Canon 1D Mark III vs Leica M10
The Canon EOS-1D Mark III and the Leica M10 (Typ 3656) are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in February 2007 and January 2017. The 1D Mark III is a DSLR, while the M10 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera. The cameras are based on an APS-H (1D Mark III) and a full frame (M10) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 10.1 megapixels, whereas the Leica provides 23.8 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 | |
---|---|---|
Digital single lens reflex | Rangefinder camera | |
Canon EF mount lenses | Leica M mount lenses | |
10.1 MP, APS-H Sensor | 23.8 MP, Full Frame Sensor | |
no Video | no Video | |
ISO 100-3200 (50-6400) | ISO 100-50000 | |
Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder | |
3.0" LCD, 230k dots | 3.0" LCD, 1037k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | |
10 shutter flaps per second | 5 shutter flaps per second | |
Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body | |
2200 shots per battery charge | 210 shots per battery charge | |
156 x 157 x 80 mm, 1155 g | 139 x 80 x 39 mm, 660 g |
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS-1D Mark III and the Leica M10 (Typ 3656)? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon 1D Mark III and the Leica M10. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
The M10 can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the 1D Mark III is only available in black.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Leica M10 is considerably smaller (55 percent) than the Canon 1D Mark III. Moreover, the M10 is substantially lighter (43 percent) than the 1D Mark III. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Canon EF Lens Catalog (1D Mark III) and the Leica M Lens Catalog (M10).
As can be seen in the images above, the 1D Mark III has a battery grip built in. This facilitates image-taking in portrait orientation and gives it additional battery power.
The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark III» | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 40.7 oz | 2200 | Y | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Leica M10« | 5.5 in | 3.1 in | 1.5 in | 23.3 oz | 210 | Y | Jan 2017 | 6,595 | Leica M10 | |||
Canon 5DS R« » | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 32.8 oz | 700 | Y | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | Canon 5DS R | |||
Canon 5D Mark III« » | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 33.5 oz | 950 | Y | Mar 2012 | 3,499 | - | Canon 5D Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 43.4 oz | 1500 | Y | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 5D Mark II« » | 6.0 in | 4.5 in | 3.0 in | 30.0 oz | 850 | Y | Sep 2008 | 3,499 | - | Canon 5D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | 5.9 in | 6.3 in | 3.1 in | 48.9 oz | 1800 | Y | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 55.2 oz | 1200 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 1D Mark II« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 54.1 oz | 1200 | Y | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 44.6 oz | 600 | Y | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Leica M-E Typ 240« » | 5.5 in | 3.1 in | 1.7 in | 24.0 oz | .. | Y | Jun 2019 | 3,999 | Leica M-E Typ 240 | |||
Leica M10-P« » | 5.5 in | 3.1 in | 1.5 in | 23.3 oz | 210 | Y | Aug 2018 | 7,995 | Leica M10-P | |||
Leica M Typ 262« » | 5.5 in | 3.1 in | 1.7 in | 24.0 oz | .. | Y | Nov 2015 | 5,195 | - | Leica M Typ 262 | ||
Leica Q Typ 116« » | 5.1 in | 3.1 in | 3.7 in | 22.6 oz | 300 | n | Jun 2015 | 4,249 | - | Leica Q Typ 116 | ||
Leica M Typ 240« » | 5.5 in | 3.1 in | 1.7 in | 24.0 oz | .. | Y | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | - | Leica M Typ 240 | ||
Nikon D3« » | 6.3 in | 6.2 in | 3.5 in | 45.9 oz | 4300 | Y | Aug 2007 | 4,999 | - | Nikon D3 | ||
Nikon D2Xs« » | 6.2 in | 5.9 in | 3.4 in | 44.2 oz | 3800 | Y | Jun 2006 | 4,699 | - | Nikon D2Xs | ||
Note: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. |
Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The 1D Mark III was launched at a markedly lower price (by 32 percent) than the M10, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison
The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be more expensive and lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 1D Mark III features an APS-H sensor and the Leica M10 a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the M10 is 63 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.3 and 1.0. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.
In terms of underlying technology, both cameras are build around CMOS sensors.

With 23.8MP, the M10 offers a higher resolution than the 1D Mark III (10.1MP), but the M10 has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 6.00μm versus 7.21μm for the 1D Mark III). Yet, the M10 is a much more recent model (by 9 years and 10 months) than the 1D Mark III, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the M10 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Leica M10 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the M10 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 29.8 x 20 inch or 75.6 x 50.7 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 23.8 x 16 inch or 60.5 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 19.8 x 13.3 inch or 50.4 x 33.8 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 1D Mark III are 19.4 x 13 inch or 49.4 x 32.9 cm for good quality, 15.6 x 10.4 inch or 39.5 x 26.3 cm for very good quality, and 13 x 8.6 inch or 32.9 x 21.9 cm for excellent quality prints.
The Canon EOS-1D Mark III has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 3200, which can be extended to ISO 50-6400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Leica M10 (Typ 3656) are ISO 100 to ISO 50000 (no boost).

