Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
The Canon EOS 1000D (called Canon XS in some regions) and the Nikon D3000 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in June 2008 and July 2009. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. The Canon has a resolution of 10.1 megapixels, whereas the Nikon provides 10 MP. Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their sensors, their features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Canon 1000D | Nikon D3000 | |
Digital single lens reflex | Digital single lens reflex | |
Canon EF mount lenses | Nikon F mount lenses | |
10.1 MP, APS-C Sensor | 10 MP, APS-C Sensor | |
no Video | no Video | |
ISO 100-800 (100-1600) | ISO 100-1600 (100-3200) | |
Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder | |
2.5" LCD, 230k dots | 3.0" LCD, 230k dots | |
Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | Fixed screen (not touch-sensitive) | |
3 shutter flaps per second | 3 shutter flaps per second | |
500 shots per battery charge | 500 shots per battery charge | |
126 x 98 x 65 mm, 502 g | 126 x 97 x 64 mm, 536 g |
Body comparison: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
An illustration of the physical size and weight of the Canon 1000D and the Nikon D3000 is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive views from the front, the top, and the rear side are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.



If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Nikon D3000 is somewhat smaller (1 percent) than the Canon 1000D. However, the D3000 is markedly heavier (7 percent) than the 1000D. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the 1000D nor the D3000 are weather-sealed.
The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Yet, since both cameras are based around an APS-C sensor, their respective lenses will tend to have similar dimensions and heft. You can compare the optics available for the two cameras in the Canon EF Lens Catalog (1000D) and the Nikon Lens Catalog (D3000).
The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. If you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination, just use the right or left arrows in the table to switch to the respective camera. Alternatively, you can also navigate to the CAM-parator app and make your selection from the full list of cameras there.
Camera Model |
Camera Width |
Camera Height |
Camera Depth |
Camera Weight |
Battery Life (CIPA) |
Weather Sealing (yes/no) |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1000D» | 5.0 in | 3.9 in | 2.6 in | 17.7 oz | 500 | n | Jun 2008 | 449 | - | Canon 1000D | ||
Nikon D3000« | 5.0 in | 3.8 in | 2.5 in | 18.9 oz | 500 | n | Jul 2009 | 599 | - | Nikon D3000 | ||
Canon 2000D« » | 5.1 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 16.8 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Canon 4000D« » | 5.1 in | 4.0 in | 3.0 in | 15.4 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2018 | 399 | Canon 4000D | |||
Canon 1300D« » | 5.1 in | 4.0 in | 3.1 in | 17.1 oz | 500 | n | Mar 2016 | 449 | - | Canon 1300D | ||
Canon 1200D« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 3.1 in | 16.9 oz | 500 | n | Feb 2014 | 449 | - | Canon 1200D | ||
Canon SX50« » | 4.8 in | 3.4 in | 4.2 in | 21.0 oz | 315 | n | Sep 2012 | 429 | - | Canon SX50 | ||
Canon 1100D« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 3.1 in | 17.5 oz | 700 | n | Feb 2011 | 449 | - | Canon 1100D | ||
Canon 500D« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 2.4 in | 18.3 oz | 400 | n | Mar 2009 | 799 | - | Canon 500D | ||
Canon 450D« » | 5.1 in | 3.9 in | 2.4 in | 18.5 oz | 500 | n | Jan 2008 | 799 | - | Canon 450D | ||
Canon 40D« » | 5.7 in | 4.3 in | 2.9 in | 29.0 oz | 750 | n | Aug 2007 | 1,299 | - | Canon 40D | ||
Nikon D3100« » | 4.9 in | 3.8 in | 3.0 in | 17.8 oz | 550 | n | Aug 2010 | 599 | - | Nikon D3100 | ||
Nikon D5000« » | 5.0 in | 4.1 in | 3.1 in | 20.8 oz | 510 | n | Apr 2009 | 749 | - | Nikon D5000 | ||
Nikon D60« » | 5.0 in | 3.7 in | 2.5 in | 18.4 oz | 500 | n | Jan 2008 | 629 | - | Nikon D60 | ||
Nikon D40X« » | 4.9 in | 3.7 in | 2.5 in | 18.4 oz | 520 | n | Mar 2007 | 729 | - | Nikon D40X | ||
Nikon D40« » | 4.9 in | 3.7 in | 2.5 in | 18.4 oz | 470 | n | Nov 2006 | 499 | - | Nikon D40 | ||
Olympus E-450« » | 5.1 in | 3.6 in | 2.1 in | 15.5 oz | 500 | n | Mar 2009 | 499 | - | Olympus E-450 | ||
Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the market segment that the manufacturer of the cameras have been targeting. The 1000D was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 25 percent) than the D3000, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Normally, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, but after a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparison: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject from the background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses.
Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. The sensor area in the D3000 is 13 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have format factors, respectively, of 1.6 (1000D) and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

Despite having a smaller sensor, the Canon 1000D offers a higher resolution of 10.1 megapixels, compared with 10 MP of the Nikon D3000. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 5.71μm versus 6.11μm for the D3000). Moreover, it should be noted that the D3000 is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 1 month) than the 1000D, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the light gathering capacity of its pixel-units.
The Canon EOS 1000D has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 800, which can be extended to ISO 100-1600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Nikon D3000 are ISO 100 to ISO 1600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-3200..

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), color depth ("DXO Portrait"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports"). The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Camera Model |
Sensor Class |
Resolution (MP) |
Horiz. Pixels |
Vert. Pixels |
Video Format |
DXO Portrait |
DXO Landscape |
DXO Sports |
DXO Overall |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1000D» | APS-C | 10.1 | 3888 | 2592 | - | - | - | - | - | Canon 1000D | |
Nikon D3000« | APS-C | 10.0 | 3872 | 2592 | - | 22.3 | 11.1 | 563 | 62 | Nikon D3000 | |
Canon 2000D« » | APS-C | 24.0 | 6000 | 4000 | 1080/30p | 22.6 | 11.9 | 1009 | 71 | Canon 2000D | |
Canon 4000D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.9 | 11.4 | 695 | 63 | Canon 4000D | |
Canon 1300D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | - | - | - | - | Canon 1300D | |
Canon 1200D« » | APS-C | 17.9 | 5184 | 3456 | 1080/30p | 21.9 | 11.3 | 724 | 63 | Canon 1200D | |
Canon SX50« » | 1/2.3 | 12.0 | 4000 | 3000 | 1080/24p | 20.3 | 11.2 | 179 | 47 | Canon SX50 | |
Canon 1100D« » | APS-C | 12.2 | 4272 | 2848 | 720/30p | 21.9 | 11.0 | 755 | 62 | Canon 1100D | |
Canon 500D« » | APS-C | 15.1 | 4752 | 3168 | 1080/20p | 21.7 | 11.5 | 663 | 63 | Canon 500D | |
Canon 450D« » | APS-C | 12.2 | 4272 | 2848 | - | 21.9 | 10.8 | 692 | 61 | Canon 450D | |
Canon 40D« » | APS-C | 10.1 | 3888 | 2592 | - | 22.1 | 11.3 | 703 | 64 | Canon 40D | |
Nikon D3100« » | APS-C | 14.2 | 4608 | 3072 | 1080/24p | 22.5 | 11.3 | 919 | 67 | Nikon D3100 | |
Nikon D5000« » | APS-C | 12.2 | 4288 | 2848 | 720/24p | 22.7 | 12.5 | 868 | 72 | Nikon D5000 | |
Nikon D60« » | APS-C | 10.0 | 3872 | 2592 | - | 22.5 | 11.4 | 562 | 65 | Nikon D60 | |
Nikon D40X« » | APS-C | 10.0 | 3872 | 2592 | - | 22.4 | 11.4 | 516 | 63 | Nikon D40X | |
Nikon D40« » | APS-C | 6.0 | 3008 | 2000 | - | 21.0 | 11.0 | 561 | 56 | Nikon D40 | |
Olympus E-450« » | Four Thirds | 10.0 | 3648 | 2736 | - | 21.5 | 10.5 | 512 | 56 | Olympus E-450 |
Feature comparison: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
Beyond body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a range of features. The 1000D and the D3000 are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same field of view (95%), but the viewfinder of the D3000 has a higher magnification than the one of the 1000D (0.53x vs 0.51x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon 1000D, the Nikon D3000, and comparable cameras.
