Canon 1D Mark II vs Panasonic S1
The Canon EOS-1D Mark II and the Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in January 2004 and February 2019. The 1D Mark II is a DSLR, while the S1 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. The cameras are based on an APS-H (1D Mark II) and a full frame (S1) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 8.2 megapixels, whereas the Panasonic provides 24 MP.
Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 | |
---|---|---|
Digital single lens reflex | Mirrorless system camera | |
Canon EF mount lenses | Leica L mount lenses | |
8.2 MP, APS-H Sensor | 24 MP, Full Frame Sensor | |
no Video | 4K/60p Video | |
ISO 100-1600 (50-3200) | ISO 100-51200 (50-204800) | |
Optical viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder (5760k dots) | |
2.0" LCD, 230k dots | 3.2" LCD, 2100k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Fully flexible touchscreen | |
8.3 shutter flaps per second | 9 shutter flaps per second | |
Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization | |
Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body | |
1200 shots per battery charge | 400 shots per battery charge | |
156 x 158 x 80 mm, 1535 g | 149 x 110 x 97 mm, 1017 g |
Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS-1D Mark II and the Panasonic Lumix DC-S1? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparison
The physical size and weight of the Canon 1D Mark II and the Panasonic S1 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Panasonic S1 is considerably smaller (34 percent) than the Canon 1D Mark II. Moreover, the S1 is markedly lighter (34 percent) than the 1D Mark II. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and dust-proof and can, hence, be used in inclement weather conditions or harsh environments.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.
Concerning battery life, the 1D Mark II gets 1200 shots out of its NP-E3 battery, while the S1 can take 400 images on a single charge of its DMW-BLJ31 power pack. As can be seen in the images above, the 1D Mark II has a battery grip built in. This facilitates image-taking in portrait orientation and gives it additional battery power. In order to provide similar functionality for the S1, Panasonic provides the DMW-BGS1 vertical grip as an optional accessory (see here on eBay). The power pack in the S1 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, just click on the right or left arrow next to the camera that you would like to inspect. Alternatively, you can also use the CAM-parator to select your camera combination among a larger number of options.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark II» | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 54.1 oz | 1200 | Y | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Panasonic S1« | 5.9 in | 4.3 in | 3.8 in | 35.9 oz | 400 | Y | Feb 2019 | 2,499 | Panasonic S1 | |||
Canon 5DS« » | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 32.8 oz | 700 | Y | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | Canon 5DS | |||
Canon 5DS R« » | 6.0 in | 4.6 in | 3.0 in | 32.8 oz | 700 | Y | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | Canon 5DS R | |||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 43.4 oz | 1500 | Y | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 1D Mark III« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 40.7 oz | 2200 | Y | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | 5.9 in | 6.3 in | 3.1 in | 48.9 oz | 1800 | Y | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 55.2 oz | 1200 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 5D« » | 6.0 in | 4.4 in | 3.0 in | 31.6 oz | 400 | Y | Aug 2005 | 3,299 | - | Canon 5D | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 42.9 oz | 1200 | Y | Sep 2004 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 44.6 oz | 600 | Y | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Canon 1D« » | 6.1 in | 6.2 in | 3.1 in | 55.9 oz | 500 | Y | Sep 2001 | 6,499 | - | Canon 1D | ||
Leica SL« » | 5.8 in | 4.1 in | 1.5 in | 29.9 oz | 400 | Y | Oct 2015 | 7,450 | Leica SL | |||
Panasonic S1R« » | 5.9 in | 4.3 in | 3.8 in | 35.8 oz | 380 | Y | Feb 2019 | 3,699 | Panasonic S1R | |||
Panasonic S1H« » | 5.9 in | 4.5 in | 4.3 in | 37.1 oz | 400 | Y | May 2019 | 3,999 | Panasonic S1H | |||
Sony A99 II« » | 5.6 in | 4.1 in | 3.0 in | 29.9 oz | 490 | Y | Sep 2016 | 3,199 | Sony A99 II | |||
Sony A900« » | 6.1 in | 4.6 in | 3.2 in | 31.6 oz | 880 | Y | Sep 2008 | 2,999 | - | Sony A900 | ||
Note: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders. |
The price is, of course, an important factor in any camera decision. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The S1 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 44 percent) than the 1D Mark II, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.
