Canon 40D vs Kodak S-1

The Canon EOS 40D and the Kodak PixPro S-1 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in August 2007 and January 2012. The 40D is a DSLR, while the S-1 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. The cameras are based on an APS-C (40D) and a Four Thirds (S-1) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 10.1 megapixels, whereas the Kodak provides 16.1 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon 40D		Kodak S-1
Digital single lens reflex		Mirrorless system camera
Canon EF mount lenses		Micro Four Thirds lenses
10.1 MP, APS-C Sensor		16.1 MP, Four Thirds Sensor
no Video		1080/30p Video
ISO 100-1,600 (100 - 3,200)		ISO 200-12,800
Optical viewfinder		No viewfinder, LCD framing
3.0 LCD, 230k dots		3.0 LCD, 920k dots
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)		Tilting screen (not touch-sensitive)
6.5 shutter flaps per second		4 shutter flaps per second
Lens stabilization only		In-body stabilization
750 shots per battery charge		410 shots per battery charge
146 x 108 x 74 mm, 822 g		116 x 68 x 36 mm, 290 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS 40D and the Kodak PixPro S-1? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Canon 40D and the Kodak S-1 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The S-1 can be obtained in two different colors (black, white), while the 40D is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Kodak S-1 is considerably smaller (50 percent) than the Canon 40D. Moreover, the S-1 is substantially lighter (65 percent) than the 40D. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the 40D nor the S-1 are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Canon EF Lens Catalog (40D) and the Micro Four Thirds Lens Catalog (S-1). Mirrorless cameras, such as the S-1, have moreover the advantage that they can use many lenses from other systems via adapters, as they have a relatively short flange to focal plane distance.

The power pack in the S-1 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, you can navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from a broad list of cameras there.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon 40D	146 mm	108 mm	74 mm	822 g	750	n	Aug 2007	1,299
2.		Kodak S-1	116 mm	68 mm	36 mm	290 g	410	n	Jan 2012	299
3.		Canon T3	130 mm	100 mm	78 mm	495 g	700	n	Feb 2011	449
4.		Canon 60D	145 mm	106 mm	79 mm	755 g	1100	Y	Aug 2010	1,399
5.		Canon 50D	146 mm	108 mm	74 mm	822 g	800	Y	Aug 2008	1,299
6.		Canon XS	126 mm	98 mm	65 mm	502 g	500	n	Jun 2008	449
7.		Canon XSi	129 mm	98 mm	62 mm	524 g	500	n	Jan 2008	799
8.		Canon 30D	144 mm	106 mm	74 mm	785 g	750	n	Feb 2006	1,399
9.		Canon XTi	127 mm	84 mm	65 mm	556 g	370	n	Aug 2006	799
10.		Canon 20D	144 mm	106 mm	72 mm	770 g	700	n	Aug 2004	1,499
11.		Canon 10D	150 mm	107 mm	75 mm	850 g	500	n	Feb 2003	1,999
12.		Nikon D90	132 mm	103 mm	77 mm	703 g	850	n	Aug 2008	1,299
13.		Olympus E-P5	122 mm	69 mm	37 mm	420 g	330	n	May 2013	999
14.		Olympus E-PL6	111 mm	64 mm	38 mm	325 g	360	n	May 2013	599
15.		Olympus E-PL5	111 mm	64 mm	38 mm	325 g	360	n	Sep 2012	599
16.		Olympus E-PM2	110 mm	64 mm	34 mm	269 g	360	n	Sep 2012	499
17.		Panasonic GX7	123 mm	71 mm	55 mm	402 g	350	n	Aug 2013	999
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Imperial

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The S-1 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 77 percent) than the 40D, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 40D features an APS-C sensor and the Kodak S-1 a Four Thirds sensor. The sensor area in the S-1 is 32 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.6 and 2.0. The sensor in the 40D has a native 3:2 aspect ratio, while the one in the S-1 offers a 4:3 aspect.

Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the S-1 offers a higher resolution of 16.1 megapixels, compared with 10.1 MP of the 40D. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 3.74μm versus 5.73μm for the 40D). However, it should be noted that the S-1 is much more recent (by 4 years and 4 months) than the 40D, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently.

The resolution advantage of the Kodak S-1 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the S-1 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 23.2 x 17.4 inches or 58.9 x 44.2 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 18.6 x 13.9 inches or 47.1 x 35.4 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 15.5 x 11.6 inches or 39.3 x 29.5 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 40D are 19.4 x 13 inches or 49.4 x 32.9 cm for good quality, 15.6 x 10.4 inches or 39.5 x 26.3 cm for very good quality, and 13 x 8.6 inches or 32.9 x 21.9 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon EOS 40D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 100-3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Kodak PixPro S-1 are ISO 200 to ISO 12800 (no boost).

For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported by DXO Mark. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Canon 40D	APS-C	10.1	3888	2592	none	22.1	11.3	703	64
2.		Kodak S-1	Four Thirds	16.1	4640	3480	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
3.		Canon T3	APS-C	12.2	4272	2848	720/30p	21.9	11.0	755	62
4.		Canon 60D	APS-C	17.9	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.2	11.5	813	66
5.		Canon 50D	APS-C	15.1	4752	3168	none	21.8	11.4	696	63
6.		Canon XS	APS-C	10.1	3888	2592	none	..	..	..	..
7.		Canon XSi	APS-C	12.2	4272	2848	none	21.9	10.8	692	61
8.		Canon 30D	APS-C	8.2	3504	2336	none	21.5	10.8	736	59
9.		Canon XTi	APS-C	10.1	3888	2592	none	22.1	11.0	664	62
10.		Canon 20D	APS-C	8.2	3504	2336	none	21.9	11.0	721	62
11.		Canon 10D	APS-C	6.3	3072	2048	none	21.1	10.9	571	57
12.		Nikon D90	APS-C	12.2	4288	2848	720/24p	22.7	12.5	977	73
13.		Olympus E-P5	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	22.8	12.4	895	72
14.		Olympus E-PL6	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	..	..	..	..
15.		Olympus E-PL5	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	22.8	12.3	889	72
16.		Olympus E-PM2	Four Thirds	15.9	4608	3456	1080/30p	22.7	12.2	932	72
17.		Panasonic GX7	Four Thirds	15.8	4592	3448	1080/60p	22.6	12.2	718	70

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The S-1 indeed provides for movie recording, while the 40D does not. The highest resolution format that the S-1 can use is 1080/30p.

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. For example, the 40D has an optical viewfinder, which can be very useful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the S-1 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon 40D, the Kodak S-1, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon 40D	optical	Y	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	6.5	Y	n
2.		Kodak S-1	none	n	3.0	920	tilting	n	1/4000s	4.0	n	Y
3.		Canon T3	optical	n	2.7	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
4.		Canon 60D	optical	Y	3.0	1040	swivel	n	1/8000s	5.3	Y	n
5.		Canon 50D	optical	Y	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/8000s	6.3	Y	n
6.		Canon XS	optical	n	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
7.		Canon XSi	optical	n	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.5	Y	n
8.		Canon 30D	optical	Y	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	Y	n
9.		Canon XTi	optical	n	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
10.		Canon 20D	optical	Y	1.8	118	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	Y	n
11.		Canon 10D	optical	Y	1.8	118	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
12.		Nikon D90	optical	Y	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/4000s	4.5	Y	n
13.		Olympus E-P5	optional	n	3.0	1037	tilting	Y	1/8000s	9.0	Y	Y
14.		Olympus E-PL6	optional	n	3.0	460	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	Y
15.		Olympus E-PL5	optional	n	3.0	460	tilting	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	Y
16.		Olympus E-PM2	optional	n	3.0	460	fixed	Y	1/4000s	8.0	n	Y
17.		Panasonic GX7	2760	n	3.0	1040	tilting	Y	1/8000s	5.0	Y	Y

One difference between the cameras concerns the presence of an on-board flash. The 40D has one, while the S-1 does not. While the built-in flash of the 40D is not very powerful, it can at times be useful as a fill-in light.