Camera Model |
Viewfinder (Type or '000 dots) |
Control Panel (yes/no) |
LCD Size (inch) |
LCD Resolution ('000 dots) |
LCD Attach- ment |
Touch Screen (yes/no) |
Shutter speed (1/sec) |
Shutter flaps (1/sec) |
Built-in Flash (yes/no) |
Built-in Image Stab |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1000D» | optical | n | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1000D | |
Nikon D3000« | optical | n | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Nikon D3000 | |
Canon 2000D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 2000D | |
Canon 4000D« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 4000D | |
Canon 1300D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1300D | |
Canon 1200D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 460 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1200D | |
Canon SX50« » | 202 | n | 3.0 | 461 | swivel | n | 2000 | 2.2 | Y | Y | Canon SX50 | |
Canon 1100D« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Canon 1100D | |
Canon 500D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 920 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.4 | Y | n | Canon 500D | |
Canon 450D« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.5 | Y | n | Canon 450D | |
Canon 40D« » | optical | Y | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 8000 | 6.5 | Y | n | Canon 40D | |
Nikon D3100« » | optical | n | 3.0 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Nikon D3100 | |
Nikon D5000« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 230 | full-flex | n | 4000 | 4.0 | Y | n | Nikon D5000 | |
Nikon D60« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Nikon D60 | |
Nikon D40X« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.0 | Y | n | Nikon D40X | |
Nikon D40« » | optical | n | 2.5 | 230 | fixed | n | 4000 | 2.5 | Y | n | Nikon D40 | |
Olympus E-450« » | optical | n | 2.7 | 215 | fixed | n | 4000 | 3.5 | Y | n | Olympus E-450 |
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 1000D and the D3000 write their files to SDHC cards.
Connectivity comparison: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 1000D and Nikon D3000 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.
Camera Model |
Hotshoe Port |
Internal Microphone |
Internal Speaker |
Microphone Port |
Headphone Port |
HDMI Port |
USB Type |
WiFi Support |
NFC Support |
Bluetooth Support |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1000D» | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1000D | |
Nikon D3000« | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D3000 | |
Canon 2000D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 2000D | |
Canon 4000D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 4000D | |
Canon 1300D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | Y | Y | - | Canon 1300D | |
Canon 1200D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1200D | |
Canon SX50« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon SX50 | |
Canon 1100D« » | Y | stereo | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 1100D | |
Canon 500D« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 500D | |
Canon 450D« » | Y | - | - | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 450D | |
Canon 40D« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Canon 40D | |
Nikon D3100« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D3100 | |
Nikon D5000« » | Y | mono | mono | - | - | mini | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D5000 | |
Nikon D60« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D60 | |
Nikon D40X« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D40X | |
Nikon D40« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Nikon D40 | |
Olympus E-450« » | Y | - | - | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | - | - | Olympus E-450 |
Both the 1000D and the D3000 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on eBay. The 1000D was replaced by the Canon 1100D, while the D3000 was followed by the Nikon D3100.
Review summary: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
So how do things add up? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 1000D or the Nikon D3000 – has the upper hand? A synthesis of the relative strong points of each of the models is listed below.

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS 1000D:
- More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced segment (25 percent cheaper at launch).
- More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in June 2008).

Reasons to prefer the Nikon D3000:
- Larger screen: Has a bigger rear LCD (3.0" vs 2.5") for image review and settings control.
- More modern: Was introduced somewhat (1 year and 1 month) more recently.
If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the D3000 comes out slightly ahead of the 1000D (3 : 2 points). However, the relevance of individual strengths will vary across photographers, so that you might want to apply your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new camera.
In any case, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can be instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance when actually working with the 1000D or the D3000. User reviews that are available, for instance, at amazon can sometimes shed light on these issues, but such feedback is all too often partial, inconsistent, and inaccurate.
Expert reviews: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (cameralabs, dpreview, ephotozine, imaging-resource, photographyblog). You can find the full text of the reviews by clicking on the site logo in the table header.