Sensor comparison
The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 1D Mark II features an APS-H sensor and the Panasonic S1 a full frame sensor. The sensor area in the S1 is 55 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.3 and 1.0. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

With 24MP, the S1 offers a higher resolution than the 1D Mark II (8.2MP), but the S1 has smaller individual pixels (pixel pitch of 5.94μm versus 8.17μm for the 1D Mark II). Yet, the S1 is a much more recent model (by 15 years) than the 1D Mark II, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units. Coming back to sensor resolution, it should be mentioned that the S1 has no anti-alias filter installed, so that it can capture all the detail its sensor resolves.
The resolution advantage of the Panasonic S1 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the S1 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x 20 inch or 76.2 x 50.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 24 x 16 inch or 61 x 40.6 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 20 x 13.3 inch or 50.8 x 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 1D Mark II are 17.5 x 11.7 inch or 44.5 x 29.7 cm for good quality, 14 x 9.3 inch or 35.6 x 23.7 cm for very good quality, and 11.7 x 7.8 inch or 29.7 x 19.8 cm for excellent quality prints.
Unlike the 1D Mark II, the S1 has the capacity to capture high quality composite images (96MP) by combining multiple shots after shifting its sensor by miniscule distances. This multi-shot, pixel-shift mode is most suitable for photography of stationary objects (landscapes, studio scenes).
The Canon EOS-1D Mark II has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 50-3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 are ISO 100 to ISO 51200, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 50-204800.

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. Of the two cameras under consideration, the S1 offers substantially better image quality than the 1D Mark II (overall score 29 points higher). The advantage is based on 2.9 bits higher color depth, 3.4 EV in additional dynamic range, and 1.7 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark II» | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.1 | 1003 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Panasonic S1« | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/60p | 25.2 | 14.5 | 3333 | 95 | Panasonic S1 | |
Canon 5DS« » | Full Frame | 50.3 | 8688 | 5792 | 1080/30p | 24.7 | 12.4 | 2381 | 87 | Canon 5DS | |
Canon 5DS R« » | Full Frame | 50.3 | 8688 | 5792 | 1080/30p | 24.6 | 12.4 | 2308 | 86 | Canon 5DS R | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | APS-H | 16.0 | 4896 | 3264 | 1080/30p | 22.8 | 12.0 | 1320 | 74 | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | APS-H | 10.1 | 3888 | 2592 | - | 22.7 | 11.7 | 1078 | 71 | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Full Frame | 21.0 | 5616 | 3744 | - | 24.0 | 12.0 | 1663 | 80 | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | APS-H | 8.2 | 3504 | 2336 | - | 22.3 | 11.2 | 975 | 66 | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 5D« » | Full Frame | 12.7 | 4368 | 2912 | - | 22.9 | 11.1 | 1368 | 71 | Canon 5D | |
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | Full Frame | 16.6 | 4992 | 3328 | - | 23.3 | 11.3 | 1480 | 74 | Canon 1Ds Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | Full Frame | 11.0 | 4064 | 2704 | - | 21.8 | 11.0 | 954 | 63 | Canon 1Ds | |
Canon 1D« » | APS-H | 4.1 | 2496 | 1662 | - | - | - | - | - | Canon 1D | |
Leica SL« » | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 4K/30p | 25.0 | 13.4 | 1821 | 88 | Leica SL | |
Panasonic S1R« » | Full Frame | 46.7 | 8368 | 5584 | 4K/60p | 26.4 | 14.1 | 3525 | 100 | Panasonic S1R | |
Panasonic S1H« » | Full Frame | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 6K/30p | - | - | - | - | Panasonic S1H | |
Sony A99 II« » | Full Frame | 42.2 | 7952 | 5304 | 4K/30p | 25.4 | 13.4 | 2317 | 92 | Sony A99 II | |
Sony A900« » | Full Frame | 24.4 | 6048 | 4032 | - | 23.7 | 12.3 | 1431 | 79 | Sony A900 |
Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos. The S1 indeed provides for movie recording, while the 1D Mark II does not. The highest resolution format that the S1 can use is 4K/60p.
