Canon 1D Mark II vs Nikon D40X

The Canon EOS-1D Mark II and the Nikon D40X are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in January 2004 and March 2007. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are based on an APS-H (1D Mark II) and an APS-C (D40X) sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 8.2 megapixels, whereas the Nikon provides 10 MP.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Headline Specifications

Canon 1D Mark II		Nikon D40X
Digital single lens reflex		Digital single lens reflex
Canon EF mount lenses		Nikon F mount lenses
8.2 MP, APS-H Sensor		10 MP, APS-C Sensor
no Video		no Video
ISO 100-1,600 (50 - 3,200)		ISO 100-1,600 (100 - 3,200)
Optical viewfinder		Optical viewfinder
2.0 LCD, 230k dots		2.5 LCD, 230k dots
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)		Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive)
8.3 shutter flaps per second		3 shutter flaps per second
Weathersealed body		not weather sealed
1200 shots per battery charge		520 shots per battery charge
156 x 158 x 80 mm, 1535 g		124 x 94 x 64 mm, 522 g

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS-1D Mark II and the Nikon D40X? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 1D Mark II and the Nikon D40X is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

The D40X can be obtained in two different colors (black, silver), while the 1D Mark II is only available in black.

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Nikon D40X is considerably smaller (53 percent) than the Canon 1D Mark II. Moreover, the D40X is substantially lighter (66 percent) than the 1D Mark II. It is worth mentioning in this context that the 1D Mark II is splash and dust resistant, while the D40X does not feature any corresponding weather-sealing.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor will tend to go along with bigger and heavier lenses, although exceptions exist. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Canon EF Lens Catalog (1D Mark II) and the Nikon Lens Catalog (D40X).

Concerning battery life, the 1D Mark II gets 1200 shots out of its NP-E3 battery, while the D40X can take 520 images on a single charge of its EN-EL9 power pack. As can be seen in the images above, the 1D Mark II has a battery grip built in. This facilitates image-taking in portrait orientation and gives it additional battery power. In order to provide similar functionality for the D40X, there are third party battery grips available as optional accessories (see here on eBay).

The adjacent table lists the principal physical characteristics of the two cameras alongside a wider set of alternatives. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.

Body Specifications

	Camera Model	Camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Weather Sealing	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon 1D Mark II	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	54.1 oz	1200	Y	Jan 2004	4,499
	Nikon D40X	4.9 in	3.7 in	2.5 in	18.4 oz	520	n	Mar 2007	729
	Canon 5DS	6.0 in	4.6 in	3.0 in	32.8 oz	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 5DS R	6.0 in	4.6 in	3.0 in	32.8 oz	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 1D Mark IV	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	43.4 oz	1500	Y	Oct 2009	4,999
	Canon 1D Mark III	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	40.7 oz	2200	Y	Feb 2007	4,499
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	5.9 in	6.3 in	3.1 in	48.9 oz	1800	Y	Aug 2007	7,999
	Canon 1D Mark II N	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	55.2 oz	1200	Y	Aug 2005	3,999
	Canon 5D	6.0 in	4.4 in	3.0 in	31.6 oz	400	Y	Aug 2005	3,299
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	42.9 oz	1200	Y	Sep 2004	7,999
	Canon 1Ds	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	44.6 oz	600	Y	Sep 2002	8,999
	Canon 1D	6.1 in	6.2 in	3.1 in	55.9 oz	500	Y	Sep 2001	6,499
	Nikon D3000	5.0 in	3.8 in	2.5 in	18.9 oz	500	n	Jul 2009	599
	Nikon D5000	5.0 in	4.1 in	3.1 in	20.8 oz	510	n	Apr 2009	749
	Nikon D60	5.0 in	3.7 in	2.5 in	18.4 oz	500	n	Jan 2008	629
	Nikon D40	4.9 in	3.7 in	2.5 in	18.4 oz	470	n	Nov 2006	499
	Nikon D80	5.2 in	4.1 in	3.0 in	23.6 oz	600	n	Aug 2006	999
Notes: Measurements and pricing do not include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.
Convert to Metric

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The D40X was launched at a markedly lower price (by 84 percent) than the 1D Mark II, which puts it into a different market segment. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Furthermore, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more possibilities to use shallow depth-of-field in order to isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.

Of the two cameras under consideration, the Canon 1D Mark II features an APS-H sensor and the Nikon D40X an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the D40X is 32 percent smaller. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.3 and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the D40X offers a higher resolution of 10 megapixels, compared with 8.2 MP of the 1D Mark II. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 6.11μm versus 8.17μm for the 1D Mark II). However, it should be noted that the D40X is much more recent (by 3 years and 1 month) than the 1D Mark II, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that make it possible to gather light more efficiently.