The 40D writes its imaging data to Compact Flash cards, while the S-1 uses SDXC cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 40D and Kodak PixPro S-1 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon 40D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
2.		Kodak S-1	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
3.		Canon T3	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
4.		Canon 60D	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
5.		Canon 50D	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
6.		Canon XS	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
7.		Canon XSi	Y	-	-	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
8.		Canon 30D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
9.		Canon XTi	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
10.		Canon 20D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	-	-
11.		Canon 10D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	-	-
12.		Nikon D90	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
13.		Olympus E-P5	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	micro	2.0	Y	-	-
14.		Olympus E-PL6	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
15.		Olympus E-PL5	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
16.		Olympus E-PM2	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
17.		Panasonic GX7	Y	stereo	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	Y	Y	-

It is notable that the S-1 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the 40D does not provide wifi capability.

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 40D (unlike the S-1) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

Both the 40D and the S-1 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 40D was replaced by the Canon 50D, while the S-1 does not have a direct successor. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Kodak websites.

Review summary

So what is the bottom line? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon 40D and the Kodak S-1? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS 40D:

• Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (6.5 vs 4 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (750 versus 410) on a single battery charge.
• Easier fill-in: Is equipped with a small onboard flash to brighten deep shadow areas.
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in August 2007).

Arguments in favor of the Kodak PixPro S-1:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (16.1 vs 10.1MP), which boosts linear resolution by 24%.
• Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 1080/30p video.
• More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (920k vs 230k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-angle shots in landscape orientation.
• More selfie-friendly: Has an articulated screen that can be turned to be front-facing.
• More compact: Is smaller (116x68mm vs 146x108mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 532g or 65 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
• More legacy lens friendly: Can use many non-native lenses via adapters.
• Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (77 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 4 years and 4 months of technical progress since the 40D launch.

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the S-1 is the clear winner of the contest (13 : 8 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 40D and the Kodak S-1 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the 40D or the S-1. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Camera   Model	AP   score	CL   score	DPR   score	EPZ   score	PB   score	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon 40D	..	+ +	+ +	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2007	1,299
2.		Kodak S-1	..	..	..	4/5	4/5	Jan 2012	299
3.		Canon T3	..	80/100	69/100	4/5	4.5/5	Feb 2011	449
4.		Canon 60D	5/5	+	79/100	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2010	1,399
5.		Canon 50D	..	+ +	+ +	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2008	1,299
6.		Canon XS	..	82/100	+ +	3.5/5	4.5/5	Jun 2008	449
7.		Canon XSi	..	+ +	+ +	4/5	4.5/5	Jan 2008	799
8.		Canon 30D	..	+ +	+ +	o	..	Feb 2006	1,399
9.		Canon XTi	..	+ +	+ +	o	4/5	Aug 2006	799
10.		Canon 20D	..	..	+ +	..	..	Aug 2004	1,499
11.		Canon 10D	..	..	+ +	..	..	Feb 2003	1,999
12.		Nikon D90	..	+ +	+ +	4/5	4.5/5	Aug 2008	1,299
13.		Olympus E-P5	5/5	+ +	78/100	4.5/5	5/5	May 2013	999
14.		Olympus E-PL6	..	..	..	..	..	May 2013	599
15.		Olympus E-PL5	3/5	+ +	..	4.5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	599
16.		Olympus E-PM2	3/5	..	77/100	5/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	499
17.		Panasonic GX7	4/5	+	79/100	5/5	5/5	Aug 2013	999
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just use the search menu below. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.

~

Specifications: Canon 40D vs Kodak S-1

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.