Feature comparison
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. For example, the S1 has an electronic viewfinder (5760k dots), while the 1D Mark II has an optical one. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to project supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-free viewing and a very clear framing image. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same field of view (100%), but the viewfinder of the S1 has a higher magnification than the one of the 1D Mark II (0.78x vs 0.55x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon 1D Mark II and Panasonic S1 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Mech Shutter Speed |
Shutter Flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark II» | optical | Y | 2.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.3 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Panasonic S1« | 5760 | Y | 3.2 | 2100 | full-flex | Y | 1/8000s | 9.0 | n | Y | Panasonic S1 | |
Canon 5DS« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 5DS | |
Canon 5DS R« » | optical | Y | 3.2 | 1040 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 5DS R | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 10.0 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 8.5 | n | n | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 5D« » | optical | Y | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.0 | n | n | Canon 5D | |
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 4.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 120 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 3.0 | n | n | Canon 1Ds | |
Canon 1D« » | optical | Y | 2.0 | 120 | fixed | n | 1/16000s | 8.0 | n | n | Canon 1D | |
Leica SL« » | 4400 | Y | 3.0 | 1040 | fixed | Y | 1/8000s | 11.0 | n | n | Leica SL | |
Panasonic S1R« » | 5760 | Y | 3.2 | 2100 | full-flex | Y | 1/8000s | 9.0 | n | Y | Panasonic S1R | |
Panasonic S1H« » | 5760 | Y | 3.2 | 2330 | swivel | Y | 1/8000s | 9.0 | n | Y | Panasonic S1H | |
Sony A99 II« » | 2400 | Y | 3.0 | 1229 | full-flex | n | 1/8000s | 12.0 | n | Y | Sony A99 II | |
Sony A900« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 922 | fixed | n | 1/8000s | 5.0 | n | Y | Sony A900 |
One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The S1 has a touchscreen, while the 1D Mark II has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point.
The reported shutter speed information refers to the use of the mechanical shutter. Yet, some cameras only have an electronic shutter, while others have an electronic shutter in addition to a mechanical one. In fact, the S1 is one of those camera that have an additional electronic shutter, which makes completely silent shooting possible. However, this mode is less suitable for photographing moving objects (risk of rolling shutter) or shooting under artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
The 1D Mark II writes its imaging data to Compact Flash or SD cards, while the S1 uses SDHC or XQD cards. Both cameras feature dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. The S1 supports UHS-II cards (on both slots), while the 1D Mark II cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.
Connectivity comparison
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS-1D Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark II» | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II | |
Panasonic S1« | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | full | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | Panasonic S1 | |
Canon 5DS« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5DS | |
Canon 5DS R« » | Y | mono | mono | Y | - | mini | 3.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5DS R | |
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | Y | stereo | - | Y | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | |
Canon 1D Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark III | |
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | |
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 1.1 | - | - | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | |
Canon 5D« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 5D | |
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds Mark II | |
Canon 1Ds« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | FW | - | - | - | Canon 1Ds | |
Canon 1D« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | FW | - | - | - | Canon 1D | |
Leica SL« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | full | 3.0 | Y | - | - | Leica SL | |
Panasonic S1R« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | full | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | Panasonic S1R | |
Panasonic S1H« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | full | 3.1 | Y | - | Y | Panasonic S1H | |
Sony A99 II« » | Y | stereo | mono | Y | Y | micro | 2.0 | Y | Y | Y | Sony A99 II | |
Sony A900« » | Y | - | - | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Sony A900 |
It is notable that the S1 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the 1D Mark II does not offer wifi capability.
Both cameras feature a PC Sync terminal to control professional strobe lights, which will be appreciated by studio photographers.