The resolution advantage of the Nikon D40X implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the D40X for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 19.4 x 13 inches or 49.2 x 32.9 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 15.5 x 10.4 inches or 39.3 x 26.3 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 12.9 x 8.6 inches or 32.8 x 21.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 1D Mark II are 17.5 x 11.7 inches or 44.5 x 29.7 cm for good quality, 14 x 9.3 inches or 35.6 x 23.7 cm for very good quality, and 11.7 x 7.8 inches or 29.7 x 19.8 cm for excellent quality prints.

The Canon EOS-1D Mark II has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 1600, which can be extended to ISO 50-3200. The corresponding ISO settings for the Nikon D40X are ISO 100 to ISO 1600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-3200.

Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. The Overall DXO ratings for the two cameras under consideration are close, suggesting that they provide similar imaging performance. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

	Camera Model	Sensor Class	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Landscape	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
	Canon 1D Mark II	APS-H	8.2	3504	2336	none	22.3	11.1	1003	66
	Nikon D40X	APS-C	10.0	3872	2592	none	22.4	11.4	516	63
	Canon 5DS	Full Frame	50.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.7	12.4	2381	87
	Canon 5DS R	Full Frame	50.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.6	12.4	2308	86
	Canon 1D Mark IV	APS-H	16.0	4896	3264	1080/30p	22.8	12.0	1320	74
	Canon 1D Mark III	APS-H	10.1	3888	2592	none	22.7	11.7	1078	71
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	Full Frame	21.0	5616	3744	none	24.0	12.0	1663	80
	Canon 1D Mark II N	APS-H	8.2	3504	2336	none	22.3	11.2	975	66
	Canon 5D	Full Frame	12.7	4368	2912	none	22.9	11.1	1368	71
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	Full Frame	16.6	4992	3328	none	23.3	11.3	1480	74
	Canon 1Ds	Full Frame	11.0	4064	2704	none	21.8	11.0	954	63
	Canon 1D	APS-H	4.1	2496	1662	none	..	..	..	..
	Nikon D3000	APS-C	10.0	3872	2592	none	22.3	11.1	563	62
	Nikon D5000	APS-C	12.2	4288	2848	720/24p	22.7	12.5	868	72
	Nikon D60	APS-C	10.0	3872	2592	none	22.5	11.4	562	65
	Nikon D40	APS-C	6.0	3008	2000	none	21.0	11.0	561	56
	Nikon D80	APS-C	10.0	3872	2592	none	22.1	11.2	524	61

Feature comparison

Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The 1D Mark II and the D40X are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The viewfinder in the 1D Mark II offers a wider field of view (100%) than the one in the D40X (95%), so that a larger proportion of the captured image is visible in the finder. In addition, the viewfinder of the 1D Mark II has a higher magnification (0.55x vs 0.53x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon 1D Mark II and Nikon D40X along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

Core Features

	Camera Model	Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots)	Control Panel (yes/no)	LCD Size (inch)	LCD Resolution (000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch Screen (yes/no)	Mech Shutter Speed	Shutter Flaps (1/sec)	Built-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
	Canon 1D Mark II	optical	Y	2.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.3	n	n
	Nikon D40X	optical	n	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
	Canon 5DS	optical	Y	3.2	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
	Canon 5DS R	optical	Y	3.2	1040	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
	Canon 1D Mark IV	optical	Y	3.0	920	fixed	n	1/8000s	10.0	n	n
	Canon 1D Mark III	optical	Y	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	10.0	n	n
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	optical	Y	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	5.0	n	n
	Canon 1D Mark II N	optical	Y	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	8.5	n	n
	Canon 5D	optical	Y	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	3.0	n	n
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	optical	Y	2.0	230	fixed	n	1/8000s	4.0	n	n
	Canon 1Ds	optical	Y	2.0	120	fixed	n	1/8000s	3.0	n	n
	Canon 1D	optical	Y	2.0	120	fixed	n	1/16000s	8.0	n	n
	Nikon D3000	optical	n	3.0	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
	Nikon D5000	optical	n	2.7	230	full-flex	n	1/4000s	4.0	Y	n
	Nikon D60	optical	n	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n
	Nikon D40	optical	n	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	2.5	Y	n
	Nikon D80	optical	n	2.5	230	fixed	n	1/4000s	3.0	Y	n

One feature that is present on the 1D Mark II, but is missing on the D40X is a top-level LCD. While being, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control panel conveys some of the essential shooting information and can be convenient for quick and easy settings verification.