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. Of the two cameras under consideration, the M10 offers substantially better image quality than the 1D Mark III (overall score 15 points higher). The advantage is based on 1.7 bits higher color depth, 1.5 EV in additional dynamic range, and 1 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The following table provides an overview of the physical sensor characteristics, as well as the sensor quality measurements for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark III» | APS-H | 10.1 | 3888 | 2592 | - | 22.7 | 11.7 | 1078 | 71 | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Leica M10« | Full Frame | 23.8 | 5952 | 3992 | - | 24.4 | 13.2 | 2133 | 86 | Leica M10 | |
Canon 5DS R« » | Full Frame | 50.3 | 8688 | 5792 | 1080/30p | 24.6 | 12.4 | 2308 | 86 | Canon 5DS R | |
Canon 5D Mark III« » | Full Frame | 22.1 | 5760 | 3840 | 1080/30p | 24.0 | 11.7 | 2293 | 81 | Canon 5D Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | APS-H | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 12.0 | 1320 | 74 | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 5D Mark II« » | Full Frame | 21.0 | 5616 | 3744 | 1080/30p | 23.7 | 11.9 | 1815 | 79 | Canon 5D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Full Frame | 21.0 | 5616 | 3744 | - | 24.0 | 12.0 | 1663 | 80 | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.2 | 975 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.1 | 1003 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | Full Frame | 11.0 | 4064 | 2704 | - | 21.8 | 11.0 | 954 | 63 | Canon 1Ds | |
Leica M-E Typ 240« » | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | - | - | - | - | Leica M-E Typ 240 | |
Leica M10-P« » | Full Frame | 23.8 | 5952 | 3992 | - | - | - | - | - | Leica M10-P | |
Leica M Typ 262« » | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | - | - | - | - | - | Leica M Typ 262 | |
Leica Q Typ 116« » | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/60p | 24.3 | 12.7 | 2221 | 85 | Leica Q Typ 116 | |
Leica M Typ 240« » | Full Frame | 23.7 | 5952 | 3976 | 1080/25p | 24.0 | 13.3 | 1860 | 84 | Leica M Typ 240 | |
Nikon D3« » | Full Frame | 12.1 | 4256 | 2832 | - | 23.5 | 12.2 | 2290 | 81 | Nikon D3 | |
Nikon D2Xs« » | APS-C | 12.2 | 4288 | 2848 | - | 22.2 | 10.9 | 489 | 59 | Nikon D2Xs |
Feature comparison
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The 1D Mark III and the M10 are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same field of view (100%), but the viewfinder of the M10 has a higher magnification than the one of the 1D Mark III (0.73x vs 0.58x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon 1D Mark III, the Leica M10, and comparable cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark III» | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Leica M10« | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | Leica M10 | |
Canon 5DS R« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 5DS R | |
Canon 5D Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 6.0 | n | n | Canon 5D Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 5D Mark II« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.9 | n | n | Canon 5D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.5 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 120 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds | |
Leica M-E Typ 240« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | Leica M-E Typ 240 | |
Leica M10-P« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 1037 | fixed | Y | 1/4000s | 5.0 | n | n | Leica M10-P | |
Leica M Typ 262« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 921 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | Leica M Typ 262 | |
Leica Q Typ 116« » | 3680 | n | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/2000s | 10.0 | n | Y | Leica Q Typ 116 | |
Leica M Typ 240« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/4000s | 3.0 | n | n | Leica M Typ 240 | |
Nikon D3« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 922 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 11.0 | n | n | Nikon D3 | |
Nikon D2Xs« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Nikon D2Xs |
One feature that is present on the 1D Mark III, but is missing on the M10 is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.
The Leica M10 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
The 1D Mark III writes its imaging data to Compact Flash or SDHC cards, while the M10 uses SDXC cards. The 1D Mark III features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the M10 only has one slot. The M10 supports UHS-I cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s), while the 1D Mark III cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS-1D Mark III and Leica M10 (Typ 3656) and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark III» | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Leica M10« | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | Leica M10 | |
Canon 5DS R« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5DS R | |
Canon 5D Mark III« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | Y | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5D Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | Y | stereo | - | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 5D Mark II« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 1D Mark II« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | FW | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds | |
Leica M-E Typ 240« » | Y | mono | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Leica M-E Typ 240 | |
Leica M10-P« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | - | - | Leica M10-P | |
Leica M Typ 262« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Leica M Typ 262 | |
Leica Q Typ 116« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Leica Q Typ 116 | |
Leica M Typ 240« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Leica M Typ 240 | |
Nikon D3« » | Y | - | - | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D3 | |
Nikon D2Xs« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D2Xs |
It is notable that the M10 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the 1D Mark III does not offer wifi capability.
Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 1D Mark III (unlike the M10) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.
The M10 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Leica. In contrast, the 1D Mark III has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the 1D Mark III was succeeded by the Canon 1D Mark IV. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Leica websites.
Review summary
So what conclusions can be drawn? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 1D Mark III or the Leica M10 – has the upper hand? Is one clearly better than the other? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS-1D Mark III:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
- Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
- Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
- More portrait friendly: Features an integrated vertical grip for easier portrait shooting.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (2200 versus 210) on a single battery charge.
- Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
- Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (32 percent cheaper at launch).
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in February 2007).

Arguments in favor of the Leica M10 (Typ 3656):
- More detail: Has more megapixels (23.8 vs 10.1MP), which boosts linear resolution by 53%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (15 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
- Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (1.7 bits more color depth).
- More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (1.5 EV of extra DR).
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (1 stops ISO advantage).
- Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.73x vs 0.58x).
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (1037k vs 230k dots).
- Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
- More compact: Is smaller (139x80mm vs 156x157mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 495g or 43 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- Faster buffer clearing: Has an SD card interface that supports the UHS-I standard.
- More prestigious: Has the Leica luxury appeal, which ensures a high resale value.
- More modern: Reflects 9 years and 10 months of technical progress since the 1D Mark III launch.
If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the M10 is the clear winner of the contest (15 : 10 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the 1D Mark III or the M10. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.
Expert reviews
This is why expert reviews are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark III» | - | - | - | o | - | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Leica M10« | - | - | 4/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jan 2017 | 6,595 | Leica M10 | |||
Canon 5DS R« » | + | 83/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | Canon 5DS R | |||
Canon 5D Mark III« » | + + | 82/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2012 | 3,499 | - | Canon 5D Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | - | 89/100 | - | 5/5 | - | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 5D Mark II« » | 91/100 | 79/100 | 4/5 | 5/5 | - | Sep 2008 | 3,499 | - | Canon 5D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | - | + + | 4.5/5 | - | - | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | - | - | - | - | - | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 1D Mark II« » | - | + + | - | o | - | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds« » | - | + + | - | - | - | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Leica M-E Typ 240« » | - | - | - | - | - | Jun 2019 | 3,999 | Leica M-E Typ 240 | |||
Leica M10-P« » | - | - | - | - | 4/5 | Aug 2018 | 7,995 | Leica M10-P | |||
Leica M Typ 262« » | - | - | - | - | - | Nov 2015 | 5,195 | - | Leica M Typ 262 | ||
Leica Q Typ 116« » | - | 80/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Jun 2015 | 4,249 | - | Leica Q Typ 116 | ||
Leica M Typ 240« » | - | - | 4/5 | - | - | Sep 2012 | 6,950 | - | Leica M Typ 240 | ||
Nikon D3« » | - | + + | 5/5 | o | 4.5/5 | Aug 2007 | 4,999 | - | Nikon D3 | ||
Nikon D2Xs« » | - | - | - | o | - | Jun 2006 | 4,699 | - | Nikon D2Xs | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (-) not available. |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.
Check Ebay offers Leica M10:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Canon SX710
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Leica CL
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Nikon W150
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Pentax 645Z
- Canon 1D Mark III vs Sony RX1R
- Canon 30D vs Leica M10
- Canon T6i vs Leica M10
- Fujifilm X-E1 vs Leica M10
- Leica M10 vs Nikon D2Xs
- Leica M10 vs Nikon D5300
- Leica M10 vs Panasonic GM5
- Leica M10 vs Sony NEX-5T
Specifications: Canon 1D Mark III vs Leica M10
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Rangefinder camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | Leica M mount lenses |
Launch Date | February 2007 | January 2017 |
Launch Price | USD 4499 | USD 6595 |
Sensor Specs | Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-H Sensor | Full Frame Sensor |
Sensor Size | 28.1 x 18.7 mm | 35.8 x 23.9 mm |
Sensor Area | 525.47 mm2 | 855.62 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 33.8 mm | 43 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.3x | 1.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 10.1 Megapixels | 23.8 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 3888 x 2592 pixels | 5952 x 3992 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 7.21 μm | 6.00 μm |
Pixel Density | 1.92 MP/cm2 | 2.78 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | no Video |
ISO Setting | 100-3200 ISO | 100-50000 ISO |
ISO Boost | 50-6400 ISO | no Enhancement |
Image Processor | DIGIC III | Maestro II |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 71 | 86 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 22.7 | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 11.7 | 13.2 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 1078 | 2133 |
Screen Specs | Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 |
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.58x | 0.73x |
Top-Level Screen | Control Panel | no Top Display |
LCD Framing | Live View | Live View |
Rear LCD Size | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 230k dots | 1037k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fixed screen |
Shooting Specs | Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 |
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | No Peaking Feature | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/8000/s | 1/4000/s |
Continuous Shooting | 10 shutter flaps/s | 5 shutter flaps/s |
Time-Lapse Photography | no Intervalometer | Intervalometer built-in |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | no On-Board Flash |
Storage Medium | CF or SDHC cards | SDXC cards |
Second Storage Option | Dual card slots | Single card slot |
UHS card support | no | UHS-I |
Connectivity Specs | Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | PC Sync socket | no PC Sync |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB no |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | no HDMI |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Body Specs | Canon 1D Mark III | Leica M10 |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | LP-E4 | BP-SCL5 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 2200 shots per charge | 210 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
156 x 157 x 80 mm (6.1 x 6.2 x 3.1 in) |
139 x 80 x 39 mm (5.5 x 3.1 x 1.5 in) |
Camera Weight | 1155 g (40.7 oz) | 660 g (23.3 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.