The S1 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Panasonic. In contrast, the 1D Mark II has been discontinued (but it can be found pre-owned on eBay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the 1D Mark II was succeeded by the Canon 1D Mark II N. Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Panasonic websites.
Review summary
So what conclusions can be drawn? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon 1D Mark II and the Panasonic S1? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS-1D Mark II:
- Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images.
- Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free composition.
- More portrait friendly: Features an integrated vertical grip for easier portrait shooting.
- Longer lasting: Can take more shots (1200 versus 400) on a single battery charge.
- More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in January 2004).

Advantages of the Panasonic Lumix DC-S1:
- More detail: Has more megapixels (24 vs 8.2MP), which boosts linear resolution by 71%.
- Maximized detail: Lacks an anti-alias filter to exploit the sensor's full resolution potential.
- High quality composites: Can combine several shots after pixel-shifting its sensor.
- Better image quality: Scores substantially higher (29 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
- Richer colors: Generates noticeably more natural colors (2.9 bits more color depth).
- More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (3.4 EV of extra DR).
- Better low-light sensitivity: Can shoot in dim conditions (1.7 stops ISO advantage).
- Broader imaging potential: Can capture not only stills but also 4K/60p video.
- More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
- Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.78x vs 0.55x).
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2" vs 2.0") for image review and settings control.
- More detailed LCD: Has a higher resolution rear screen (2100k vs 230k dots).
- More flexible LCD: Has a full-flex screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
- Fewer buttons to press: Has a touchscreen to facilitate handling and shooting adjustments.
- Less disturbing: Has an electronic shutter option for completely silent shooting.
- More compact: Is smaller (149x110mm vs 156x158mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
- Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 518g or 34 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
- Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
- Sharper images: Has stabilization technology built-in to reduce the impact of hand-shake.
- More legacy lens friendly: Can use many non-native lenses via adapters.
- Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (3.1 vs 1.1).
- Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the web.
- Easier wireless transfer: Supports Bluetooth for image sharing without cables.
- Faster buffer clearing: Supports Ultra High Speed (UHS-II) SDXC cards on both slots.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (44 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Reflects 15 years of technical progress since the 1D Mark II launch.
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the S1 is the clear winner of the contest (25 : 5 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera. A professional sports photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a street photog, and a person interested in family portraits has distinct needs from a landscape shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.
How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 1D Mark II and the Panasonic S1 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listings whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.
In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the 1D Mark II and the S1 in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.
Expert reviews
This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1D Mark II» | - | + + | - | o | - | Jan 2004 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark II | ||
Panasonic S1« | + + | 88/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4/5 | Feb 2019 | 2,499 | Panasonic S1 | |||
Canon 5DS« » | + | 83/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | Canon 5DS | |||
Canon 5DS R« » | + | 83/100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2015 | 3,699 | Canon 5DS R | |||
Canon 1D Mark IV« » | - | 89/100 | - | 5/5 | - | Oct 2009 | 4,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark IV | ||
Canon 1D Mark III« » | - | - | - | o | - | Feb 2007 | 4,499 | - | Canon 1D Mark III | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark III« » | - | + + | 4.5/5 | - | - | Aug 2007 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark III | ||
Canon 1D Mark II N« » | - | - | - | - | - | Aug 2005 | 3,999 | - | Canon 1D Mark II N | ||
Canon 5D« » | 88/100 | + + | o | o | - | Aug 2005 | 3,299 | - | Canon 5D | ||
Canon 1Ds Mark II« » | - | + + | - | - | - | Sep 2004 | 7,999 | - | Canon 1Ds Mark II | ||
Canon 1Ds« » | - | + + | - | - | - | Sep 2002 | 8,999 | - | Canon 1Ds | ||
Canon 1D« » | - | + + | - | - | - | Sep 2001 | 6,499 | - | Canon 1D | ||
Leica SL« » | - | 84/100 | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | Oct 2015 | 7,450 | Leica SL | |||
Panasonic S1R« » | - | 89/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Feb 2019 | 3,699 | Panasonic S1R | |||
Panasonic S1H« » | - | - | - | - | - | May 2019 | 3,999 | Panasonic S1H | |||
Sony A99 II« » | - | 85/100 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Sep 2016 | 3,199 | Sony A99 II | |||
Sony A900« » | + + | + + | 4.5/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | Sep 2008 | 2,999 | - | Sony A900 | ||
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (-) not available. |
Care should be taken when interpreting the review scores above, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Ebay offers Panasonic S1:
Check Amazon price
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.