The 1D Mark II writes its imaging data to Compact Flash or SD cards, while the D40X uses SDHC cards. The 1D Mark II features dual card slots, which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the D40X only has one slot.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS-1D Mark II and Nikon D40X and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

	Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Microphone	Internal Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
	Canon 1D Mark II	Y	-	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	-	-
	Nikon D40X	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 5DS	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon 5DS R	Y	mono	mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D Mark IV	Y	stereo	-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D Mark III	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	Y	mono	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1D Mark II N	Y	-	-	-	-	-	1.1	-	-	-
	Canon 5D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Canon 1Ds	Y	-	-	-	-	-	FW	-	-	-
	Canon 1D	Y	-	-	-	-	-	FW	-	-	-
	Nikon D3000	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Nikon D5000	Y	mono	mono	-	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
	Nikon D60	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Nikon D40	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
	Nikon D80	Y	-	-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-

Studio photographers will appreciate that the Canon 1D Mark II (unlike the D40X) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera.

Both the 1D Mark II and the D40X have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 1D Mark II was replaced by the Canon 1D Mark II N, while the D40X was followed by the Nikon D60 . Further information on the two cameras (e.g. user guides, manuals), as well as related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Nikon websites.

Review summary

So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon 1D Mark II and the Nikon D40X? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS-1D Mark II:

• Better low-light sensitivity: Requires less light for good images (1 stops ISO advantage).
• More complete view: Has a viewfinder with a larger field of view (100% vs 95%).
• Larger viewfinder image: Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.55x vs 0.53x).
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• Faster shutter: Has higher mechanical shutter speed (1/8000s vs 1/4000s) to freeze action.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (8.3 vs 3 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• More portrait friendly: Features an integrated vertical grip for easier portrait shooting.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (1200 versus 520) on a single battery charge.
• Better sealing: Is weather sealed to enable shooting in dusty or wet environments.
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional strobe lights.
• Greater peace of mind: Features a second card slot as a backup in case of memory card failure.
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in January 2004).

Advantages of the Nikon D40X:

• More detail: Has more megapixels (10 vs 8.2MP), which boosts linear resolution by 11%.
• Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (2.5" vs 2.0") for image review and settings control.
• More compact: Is smaller (124x94mm vs 156x158mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 1013g or 66 percent) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier fill-in: Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
• Faster data transfer: Supports a more advanced USB protocol (2.0 vs 1.1).
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (84 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Reflects 3 years and 1 month of technical progress since the 1D Mark II launch.

If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the 1D Mark II is the clear winner of the match-up (12 : 8 points). However, the pertinence of the various camera strengths will differ across photographers, so that you might want to weigh individual camera traits according to their importance for your own imaging needs before making a camera decision. A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 1D Mark II and the Nikon D40X place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the 1D Mark II or the D40X perform in practice. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Expert reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, and photographyblog). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Review Scores

	Camera Model	camera   labs	dp review	ephoto   zine	imaging resource	photography   blog	Camera Launch	Launch Price (USD)	Street Price
	Canon 1D Mark II	..	+ +	..	o	..	Jan 2004	4,499
	Nikon D40X	79/100	+ +	4/5	o	4/5	Mar 2007	729
	Canon 5DS	+	83/100	4.5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 5DS R	+	83/100	5/5	5/5	4.5/5	Feb 2015	3,699
	Canon 1D Mark IV	..	89/100	..	5/5	..	Oct 2009	4,999
	Canon 1D Mark III	..	..	..	o	..	Feb 2007	4,499
	Canon 1Ds Mark III	..	+ +	4.5/5	..	..	Aug 2007	7,999
	Canon 1D Mark II N	..	..	..	..	..	Aug 2005	3,999
	Canon 5D	88/100	+ +	o	o	..	Aug 2005	3,299
	Canon 1Ds Mark II	..	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2004	7,999
	Canon 1Ds	..	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2002	8,999
	Canon 1D	..	+ +	..	..	..	Sep 2001	6,499
	Nikon D3000	+	72/100	4/5	3.5/5	4.5/5	Jul 2009	599
	Nikon D5000	+ +	75/100	4/5	5/5	4.5/5	Apr 2009	749
	Nikon D60	80/100	+ +	4/5	o	4.5/5	Jan 2008	629
	Nikon D40	81/100	+ +	o	5/5	4.5/5	Nov 2006	499
	Nikon D80	+	+ +	o	4.5/5	4.5/5	Aug 2006	999
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just use the search menu below. As an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

~

Specifications: Canon 1D Mark II vs Nikon D40X

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.