Camera Model |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Camera Launch (announced) |
Launch Price (USD) |
Street Price (USD) |
Used Price (USD) |
Camera Model |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canon 1000D» | 82/100 | HiRec | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Jun 2008 | 449 | - | Canon 1000D | ||
Nikon D3000« | Rec | 72/100 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jul 2009 | 599 | - | Nikon D3000 | ||
Canon 2000D« » | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 449 | Canon 2000D | |||
Canon 4000D« » | rev | - | 3.5/5 | - | 3.5/5 | Feb 2018 | 399 | Canon 4000D | |||
Canon 1300D« » | rev | 73/100 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Mar 2016 | 449 | - | Canon 1300D | ||
Canon 1200D« » | Rec | - | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2014 | 449 | - | Canon 1200D | ||
Canon SX50« » | HiRec | 72/100 | 4.5/5 | - | 4.5/5 | Sep 2012 | 429 | - | Canon SX50 | ||
Canon 1100D« » | 80/100 | 69/100 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | Feb 2011 | 449 | - | Canon 1100D | ||
Canon 500D« » | HiRec | 74/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Mar 2009 | 799 | - | Canon 500D | ||
Canon 450D« » | HiRec | HiRec | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Jan 2008 | 799 | - | Canon 450D | ||
Canon 40D« » | HiRec | HiRec | 4.5/5 | rev | 4.5/5 | Aug 2007 | 1,299 | - | Canon 40D | ||
Nikon D3100« » | HiRec | 72/100 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Aug 2010 | 599 | - | Nikon D3100 | ||
Nikon D5000« » | HiRec | 75/100 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Apr 2009 | 749 | - | Nikon D5000 | ||
Nikon D60« » | 80/100 | HiRec | 4/5 | rev | 4.5/5 | Jan 2008 | 629 | - | Nikon D60 | ||
Nikon D40X« » | 79/100 | HiRec | 4/5 | rev | 4/5 | Mar 2007 | 729 | - | Nikon D40X | ||
Nikon D40« » | 81/100 | HiRec | rev | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | Nov 2006 | 499 | - | Nikon D40 | ||
Olympus E-450« » | - | - | 4/5 | - | 4/5 | Mar 2009 | 499 | - | Olympus E-450 |
The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Hence, a score should always be seen in the context of the camera's market launch date and its price, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. Also, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Check Ebay offers Nikon D3000:
Check Ebay offers
Other camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make your choice using the following search menu. An an alternative, you can also directly jump to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
- Canon 2000D vs Sony A7 II
- Canon 60D vs Sony A77 II
- Canon G9 X Mark II vs Pentax 645Z
- Canon T3i vs Nikon D750
- Fujifilm X-T1 vs Nikon D5500
- Leitz Ur-Leica vs Leica S Typ 006
- Nikon D3400 vs Canon 200D
- Panasonic G85 vs Panasonic GX8
- Panasonic GH5s vs Pentax 645Z
- Panasonic L10 vs Sony RX100 II
- Panasonic LX100 vs Panasonic GH5s
- Sony WX800 vs Sony RX100 V
Specifications: Canon 1000D vs Nikon D3000
Camera Model | Canon 1000D | Nikon D3000 |
Camera Type | Digital single lens reflex | Digital single lens reflex |
Camera Lens | Canon EF mount lenses | Nikon F mount lenses |
Launch Date | June 2008 | July 2009 |
Launch Price | USD 449 | USD 599 |
Sensor Specs | ||
Sensor Technology | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Format | APS-C Sensor | APS-C Sensor |
Sensor Size | 22.2 x 14.8 mm | 23.6 x 14.8 mm |
Sensor Area | 328.56 mm2 | 372.88 mm2 |
Sensor Diagonal | 26.7 mm | 28.4 mm |
Crop Factor | 1.6x | 1.5x |
Sensor Resolution | 10.1 Megapixels | 10 Megapixels |
Image Resolution | 3888 x 2592 pixels | 3872 x 2592 pixels |
Pixel Pitch | 5.71 μm | 6.11 μm |
Pixel Density | 3.07 MP/cm2 | 2.69 MP/cm2 |
Moiré control | Anti-Alias filter | Anti-Alias filter |
Movie Capability | no Video | no Video |
ISO Setting | 100-800 ISO | 100-1600 ISO |
ISO Boost | 100-1600 ISO | 100-3200 ISO |
Image Processor | DIGIC 3 | EXPEED |
DXO Sensor Quality (score) | .. | 62 |
DXO Color Depth (bits) | .. | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic Range (EV) | .. | 11.1 |
DXO Low Light (ISO) | .. | 563 |
Screen Specs | ||
Viewfinder Type | Optical viewfinder | Optical viewfinder |
Viewfinder Field of View | 95% | 95% |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.51x | 0.53x |
LCD Framing | Live View | n/a |
Rear LCD Size | 2.5 inch | 3.0 inch |
LCD Resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
LCD Attachment | Fixed screen | Fixed screen |
Shooting Specs | ||
Autofocus System | Phase-detect AF | Phase-detect AF |
Maximum Shutter Speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous Shooting | 3 shutter flaps/s | 3 shutter flaps/s |
Fill Flash | Build-in Flash | Build-in Flash |
Storage Medium | SDHC cards | SDHC cards |
Second Storage Option | Single card slot | Single card slot |
Connectivity Specs | ||
External Flash | Hotshoe | Hotshoe |
USB Connector | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Port | no HDMI | no HDMI |
Wifi Support | no Wifi | no Wifi |
Body Specs | ||
Battery Type | LP-E5 power pack | EN-EL9a power pack |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 500 shots per charge | 500 shots per charge |
Body Dimensions |
126 x 98 x 65 mm (5.0 x 3.9 x 2.6 in) |
126 x 97 x 64 mm (5.0 x 3.8 x 2.5 in) |
Camera Weight | 502 g (17.7 oz) | 536 g (18.9 oz) |
Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.