- Canon 1000D vs Panasonic S1
- Canon 1D Mark II N vs Nikon D5600
- Canon 1D Mark II N vs Olympus E-PL7
- Canon 1D Mark II N vs Sony A99
- Canon 1D Mark II vs Panasonic GF5
- Canon 1D Mark II vs Sony HX400V
- Canon 1D Mark II vs Sony HX95
- Canon 1D Mark II vs Sony RX1R II
- Canon G7 X vs Panasonic S1
- Olympus E-M10 vs Panasonic S1
- Panasonic G5 vs Panasonic S1
- Panasonic S1 vs Sony A7R II
Specifications: Canon 1D Mark II vs Panasonic S1
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
Camera Model | Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 |
---|---|---|
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Mirrorless system camera |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | Leica L mount lenses |
Launch Date | January 2004 | February 2019 |
Launch Price | USD 4499 | USD 2499 |
Sensor Specs | Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 |
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Format | APS-H Sensor | Full Frame Sensor |
Sensor Size | 28.7 x 19.1 mm | 35.6 x 23.8 mm |
Sensor Area | 548.17 mm2 | 847.28 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 34.5 mm | 42.8 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.3x | 1.0x |
Sensor Resolution | 8.2 Megapixels | 24 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 3504 x 2336 pixels | 6000 x 4000 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 8.17 μm | 5.94 μm |
Pixel Density | 1.49 MP/cm2 | 2.83 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | no AA filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | 4K/60p Video |
ISO Setting | 100-1600 ISO | 100-51200 ISO |
ISO Boost | 50-3200 ISO | 50-204800 ISO |
Image Processor | DIGIC II | Venus |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | 66 | 95 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | 22.3 | 25.2 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | 11.1 | 14.5 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | 1003 | 3333 |
Screen Specs | Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 |
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.55x | 0.78x |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5760k dots | |
Top-Level Screen | Control Panel | Control Panel |
LCD Framing | Live View | |
Rear LCD Size | 2.0 inch | 3.2 inch |
LCD Resolution | 230k dots | 2100k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fully flexible screen |
Touch Input | no Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Shooting Specs | Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 |
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Contrast-detect AF |
Manual Focusing Aid | No Peaking Feature | Focus Peaking |
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical) | 1/8000/s | 1/8000/s |
Continuous Shooting | 8.3 shutter flaps/s | 9 shutter flaps/s |
Electronic Shutter | no E-Shutter | up to 1/8000s |
Image Stabilization | Lens stabilization only | In-body stabilization |
Fill Flash | no On-Board Flash | no On-Board Flash |
Storage Medium | CF or SD cards | SDXC or XQD cards |
Second Storage Option | Dual card slots | Dual card slots |
UHS card support | no | Dual UHS-II |
Connectivity Specs | Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 |
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
Studio Flash | PC Sync socket | PC Sync socket |
USB Connector | USB 1.1 | USB 3.1 |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | full HDMI |
Microphone Port | no MIC socket | External MIC port |
Headphone Socket | no Headphone port | Headphone port |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | Wifi built-in |
Bluetooth Support | no Bluetooth | Bluetooth built-in |
Body Specs | Canon 1D Mark II | Panasonic S1 |
Environmental Sealing | Weathersealed body | Weathersealed body |
Battery Type | NP-E3 | DMW-BLJ31 |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 1200 shots per charge | 400 shots per charge |
In-Camera Charging | no USB charging | USB charging |
Body Dimensions |
156 x 158 x 80 mm (6.1 x 6.2 x 3.1 in) |
149 x 110 x 97 mm (5.9 x 4.3 x 3.8 in) |
Camera Weight | 1535 g (54.1 oz) | 1017 g (35.9 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.