark II | 91/100 | 79/100 | 4/5 | 5/5 | .. | Sep 2008 | 3,499 | ||
Canon 5D | 88/100 | + + | o | o | .. | Aug 2005 | 3,299 | ||
Nikon D610 | + + | 87/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Oct 2013 | 1,999 | ||
Nikon D600 | + + | 87/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2012 | 2,099 | ||
Nikon D800 | + + | 82/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | Feb 2012 | 2,999 | ||
Nikon D800E | .. | 84/100 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | Feb 2012 | 3,299 | ||
Sony HX350 | .. | .. | .. | .. | 4/5 | Dec 2016 | 449 | ||
Sony HX90V | + + | .. | 4/5 | .. | 4.5/5 | Apr 2015 | 429 | ||
Sony H400 | o | .. | 3.5/5 | .. | 3.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 319 | ||
Sony H300 | + | .. | 4.5/5 | .. | 4/5 | Feb 2014 | 219 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available. |
The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.
Check Ebay offers Sony HX400V:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
Specifications: Canon 5D Mark III vs Sony HX400V
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Canon 5D Mark III | Sony HX400V |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Fixed lens compact camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | 24-1200mm f/2.8-6.3 |
Launch Date | March 2012 | February 2014 |
Launch Price | USD 3,499 | USD 499 |
Sensor Specs | Canon 5D Mark III | Sony HX400V |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Format | Full Frame Sensor | 1/2.3" Sensor |
Sensor Size | 36.0 x 24.0 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Sensor Area | 864 mm2 | 28.0735 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 43.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.0x | 5.6x |
Sensor Resolution | 22.1 Megapixels | 20.2 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 5760 x 3840 pixels | 5184 x 3888 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 6.25 μm | 1.18 μm |
Pixel Density | 2.56 MP/cm2 | 71.80 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | 1080/30p Video | 1080/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100 - 25,600 ISO | 80 - 3,200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 50 - 102,400 ISO | 80 - 12,800 ISO |
Image Processor | DIGIC 5+ | BIONZ X |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 81 | .. |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 24.0 | .. |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 11.7 | .. |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 2293 | .. |
Screen Specs | Canon 5D Mark III | Sony HX400V |
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.71x | |
Viewfinder Resolution | 210k dots | |
Top-Level Screen | Control Panel | no Top Display |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.2inch | 3.0inch |
LCD Resolution | 1040k dots | 921k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Tilting screen |
Shooting Specs | Canon 5D Mark III | Sony HX400V |
Focus System | Phase-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Continuous Shooting | 6 shutter flaps/s | 10 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | CF or SDXC cards | MS or SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Dual card slots | Single card slot |
UHS card support | no | no |
Connectivity Specs | Canon 5D Mark III | Sony HX400V |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | PC Sync socket | no PC Sync |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | mini HDMI | micro HDMI |
Microphone Port | External MIC port | no MIC socket |
Headphone Socket | Headphone port | no Headphone port |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Near-Field Communication | no NFC | NFC built-in |
Geotagging | no internal GPS | GPS built-in |
Body Specs | Canon 5D Mark III | Sony HX400V |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | not weather sealed |
Battery Type | LP-E6 | NP-BX1 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 950 shots per charge | 300 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
152 x 116 x 76 mm (6.0 x 4.6 x 3.0 in) |
130 x 93 x 103 mm (5.1 x 3.7 x 4.1 in) |
Camera Weight | 950 g (33.5 oz) | 660 g (23.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.